[ARCHIVED THREAD] - -Wolverine- (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 9/8/2012 7:13:12 PM EDT
| A friend of mine use to be a member here but was banned for socialist actions. Anyone familiar with him? His name was -Wolverine- |
|
|
|
|
Yep sounds like him lol. I was talking with him today and brought up arfcom. He's the one who stated socialist actions. Which doesn't surprise me lol |
|
Quoted:
In on 1?! Quoted:
"Banned for socialist actions"? This should be interesting..... What exactly are "socialist actions?" Bitter partisanship does not get into the way of common sense with me. I bet you would find it shocking that I am all for the removal of religiously backed laws, for gay marriage, progressive taxation, and socialized healthcare for those who are unable to afford it themselves
|
|
Hmmm... interesting read. Can't say I agree with your friend on just about anything he said there, but no, I was not formerly familiar with "Wolverine". ETA: He kept on saying things comparing driving a car and having to qualify for a driver's license to obtaining a ccw. The most obvious flaw in this line of thinking is the fact that driving a car isn't a right, it is a privilege and subject to qualifications. The 2A is intended to GUARANTEE the RIGHT to keep and bear arms, so that they SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Forcing people to qualify for their rights, and making them subjective, immediately takes away their status as rights, and makes them privileges. Socialist? Meh. Communist? Maybe. Constitutional? Not even close. |
|
Quoted:
Hmmm... interesting read. Can't say I agree with your friend on just about anything he said there, but no, I was not formerly familiar with "Wolverine". ETA: He kept on saying things comparing driving a car and having to qualify for a driver's license to obtaining a ccw. The most obvious flaw in this line of thinking is the fact that driving a car isn't a right, it is a privilege and subject to qualifications. The 2A is intended to GUARANTEE the RIGHT to keep and bear arms, so that they SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Forcing people to qualify for their rights, and making them subjective, immediately takes away their status as rights, and makes them privileges. Socialist? Meh. Communist? Maybe. Constitutional? Not even close. He definitly tends to lean more socialist in the conversations I've had with him. He's a great guy just a little different 
|
|
Bitter partisanship does not get into the way of common sense with me. I bet you would find it shocking that I am all for the removal of religiously backed laws, for gay marriage, progressive taxation, and socialized healthcare for those who are unable to afford it themselves |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Are you familiar?  Negative. Just a curious friend.  Then... http://www.cinemagraphcollection.com/cinemagraphs/tumblr_ldtyt4PBGy1qe0eclo1_r2_500.gif Walk this way! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
In on 1?! Quoted:
"Banned for socialist actions"? This should be interesting..... What exactly are "socialist actions?" Bitter partisanship does not get into the way of common sense with me. I bet you would find it shocking that I am all for the removal of religiously backed laws, for gay marriage, progressive taxation, and socialized healthcare for those who are unable to afford it themselves Well then, OP's friend is a dildo! Glad he got the hammer! Which mod did it, I want to sent them 28 internets. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
In on 1?! Quoted:
"Banned for socialist actions"? This should be interesting..... What exactly are "socialist actions?" Bitter partisanship does not get into the way of common sense with me. I bet you would find it shocking that I am all for the removal of religiously backed laws, for gay marriage, progressive taxation, and socialized healthcare for those who are unable to afford it themselves Well then, OP's friend is a dildo! Glad he got the hammer! Which mod did it, I want to sent them 28 internets. Looked like VAGunut. |
|
Quoted:
A friend of mine use to be a member here but was banned for socialist actions. AR15.COM is not a political site. Nobody gets banned for "socialist" anything. People get banned for repeatedly violating the CoC (or for particularly egregious one-time violations), for deliberate trolling, or for being previously banned members trying to sneak back in. ETA: If he wanted to be unlocked and return to the site, my guess is that an email exchange with whomever locked his account would accomplish that fairly easily. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
A friend of mine use to be a member here but was banned for socialist actions. AR15.COM is not a political site. Nobody gets banned for "socialist" anything. People get banned for repeatedly violating the CoC (or for particularly egregious one-time violations), for deliberate trolling, or for being previously banned members trying to sneak back in. ETA: If he wanted to be unlocked and return to the site, my guess is that an email exchange with whomever locked his account would accomplish that fairly easily. Ill pass that on. Thanks! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
A friend of mine use to be a member here but was banned for socialist actions. AR15.COM is not a political site. Nobody gets banned for "socialist" anything. People get banned for repeatedly violating the CoC (or for particularly egregious one-time violations), for deliberate trolling, or for being previously banned members trying to sneak back in. ETA: If he wanted to be unlocked and return to the site, my guess is that an email exchange with whomever locked his account would accomplish that fairly easily. Ill pass that on. Thanks! Super, that's just what we need, another socialist troll. |
|
Quoted: A friend of mine use to be a member here but was banned for socialist actions. Anyone familiar with him? His name was -Wolverine- It's typical that people who get banned claim "I didn't do nuthin'" to everyone outside of Arfcom - as is the case here. His ban was NOT for being a socialist but for trolling. I suspect he could have worked that out with the Staff member who banned him as it was his first violation. |
