stringy blood clots seen by morticians identified (Page 3 of 4)
|
Originally Posted By LetFreedomBeep: If i am reading This paper correctly i think it affirms what you are saying. I think it leaves room that covid could cause some clotting (the Campbell video alluded to some sightings of the clots in 2020 before the shots rolled out but the sightings went way up after shots were pushed hard). That paper also appears to suggest covid is not a suspect in myocarditis - i have seen many of the shot fans around here claim otherwise Originally Posted By LetFreedomBeep: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By planemaker: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: There is no question the side effects were understated. The question now is the long term effects. Are you having any? To date, the wild claims of such occurring on massive scale from a ticking time bomb, have all shown to be false. Even this topic - where in the other thread before this DUPE, a mortician joined in and said that's not new and he's always seen that. So once again, the youtube conspiracy ($click revenue generation$) source. Was bullshit. Again. Imagine if the same criteria of credibility and consistency that's applied to the FDA on this topic (which they admittedly have failed), were also applied to the constantly shown wrong and often mathematically impossible anti-Vax sources. The claims of massive scale negative effects long term aren't showing up. Memories seem short on Trust-The-NonScience-Made-Up-Shit. The "regulators" aren't seeing any of it because they aren't looking. Something is happening whether people want to admit it or not. This guy gets all his data from the CDC. He's doing the work we pay the CDC to do but are refusing to. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFwDJRKXEAAhCOY?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGQWZPsXYAAEe9l?format=jpg&name=large The flaw is that raise is all spuriously blamed on vaccination status with nothing credible backing that. Neglecting a whole lot of other COVID-national-overreaction other effects (alcohol, drugs, sedentary, depression, etc) The one time someone (who was traditionally credible) here Posted data saying it was vaccination, I took enough time to study it based on respect for the user - and no, it said the opposite. It did say the vaccine is pretty much completely useless now unless you booster in the last 3 weeks (!). But it also said being old-vaccinated didn't actually hurt either. Almost as if the treatment that is no longer effective at all if taken 2 years ago - is no longer having any effects. Imagine that. As to linkages, like the above, there is no actual link outside of youtube quality bullshit. Looking at the curves, you can see that the cancer rates from 2014-2019 were steadily increasing (but very slowly). If you look at 2021 forward, there is a divergence from what was already happening that is quite significant. The curves themselves don't tell us what the cause is, only that there has been something very significant happening since 2021. Figuring out what that is is *supposed* to be the CDC's job but they seem quite uninterested in finding the cause. Correlation is not causation. To date, there has no credible sourced linkage regression analysis showing an enhanced correlation of that with vaccination status. I'm sure there are youtube video's that make the claim though. Also, cancer has lead-time, so it's not that surprising it took a couple years of our global leaders breaking the whole damned world, for it to show up. There is a point were correlation becomes overwhelming...combine that with one-way messaging involved with censorship. So I would dismiss you as an arm-waving loon, but you're actually right, there was indeed censorship. There were questions about efficacy of the shot that were censored. And there were questions about the side-effects of the shot, that were censored. The challenge now is, does that censorship now validate every claim forever and ever? To the cynical, I guess the answer is yes. To me - no. The censorship has caused many to claim the shot therefore had no benefit. Which is actually quite false. Though it was way way WAYYY overstated as an immunization and to be forced on everyone because of that. So I can't say the cynicism isn't come by honesty; after that horseshit. We're about done with Jan 6th prosecutions, so Dear Washington, how about we devote those resources to investigating and prosecuting the fraud done on this topic in fact? Yea - we'll be waiting a while for that one. As to the censorship on side effects - again, that has resulted in an autoacceptance of all claims now regarding negative side-effects; which isn't true either. I actually don't have a "side" on this, just what's the actual truth. Truth is for most people in 2020-2022, the shot actually was the better path. And today in 2024, if you had the shot from then - you get fuck-all benefit from it still today, because it's gone and does nothing. And it's gone, and does nothing. When I looked, I've seen nothing to suggest from anything actually credible, that taking the shot that's gone, 3 years ago is actually correlating to the cancer rates at a higher degree than baseline. And I know enough medical community people, that if there was a "gee, this seems to be happening a lot and correlates to vaccination.., hmmm" I'd be hearing that by now - and I'm not. As to the current guidelines to take the booster shot about at the same frequency some people floss their teeth ... yea, I'm just going to politely decline - thanks. What I am hearing and seeing, is a steady stream of false anti-vax claims here. Much(but not all) of the anti-vax hysteria here is false, inspired