Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
3/20/2011 4:50:57 PM EDT
I'm watching FOX News and watching the local Libyans firing their AK's in the air in celebration. It's at least a couple hundred rounds (likely more).



I wonder how many locals get nailed in by those celebratory bullets as they make their way back to Earth?
3/20/2011 4:52:41 PM EDT
[#1]
0
3/20/2011 4:54:19 PM EDT
[#2]
Bullets fired in the air will only kill or injure if it comes down on a trajectory course, not if it goes relatively straight up then down
3/20/2011 4:55:28 PM EDT
[#3]
Mythbusters did this already.  A bullet that goes straight up and falls straight down will likely result in no more than a bruise and a headache.





A bullet that is still following an arc of trajectory will kill when it hits someone.

 
3/20/2011 4:56:28 PM EDT
[#4]
Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.
3/20/2011 5:00:23 PM EDT
[#5]



Quoted:


Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.


fxt

 
3/20/2011 5:01:52 PM EDT
[#6]
not if fired straight up
3/20/2011 5:02:09 PM EDT
[#7]
87
 
3/20/2011 5:04:25 PM EDT
[#8]
Every time I see them wasting ammo I facepalm.
3/20/2011 5:05:35 PM EDT
[#9]




Quoted:

Bullets fired in the air will only kill or injure if it comes down on a trajectory course, not if it goes relatively straight up then down




3/20/2011 5:07:29 PM EDT
[#10]
There are lots of variables involved here.   One is how much the bullet tumbles, if any.  If it tumbles, it will be moving slower than one that comes base down.

It is not a safe practice.  A falling bullet could easily put out an eye, for example.  Also, some people's skulls are harder than others.  Just because a falling bullet won't usually cause any injuries is no reason to take a chance.  Fire those celebratory AKs into a nearby berm.
3/20/2011 5:10:28 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Every time I see them wasting ammo I facepalm.


Me too, and  I wonder if politicians  would be more receptive towards helping  them if they acted like professionals and not like a  mob. It would look better to point to calm, controlled people and say "this is who we're helping" than to point to a bunch of nuts shooting into the air wildly.
3/20/2011 5:10:39 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Mythbusters did this already.  A bullet that goes straight up and falls straight down will likely result in no more than a bruise and a headache.

A bullet that is still following an arc of trajectory will may kill when it hits someone.  


fixed.  There are *way* too many variables to make that kind of a generalization.
3/20/2011 5:12:18 PM EDT
[#13]
I worked at a car dealership and saw the day after New Years a hole entirely through the sheet metal on a car hood....  it was from people shooting up in the air.... both 9mm and .45... (found the spent rounds)


J
3/20/2011 5:25:39 PM EDT
[#14]



Quoted:





Quoted:

Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.


fxt  
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.





 
3/20/2011 5:27:56 PM EDT
[#15]
I had a guy get hit in the head by a 7.62x39 during some celebratory fire.  He was fine.
3/20/2011 5:28:01 PM EDT
[#16]



Quoted:


Every time I see them wasting ammo I facepalm.


They have cheap ammo because they don't have Obama



 
3/20/2011 5:36:40 PM EDT
[#17]
I wouldn't want to catch one of those in the dome.
3/20/2011 5:41:55 PM EDT
[#18]
Haven't you heard? "A bullet fired straight into the air comes back down at the same speed."
3/20/2011 5:42:07 PM EDT
[#19]
Who gives a shit?
3/20/2011 5:45:58 PM EDT
[#20]
Yep, no different than a bow and arrow fired straight up....won't do nothing.

3/20/2011 5:48:14 PM EDT
[#21]
Mythbusters didn't properly spin the bullets before their little "tests".

177,000 RPM tends to stabilize bullets somewhat, resulting in them coming down nose first, unless fired perfectly striaght up.

