|
Originally Posted By Oldgold: I want to know if MJ 12 is real and the truth about Roswell. That would open Pandora’s box. MJ12 is real. Been there and got the hat.
|
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
|
Originally Posted By dukeofearl: Maybe the government agencies are doing everything they can to obstruct because, due to the mysterious deaths and disappearances of potential whistleblowers, investigations could result. I think this is most likely. The misappropriation of funds, people threatened/harmed/killed to keep secrets, and any other devious stuff going on. They don’t want people looking into it too deeply. You’d have to give complete amnesty for anything related to even have a chance at getting to the real truth. |
|
It’s still all grainy, FLIR or abstract, old microfiche-documents. It’s still material in the realm of mundane evidence. It’s evidence, real evidence, don’t get me wrong, but not enough for ontological shock. It’s enough to move the ball forward again. You know… i dont think it will just continue to inch forward. It’s starting to actually roll. I think we will get clear photos of craft next, film style. Then the digital stills and 4k videos of craft. The biologics next. And by then people will be ready for the real meat of it. What are their purpose and what do they want. |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
So far only two videos stand out as being interesting. The high res video of an orb flying over a ME village. And the “starburst” IR video. I need to go back and look at the orb video for a shadow shape and location. If there’s no shadow, it could be a balloon at a higher elevation giving the appearance of a faster speed. Some of the X videos are clearly fakes. I’m disappointed in how many people are jumping in without any critical thinking. |
|
Originally Posted By sq40: It’s still all grainy, FLIR or abstract, old microfiche-documents. It’s still material in the realm of mundane evidence. It’s evidence, real evidence, don’t get me wrong, but not enough for ontological shock. It’s enough to move the ball forward again. You know… i dont think it will just continue to inch forward. It’s starting to actually roll. I think we will get clear photos of craft next, film style. Then the digital stills and 4k videos of craft. The biologics next. And by then people will be ready for the real meat of it. What are their purpose and what do they want. What they have shown so far isn't any more fantastic than what is out there in the public already, but the difference is that these images/videos are from the DoW, which has greater context on their provenance, and is claiming to have no explanation for them. Either they are legit, or we are being intentionally misled by the military. |
|
National Archives made their first drop: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps Attached File https://catalog.archives.gov/id/218517913 Attached File https://catalog.archives.gov/id/295136829 |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By sq40: It’s still all grainy, FLIR or abstract, old microfiche-documents. It’s still material in the realm of mundane evidence. It’s evidence, real evidence, don’t get me wrong, but not enough for ontological shock. It’s enough to move the ball forward again. You know… i dont think it will just continue to inch forward. It’s starting to actually roll. I think we will get clear photos of craft next, film style. Then the digital stills and 4k videos of craft. The biologics next. And by then people will be ready for the real meat of it. What are their purpose and what do they want. I agree. I’ll skim through this stuff but wait for the people I generally trust (Gerb, Coulthart, Knapp, Michels, Ramsey, etc.) to find patterns and connections. Jesse Michels and UAPGerb I’m thinking of in particular for the connections to things they’ve already talked about. People who have far more time to devote to it than I do. |
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Lovell and Borman 1965 ![]() LISTEN: Pentagon Releases Audio Of Gemini 7 Mission Astronauts Encountering Unidentified Object |
|
Originally Posted By macman37: I agree. I’ll skim through this stuff but wait for the people I generally trust (Gerb, Coulthart, Knapp, Michels, Ramsey, etc.) to find patterns and connections. Jesse Michels and UAPGerb I’m thinking of in particular for the connections to things they’ve already talked about. People who have far more time to devote to it than I do. Same here. I did a quick scan and posted a couple of Apollo pics. So far I’ve only seen Ross Coulthart do a piece on it. Waiting for the experts and their analysis'. |
|
May 8th 2026 was Disclosure Day. Hard for that to really sink in for me. But it happened. It’s just the start of the “Disclosure Years”, but it’s a significant date. |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: May 8th 2026 was Disclosure Day. Hard for that to really sink in for me. But it happened. It’s just the start of the “Disclosure Years”, but it’s a significant date. Truly we should all remember 5/8/26 as a momentous date in history. |
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