by a somewhat defendable zeal what with the whole tyranny thing and fraudulently oversold nature of what the "vaccine" was - combined with basically the destruction of the 2020's decade globally by the same fuckstains. So there's that. I guess part of the frustration is the rigor of judgment at being lied to by the Vax pushers and government (which they did indeed lie), is not being applied with the same level to the extent of obvious lies being fed from the anti-vax side. Like the origin of this very thread, which is a lie, and is not new - as posted by one of AR15.com's own morticians in the other thread. I don't think the mortician/embalmer said it was a lie , only that he didn't see it . And , apparently not 100% have. Blood clots are a known issue with the shot though. The nature of the blood clots and mechanisms of action are also mostly known. MRNA shots are new and the tissues they target are indiscriminate unlike traditional vaccines that target specific tissues. It was a huge mistake , unless it wasn't a mistake . A covid infection rarely results in viremia. A covid vaccination always goes systemic . Blood-barriers are barriers for a reason. Arm waiving over. If i am reading This paper correctly i think it affirms what you are saying. I think it leaves room that covid could cause some clotting (the Campbell video alluded to some sightings of the clots in 2020 before the shots rolled out but the sightings went way up after shots were pushed hard). That paper also appears to suggest covid is not a suspect in myocarditis - i have seen many of the shot fans around here claim otherwise Excellent example. I think many people assumed since it was rarely said , that the virus just went all through your body every time . This is a false assumption and one that should have been cleared up early on . When the first and second waves came through viremia may have been more so , but it was still generally limited to those with advanced age or multiple comorbidities. It's another lie by omission. When you get the covid vaccine it automatically goes systemic. The Japanese did biodistribution studies very early on because " it stays in the arm " . The Cleveland Clinic study then showed that more shots equalled more infections. And , then you have IgG4 antibodies. First they used mass fear , then the carrot , finally the stick. Herded like cattle. |
|
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Excellent example. I think many people assumed since it was rarely said , that the virus just went all through your body every time . This is a false assumption and one that should have been cleared up early on . When the first and second waves came through viremia may have been more so , but it was still generally limited to those with advanced age or multiple comorbidities. It's another lie by omission. When you get the covid vaccine it automatically goes systemic. The Japanese did biodistribution studies very early on because " it stays in the arm " . The Cleveland Clinic study then showed that more shots equalled more infections. And , then you have IgG4 antibodies. First they used mass fear , then the carrot , finally the stick. Herded like cattle. Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By LetFreedomBeep: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By planemaker: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: There is no question the side effects were understated. The question now is the long term effects. Are you having any? To date, the wild claims of such occurring on massive scale from a ticking time bomb, have all shown to be false. Even this topic - where in the other thread before this DUPE, a mortician joined in and said that's not new and he's always seen that. So once again, the youtube conspiracy ($click revenue generation$) source. Was bullshit. Again. Imagine if the same criteria of credibility and consistency that's applied to the FDA on this topic (which they admittedly have failed), were also applied to the constantly shown wrong and often mathematically impossible anti-Vax sources. The claims of massive scale negative effects long term aren't showing up. Memories seem short on Trust-The-NonScience-Made-Up-Shit. The "regulators" aren't seeing any of it because they aren't looking. Something is happening whether people want to admit it or not. This guy gets all his data from the CDC. He's doing the work we pay the CDC to do but are refusing to. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFwDJRKXEAAhCOY?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGQWZPsXYAAEe9l?format=jpg&name=large The flaw is that raise is all spuriously blamed on vaccination status with nothing credible backing that. Neglecting a whole lot of other COVID-national-overreaction other effects (alcohol, drugs, sedentary, depression, etc) The one time someone (who was traditionally credible) here Posted data saying it was vaccination, I took enough time to study it based on respect for the user - and no, it said the opposite. It did say the vaccine is pretty much completely useless now unless you booster in the last 3 weeks (!). But it also said being old-vaccinated didn't actually hurt either. Almost as if the treatment that is no longer effective at all if taken 2 years ago - is no longer having any effects. Imagine that. As to linkages, like the above, there is no actual link outside of youtube quality bullshit. Looking at the curves, you can see that the cancer rates from 2014-2019 were steadily increasing (but very slowly). If you look at 2021 forward, there is a divergence from what was already happening that is quite significant. The curves themselves don't tell us what the cause is, only that there has been something