IIRC, their actual tests, not random bullets in a blower, showed that they penetrated far beyond what their lab experiments predicted.  They also learned that there is rarely anything as "straight up", and any bullet fired up will tend to stay nose first in its ballistic arc, until it comes down and punches holes in things.

(AK-47: 710meters/sec, 1 in 240mm twist rate = 177,500 RPM)

3/20/2011 5:49:08 PM EDT
[#22]
If it falls on your face from the barrel of a gun, yes, otherwise no.
3/20/2011 5:49:56 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Yep, no different than a bow and arrow fired straight up....won't do nothing.



I tried that. I don't recomend it.
3/20/2011 5:50:41 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
I worked at a car dealership and saw the day after New Years a hole entirely through the sheet metal on a car hood....  it was from people shooting up in the air.... both 9mm and .45... (found the spent rounds)


J


they were shot at an angle I'd bet ..unless you saw the dents from the feet of  the shooter standing on the hood of the car
3/20/2011 5:56:01 PM EDT
[#25]





Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.



fxt  
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.





 



They suspended bullets in an air column, and then the actual fired 9mm bullets and balloon-dropped .30-06 bullets punched sideways holes in the ground and were found in the holes that way.  If a bullet is fired straight up, it will lose spin and fall sideways at roughly 160fps.  No seasoning needed.


 
3/20/2011 5:58:35 PM EDT
[#26]



Quoted:


Mythbusters didn't properly spin the bullets before their little "tests".



177,000 RPM tends to stabilize bullets somewhat, resulting in them coming down nose first, unless fired perfectly striaght up.



IIRC, their actual tests, not random bullets in a blower, showed that they penetrated far beyond what their lab experiments predicted.  They also learned that there is rarely anything as "straight up", and any bullet fired up will tend to stay nose first in its ballistic arc, until it comes down and punches holes in things.



(AK-47: 710meters/sec, 1 in 240mm twist rate = 177,500 RPM)





They fired 9mm bullets straight up and the ground penetration was consistent with their expectations.

 
3/20/2011 6:19:19 PM EDT
[#27]
Sure, all the ones they claim are killed by Americans.
3/20/2011 6:27:08 PM EDT
[#28]




Quoted:





Quoted:





Quoted:





Quoted:

Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.


fxt
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.





They suspended bullets in an air column, and then the actual fired 9mm bullets and balloon-dropped .30-06 bullets punched sideways holes in the ground and were found in the holes that way. If a bullet is fired straight up, it will lose spin and fall sideways at roughly 160fps. No seasoning needed.







Col. Hatcher, who actually performed this experiment with a Browning MG, firing M1 ball, would disagree . . .

3/20/2011 8:51:51 PM EDT
[#29]



Quoted:


Who gives a shit?


This reply wins.

 
3/20/2011 8:58:05 PM EDT
[#30]



Quoted:





Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:

Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.


fxt
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.





They suspended bullets in an air column, and then the actual fired 9mm bullets and balloon-dropped .30-06 bullets punched sideways holes in the ground and were found in the holes that way. If a bullet is fired straight up, it will lose spin and fall sideways at roughly 160fps. No seasoning needed.







Col. Hatcher, who actually performed this experiment with a Browning MG, firing M1 ball, would disagree . . .



Spin decays A LOT slower than velocity.

 
3/20/2011 9:41:35 PM EDT
[#31]



Quoted:





Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:

Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.


fxt
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.





They suspended bullets in an air column, and then the actual fired 9mm bullets and balloon-dropped .30-06 bullets punched sideways holes in the ground and were found in the holes that way. If a bullet is fired straight up, it will lose spin and fall sideways at roughly 160fps. No seasoning needed.







Col. Hatcher, who actually performed this experiment with a Browning MG, firing M1 ball, would disagree . . .



Spin decays A LOT slower than velocity.  



Once again, the experiment was also ACTUALLY performed with a 9mm, and the bullets fell sideways.  So tell me what does your thought experiment, which is clearly more credible than an actual 1:1 experiment recreating the scenario, say the chain of events is?





