Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
7/10/2012 7:48:32 PM EDT
on an F-15E, can the WSO fly the plane from the back seat?
7/10/2012 7:52:36 PM EDT
[#1]
I don't think so?


Well, learned something new today.
7/10/2012 7:53:34 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
I don't think so?


well basically, like, what the fuck does the WSO do if something happens to the pilot? just punch out and let millions of dollars worth of jet lawndart into the ground?
7/10/2012 7:54:22 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think so?


well basically, like, what the fuck does the WSO do if something happens to the pilot? just punch out and let millions of dollars worth of jet lawndart into the ground?


That what I would do

7/10/2012 7:55:17 PM EDT
[#4]
Yes they have dual controls.
7/10/2012 7:57:16 PM EDT
[#5]
I believe that "WSO" is a Navy term.

Not sure what the equivalent USAF parlance is.

It matters, though.
7/10/2012 7:58:33 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
I believe that "WSO" is a Navy term.

Not sure what the equivalent USAF parlance is.

It matters, though.


Navy is RIO, AF is WSO
7/10/2012 8:01:52 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe that "WSO" is a Navy term.

Not sure what the equivalent USAF parlance is.

It matters, though.


Navy is RIO, AF is WSO


C'mon man, didn't you watch Top Gun?

7/10/2012 8:05:00 PM EDT
[#8]
F15E does have dual controls.

The F14 did not, from what I can remember.
7/10/2012 8:05:18 PM EDT
[#9]
I though it was GIB.
7/10/2012 8:09:07 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe that "WSO" is a Navy term.

Not sure what the equivalent USAF parlance is.

It matters, though.


Navy is RIO, AF is WSO


Depends upon the aircraft, Navy also has WSO's and B/N's.

7/10/2012 8:23:26 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe that "WSO" is a Navy term.

Not sure what the equivalent USAF parlance is.

It matters, though.


Navy is RIO, AF is WSO


Sorry, I fail.  

Didn't mean to hijack the thread with my ignorance.

7/10/2012 9:05:59 PM EDT
[#12]
If the aircraft is configured for anything other than being a trainer, then no.  There won't be controls back there.  Mission controls will replace flight controls.
7/10/2012 9:22:24 PM EDT
[#13]
The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.
7/10/2012 9:29:18 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.


Talk about a shitty job. Sure, you get to fly around in an F-15, but for me there would be no fun just sitting there pushing buttons.
7/10/2012 9:30:56 PM EDT
[#15]
Never worked an F-15E model, so I'm not sure if it's the same.

The F-15D models does have dual controls. But there is no gear lever in the backseat. Also cant shut down engines from the back.
7/10/2012 9:33:07 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Never worked an F-15E model, so I'm not sure if it's the same.

The F-15D models does have dual controls. But there is no gear lever in the backseat. Also cant shut down engines from the back.


Dafuq?

"Oh hey, my pilot is dead, so I have to belly flop this sumbitch!... oh and bring a fire truck, I can't kill the engines."
7/10/2012 9:35:00 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
Quoted:
The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.


Talk about a shitty job. Sure, you get to fly around in an F-15, but for me there would be no fun just sitting there pushing buttons.


They get to blow shit up. Lots of shit.
7/10/2012 9:37:05 PM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.


Talk about a shitty job. Sure, you get to fly around in an F-15, but for me there would be no fun just sitting there pushing buttons.


They get to blow shit up. Lots of shit.


Half the fun is flying the thing. At least for me it would be for me.
7/11/2012 12:51:11 AM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Never worked an F-15E model, so I'm not sure if it's the same.

The F-15D models does have dual controls. But there is no gear lever in the backseat. Also cant shut down engines from the back.


Dafuq?

"Oh hey, my pilot is dead, so I have to belly flop this sumbitch!... oh and bring a fire truck, I can't kill the engines."


Yup, but there is a sticker telling you not to lower the gear above 300 KT along with the emergency brake steer handle. Doesn't work really well if you cant lower the gear





Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.


Talk about a shitty job. Sure, you get to fly around in an F-15, but for me there would be no fun just sitting there pushing buttons.


They get to blow shit up. Lots of shit.


Half the fun is flying the thing. At least for me it would be for me.


I'm pretty sure the pilots will hand over the controls to the CSO from time to time.

The pilot on my ride gave me the controls. It was my first and only time anyone gave me control of a F-15 in flight, lol.

EW and navigators on the B-52 do touch and goes from time to time because there will be other aircrew members aside from the pilot and co that said they were doing touch and goes during debrief.
Not sure if that's a common thing on other airframes. Maybe the pilots feel bad for them because they don't even have a window to look outside
7/11/2012 1:26:06 AM EDT
[#20]
The throttles, stick, rudder pedals, and canopy control handle in the B, D, and E F-15 models are all arranged and rigged in series together, moving one moves the other in either seat.