very significant happening since 2021. Figuring out what that is is *supposed* to be the CDC's job but they seem quite uninterested in finding the cause. Correlation is not causation. To date, there has no credible sourced linkage regression analysis showing an enhanced correlation of that with vaccination status. I'm sure there are youtube video's that make the claim though. Also, cancer has lead-time, so it's not that surprising it took a couple years of our global leaders breaking the whole damned world, for it to show up. There is a point were correlation becomes overwhelming...combine that with one-way messaging involved with censorship. So I would dismiss you as an arm-waving loon, but you're actually right, there was indeed censorship. There were questions about efficacy of the shot that were censored. And there were questions about the side-effects of the shot, that were censored. The challenge now is, does that censorship now validate every claim forever and ever? To the cynical, I guess the answer is yes. To me - no. The censorship has caused many to claim the shot therefore had no benefit. Which is actually quite false. Though it was way way WAYYY overstated as an immunization and to be forced on everyone because of that. So I can't say the cynicism isn't come by honesty; after that horseshit. We're about done with Jan 6th prosecutions, so Dear Washington, how about we devote those resources to investigating and prosecuting the fraud done on this topic in fact? Yea - we'll be waiting a while for that one. As to the censorship on side effects - again, that has resulted in an autoacceptance of all claims now regarding negative side-effects; which isn't true either. I actually don't have a "side" on this, just what's the actual truth. Truth is for most people in 2020-2022, the shot actually was the better path. And today in 2024, if you had the shot from then - you get fuck-all benefit from it still today, because it's gone and does nothing. And it's gone, and does nothing. When I looked, I've seen nothing to suggest from anything actually credible, that taking the shot that's gone, 3 years ago is actually correlating to the cancer rates at a higher degree than baseline. And I know enough medical community people, that if there was a "gee, this seems to be happening a lot and correlates to vaccination.., hmmm" I'd be hearing that by now - and I'm not. As to the current guidelines to take the booster shot about at the same frequency some people floss their teeth ... yea, I'm just going to politely decline - thanks. What I am hearing and seeing, is a steady stream of false anti-vax claims here. Much(but not all) of the anti-vax hysteria here is false, inspired by a somewhat defendable zeal what with the whole tyranny thing and fraudulently oversold nature of what the "vaccine" was - combined with basically the destruction of the 2020's decade globally by the same fuckstains. So there's that. I guess part of the frustration is the rigor of judgment at being lied to by the Vax pushers and government (which they did indeed lie), is not being applied with the same level to the extent of obvious lies being fed from the anti-vax side. Like the origin of this very thread, which is a lie, and is not new - as posted by one of AR15.com's own morticians in the other thread. I don't think the mortician/embalmer said it was a lie , only that he didn't see it . And , apparently not 100% have. Blood clots are a known issue with the shot though. The nature of the blood clots and mechanisms of action are also mostly known. MRNA shots are new and the tissues they target are indiscriminate unlike traditional vaccines that target specific tissues. It was a huge mistake , unless it wasn't a mistake . A covid infection rarely results in viremia. A covid vaccination always goes systemic . Blood-barriers are barriers for a reason. Arm waiving over. If i am reading This paper correctly i think it affirms what you are saying. I think it leaves room that covid could cause some clotting (the Campbell video alluded to some sightings of the clots in 2020 before the shots rolled out but the sightings went way up after shots were pushed hard). That paper also appears to suggest covid is not a suspect in myocarditis - i have seen many of the shot fans around here claim otherwise Excellent example. I think many people assumed since it was rarely said , that the virus just went all through your body every time . This is a false assumption and one that should have been cleared up early on . When the first and second waves came through viremia may have been more so , but it was still generally limited to those with advanced age or multiple comorbidities. It's another lie by omission. When you get the covid vaccine it automatically goes systemic. The Japanese did biodistribution studies very early on because " it stays in the arm " . The Cleveland Clinic study then showed that more shots equalled more infections. And , then you have IgG4 antibodies. First they used mass fear , then the carrot , finally the stick. Herded like cattle. Thank you - i think i see this false assumption used by the shot fans ad nauseum in every one of these threads, never made sense. |
|
Originally Posted By LetFreedomBeep: If i am reading This paper correctly i think it affirms what you are saying. I think it leaves room that covid could cause some clotting (the Campbell video alluded to some sightings of the clots in 2020 before the shots rolled out but the sightings went way up after shots were pushed hard). That paper also appears to suggest covid is not a suspect in myocarditis - i have seen many of the shot fans around here claim otherwise At that time there were sheep enrolled in clinical trials...
