Posted: 6/24/2012 8:49:37 PM EDT
| nevermind |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
 There's no "human erection" in the video...No but I bet the fake pubes, balls, and giant cock representation is still verboten. You didn't watch it did you... it was some sort of plastic plant. I did watch it, hence REPRESENTATION You were right. "depictions thereof", even if it was a plant, would fit that category. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's no "human erection" in the video...No but I bet the fake pubes, balls, and giant cock representation is still verboten. You didn't watch it did you... it was some sort of plastic plant. I did watch it, hence REPRESENTATION You were right. "depictions thereof", even if it was a plant, would fit that category. The plant was one thing, the muppet style balls, pubes, real ass cheeks is another. This is a real odd conversation for those getting here late I bet. 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's no "human erection" in the video...No but I bet the fake pubes, balls, and giant cock representation is still verboten. You didn't watch it did you... it was some sort of plastic plant. I did watch it, hence REPRESENTATION You were right. "depictions thereof", even if it was a plant, would fit that category. The plant was one thing, the muppet style balls, pubes, real ass cheeks is another. This is a real odd conversation for those getting here late I bet.
Nope just another night in GD. |