For instance, when a certain Vice Wing Commander (who shall remain unnamed) got an incentive ride in a D model at Kadena AB circa 2002 or so, and he pulled the rear canopy control handle during a "max climb" he turned it into a convertible F-15...  

It is common practice for other aircrew members to have some time in the pilot's seat.



7/11/2012 1:42:38 AM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
The throttles, stick, rudder pedals, and canopy control handle in the B, D, and E F-15 models are all arranged and rigged in series together, moving one moves the other in either seat.

For instance, when a certain Vice Wing Commander (who shall remain unnamed) got an incentive ride in a D model at Kadena AB circa 2002 or so, and he pulled the rear canopy control handle during a "max climb" he turned it into a convertible F-15...  

It is common practice for other aircrew members to have some time in the pilot's seat.






Damn stickfigure!  Do tell!  Who was this mysterious Vice Wing Commander?  Is he someone very important today?
7/11/2012 1:46:52 AM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
The throttles, stick, rudder pedals, and canopy control handle in the B, D, and E F-15 models are all arranged and rigged in series together, moving one moves the other in either seat.

For instance, when a certain Vice Wing Commander (who shall remain unnamed) got an incentive ride in a D model at Kadena AB circa 2002 or so, and he pulled the rear canopy control handle during a "max climb" he turned it into a convertible F-15...  

It is common practice for other aircrew members to have some time in the pilot's seat.





We had an academy cadidiot we were giving a ride to at Nellis jettison the rear canopy of an F-4 when the pilot told him to close it.  It was probably the same guy.  
7/11/2012 2:49:21 AM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Never worked an F-15E model, so I'm not sure if it's the same.

The F-15D models does have dual controls. But there is no gear lever in the backseat. Also cant shut down engines from the back.


There is no gear lever, but you can lower the gear from the back seat via the emergency gear handle.  The hook can be lowered from the back seat as well. I.e, the WSO has no hardware limitation to prevent them from landing the jet.  Unfortunately, WSOs are not allowed to perform a touch & go or landing.

I am sure TaylorWSO will be along shortly here as well.
7/11/2012 4:34:20 AM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
Quoted:
The throttles, stick, rudder pedals, and canopy control handle in the B, D, and E F-15 models are all arranged and rigged in series together, moving one moves the other in either seat.

For instance, when a certain Vice Wing Commander (who shall remain unnamed) got an incentive ride in a D model at Kadena AB circa 2002 or so, and he pulled the rear canopy control handle during a "max climb" he turned it into a convertible F-15...  

It is common practice for other aircrew members to have some time in the pilot's seat.






Damn stickfigure!  Do tell!  Who was this mysterious Vice Wing Commander?  Is he someone very important today?


All I will say is that it did make the front page of Stars and Stripes, and the base paper at the time.

Our Shop Chief (about 18 years of experience) at that time named "Joe" crawled up in the cockpit after we recovered it, as AR Shop is also "Crash Recovery" and noticed that the rear canopy handle was pulled "aft".  The pilot would not say a damn thing except that he was pissed and a bit freaked out.  But later through the rumor mill, had mentioned, "During the climb, I noticed out of the corner of my eye the forward handle started moving... And I thought 'Oh, shit'..."  

Honestly I don't remember who that Vice Wing Commander was, but the Wing Commander at that time was Brig. General Gary North.  I had the opportunity to meet and work with him several times as a young Airman Crew Chief.  I saw him again about 7-8 later when he was CENTCOM Commander and I was a C-130 FE, now his is PACAF Commander.  If I am not mistaken he made the first air-to-air kill in and F-15C during Desert Storm.  He was and still is, very big shit.  He's been somewhere in my chain of Command three different times.  I would expect in the future to see him as Chief of the AF or a member of the JCS.
7/11/2012 6:10:14 AM EDT
[#25]
I signed up to be a WSO when the guard had F-4's.  Just couldn't go through with it.  I wanted to be a pilot, not a WSO.  Never got to fly fighters but at least I got to fly.  Back then, the WSO's did a lot of flying (even formation aerobatics ) and some low approaches.  One time, the pilot passed out and the backseater landed the aircraft.  He ended up in a snow bank and collapsed the nose gear (which makes sense if he only had emergency braking).  Seems like I remember the nose gear collapse triggering an ejection but not sure.

Kind of wish I'd done it––it would have been a hoot and I might have been able to go to UPT when the F-16's showed up (but no guarantees).