A52’s Commentary on for the video releases: ![]() ALL Government UFO Videos Explained. |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
Hmmmm. Here is an interesting alternative explanation for the windmill video:![]() The Pentagon's Wind Farm UFO Video - Explained Any thoughts on this? |
|
Makes sense to me. But I’m a huge skeptic when it comes to UFOs. I enjoy watching and ready stuff but take it all with a grain of salt. At my house I have a large ridge line about 1mi from my house. I could setup a camera and catch orbs about every night that float and disappear. Same as that mountain in NC I believe that’s been filmed so many times. It’s actually commercial aircraft climbing out of harts field Jackson airport in Atlanta which is like 90miles away. Once the aircraft plane out either there lights are turned off or they plane out in a way where they are no longer visible. But it would be super easy to say it’s a ufo. I could even show on Adsb no aircraft in the area but if one is to zoom out you would then see them. This whole drop from .gov has been pretty underwhelming for me. |
|
Attached File |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_5855_jpeg-3760686.JPG I'm going to be like Missouri here.. show me. |
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
|
Originally Posted By Finslayer83: I'm going to be like Missouri here.. show me. Yup, same here. Obviously (to me) these are not all some easily explained phenomena. When they are tracked by multiple sensors and human eyes doing things that can't be done by us, something very interesting is going on. Having said that, so far I am not impressed. Show me the high def, indisputable videos. Hopefully Trump and his people will not be intimidated by the man bun bureaucrats into settling for less. |
|
Originally Posted By sq40: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_5855_jpeg-3760686.JPG On the last one, intercepting our guys while wearing an alien mask is the kind of thing I would want to do if I was piloting a secret antigravity craft. |
|
Originally Posted By castlebravo84: On the last one, intercepting our guys while wearing an alien mask is the kind of thing I would want to do if I was piloting a secret antigravity craft. Originally Posted By castlebravo84: Originally Posted By sq40: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_5855_jpeg-3760686.JPG On the last one, intercepting our guys while wearing an alien mask is the kind of thing I would want to do if I was piloting a secret antigravity craft. Not going to lie, that would be pretty funny. |
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
|
Originally Posted By castlebravo84: On the last one, intercepting our guys while wearing an alien mask is the kind of thing I would want to do if I was piloting a secret antigravity craft. Originally Posted By castlebravo84: Originally Posted By sq40: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_5855_jpeg-3760686.JPG On the last one, intercepting our guys while wearing an alien mask is the kind of thing I would want to do if I was piloting a secret antigravity craft. Just paint windows with aliens on the side of it. What better way to keep it secret? |
|
Originally Posted By castlebravo84: On the last one, intercepting our guys while wearing an alien mask is the kind of thing I would want to do if I was piloting a secret antigravity craft. Wouldn't be the first time: ![]() https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/jack-woolams-gorilla-mask.html |
|
Originally Posted By Birddog15: Yup, same here. Obviously (to me) these are not all some easily explained phenomena. When they are tracked by multiple sensors and human eyes doing things that can't be done by us, something very interesting is going on. Having said that, so far I am not impressed. Show me the high def, indisputable videos. Hopefully Trump and his people will not be intimidated by the man bun bureaucrats into settling for less. Originally Posted By Birddog15: Originally Posted By Finslayer83: I'm going to be like Missouri here.. show me. Yup, same here. Obviously (to me) these are not all some easily explained phenomena. When they are tracked by multiple sensors and human eyes doing things that can't be done by us, something very interesting is going on. Having said that, so far I am not impressed. Show me the high def, indisputable videos. Hopefully Trump and his people will not be intimidated by the man bun bureaucrats into settling for less. I have had two sightings as a preteen that were absolutely bonkers! They Perturb Me to this day. Everything I have seen them release in this batch have strong possibilities of being drones or aircrafts, rockets, along with some kind of photo processing effects due to technological processing artifacts. Its like their release at this point is to create doubt. The stuff they released so far is hard to justify as classified. |