|
|
Alabama embalmer interviewed by Dr. Campbell. Summary: These white stringy clots are different than 'normal' clots he has seen over his 23 years of embalming, and he first started seeing these white stringy clots in 2021. Not all deceased persons have these clots, but he estimated half of his cases now have these new-looking clots present. Dr. Campbell indicated this may be a new disease/pathology and it needs to be investigated. Part 1 (13 minutes) ![]() White clots USA Part 2 - (7 minutes) Summary: Continues discussion and shows pics of the whitish, fibrous, stringy clots from the deceased (as well as pics from live patients provided by other medical sources). ![]() White clots USA, Part 2 |
|
Originally Posted By zeekh: You would think. My tin foil side says what if blood backs can't say anything because it would be so wide spread Originally Posted By zeekh: Originally Posted By California_Kid: Originally Posted By TNC: I'd expect to see those blobs in the blood supply provided by jabbed donors. Doc's discussion is perfectly pitched to the layperson, very clear eyed and well informed. One might assume that blood banks would notice something like that. ![]() You would think. My tin foil side says what if blood backs can't say anything because it would be so wide spread It cleverly relied on the subversion of the government of every country in the world, the entire medical community of doctors, nurses, phlebotomists, data entry clerks, janitors, administrators, medical researchers, every single scientist in every single scientific discipline, the entire pharma industry, local pharmacists, the media, the CIA, FBI, NSA, the US Congress, State and local legislators, the US military, School administrators, the Federal, state and municipal courts, every lawyer in America, and the spouses and families of all the people...and kept them quiet for over three years now. What's more, the planning that went into it fair boggles the mind. It took years to put the pieces into place. The mastermind used Fauci to illegally contract with the lab in Wuhan to engineer a bioweapon, then had the Chinese government incubate it in their own population and release it, then had Big Pharma-those genocidal demon bastards-create another bioweapon posing as a "vaccine", then activated the aforementioned conspiracy apparatus to both force the vaccine bioweapon on every human alive in order to achieve his Grand Design: the elimination of the human race except for a few hundred thousand slaves, although I'm not quite clear on who the slaves are supposed to be drawn from. The people killed by the clot shot or the people who died from Covid? Meanwhile, the Master Plan caused massive destruction to the world economy in order to weaken resistance and transfer the majority of the world's wealth to the Cabal of co-conspirators so that they could buy up enough Mountain House and ammo to supply their castles as the human race dies off precipitously and the world economy disappears along with all manufacturing, infrastructure and supply. The Master Mind(let's just call him what he is: THE ANTICHRIST), will then live in splendid isolation with his harem of sex slaves and former US military zombies to protect him from the few people left in the world while his plantation slaves grow non-GMO(Don't get me started!) corn to feed him as he enjoys his 12th century lifestyle for the rest of his short life. Christ, we don't have a chance against such brilliant Evil, a mind so subtle and determined. |
|
Originally Posted By OzarkOkie: I really don't care what a CNA has to say on the matter. Originally Posted By OzarkOkie: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: What , that spike protein and its subsequent product amyloid fibrils cause blood clots ? I really don't care what a CNA has to say on the matter. That's a shitty thing to say to a nurse . * been at it a few decades . Before that I was a combat medic . |
|
Doctors everywhere are posting videos of shot clots being removed. This is gotta be some scary stuff for vaccinated folks https://twitter.com/DiedSuddenly_/status/1759394682973356455 |
|
Another exemplary Nurse though with a PHD . https://youtu.be/XSKT4k6Kr34?si=KH2f6Lo-CS19cn31 ![]() Loss of lives |
|
Originally Posted By Mike_Anthony: Doctors everywhere are posting videos of shot clots being removed. This is gotta be some scary stuff for vaccinated folks https://twitter.com/DiedSuddenly_/status/1759394682973356455 Already pulled |
|
Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Once you notice his postings they kind of stand out for completely lacking anything of value. Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: That's a shitty thing to say to a nurse . * been at it a few decades . Before that I was a combat medic . Once you notice his postings they kind of stand out for completely lacking anything of value. He's made quite an impression with me already!
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy:
That's not chicken fat , grape jelly , or coffee ground . They need to do the amyloid diagnostic on it. |
|
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: That's not chicken fat , grape jelly , or coffee ground . They need to do the amyloid diagnostic on it. Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy:
That's not chicken fat , grape jelly , or coffee ground . They need to do the amyloid diagnostic on it. I'd like to see a complete analysis showing all of the components from multiple samples and from different regions to see if they are the same or if there are variations. Just based on the reports, there were various batches (ex. howbadismybatch.com) with varying ingredients and contaminants. I feel confident that these have been analyzed, especially by pfizer, etc. but I have yet to see a full assay report in the wild. |
|
Originally Posted By OzarkOkie: I really don't care what a CNA has to say on the matter. Virus’s can cause myocarditis and inflammation and even damage the heart. Its proven that the vaccine has a substantial quantity of spike protein over a natural infection. Would it it be so hard to believe? |