 
3/20/2011 9:59:35 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
Yep, no different than a bow and arrow fired straight up....won't do nothing.



Might want to re-think that theory.......

3/20/2011 10:04:19 PM EDT
[#33]



Quoted:



Quoted:

Yep, no different than a bow and arrow fired straight up....won't do nothing.







Might want to re-think that theory.......



http://www.above-timberline.com/images/08razortrick.jpg


Ow.



 
3/20/2011 10:07:51 PM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
Yep, no different than a bow and arrow fired straight up....won't do nothing.



Herp!
3/21/2011 5:22:08 AM EDT
[#35]



Quoted:





Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:

Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.


fxt
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.





They suspended bullets in an air column, and then the actual fired 9mm bullets and balloon-dropped .30-06 bullets punched sideways holes in the ground and were found in the holes that way. If a bullet is fired straight up, it will lose spin and fall sideways at roughly 160fps. No seasoning needed.







Col. Hatcher, who actually performed this experiment with a Browning MG, firing M1 ball, would disagree . . .



Spin decays A LOT slower than velocity.  



Once again, the experiment was also ACTUALLY performed with a 9mm, and the bullets fell sideways.  So tell me what does your thought experiment, which is clearly more credible than an actual 1:1 experiment recreating the scenario, say the chain of events is?



 
The obvious flaw in their test is that a 9mm bullet has it's weight spread pretty even across the entire bullet. Whereas a rifle bullet as designated by the OP has 90% of it's weight at the base. The bullet will fall the direction of it's heaviest part. You are wrong.





 
3/21/2011 5:40:23 AM EDT
[#36]
There are certain things that gun guys insist on.

1.  Shooting into the air, because if you do it just perfect, they'll just whack you skull at 300 mph instead of 1000 mph

2.  Leaving guns within easy access of children, because their kids are superhuman and never, ever get out of line or do anything foolish.

3.  Drinking and shooting, because what could go wrong?  It's no big deal.


I've basically given up arguing these points, the people that are fucking stupid enough to think they are a good idea are too fucking stupid to be convinced otherwise.

No amount of tragic examples will convince them.  Pride goeth before the fall.  

3/21/2011 5:49:30 AM EDT
[#37]
Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.

fxt
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.


They suspended bullets in an air column, and then the actual fired 9mm bullets and balloon-dropped .30-06 bullets punched sideways holes in the ground and were found in the holes that way. If a bullet is fired straight up, it will lose spin and fall sideways at roughly 160fps. No seasoning needed.



Col. Hatcher, who actually performed this experiment with a Browning MG, firing M1 ball, would disagree . . .

Spin decays A LOT slower than velocity.  

Once again, the experiment was also ACTUALLY performed with a 9mm, and the bullets fell sideways.  So tell me what does your thought experiment, which is clearly more credible than an actual 1:1 experiment recreating the scenario, say the chain of events is?

 


Guys,

I am an expert in both math and physics.  One time just for the heck of it I wrote a BASIC computer program that exactly replicates the bullet trajectory tables in the back of the Speer reloading manual.

Nobody on this website understands this problem better than I do.

Here's the final conclusion to be drawn from the entire controversy:  anybody who fires a bullet into the air should have the gun taken away from him and shoved up his ass.

You don't need to use quartic runge cutta to figure that one out.
3/21/2011 5:49:50 AM EDT
[#38]
Is this a New Years Eve thread, or like when the Cowboys win
3/21/2011 3:33:45 PM EDT
[#39]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:




Quoted:

Unless they are fired at an angle the most one would get is a bruise on the head. A bullet fired straight up will come to earth at terminal velocity base down on its side. It would be like being hit with a hail stone of the same weight.


fxt
I take anything they do with a grain of salt.