| Supposedly there are 8 new very revealing videos in the new Corbell flick coming out tomorrow if it's fucking possible to watch somewhere. That I still haven't figured out how it's happening considering there isn't a single ad about it on Amazon ahead of time which I find incredibly strange. I believe the ball is really starting to roll, but in reality just how much do we really want to know? Groush seems to think we will be much better off knowing and isn't very concerned about how it will affect humanity so hopefully he knows an awful lot especially concerning the interdimensional aspect. And he briefed Trump as well a while back. |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Coming as soon as Thursday Excellent. I was wondering when the next tranche(s) were scheduled to drop. Hopefully they keep up a good steady schedule. |
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
I am really confused by the agents shouting all over that the 8 pointed item is a parachute flare, one that goes both up and down, and doesn't have a parachute, and doesn't flicker dim/bright the way parachute flares do. I'm guessing many have never seen a parachute flare or don't remember the flickering illumination around them. They apparently just want that video to not be real, by any means necessary, some are posting both that it's a parachute flare as well as lens flare from an airplane behind it as well as other theories, all at the same time, so long as "UAP/UFO" isn't part of what it might be. |
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Coming as soon as Thursday It sounded to me like she was saying that her committee will get them on Thursday. I'm not sure if that means that they will release them at that time, or not. I think from what Tim Burchett has said, that the "holy crap" video is in that group of 40+ videos they have been asking for, so hopefully when they get them they pass them on to the press. |
|
Originally Posted By brass: I am really confused by the agents shouting all over that the 8 pointed item is a parachute flare, one that goes both up and down, and doesn't have a parachute, and doesn't flicker dim/bright the way parachute flares do. I'm guessing many have never seen a parachute flare or don't remember the flickering illumination around them. They apparently just want that video to not be real, by any means necessary, some are posting both that it's a parachute flare as well as lens flare from an airplane behind it as well as other theories, all at the same time, so long as "UAP/UFO" isn't part of what it might be. I don't buy the parachute flare explanation either. A better explanation would be some type of rocket/hovering decoy like Nulka, but I don't think that's it either. All the other IR video I've seen of a flaming/exploding object bright enough to flare the sensor like that also washes out all contrast in the image background. The other thing about the UAP video that is extremely strange is that the trail the object leaves behind is COLDER than the background. How does a burning flare/rocket leave a cold exhaust plume? ![]() Nulka test shot, USCG |
|
Originally Posted By brass: I am really confused by the agents shouting all over that the 8 pointed item is a parachute flare, one that goes both up and down, and doesn't have a parachute, and doesn't flicker dim/bright the way parachute flares do. I'm guessing many have never seen a parachute flare or don't remember the flickering illumination around them. They apparently just want that video to not be real, by any means necessary, some are posting both that it's a parachute flare as well as lens flare from an airplane behind it as well as other theories, all at the same time, so long as "UAP/UFO" isn't part of what it might be. There is definitely something that looks like a parachute at some points in the video, and it moves around like its attached to the object. Although the object is near the center of the frame when it does that, so the "parachute" may just be rotating around the center axis of the camera. I lean towards the "parachute" being a lens flare. Is that really any different from people who so desperately want it to be aliens that they will ignore normal explanations for UFO's? This video isn't clear evidence of anything, same as when it was leaked a few years ago. |
|
Are any of these releases going to accompany a speaker telling us any info? Is anyone going to come out and say we have been communicating with ETs for the past 70 years? We have been creating ARVs for 50 years, etc? Or will everything just be implied? I have to assume the holy shit moment includes hard proof of aliens or some other being that resides on planet earth with us, maybe both. |
|
Originally Posted By raverill: Are any of these releases going to accompany a speaker telling us any info? Is anyone going to come out and say we have been communicating with ETs for the past 70 years? We have been creating ARVs for 50 years, etc? Or will everything just be implied? I have to assume the holy shit moment includes hard proof of aliens or some other being that resides on planet earth with us, maybe both. Based on bits and pieces of interviews of Tim Burchett, I think the "holy crap" video he is talking about shows some sort of underwater object going past some oil rigs. It is supposedly really big and moving really fast, with the oil rigs providing scale. This is purely my own speculation though, just based on what I've seen him say in a few different ways. The more I have thought about this recent release, the more I am convinced that the gatekeepers of these videos are basically stonewalling and flipping off Hegseth and Trump. Various congressmen have complained about the arrogance of the bureaucrats that control this stuff. Releasing these inconclusive videos and calling it "disclosure", seems to be more of the same. |