|
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395759/ https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.2c03925 So the spike proteins are implicated in recruiting neutrophils. The neutrophils induce amyloid fibrils . The amyloid reacts further with fibrinogen . A vicious cycle of inflammation and building insoluble clots . |
Whistle blower report of stringy white clots in live patients. Consider this as anecdotal until confirmed.![]() Whistleblower - Embalmer Type Clots Occurring in the Living? |
|
Originally Posted By darkd0r: Whistle blower report of stringy white clots in live patients. Consider this as anecdotal until confirmed. It was from one of Dr McMillan's " covid congress panels" I believe around Oct 2023 that one of the Dr's commented on the spike proteins " spider webbing" . It barely stuck out in my mind but after the fact I recalled it and went back to see if there was anything to this mechanism...and there was , actual lab studies that showed neutrophil elastace inducing this very thing . The fact that these clots do not dissolve like typical clots with the usual protocol of heparin are an indicator that amyloid is involved. Thankfully there are also studies on Nattokinase that show it does degrade this type protein. The Dr in this interview points out that we have people from 1-8 shots . To me , there is a stratification of risk ; on the low end its just spike protein ( same as with just covid ) ...starting about shots 2-3 you start to get IgG4 antibodies ( a new risk factor) ...shots 4 and beyond its shear spike load and resulting feedstock for amyloid . All that does not incorporate the variables of LNP toxicity, mrna pseudouridine, "hot" shots , or the wildcard of plasmid dna contamination. The good thing about Dr McMillan's videos is due to his slow cadence you can listen at 1.75x playback and he sounds Normal. Anecdotal evidence should be investigated. Correlation doesn't prove cause but enough of it and there is another indicator for further investigation. There should be no effort to sweep under the rug or look the other way . |
![]() Embalmers’ Clots - How Can They Form Pre-mortem? Clots in the living |
|
Originally Posted By turinreza: did you even look at the video? they centrifuge to get the white blob. blood banks won't notice it, they don't centrifuge (spin) blood Originally Posted By turinreza: Originally Posted By California_Kid: One might assume that blood banks would notice something like that. ![]() did you even look at the video? they centrifuge to get the white blob. blood banks won't notice it, they don't centrifuge (spin) blood Ya they do; I've done it. Spin it and RBCs sink to the bottom, bag goes in a press to extract plasma. |
|
Originally Posted By TNC: How long does the mRNA persist in a jabbed patient? Does it keep circulating for a long period of time, producing more spike protein, or is it cleared by the kidneys, liver, or by decomposing? Then they encapsulated the mRNA and it could get into the cells. IIRC, and I am not going to look it up, it still resulted in only about 50% survived long enough to get into the cells. It isn't supposed to last long, and each mRNA strand only infects 1 cell, goes into the cytoplasm and produces 1 spike protein just like any body made mRNA made by the cell only produces 1 protein each. That is what I remember, but I question everything these days, I have no idea if any of that is true. |
Nobody is coming to save us.
.
|
Originally Posted By Mach: The earlier studies using mRNA directly without being encapsulated by lipids resulted in deterioration of the mRNA before any could get into the cells. Then they encapsulated the mRNA and it could get into the cells. IIRC, and I am not going to look it up, it still resulted in only about 50% survived long enough to get into the cells. It isn't supposed to last long, and each mRNA strand only infects 1 cell, goes into the cytoplasm and produces 1 spike protein just like any body made mRNA made by the cell only produces 1 protein each. That is what I remember, but I question everything these days, I have no idea if any of that is true. Originally Posted By Mach: Originally Posted By TNC: How long does the mRNA persist in a jabbed patient? Does it keep circulating for a long period of time, producing more spike protein, or is it cleared by the kidneys, liver, or by decomposing? Then they encapsulated the mRNA and it could get into the cells. IIRC, and I am not going to look it up, it still resulted in only about 50% survived long enough to get into the cells. It isn't supposed to last long, and each mRNA strand only infects 1 cell, goes into the cytoplasm and produces 1 spike protein just like any body made mRNA made by the cell only produces 1 protein each. That is what I remember, but I question everything these days, I have no idea if any of that is true. The transfected cells express spike protein until they burst or the body attacks it and the contents get expelled . The bad thing about mrna is that they replaced the the uridines with ones that don't break down so they can go on to transfect other cells . https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10165024/ |
|
You'll see a part in here where it's discussed that the modified proteins are not able to be broken down well from endogenous or exogenous enzymes ....like neutrophil elastase . Biological roadblocks . https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/prp2.1218 |
|
Originally Posted By MacMunnford: the jabbed have permanently altered their DNA they will never be rid of it making way for the replacement class That’s an interesting claim. Any proof to back it up? Given the vast numbers of people who have done 23&me, Ancestry DNA, etc, it should be very easy to find a patient who gave DNA and then got the jab. Thus, documenting the changes in their DNA would be a simple matter of a retest. Have any examples of this happening? |
“ If you rat on the Parade of Hope, you'll be lucky to find your toenails. These guys are the roughest of all the charities.”