They suspended bullets in an air column, and then the actual fired 9mm bullets and balloon-dropped .30-06 bullets punched sideways holes in the ground and were found in the holes that way. If a bullet is fired straight up, it will lose spin and fall sideways at roughly 160fps. No seasoning needed.







Col. Hatcher, who actually performed this experiment with a Browning MG, firing M1 ball, would disagree . . .



Spin decays A LOT slower than velocity.  



Once again, the experiment was also ACTUALLY performed with a 9mm, and the bullets fell sideways.  So tell me what does your thought experiment, which is clearly more credible than an actual 1:1 experiment recreating the scenario, say the chain of events is?



 




Guys,



I am an expert in both math and physics.  One time just for the heck of it I wrote a BASIC computer program that exactly replicates the bullet trajectory tables in the back of the Speer reloading manual.



Nobody on this website understands this problem better than I do.



Here's the final conclusion to be drawn from the entire controversy:  anybody who fires a bullet into the air should have the gun taken away from him and shoved up his ass.



You don't need to use quartic runge cutta to figure that one out.
Your mathematic prowess aside, your conclusion is totally irrelevant to the question.





 
3/21/2011 3:36:59 PM EDT
[#40]
I'm confused, when you bullets into the air, you're telling me they don't disappear?
3/21/2011 3:46:20 PM EDT
[#41]
90* Celebratory fire in 7.62x39=

90* Celebratory fire in 40mm AA=

Both are available for our viewing pleasure!
3/21/2011 3:48:12 PM EDT
[#42]
Here is my humble contribution to the subject matter contained in this thread.  I do commerical a/c work, and I find fired projectiles on rooftops all the time.  Some are just laying there, others are embedded in the roofing material.  Looking at the pictures, if you are familiar with the materials used in roofing, you'll notice what it is.  It takes real effort to drive a screwdriver into it, and I pull slugs from these roofs all the time, with channel locks because I can't do it with my fingers.  I have dozens of them to remind me, that what goes up, must come down.  Seems to me, if they can embed in these roofs, they can do the same with skulls.

Recent finds include 3 (what appear to be .308) rounds





3/21/2011 4:30:28 PM EDT
[#43]


So if the US filled a B-52 full of a few million 9mm bullets and dropped them over Tripoli we could wrap this thing up in a couple of days?    



3/21/2011 4:41:49 PM EDT
[#44]
WHO REALLY CARES ABOUT THE SMALL ARMS???

Did you see the guys shooting the RPG's straight into the air thinking they could hit the airplanes last week???

hhhhmmmmmm.......what do you think that fin stabilized HE round is going to do when it lands???
3/21/2011 4:50:03 PM EDT
[#45]
I can give a rats ass.  More dead Libyans the better.  I still remember them treating the Lockerbie bomber like a hero.
3/21/2011 5:02:04 PM EDT
[#46]
Clearly a bunch of third world neanderthals, they must need a strong dictatorship to keep them in line.
..We can bomb them all day long, but sooner or later, we have to install a friendly puppet government, and  send our war machine on to the next  oppressed population capable of  petroleum exports.
3/21/2011 5:08:09 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
I'm confused, when you bullets into the air, you're telling me they don't disappear?


They do if you shoot near a SuperMoon, they'll get sucked in by it's gravity.  
3/21/2011 5:16:21 PM EDT
[#48]
Oh this will be fun...popping the kettle corn
3/21/2011 5:17:20 PM EDT
[#49]
You silly people, it was not bullets that hurt those poor rebels; it was US airpower that missed the target. Damn, sounds like I could work for AL Jazeera.
3/21/2011 5:20:06 PM EDT
[#50]
Well...we had a guy get a celebratory round stuck in his shoulder armor in Iraq. (whenever they won some soccer game in the '06/07 timeframe)



And we had a kid in our AO that had one lodged behind his...left?...eye. The x-ray showed that bullet had come down at a pretty steep angle.



So...kill? Can. I know I wouldn't want to have a bullet lodged in my head, either.
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page