TC
7/11/2012 7:18:32 AM EDT
[#26]
Gen. Gary North was not listed with any air to air kills as far as I can find.  From what I've heard he had a pretty nasty reputation as well.  He is set to retire 1 Oct 12.
7/11/2012 7:20:30 AM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
Quoted:
The throttles, stick, rudder pedals, and canopy control handle in the B, D, and E F-15 models are all arranged and rigged in series together, moving one moves the other in either seat.

For instance, when a certain Vice Wing Commander (who shall remain unnamed) got an incentive ride in a D model at Kadena AB circa 2002 or so, and he pulled the rear canopy control handle during a "max climb" he turned it into a convertible F-15...  

It is common practice for other aircrew members to have some time in the pilot's seat.





We had an academy cadidiot we were giving a ride to at Nellis jettison the rear canopy of an F-4 when the pilot told him to close it.  It was probably the same guy.  



We had some nonner jettison a canopy on a incentive ride just before take off while TDY to Canada on a F-15 quite a few years ago.  

During the investigation on the audio recording you could here her ask serveral times which lever to move to arm the ejection seat and the pilot told her " the black and yellow one by the canopy "  instead of the one that says "ejection controls locked/ ejection controls armed".  
7/11/2012 7:20:39 AM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
on an F-15E, can the WSO fly the plane from the back seat?


IIRC, Backseaters have controls in an Air Force two-seater. Navy RIOs can basically punch out. Again, IIRC........





7/11/2012 7:32:56 AM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:

All I will say is that it did make the front page of Stars and Stripes, and the base paper at the time.

Our Shop Chief (about 18 years of experience) at that time named "Joe" crawled up in the cockpit after we recovered it, as AR Shop is also "Crash Recovery" and noticed that the rear canopy handle was pulled "aft".  The pilot would not say a damn thing except that he was pissed and a bit freaked out.  But later through the rumor mill, had mentioned, "During the climb, I noticed out of the corner of my eye the forward handle started moving... And I thought 'Oh, shit'..."  

Honestly I don't remember who that Vice Wing Commander was, but the Wing Commander at that time was Brig. General Gary North.  I had the opportunity to meet and work with him several times as a young Airman Crew Chief.  I saw him again about 7-8 later when he was CENTCOM Commander and I was a C-130 FE, now his is PACAF Commander.  If I am not mistaken he made the first air-to-air kill in and F-15C with an AIM-120 while flying an F-16 during Desert Storm.  He was and still is, very big shit.  He's been somewhere in my chain of Command three different times.  I would expect in the future to see him as Chief of the AF or a member of the JCS.


Fixed.
7/11/2012 7:48:28 AM EDT
[#30]








F-14 Passenger Ejects
















"I'VE LOST MY RIO"