|
Originally Posted By W_E_G: The Pharma companies have been given immunity in the courts for their demonic behavior. I guess they will have to be held to account in some other manner. They did THIS to me. All over my body from my armpits to my ankles Two days after MODERNA jab #2 https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/105614/covid_bullseyes_jpg-2786557.JPG |
|
Originally Posted By zeekh: You would think. My tin foil side says what if blood backs can't say anything because it would be so wide spread Amalgam fillings in teeth are a great example of this. (who'd of thought that mixing lead & mercury with a stick & putting them in your mouth was a bad idea) It became illegal in most of the world except the UK & US who continued the practice & tried to keep it quiet to not cause a panic. Likely that most reading this have some in their mouth. Some people are just way more sensitive to the effects of heavy metals. Much like the jab they screwed the health of a lot of people just to avoid admitting they were wrong. |
|
Originally Posted By ParityError: That’s an interesting claim. Any proof to back it up? Given the vast numbers of people who have done 23&me, Ancestry DNA, etc, it should be very easy to find a patient who gave DNA and then got the jab. Thus, documenting the changes in their DNA would be a simple matter of a retest. Have any examples of this happening? Originally Posted By ParityError: Originally Posted By MacMunnford: the jabbed have permanently altered their DNA they will never be rid of it making way for the replacement class That’s an interesting claim. Any proof to back it up? Given the vast numbers of people who have done 23&me, Ancestry DNA, etc, it should be very easy to find a patient who gave DNA and then got the jab. Thus, documenting the changes in their DNA would be a simple matter of a retest. Have any examples of this happening? Why would anyone do those DNA tests twice? Also, those DNA tests for familial relatedness wont show changes that affect gene expression |
|
Humm, some will deny the source but “peer reviewed” study inside: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-news-twice-censored-landmark?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true “The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to-date, providing robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, has been officially republished following successful peer-review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law: A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination. This comes after unethical censorship on two occasions: first, removal from Preprints with the Lancet and later, withdrawal by Elsevier after publication in Forensic Science International. “ |
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
|
Originally Posted By ParityError: That’s an interesting claim. Any proof to back it up? Given the vast numbers of people who have done 23&me, Ancestry DNA, etc, it should be very easy to find a patient who gave DNA and then got the jab. Thus, documenting the changes in their DNA would be a simple matter of a retest. Have any examples of this happening? Originally Posted By ParityError: Originally Posted By MacMunnford: the jabbed have permanently altered their DNA they will never be rid of it making way for the replacement class That’s an interesting claim. Any proof to back it up? Given the vast numbers of people who have done 23&me, Ancestry DNA, etc, it should be very easy to find a patient who gave DNA and then got the jab. Thus, documenting the changes in their DNA would be a simple matter of a retest. Have any examples of this happening? Those services aren't a whole genome sequence. |
Colonialism, bringing ethnic diversity to a continent near you. - My Father
Me being brief, this is like seeing a comet - Geralt55
|
Originally Posted By ParityError: That’s an interesting claim. Any proof to back it up? Given the vast numbers of people who have done 23&me, Ancestry DNA, etc, it should be very easy to find a patient who gave DNA and then got the jab. Thus, documenting the changes in their DNA would be a simple matter of a retest. Have any examples of this happening? the mRNA didn't transfect every cell in the body. It's been proven in the lab to alter the DNA of liver cells. This has been known for almost 3 years now. Would also explain why they're still finding spike protein in people that were vaccinated 3.5 years ago but no other sign of any of the rest the virus. There is no off switch. The lab rats are now GMO's.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73 |
|
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: That's a shitty thing to say to a nurse . * been at it a few decades . Before that I was a combat medic . Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By OzarkOkie: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: What , that spike protein and its subsequent product amyloid fibrils cause blood clots ? I really don't care what a CNA has to say on the matter. That's a shitty thing to say to a nurse . * been at it a few decades . Before that I was a combat medic . He's here because he's curious, and he's mad because he got it and you are giving him cause for concern. He thinks he can appeal to authority and credentialism and somehow you'll be wrong and he'll be fine, but that changes nothing and it certainly doesn't change the results of those peer reviewed studies. Hopefully he had the right variables working in his favor; the whole vaccine payload was as intramuscular as possible to avoid heart issues, it came from a good lot with minimal DNA fragment contamination to avoid cancer risks down the road, and some level of genetic resilience, etc. |
|
Originally Posted By California_Kid: That's an impressive pile of bullshit right there. You cannot read my mind. I'll even hazard a guess that you can't tell how many fingers I am holding up now. ![]() Originally Posted By California_Kid: Originally Posted By jRob: He is clearly someone who wrestles internally with his decision to get jabbed up and knows deep down inside he shouldn't have. Yet it's permanent and he cannot have it taken out of him. So instead of admitting it was a huge mistake (quite possible the biggest mistake he's ever made), he wants to respond to those on a forum who are posting useful, and informative new data, telling them they are wrong in various ways. Anything to help him sleep at night. There are likely millions like him, he just uses the forums to vent out these feelings he will never be able to shake. They nag at him day in and day out. Rarely leaving his daily thoughts. That's why he keeps visiting the COVID forum section. There is no other logical reason to do so if someone is at peace about their decision to jab an unknown substance into their body. He will continue to visit this sub forum because, again he is being eaten up inside about the permanent decision he made. Completely permanent. Not like getting married (you can get divorced), not like buying a home and having a mortgage (you can walk away from the home), not like having children (you can be a dick and leave your children). Those are arguably the most important decisions you can make in life and you can basically walk away from each of them. The COVID jabs you CANNOT walk away from. You cannot reverse them. You cannot take it out. It is damaging them every minute and will continue to damage them every minute of the remainder of their life. That's an impressive pile of bullshit right there. You cannot read my mind. I'll even hazard a guess that you can't tell how many fingers I am holding up now. ![]() |
|
Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy: the mRNA didn't transfect every cell in the body. It's been proven in the lab to alter the DNA of liver cells. This has been known for almost 3 years now. Would also explain why they're still finding spike protein in people that were vaccinated 3.5 years ago but no other sign of any of the rest the virus. There is no off switch. The lab rats are now GMO's.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73 Just as a note - the mRNA vaccines haven't been proven to do anything to normal liver cells. It has been shown that a specific line of liver cancer cells can reverse transcript some of the RNA from the Pfizer-Biontech Covid vaccine into DNA. This is a property of the cancer cell, not of the Pfizer vaccine (or vaccines in general). Please note that the study specifically calls out the Huh7 cell line, which is a carcinoma cell line from a liver tumor sample obtained in 1982. That specific liver cancer cell line has been used in research for many years due to its unique properties. For example, it was this cell line which first allowed researchers to culture the Hepatitus C virus in 2005 (notably, this is an RNA virus), and has been used extensively in the development of drugs for treating Hepatitus C. Mike |
A bit of an update, since this seems to have fallen of the MSM's radar (I'm sure that was purely an oversight, not intentional). ![]() White clot science |
|
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Go to 57:57 . * Neutrophil elastase ; it transforms s-protein into a big stringy web ** an interesting thought is these spike proteins can persist over a year and any infection that activates the Neutrophils could activate this enzyme. |
Nobody is coming to save us.
