[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Thompson Pron (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 9/18/2011 9:57:24 AM EDT
|
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. The barrel looks too small to be 45 cal as well. Very nice. |
|
Quoted:
The full wood one looks sort of sci-fi to me. This is the one I am curious about as well. I didn't even know they had made a 30-06 model. These guys are a local club I think I might try and find out when they are doing another show. I could take a real camera next time.
|
|
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. |
|
Quoted:
Oh, my. That was a very nice display. The biggest surprise I ever had regarding Thompson's was how HEAVY they were. And therein lies the magic. The weight counterbalances the recoil almost perfectly, so when shooting full auto, they just sort of hang there almost like they're weightless. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. Either way, do want |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. Either way, do want Wiki says Model 1919's came in multiple calibers, .45 ACP, .22, .32 ACP, .38 ACP, and 9mm. BSA Thompsons were built in Britian and France, buit to fire 9mm or 7.63 Mauser. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, I'm the opposite. '21's and '28's (Or a '28 OVERSTAMP [got both I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/treadhead/DSC_0074.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/treadhead/Thompson40.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/treadhead/DSC_0066.jpg fap,fap,fap,fap,fap......Colt 1921 is the flat best looking SMG ever.fap,fap,fap |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. Either way, do want Wiki says Model 1919's came in multiple calibers, .45 ACP, .22, .32 ACP, .38 ACP, and 9mm. BSA Thompsons were built in Britian and France, buit to fire 9mm or 7.63 Mauser. 1919's don't have buttstocks or sights. I agree with the 30 carbine prototype. |
|
Quoted: I've had a couple including an early "A5" (Not the new ones!) that I threw up on the table at shows to get folks over and I "think"So what's the thoughts on a Auto Ordnance modern 1928? I have one and love it. that they're OK. Of course, I've been exposed to "machine gun books.com" (That's full of 60-70yr old something guys that were buying '21's from J Curtis Earl in the 60's and 70's for what we pay for satellite TV every 6 months and think that the AO's (Except for the VERY,VERY early guns) and the KA's are shit but, I still like 'em. I AM glad to see that they've gone to a more "correct" actuator lately though. |
|
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. I've shot both and still prefer the M1 style. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. Its the Blish block action. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. I've shot both and still prefer the M1 style. Understand. Shooting full auto Thompsons on a regular basis might give you a different opinion. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Very cool display, OP. Quoted:
Someday I will own a Thompson. And 2 625 revolvers. And I will ask people to call me Earl. Your style. I like it.
I just got a few M.H.I. Smiley patches. Where did you get the smiley face patches? I want to buy some. http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/buy-stuff/ |
→ 