by Lt. Geoff Vickers

My squadron and air wing were detached to NAS Fallon, Nevada, for strike training. Most of us attended lectures all day, but I was tasked with giving the battle-group-air-warfare commander an orientation flight in the F-14D. As skipper of the cruiser in charge of the battle group's air defenses, he had been spending time with the air wing to better understand how we conduct our missions. He had observed a number of the strike events through the tactical-air-combat-training system (TACTS) replays, and he had flown with the E-2C and EA-6B squadrons. He was proud that the Prowler guys hadn't been able to make him sick.
My job was to demonstrate the Tomcat's performance and tactical capabilities. Though this flight was my first without a qualified radar-intercept officer (RIO) in the back seat, I had flown with a number of aviators who had very little Tomcat experience.
The Captain arrived at the squadron a half-hour before the brief to receive his cockpit-orientation lecture and ejection-seat checkout. Once in the ready room, we briefed the flight with our wingman. I covered the administrative and tactical procedures in accordance with our squadron's standard-operating procedures (SOP).
I told the Captain that after the G-awareness maneuver, we would do a quick inverted check to verify cockpit security. Looking back, I should have recognized his anxiety when he mocked me and said, "Just a quick inverted check?" then laughed. I didn't realize hanging upside down with nothing but glass and 11,000 feet of air separating you from the desert floor might not be the most comfortable situation in the world for a surface-warfare officer.
I continued the brief and told the captain we would do a performance demo and a couple of intercepts, followed by tanking from an S-3. I told him if, at any point, he felt uncomfortable, we would stop whatever we were doing, roll wings level, and take it easy. I was determined to avoid the temptation to intentionally make him sick and uncomfortable.
The start, taxi, and takeoff were normal. We joined with our lead and did the standard clean-and-dry checks. We pressed into the working area and assumed a defensive combat-spread formation in preparation for the G-warm. I told him what was happening, and he seemed to remember the sequence of events from the brief. After we completed the checks, I asked him, "Are you ready for the inverted check? Do you have everything stowed?" All set" was the last thing I heard him say.
I checked the airspeed and confirmed it was above the 300 knots recommended to do the check, and I rolled the aircraft inverted. I decided not to really put on a lot of negative G and unloaded to about .3 to .5 negative G's-just enough to make anything float that wasn't stowed properly. If he was uncomfortable in such a benign maneuver, it would be better to find out then, rather than when we were racing toward the earth during a radar-missile defense.
As I started to push on the stick, I heard a loud pop, followed by a roar. The cockpit filled with smoke, and we suddenly lost cabin pressure. I first thought a catastrophic environmental-control system (ECS) had failed. I said to myself, "This is new. I've never even heard of something like this happening."
Time compression turned the next few seconds into an eternity. I knew the first thing I had to do was to roll the jet upright and assess the situation. About three seconds after the first indication of a problem, I had the jet upright and knew exactly what had happened. transmitted, "Lion 52. Emergency, my RIO just ejected."
I was yelling into the mic, thinking I would have to make all the calls in the blind. I never would have thought I easily could communicate with all the noise of flying at 320 knots without a canopy. As I turned the jet to try and get a visual of my wayward passenger, Desert Control asked,"Understand your wingman ejected?" "Negative, my RIO ejected. I'm still flying the plane." "OK. Understand your RIO ejected. You're flying the plane, and you're OK?"
I almost said I was far from OK, but I just told them I was all right, except I was flying a convertible. I was relieved to see a good parachute below me, and I passed this info to Desert Control. Very quickly after the emergency call, an FA-18 pilot from the Naval Strike and Air-Warfare Center, who also was in the area, announced he would take over as the on-scene commander of the search-and-rescue (SAR) effort.
I told my wingman to pass the location of the Captain because I could not change any of my displays. Once my wingman started to pass the location, I started dumping gas and put the needle on the nose back to NAS Fallon.
One of our air-wing SH-60s was in the area and responded, along with the station's UH-1N. The Captain was recovered almost immediately and transported to the local hospital for treatment and evaluation. The only F-14D boldface procedures for a canopy problem include placing the canopy handle in "boost close" position and then moving the command eject lever to "pilot." Obviously, the canopy already was gone, so that lever action didn't apply, and, if the command-eject lever wasn't already in "pilot," as briefed, I also would have been ejected.
I slowed the aircraft and lowered my seat because that's what I remembered from the rest of the steps in the checklist. However, after sitting at eye-level with my multi-function display for about 30 seconds, I thought it would be more prudent to see outside, so I raised my seat. Slowing the aircraft had little affect on the windblast, but, as long as I leaned forward, the wind hit only my shoulders. Because it was very cold at altitude, I decided to return quickly to base, but I needed to watch my airspeed since the ejection had occurred.
The PCL says to fly less than 200 knots and 15,000 feet and to complete a controllability check for the loss of the canopy, but I never pulled out my PCL to reference it. I figured with the way my day was going, I'd probably just drop my PCL down an intake and complicate my problems. In retrospect, I should have requested my wingman break out his checklist and talk me through the steps. Though this practice of having a wingman assist is common in single-seat communities, Tomcat crews tend to forget this coordination technique is a viable option.
I did consider the controllability check, and I directed my wingman to check for damage to the vertical stabilizers-she found none. The faster I got on deck, the faster I would get warm. I slowed to approach speed in 10-knot increments at about 3,000 feet AGL and had no problems handling the jet. As I approached the field, I was surprised at how quiet it got. The noise was only slightly louder than the normal ECS roar in the Tomcat. I'll admit I felt silly saying the landing checklist over the ICS when no one else was in the cockpit, but I didn't want to risk breaking my standard habit patterns.
The landing was uneventful, and, when I pulled back into the line, I was surprised to find how many people had come out to see the spectacle. The magnitude of the situation finally set in when my skipper gave me a hug after I got out of the jet.
The Captain and I were very fortunate: All of the ejection and aviation-life-support-systems (ALSS) equipment functioned as expected. Our PR1 had taken the time to properly fit the captain, using components from three different sets of flight gear. This action caused a problem after the mishap-getting everyone's gear replaced-but it renewed my faith in our escape systems. A 48-year-old man ejected from the jet when it was inverted, at negative .5 G's, at 320 knots, and the only injuries he had were two minor cuts to his face.
After talking to the Captain at the O'Club later that night, I realized I better could have briefed elements of the flight. Though I covered all of the details, I didn't fully consider his perspective. He said he didn't know where to put his hands. Consequently, he just left them in loosely clenched fists on his lap, about two inches away from the ejection handle. It never occurred to me that someone would not know what to do with his hands. Obviously, I fly with the stick and throttle in my hands 95 percent of the flight, but I failed to consider his situation.
The mishap board surmised that, during the inverted maneuver, he must have flinched when he slightly rose out of the seat and pulled the ejection handle. Now, before any brief, I try to place myself in the other person's shoes (even if they are black shoes) and imagine what the flight will be like for him. Whether it is the person who never has flown a tactical aircraft before or just the nugget pilot who never has flown with NVGs, remembering what it was like when I was unfamiliar with the environment will prevent this type of mishap from recurring.