|
Nothing in the videos they released look even remotely other worldly. I can't even see a reason why they would be classified other than where they were taken and by what assets at the time. This is a misinformation program or incompetence of our Intel ppl. Hopefully the next batch of video is better. |
This is short and concise summary of the political landscape and players pushing for more material releases, versus the people blocking it.![]() LATEST UFO DISCLOSURE IS BEING BLOCKED |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By Herc: There is definitely something that looks like a parachute at some points in the video, and it moves around like its attached to the object. Although the object is near the center of the frame when it does that, so the "parachute" may just be rotating around the center axis of the camera. I lean towards the "parachute" being a lens flare. Is that really any different from people who so desperately want it to be aliens that they will ignore normal explanations for UFO's? This video isn't clear evidence of anything, same as when it was leaked a few years ago. Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By brass: I am really confused by the agents shouting all over that the 8 pointed item is a parachute flare, one that goes both up and down, and doesn't have a parachute, and doesn't flicker dim/bright the way parachute flares do. I'm guessing many have never seen a parachute flare or don't remember the flickering illumination around them. They apparently just want that video to not be real, by any means necessary, some are posting both that it's a parachute flare as well as lens flare from an airplane behind it as well as other theories, all at the same time, so long as "UAP/UFO" isn't part of what it might be. There is definitely something that looks like a parachute at some points in the video, and it moves around like its attached to the object. Although the object is near the center of the frame when it does that, so the "parachute" may just be rotating around the center axis of the camera. I lean towards the "parachute" being a lens flare. Is that really any different from people who so desperately want it to be aliens that they will ignore normal explanations for UFO's? This video isn't clear evidence of anything, same as when it was leaked a few years ago. I see it as unidentified. No idea what it might be, but now whenever it's posted on twitter and other platforms, people immediately say "that's debunked". We're back to covid all over again. Nobody can explain what it is, but it's obviously not real or something we know about, despite being released in a bunch of documents and videos regarding unidentified objects. A discussion is fine, but calling it debunked or "parachute flare" often enough isn't debunking it, it's blocking conversations on other platforms to produce a video that matches what this object appears to be. |
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
This guy says Japan is jumping on the bandwagon of releasing with footage from Fukushima, not sure if legit but interesting and matches all the other "ors" seen n IR or with a very fast shutter speed in bright daylight (as 'dragonflies' since that's what a guy that found them in CA thought they were until realizing they followed aircraft and orbited them for a while in a playful manner then vanished)
————————————————————————————
|
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Originally Posted By sq40: It's still all grainy, FLIR or abstract, old microfiche-documents. It's still material in the realm of mundane evidence. It's evidence, real evidence, don't get me wrong, but not enough for ontological shock. It's enough to move the ball forward again. You know i dont think it will just continue to inch forward. It's starting to actually roll. I think we will get clear photos of craft next, film style. Then the digital stills and 4k videos of craft. The biologics next. And by then people will be ready for the real meat of it. What are their purpose and what do they want. (PS I don't get the discouragement of some, it's never been better for disclosure, kids!) ![]() ETA also, I REALLY trust Eric,
|
|
More stuff I put in the wrong thread so cross-posting: Seems they were right with all the countries following once one started Disclosure. China:
Japan:
———————————————————————————— This one is a typical orb video but there's a lot going on in the area, and it's just orbs but many of the in formation and above the contested waters where they're terraforming the atolls into islands so I don't know what to think. It's in the interesting category but I'm starting to see that well over half of these are the orbs which in FLIR are colder than the outside environment.