.
|
Originally Posted By California_Kid: Viral vector vaccines have only been around for about 50 years. I guess you could call them traditional. Yes, spike protein is a bad actor. Originally Posted By California_Kid: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By California_Kid: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: I believe the j&j used modified viruses to deliver rna .... The no-longer-available J&J COVID-19 vaccine used an adenovirus vector to deliver a fragment of SARS-CoV-2 viral DNA into patients' cells, causing them to manufacture the spike protein. Ah , got it . It never became important for me to know for sure haha. It was a traditional vaccine . Making spike protein is bad news still. Viral vector vaccines have only been around for about 50 years. I guess you could call them traditional. Yes, spike protein is a bad actor. Traditional Viral Vector vaccines do not carry altered DNA so that the cell makes the mRNA for the cytoplasm to make a protein. It is a nonpathogenic virus that is altered to include some protein from the vaccine virus target and it can not replicate. It enters the cell, enters the nucleus and sits there and mimics an infection, and the body makes immune cells against the selected pathogenic proteins that were put in the vector virus. The nucleus is inert. It does not make mRNA for the cytoplasm to make viral proteins like the spike proten. It delivers the viral protein directly to the cell, then the immune system works against the viral protein. The J&J vaccine was just as experimental as the mRNA vaccines because the caused the cell to make the mRNA were as the mRNA vaccines delivered the mRNA directly. |
Nobody is coming to save us.
.
|
Originally Posted By planemaker: Looking at the curves, you can see that the cancer rates from 2014-2019 were steadily increasing (but very slowly). If you look at 2021 forward, there is a divergence from what was already happening that is quite significant. The curves themselves don't tell us what the cause is, only that there has been something very significant happening since 2021. Figuring out what that is is *supposed* to be the CDC's job but they seem quite uninterested in finding the cause. Originally Posted By planemaker: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: There is no question the side effects were understated. The question now is the long term effects. Are you having any? To date, the wild claims of such occurring on massive scale from a ticking time bomb, have all shown to be false. Even this topic - where in the other thread before this DUPE, a mortician joined in and said that's not new and he's always seen that. So once again, the youtube conspiracy ($click revenue generation$) source. Was bullshit. Again. Imagine if the same criteria of credibility and consistency that's applied to the FDA on this topic (which they admittedly have failed), were also applied to the constantly shown wrong and often mathematically impossible anti-Vax sources. The claims of massive scale negative effects long term aren't showing up. Memories seem short on Trust-The-NonScience-Made-Up-Shit. The "regulators" aren't seeing any of it because they aren't looking. Something is happening whether people want to admit it or not. This guy gets all his data from the CDC. He's doing the work we pay the CDC to do but are refusing to. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFwDJRKXEAAhCOY?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGQWZPsXYAAEe9l?format=jpg&name=large The flaw is that raise is all spuriously blamed on vaccination status with nothing credible backing that. Neglecting a whole lot of other COVID-national-overreaction other effects (alcohol, drugs, sedentary, depression, etc) The one time someone (who was traditionally credible) here Posted data saying it was vaccination, I took enough time to study it based on respect for the user - and no, it said the opposite. It did say the vaccine is pretty much completely useless now unless you booster in the last 3 weeks (!). But it also said being old-vaccinated didn't actually hurt either. Almost as if the treatment that is no longer effective at all if taken 2 years ago - is no longer having any effects. Imagine that. As to linkages, like the above, there is no actual link outside of youtube quality bullshit. Looking at the curves, you can see that the cancer rates from 2014-2019 were steadily increasing (but very slowly). If you look at 2021 forward, there is a divergence from what was already happening that is quite significant. The curves themselves don't tell us what the cause is, only that there has been something very significant happening since 2021. Figuring out what that is is *supposed* to be the CDC's job but they seem quite uninterested in finding the cause. |
Nobody is coming to save us.