Also at: http://www.navytimes.com/legacy/new/1-292925-1311707.php





 
7/11/2012 7:59:10 AM EDT
[#31]
Ask TaylorWSO. AFAIK you can do pretty much anything from the back except shooting AtoA missiles.
7/11/2012 8:04:29 AM EDT
[#32]
I was instructed that in the event of pilot incapacitation to climb the jet to 10,000, call the tower and punch us both out. The pilots said they would not trust anyone but another pilot to land the plane from the back seat. The e model I rode in did have flight controls in the back seat, but it was a test base so the aircraft may have been different.
7/11/2012 8:15:11 AM EDT
[#33]




Quoted:

The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.




NO,



We are still WSOs if you have that designation, but the new guys will be CSOs and not become WSOs until they complete there qualification and change their AFSC
7/11/2012 8:19:40 AM EDT
[#34]




Quoted:

Ask TaylorWSO. AFAIK you can do pretty much anything from the back except shooting AtoA missiles.




Cant shut off engines, cant shoot missles or the gun (yet, but I think I can take out the pin that holds the trigger and make it work), can't control the auto-acg modes, can't jettison. I think thats all

7/11/2012 9:40:43 AM EDT
[#35]
Quoted:
Quoted:
on an F-15E, can the WSO fly the plane from the back seat?


IIRC, Backseaters have controls in an Air Force two-seater. Navy RIOs can basically punch out. Again, IIRC........







That's how it was with the F-4s.  It was apperantly interesting to watch the landings back seaters did for their currency.
7/11/2012 11:12:31 AM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Ask TaylorWSO. AFAIK you can do pretty much anything from the back except shooting AtoA missiles.


Cant shut off engines, cant shoot missles or the gun (yet, but I think I can take out the pin that holds the trigger and make it work), can't control the auto-acg modes, can't jettison. I think thats all


No VMAX either!
7/11/2012 12:02:49 PM EDT
[#37]




Quoted:



Quoted:





Quoted:

Ask TaylorWSO. AFAIK you can do pretty much anything from the back except shooting AtoA missiles.




Cant shut off engines, cant shoot missles or the gun (yet, but I think I can take out the pin that holds the trigger and make it work), can't control the auto-acg modes, can't jettison. I think thats all





No VMAX either!
I carry a stick that i cna reach it with



7/11/2012 12:03:32 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.


I've heard NFO stood for No Future Outside.    
7/11/2012 12:06:20 PM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:

http://www.vfp62.com/IMAGES_9/F14.jpg

F-14 Passenger Ejects



"I'VE LOST MY RIO"
by Lt. Geoff Vickers

My squadron and air wing were detached to NAS Fallon, Nevada, for strike training. Most of us attended lectures all day, but I was tasked with giving the battle-group-air-warfare commander an orientation flight in the F-14D. As skipper of the cruiser in charge of the battle group's air defenses, he had been spending time with the air wing to better understand how we conduct our missions. He had observed a number of the strike events through the tactical-air-combat-training system (TACTS) replays, and he had flown with the E-2C and EA-6B squadrons. He was proud that the Prowler guys hadn't been able to make him sick.

My job was to demonstrate the Tomcat's performance and tactical capabilities. Though this flight was my first without a qualified radar-intercept officer (RIO) in the back seat, I had flown with a number of aviators who had very little Tomcat experience.

The Captain arrived at the squadron a half-hour before the brief to receive his cockpit-orientation lecture and ejection-seat checkout. Once in the ready room, we briefed the flight with our wingman. I covered the administrative and tactical procedures in accordance with our squadron's standard-operating procedures (SOP).

I told the Captain that after the G-awareness maneuver, we would do a quick inverted check to verify cockpit security. Looking back, I should have recognized his anxiety when he mocked me and said, "Just a quick inverted check?" then laughed. I didn't realize hanging upside down with nothing but glass and 11,000 feet of air separating you from the desert floor might not be the most comfortable situation in the world for a surface-warfare officer.