|
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Just sayin' ("Hey Fil, what are you, 14?" - "Yes, ") Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By Solo_: Just sayin' ("Hey Fil, what are you, 14?" - "Yes, ") https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/326068/ufo_jpg-3762131.JPG I kinda want one of those too |
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
WTF is this supposed to mean? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116591901587847680 Attached File |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: WTF is this supposed to mean? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116591901587847680 https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_5912_png-3764229.JPG That's setting off my graydar for sure. |
|
Originally Posted By sq40: WTF is this supposed to mean? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116591901587847680 https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_5912_png-3764229.JPG That is hilariously bad AI nonsense. Let's see, just off the top of my head at first glance... The "alien's" manacle/restraint doesn't even connect to both wrists. It wraps around his hip? The ankle cuffs would mean he has a 2" stride, and they'd have to carry him. Trump looks like shit on a daily basis compared to that. He's way fatter and pastier than that, and his hair is not that color (or thickness). I know you're referring to "Why would DJT post something like that on Truth Social?" I can't answer that. It's just more ridiculous bullshit dribbling out of his social media accounts. |
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
|
Originally Posted By sq40: WTF is this supposed to mean? https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116591901587847680 https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_5912_png-3764229.JPG It means “oh great, someone put Grok on Trump’s phone.”
|
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By Kagetora: I know you're referring to "Why would DJT post something like that on Truth Social?" I can't answer that. It's just more ridiculous bullshit dribbling out of his social media accounts. Thats exactly my point. This is trying to add ridicule back into disclosure after so much momentum. Pisses me off. I hope it’s a one time thing as a joke. |
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By Herc: There is definitely something that looks like a parachute at some points in the video, and it moves around like its attached to the object. Although the object is near the center of the frame when it does that, so the "parachute" may just be rotating around the center axis of the camera. I lean towards the "parachute" being a lens flare. Is that really any different from people who so desperately want it to be aliens that they will ignore normal explanations for UFO's? This video isn't clear evidence of anything, same as when it was leaked a few years ago. Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By brass: I am really confused by the agents shouting all over that the 8 pointed item is a parachute flare, one that goes both up and down, and doesn't have a parachute, and doesn't flicker dim/bright the way parachute flares do. I'm guessing many have never seen a parachute flare or don't remember the flickering illumination around them. They apparently just want that video to not be real, by any means necessary, some are posting both that it's a parachute flare as well as lens flare from an airplane behind it as well as other theories, all at the same time, so long as "UAP/UFO" isn't part of what it might be. There is definitely something that looks like a parachute at some points in the video, and it moves around like its attached to the object. Although the object is near the center of the frame when it does that, so the "parachute" may just be rotating around the center axis of the camera. I lean towards the "parachute" being a lens flare. Is that really any different from people who so desperately want it to be aliens that they will ignore normal explanations for UFO's? This video isn't clear evidence of anything, same as when it was leaked a few years ago. Get some FLIR footage of parachute flares. It should be very easy to duplicate that star shape leaving a cold smoke/vapor trail and then it can be debunked. "Looks like it could be..." is NOT a "debunk". Produce a video that is a near exact to that one shown and I'll believe you. I would think the government wouldn't classify a flare, but they're so eager to classify everything to hide their affairs anything is possible. I just don't see a flare or direction. These would be a lot easier to interpret if they at least left in the heading, range, and azimuth of the platform and camera, that shouldn't leak any abilities but we'd know if they're turning right and looking left or looking right to stay in frame, there's a big difference and why some which don't appear extraordinary might be if it's turning and still hitting the stop trying to keep it in frame. |
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Originally Posted By sq40: Thats exactly my point. This is trying to add ridicule back into disclosure after so much momentum. Pisses me off. I hope it’s a one time thing as a joke. Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By Kagetora: I know you're referring to "Why would DJT post something like that on Truth Social?" I can't answer that. It's just more ridiculous bullshit dribbling out of his social media accounts. Thats exactly my point. This is trying to add ridicule back into disclosure after so much momentum. Pisses me off. I hope it’s a one time thing as a joke. Luna and Burchett saying they were cropped out, is that continuing the joke? This has been muddled with AI by the detractors so much they should know better than to even sort of make jokes. Assuming they're not throwing it all away, she needs to provide context and details now that she injected herself into the image storyline. |
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.







