Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/13/2011 12:37:22 PM EDT
Help me understand something please.





If private for-profit enterprises are concerned with increasing profits by reducing overhead, reducing costs and increasing efficiency, then why has a business model developed by the Canadian British Government (one of the most inefficient and costly organizations on this little spinning rock) become a universal standard for running an IT organization?

 
6/13/2011 12:47:47 PM EDT
[#1]
Explain.
6/13/2011 12:48:43 PM EDT
[#2]
Thought ITIL was from the UK?
6/13/2011 12:49:15 PM EDT
[#3]
It isn't Canada, it's England.
6/13/2011 12:50:55 PM EDT
[#4]



Quoted:


Thought ITIL was from the UK?


So it was, which is even worse.



 
6/13/2011 12:51:07 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
It isn't Canada, it's England.


I thought they were the same country...
6/13/2011 12:51:33 PM EDT
[#6]
We run the ITIL model at our shop and its a complete fucking waste of resources and energy
6/13/2011 12:54:26 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
We run the ITIL model at our shop and its a complete fucking waste of resources and energy

+1, though getting paid for a week of training to get the basic certification was a nice break from the daily routine.
6/13/2011 3:21:59 PM EDT
[#8]
All sorts of "efficiency" programs get picked up or sponsored by government and become big fads in business, with most of them being poorly implemented.  One place I worked used ITIL, and had some software that integrated all of the pieces, it was just cumbersome to use.  The real problem was the same manager who pushed for ITIL needed something new to show for his paycheck, so started pushing Six Sigma in an IT support organization.  THAT was a frigging nightmare, especially since he was one of the worst offenders about fudging statistics to look better (one set of metrics was on ticket closure times, so he would reprioritize tickets to lower categories to make our numbers better).