I continued the brief and told the captain we would do a performance demo and a couple of intercepts, followed by tanking from an S-3. I told him if, at any point, he felt uncomfortable, we would stop whatever we were doing, roll wings level, and take it easy. I was determined to avoid the temptation to intentionally make him sick and uncomfortable.

The start, taxi, and takeoff were normal. We joined with our lead and did the standard clean-and-dry checks. We pressed into the working area and assumed a defensive combat-spread formation in preparation for the G-warm. I told him what was happening, and he seemed to remember the sequence of events from the brief. After we completed the checks, I asked him, "Are you ready for the inverted check? Do you have everything stowed?" All set" was the last thing I heard him say.

I checked the airspeed and confirmed it was above the 300 knots recommended to do the check, and I rolled the aircraft inverted. I decided not to really put on a lot of negative G and unloaded to about .3 to .5 negative G's-just enough to make anything float that wasn't stowed properly. If he was uncomfortable in such a benign maneuver, it would be better to find out then, rather than when we were racing toward the earth during a radar-missile defense.

As I started to push on the stick, I heard a loud pop, followed by a roar. The cockpit filled with smoke, and we suddenly lost cabin pressure. I first thought a catastrophic environmental-control system (ECS) had failed. I said to myself, "This is new. I've never even heard of something like this happening."

Time compression turned the next few seconds into an eternity. I knew the first thing I had to do was to roll the jet upright and assess the situation. About three seconds after the first indication of a problem, I had the jet upright and knew exactly what had happened. transmitted, "Lion 52. Emergency, my RIO just ejected."

I was yelling into the mic, thinking I would have to make all the calls in the blind. I never would have thought I easily could communicate with all the noise of flying at 320 knots without a canopy. As I turned the jet to try and get a visual of my wayward passenger, Desert Control asked,"Understand your wingman ejected?" "Negative, my RIO ejected. I'm still flying the plane." "OK. Understand your RIO ejected. You're flying the plane, and you're OK?"

I almost said I was far from OK, but I just told them I was all right, except I was flying a convertible. I was relieved to see a good parachute below me, and I passed this info to Desert Control. Very quickly after the emergency call, an FA-18 pilot from the Naval Strike and Air-Warfare Center, who also was in the area, announced he would take over as the on-scene commander of the search-and-rescue (SAR) effort.

I told my wingman to pass the location of the Captain because I could not change any of my displays. Once my wingman started to pass the location, I started dumping gas and put the needle on the nose back to NAS Fallon.

One of our air-wing SH-60s was in the area and responded, along with the station's UH-1N. The Captain was recovered almost immediately and transported to the local hospital for treatment and evaluation. The only F-14D boldface procedures for a canopy problem include placing the canopy handle in "boost close" position and then moving the command eject lever to "pilot." Obviously, the canopy already was gone, so that lever action didn't apply, and, if the command-eject lever wasn't already in "pilot," as briefed, I also would have been ejected.

I slowed the aircraft and lowered my seat because that's what I remembered from the rest of the steps in the checklist. However, after sitting at eye-level with my multi-function display for about 30 seconds, I thought it would be more prudent to see outside, so I raised my seat. Slowing the aircraft had little affect on the windblast, but, as long as I leaned forward, the wind hit only my shoulders. Because it was very cold at altitude, I decided to return quickly to base, but I needed to watch my airspeed since the ejection had occurred.

The PCL says to fly less than 200 knots and 15,000 feet and to complete a controllability check for the loss of the canopy, but I never pulled out my PCL to reference it. I figured with the way my day was going, I'd probably just drop my PCL down an intake and complicate my problems. In retrospect, I should have requested my wingman break out his checklist and talk me through the steps. Though this practice of having a wingman assist is common in single-seat communities, Tomcat crews tend to forget this coordination technique is a viable option.

I did consider the controllability check, and I directed my wingman to check for damage to the vertical stabilizers-she found none. The faster I got on deck, the faster I would get warm. I slowed to approach speed in 10-knot increments at about 3,000 feet AGL and had no problems handling the jet. As I approached the field, I was surprised at how quiet it got. The noise was only slightly louder than the normal ECS roar in the Tomcat. I'll admit I felt silly saying the landing checklist over the ICS when no one else was in the cockpit, but I didn't want to risk breaking my standard habit patterns.

The landing was uneventful, and, when I pulled back into the line, I was surprised to find how many people had come out to see the spectacle. The magnitude of the situation finally set in when my skipper gave me a hug after I got out of the jet.

