Posted: 11/22/2011 7:31:45 AM EDT
|
CNN Republican National Security Debate
Time: Tonight, 11/22/2011, 8:00pm EST TV: CNN Streaming: CNN.com Sponsors: CNN, The Heritage Foundation, and the American Enterprise Institute Participants: Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, Huntsman, Paul, Perry, Romney, Santorum Will Bachmann talk about women's rights and Obamacare? Will Cain regain some footing he has lost in recent weeks? Will Gingrich show superior knowledge of foreign affairs? Will Huntsman thank the moderator every time and make jokes? Will Paul tout non-interventionism and "ending these wars now"? Will Perry continue his trend of performing better on foreign policy than on domestic issues? Will Romney remain slick and make thorough use of canned answers? Will Santorum get in a fight with anyone? All this and more! 
Results poll will go up after the debate is over. |
|
Quoted:
Why the GOP candidates are participating in these "debates" is beyond me. 
Would you turn down free publicity on a national stage? The anchors might not be conservative, but all the candidates are unified against them, so they get to look good while going after the media. All for free. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Why the GOP candidates are participating in these "debates" is beyond me. Would you turn down free publicity on a national stage? The anchors might not be conservative, but all the candidates are unified against them, so they get to look good while going after the media. All for free. I don't think we've been watching the same debates.  |
|
Quoted:
They have anything left to talk about? No. At this point it's just a forum to set them up to make "mistakes" so the frantic liberal media can go crazy and flail around like a crowd at a black comedy club, tomorrow morning. <<<<––––––ETA: The Eagle has Landed!! 
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Why the GOP candidates are participating in these "debates" is beyond me. Would you turn down free publicity on a national stage? The anchors might not be conservative, but all the candidates are unified against them, so they get to look good while going after the media. All for free. The lefty moderators on these debates throw out more "gotcha" questions than they do questions of substance. And the mods are attacking to influence more of the Independents than the Party voters. Even though it's for a Primary election. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why the GOP candidates are participating in these "debates" is beyond me.
Would you turn down free publicity on a national stage? The anchors might not be conservative, but all the candidates are unified against them, so they get to look good while going after the media. All for free. The lefty moderators on these debates throw out more "gotcha" questions than they do questions of substance. And the mods are attacking to influence more of the Independents than the Party voters. Even though it's for a Primary election. I don't disagree, but I think it's safe to say that the debates have had an influence on the primaries this time around. |
|
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1256008_Official_GOP_Debate_thread_11_22_live_on_CNN.html nolo beat you..... Dupe.
|
|
Quoted:
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1256008_Official_GOP_Debate_thread_11_22_live_on_CNN.html nolo beat you..... Dupe. Who posts a debate thread a day early, dammit?!
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why the GOP candidates are participating in these "debates" is beyond me. Would you turn down free publicity on a national stage? The anchors might not be conservative, but all the candidates are unified against them, so they get to look good while going after the media. All for free. The lefty moderators on these debates throw out more "gotcha" questions than they do questions of substance. And the mods are attacking to influence more of the Independents than the Party voters. Even though it's for a Primary election. I don't disagree, but I think it's safe to say that the debates have had an influence on the primaries this time around. 100% agree. The attacks have allowed us to see how articulate and knowledgeable some candidates are, and how shrill and confused others appear. Also, how well some react to hostile interrogators. |