.
|
Originally Posted By Mach: It could simply be because people stopped getting routine screening for cancer during 2020. Originally Posted By Mach: Originally Posted By planemaker: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: There is no question the side effects were understated. The question now is the long term effects. Are you having any? To date, the wild claims of such occurring on massive scale from a ticking time bomb, have all shown to be false. Even this topic - where in the other thread before this DUPE, a mortician joined in and said that's not new and he's always seen that. So once again, the youtube conspiracy ($click revenue generation$) source. Was bullshit. Again. Imagine if the same criteria of credibility and consistency that's applied to the FDA on this topic (which they admittedly have failed), were also applied to the constantly shown wrong and often mathematically impossible anti-Vax sources. The claims of massive scale negative effects long term aren't showing up. Memories seem short on Trust-The-NonScience-Made-Up-Shit. The "regulators" aren't seeing any of it because they aren't looking. Something is happening whether people want to admit it or not. This guy gets all his data from the CDC. He's doing the work we pay the CDC to do but are refusing to. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFwDJRKXEAAhCOY?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGQWZPsXYAAEe9l?format=jpg&name=large The flaw is that raise is all spuriously blamed on vaccination status with nothing credible backing that. Neglecting a whole lot of other COVID-national-overreaction other effects (alcohol, drugs, sedentary, depression, etc) The one time someone (who was traditionally credible) here Posted data saying it was vaccination, I took enough time to study it based on respect for the user - and no, it said the opposite. It did say the vaccine is pretty much completely useless now unless you booster in the last 3 weeks (!). But it also said being old-vaccinated didn't actually hurt either. Almost as if the treatment that is no longer effective at all if taken 2 years ago - is no longer having any effects. Imagine that. As to linkages, like the above, there is no actual link outside of youtube quality bullshit. Looking at the curves, you can see that the cancer rates from 2014-2019 were steadily increasing (but very slowly). If you look at 2021 forward, there is a divergence from what was already happening that is quite significant. The curves themselves don't tell us what the cause is, only that there has been something very significant happening since 2021. Figuring out what that is is *supposed* to be the CDC's job but they seem quite uninterested in finding the cause. Except for the fact that now it is trending to younger patients that ordinarily wouldn't be screening at all . |
|
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Except for the fact that now it is trending to younger patients that ordinarily wouldn't be screening at all . Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Originally Posted By Mach: Originally Posted By planemaker: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: There is no question the side effects were understated. The question now is the long term effects. Are you having any? To date, the wild claims of such occurring on massive scale from a ticking time bomb, have all shown to be false. Even this topic - where in the other thread before this DUPE, a mortician joined in and said that's not new and he's always seen that. So once again, the youtube conspiracy ($click revenue generation$) source. Was bullshit. Again. Imagine if the same criteria of credibility and consistency that's applied to the FDA on this topic (which they admittedly have failed), were also applied to the constantly shown wrong and often mathematically impossible anti-Vax sources. The claims of massive scale negative effects long term aren't showing up. Memories seem short on Trust-The-NonScience-Made-Up-Shit. The "regulators" aren't seeing any of it because they aren't looking. Something is happening whether people want to admit it or not. This guy gets all his data from the CDC. He's doing the work we pay the CDC to do but are refusing to. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFwDJRKXEAAhCOY?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGQWZPsXYAAEe9l?format=jpg&name=large The flaw is that raise is all spuriously blamed on vaccination status with nothing credible backing that. Neglecting a whole lot of other COVID-national-overreaction other effects (alcohol, drugs, sedentary, depression, etc) The one time someone (who was traditionally credible) here Posted data saying it was vaccination, I took enough time to study it based on respect for the user - and no, it said the opposite. It did say the vaccine is pretty much completely useless now unless you booster in the last 3 weeks (!). But it also said being old-vaccinated didn't actually hurt either. Almost as if the treatment that is no longer effective at all if taken 2 years ago - is no longer having any effects. Imagine that. As to linkages, like the above, there is no actual link outside of youtube quality bullshit. Looking at the curves, you can see that the cancer rates from 2014-2019 were steadily increasing (but very slowly). If you look at 2021 forward, there is a divergence from what was already happening that is quite significant. The curves themselves don't tell us what the cause is, only that there has been something very significant happening since 2021. Figuring out what that is is *supposed* to be the CDC's job but they seem quite uninterested in finding the cause. Except for the fact that now it is trending to younger patients that ordinarily wouldn't be screening at all . more than it had been due to crappy diets and poison in the food? Like it is trending up faster than it was trending up the last 15 years? If so, that is really bad. If the spike protein damages artery walls, then that leads directly to CVD. Has than trending line accelerated up? |
Nobody is coming to save us.
.