The Captain and I were very fortunate: All of the ejection and aviation-life-support-systems (ALSS) equipment functioned as expected. Our PR1 had taken the time to properly fit the captain, using components from three different sets of flight gear. This action caused a problem after the mishap-getting everyone's gear replaced-but it renewed my faith in our escape systems. A 48-year-old man ejected from the jet when it was inverted, at negative .5 G's, at 320 knots, and the only injuries he had were two minor cuts to his face.

After talking to the Captain at the O'Club later that night, I realized I better could have briefed elements of the flight. Though I covered all of the details, I didn't fully consider his perspective. He said he didn't know where to put his hands. Consequently, he just left them in loosely clenched fists on his lap, about two inches away from the ejection handle. It never occurred to me that someone would not know what to do with his hands. Obviously, I fly with the stick and throttle in my hands 95 percent of the flight, but I failed to consider his situation.

The mishap board surmised that, during the inverted maneuver, he must have flinched when he slightly rose out of the seat and pulled the ejection handle. Now, before any brief, I try to place myself in the other person's shoes (even if they are black shoes) and imagine what the flight will be like for him. Whether it is the person who never has flown a tactical aircraft before or just the nugget pilot who never has flown with NVGs, remembering what it was like when I was unfamiliar with the environment will prevent this type of mishap from recurring.


Also at: http://www.navytimes.com/legacy/new/1-292925-1311707.php  


Reminds me of "Phantom over Viet Nam", by a Marine pilot. He was telling about his RIO going bonkers one time and freaking in a dogfight. He finally told the guy to make sure {some control} was set to eject him only and get the Hell out. {Or words to that effect......


http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2880099-phantom-over-vietnam


7/11/2012 12:07:04 PM EDT
[#40]
EA6B's only have one stick.

Also, Go Navy, Beat Air Force.

7/11/2012 12:25:47 PM EDT
[#41]
Quoted:
Gen. Gary North was not listed with any air to air kills as far as I can find.  From what I've heard he had a pretty nasty reputation as well.  He is set to retire 1 Oct 12.


North is a great guy.
7/11/2012 12:27:55 PM EDT
[#42]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Never worked an F-15E model, so I'm not sure if it's the same.

The F-15D models does have dual controls. But there is no gear lever in the backseat. Also cant shut down engines from the back.


Dafuq?

"Oh hey, my pilot is dead, so I have to belly flop this sumbitch!... oh and bring a fire truck, I can't kill the engines."


Yup, but there is a sticker telling you not to lower the gear above 300 KT along with the emergency brake steer handle. Doesn't work really well if you cant lower the gear

http://i.imgur.com/DdGyn.jpg



Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The AF calls them CSOs ( combat system operators) now. The Navy calls them NFOs (naval flight officers). We all call them penguins...they have wings but they can't fly.


Talk about a shitty job. Sure, you get to fly around in an F-15, but for me there would be no fun just sitting there pushing buttons.


They get to blow shit up. Lots of shit.


Half the fun is flying the thing. At least for me it would be for me.


I'm pretty sure the pilots will hand over the controls to the CSO from time to time.

The pilot on my ride gave me the controls. It was my first and only time anyone gave me control of a F-15 in flight, lol.

EW and navigators on the B-52 do touch and goes from time to time because there will be other aircrew members aside from the pilot and co that said they were doing touch and goes during debrief.
Not sure if that's a common thing on other airframes. Maybe the pilots feel bad for them because they don't even have a window to look outside



Uh, no.  Buffs often fly with extra pilots for training.  They are the ones logging touch and goes.  Not saying an EW never did one, but not on record they didn't.
7/11/2012 12:33:06 PM EDT
[#43]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The throttles, stick, rudder pedals, and canopy control handle in the B, D, and E F-15 models are all arranged and rigged in series together, moving one moves the other in either seat.

For instance, when a certain Vice Wing Commander (who shall remain unnamed) got an incentive ride in a D model at Kadena AB circa 2002 or so, and he pulled the rear canopy control handle during a "max climb" he turned it into a convertible F-15...  

It is common practice for other aircrew members to have some time in the pilot's seat.





We had an academy cadidiot we were giving a ride to at Nellis jettison the rear canopy of an F-4 when the pilot told him to close it.  It was probably the same guy.  



We had some nonner jettison a canopy on a incentive ride just before take off while TDY to Canada on a F-15 quite a few years ago.  

During the investigation on the audio recording you could here her ask serveral times which lever to move to arm the ejection seat and the pilot told her " the black and yellow one by the canopy "  instead of the one that says "ejection controls locked/ ejection controls armed".  



Was this around 2005.  A female Master Sgt?  Were were stationed at Mt. Home during this time and my wife was due to get an incentive flight.  After this incident, the base commander stopped most of the incentive flights!
7/11/2012 12:50:13 PM EDT
[#44]
eailer then then that but yes Mtn. Home.

