Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/14/2010 3:38:02 AM EDT















12/14/2010 3:43:52 AM EDT
[#1]

There are certainly some cool looking ones.





12/14/2010 3:47:19 AM EDT
[#2]
Not often you don't see one that's not crashing or on fire.
12/14/2010 3:48:24 AM EDT
[#3]
More MIGs please.
12/14/2010 3:52:03 AM EDT
[#4]
31 is a beast:







29 is gorgeous...







All previous are shite.
12/14/2010 4:32:00 AM EDT
[#5]


You sure that isn't a Su-27 or a variant? Those "vents" along the cockpit do look very MiG-29 like BUT.....

the -29's vertical stabilizers tilt outward a slight degree and those in the pic are essentially straight up. Further, the -29 has strakes from the stabilizer moving far forward into the wing and that bottom aircraft does not appear  to have such.



and the Su-27 in comparison:


It may just be the angle of the shot....but those verticals do catch the eye.
__________________________________________
("Hall, you sure that isn't coronary?"––Dr. Stone, (w,stte), "The Andromeda Strain")
12/14/2010 4:39:24 AM EDT
[#6]
The top picture is an SU-27 with a MIG-29 below it, judging by the vertical stabilizers
12/14/2010 4:40:07 AM EDT
[#7]
With a 29 underneath the 27
12/14/2010 4:40:58 AM EDT
[#8]
The 29 may be the most aesthetically pleasing aircraft ever to crash at an airshow.
12/14/2010 4:46:37 AM EDT
[#9]



Quoted:


With a 29 underneath the 27


Not like that's a foul.  The SU-27 and variants are some of the finest airframes on the planet.  



The thrust vectoring SU-30s give me wood:








 
12/14/2010 4:49:42 AM EDT
[#10]
They are some beautiful planes for sure, but I can say, at lease in the case of a Mig 15 or 17, the fit and finish on them is awful.  The skin panels don't fit together and they're all wavy.  Looks like a drunk with a hammer and anvil shapes them by hand....and he's in a hurry.
12/14/2010 4:51:24 AM EDT
[#11]
















And in before Primorsky.
12/14/2010 4:53:26 AM EDT
[#12]

 



12/14/2010 5:17:29 AM EDT
[#13]
12/14/2010 5:29:45 AM EDT
[#14]
In before comrade Primorsky.

I'm not old enough to remember the aura of mysticism around the Mig 25, but I remember the aura around the Mig 29 in the 1980s.  We were scared they would build an insane number of them (like they did with the 21s) and overwhelm our F18s and F16s with sheer numbers.  Personally I think our F15s would have handled the situation just fine, but at the time we were worried for sure.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
12/14/2010 5:43:51 AM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:


You sure that isn't a Su-27 or a variant? Those "vents" along the cockpit do look very MiG-29 like BUT.....

the -29's vertical stabilizers tilt outward a slight degree and those in the pic are essentially straight up. Further, the -29 has strakes from the stabilizer moving far forward into the wing and that bottom aircraft does not appear  to have such.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fighter/mig29/mig29_schem_01.gif
http://www.freewebs.com/kkenterprisesinc/Mig-29%203.jpg

and the Su-27 in comparison:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/images/su-27-vs-mig-29.gif

It may just be the angle of the shot....but those verticals do catch the eye.
__________________________________________
("Hall, you sure that isn't coronary?"––Dr. Stone, (w,stte), "The Andromeda Strain")


Also look at where the IRSTS is, the Fulcrum has it off to right side of the cockpit, whereas the Flankers have it smack dab in the middle.