The one your thinking of was becuase someone died during a ride.
7/11/2012 12:51:28 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Never worked an F-15E model, so I'm not sure if it's the same.

The F-15D models does have dual controls. But there is no gear lever in the backseat. Also cant shut down engines from the back.


There is no gear lever, but you can lower the gear from the back seat via the emergency gear handle.  The hook can be lowered from the back seat as well. I.e, the WSO has no hardware limitation to prevent them from landing the jet.  Unfortunately, WSOs are not allowed to perform a touch & go or landing.

I am sure TaylorWSO will be along shortly here as well.


Okay now thats kinda BS...
If I were a front seater, I'd want to know that my guy in back could land me back home safe and sound if I was KO'd from eating a goose sandwich or some shit.

Theres a book written by an F-4 jock called "Once a Fighter Pilot", and he mentions a few times handing over control to the back seater, and once even being in the back seat and flying from that position.  Apparently that jet had the same issue with limited control of the engines and emergency gear handle only.
7/11/2012 1:05:39 PM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The throttles, stick, rudder pedals, and canopy control handle in the B, D, and E F-15 models are all arranged and rigged in series together, moving one moves the other in either seat.

For instance, when a certain Vice Wing Commander (who shall remain unnamed) got an incentive ride in a D model at Kadena AB circa 2002 or so, and he pulled the rear canopy control handle during a "max climb" he turned it into a convertible F-15...  

It is common practice for other aircrew members to have some time in the pilot's seat.





We had an academy cadidiot we were giving a ride to at Nellis jettison the rear canopy of an F-4 when the pilot told him to close it.  It was probably the same guy.  



We had some nonner jettison a canopy on a incentive ride just before take off while TDY to Canada on a F-15 quite a few years ago.  

During the investigation on the audio recording you could here her ask serveral times which lever to move to arm the ejection seat and the pilot told her " the black and yellow one by the canopy "  instead of the one that says "ejection controls locked/ ejection controls armed".  



Was this around 2005.  A female Master Sgt?  Were were stationed at Mt. Home during this time and my wife was due to get an incentive flight.  After this incident, the base commander stopped most of the incentive flights!


In 2003, a Mtn Home F-15E at Cold Lake for Tiger Meet had an incentive rider pop the canopy on the EOR.  She was an E-4 and IIRC not a nonner.  A Jet troop.

7/11/2012 1:22:04 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no gear lever, but you can lower the gear from the back seat via the emergency gear handle.  The hook can be lowered from the back seat as well. I.e, the WSO has no hardware limitation to prevent them from landing the jet.  Unfortunately, WSOs are not allowed to perform a touch & go or landing.

Okay now thats kinda BS...
If I were a front seater, I'd want to know that my guy in back could land me back home safe and sound if I was KO'd from eating a goose sandwich or some shit.

Theres a book written by an F-4 jock called "Once a Fighter Pilot", and he mentions a few times handing over control to the back seater, and once even being in the back seat and flying from that position.  Apparently that jet had the same issue with limited control of the engines and emergency gear handle only.

F-4s were originally crewed by two pilots, but even now, it is not uncommon for WSOs to fly during admin phases of flight or to practice approaches.  

As an instructor pilot you will practice close formation flying, landing, and air-to-air refueling from the backseat.  I, too, would rather my WSO be able to land the jet if required, but the chances of both of us getting into a lot of trouble are much higher than needing the WSO to land the jet.

7/11/2012 1:22:31 PM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Ask TaylorWSO. AFAIK you can do pretty much anything from the back except shooting AtoA missiles.


Cant shut off engines, cant shoot missles or the gun (yet, but I think I can take out the pin that holds the trigger and make it work), can't control the auto-acg modes, can't jettison. I think thats all


Probably the most important switch missing from the back seat is the temperature control knob, especially during the winter.
WSO: "Are you freezing in the front as well?"  
Pilot: "Not at all, in fact I just turned the heat down ."  

7/11/2012 1:26:26 PM EDT
[#49]
hence the reason I carry a stick, need to get a cattle prod
 
7/11/2012 1:31:29 PM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Ask TaylorWSO. AFAIK you can do pretty much anything from the back except shooting AtoA missiles.


Cant shut off engines, cant shoot missles or the gun (yet, but I think I can take out the pin that holds the trigger and make it work), can't control the auto-acg modes, can't jettison. I think thats all


Not all that different than my cockpit. Left seat cant shoot, but he can mess with the sight. Right seater can shoot, but cant mess with the sight.

We are close enough that a nice elbow to the chest can accomplish plenty of CRM.
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page