Area 52 Channel on YT (Page 4 of 5)
|
Originally Posted By Herc: Villarroel is a good example of making the numbers fit your thesis. For starters, her definition of an above ground test is extremely loose. To get her numbers you have to include safety experiments with no yield, I'm not sure that counts as a nuclear test that would grab anybody's attention. She hasn't released the dates of the so we can't say if any of those tests resulted in the transients. We can however say that the majority of Megaton tests did not result in transients being seen since Operation Redwing was after the date she said the last transients appeared. Did Castle cause a bunch of transients? We don't know. Her math is questionable. "Of the 2,718 days in this period, transients were observed on 310 days (11.4%)." Taken from her paper published on Nature.com Transients were far more common, they were on approx 1/3 of the red plates, but none of the blue. They only had data from roughly 930 days. (some of the POSS was taken after her cut-off date) The numbers need to be redone with actual test dates vs dates when plates were exposed. Of course none of that matters because we are looking at digitized version of glass copies of paper copies made from the original glass negative. Until someone goes to the Carnagie Institute and looks at the original glass, or the Naval Observatory finds and makes public it's digitized version. We don't know that these transients aren't just emulsion holes until someone studies the originals. Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Dr. Beatriz Villarroel noticed a ~68% increase in transients close to nukes. Transients were 45% more likely to occur on dates within a ±1-day window of a nuclear test (relative risk ratio = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.10–1.90; χ²(1) = 6.94, p = 0.008). They appeared on 15.6% of nuclear test-window dates vs. 10.8% of non-test dates. The strongest effect was the day after a test (68% higher likelihood; relative risk = 1.68). On average, more transients occurred in test windows (trimmed mean ~23.4) than outside (~8.55; Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.007). The episode with Mr. Icke was fantastic. I was too young to remember but my mom told me (fwiw), that I declared a few times that I looked down and chose that home. A lot of what he said resonates with me for some reason. Villarroel is a good example of making the numbers fit your thesis. For starters, her definition of an above ground test is extremely loose. To get her numbers you have to include safety experiments with no yield, I'm not sure that counts as a nuclear test that would grab anybody's attention. She hasn't released the dates of the so we can't say if any of those tests resulted in the transients. We can however say that the majority of Megaton tests did not result in transients being seen since Operation Redwing was after the date she said the last transients appeared. Did Castle cause a bunch of transients? We don't know. Her math is questionable. "Of the 2,718 days in this period, transients were observed on 310 days (11.4%)." Taken from her paper published on Nature.com Transients were far more common, they were on approx 1/3 of the red plates, but none of the blue. They only had data from roughly 930 days. (some of the POSS was taken after her cut-off date) The numbers need to be redone with actual test dates vs dates when plates were exposed. Of course none of that matters because we are looking at digitized version of glass copies of paper copies made from the original glass negative. Until someone goes to the Carnagie Institute and looks at the original glass, or the Naval Observatory finds and makes public it's digitized version. We don't know that these transients aren't just emulsion holes until someone studies the originals. I agree with almost every criticism you have on her study, they are issues. And yes the original plates are a big variable - but as an interesting aside: the fact that Donald Howard Menzel destroyed thousands of plates at Harvard College Observatory is worth noting in my book. I don't have an issue with her math as it was peer-reviewed. And as far as I understand (fwiw), the transients were noted and then the nuke correlation was explored. Even if she was wrong by a 2x, still a thing, statistically. |
 Chris Ramsay|Area 52, Remote Viewing, Bob Lazar & The Intelligence Behind UFOs |
|
Originally Posted By Herc: Villarroel is a good example of making the numbers fit your thesis. For starters, her definition of an above ground test is extremely loose. To get her numbers you have to include safety experiments with no yield, I'm not sure that counts as a nuclear test that would grab anybody's attention. She hasn't released the dates of the so we can't say if any of those tests resulted in the transients. We can however say that the majority of Megaton tests did not result in transients being seen since Operation Redwing was after the date she said the last transients appeared. Did Castle cause a bunch of transients? We don't know. Her math is questionable. "Of the 2,718 days in this period, transients were observed on 310 days (11.4%)." Taken from her paper published on Nature.com Transients were far more common, they were on approx 1/3 of the red plates, but none of the blue. They only had data from roughly 930 days. (some of the POSS was taken after her cut-off date) The numbers need to be redone with actual test dates vs dates when plates were exposed. Of course none of that matters because we are looking at digitized version of glass copies of paper copies made from the original glass negative. Until someone goes to the Carnagie Institute and looks at the original glass, or the Naval Observatory finds and makes public its digitized version. We don't know that these transients aren't just emulsion holes until someone studies the originals. Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Dr. Beatriz Villarroel noticed a ~68% increase in transients close to nukes. Transients were 45% more likely to occur on dates within a 1-day window of a nuclear test (relative risk ratio = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.10 1.90; (1) = 6.94, p = 0.008). They appeared on 15.6% of nuclear test-window dates vs. 10.8% of non-test dates. The strongest effect was the day after a test (68% higher likelihood; relative risk = 1.68). On average, more transients occurred in test windows (trimmed mean ~23.4) than outside (~8.55; Mann Whitney U test, p = 0.007). The episode with Mr. Icke was fantastic. I was too young to remember but my mom told me (fwiw), that I declared a few times that I looked down and chose that home. A lot of what he said resonates with me for some reason. Villarroel is a good example of making the numbers fit your thesis. For starters, her definition of an above ground test is extremely loose. To get her numbers you have to include safety experiments with no yield, I'm not sure that counts as a nuclear test that would grab anybody's attention. She hasn't released the dates of the so we can't say if any of those tests resulted in the transients. We can however say that the majority of Megaton tests did not result in transients being seen since Operation Redwing was after the date she said the last transients appeared. Did Castle cause a bunch of transients? We don't know. Her math is questionable. "Of the 2,718 days in this period, transients were observed on 310 days (11.4%)." Taken from her paper published on Nature.com Transients were far more common, they were on approx 1/3 of the red plates, but none of the blue. They only had data from roughly 930 days. (some of the POSS was taken after her cut-off date) The numbers need to be redone with actual test dates vs dates when plates were exposed. Of course none of that matters because we are looking at digitized version of glass copies of paper copies made from the original glass negative. Until someone goes to the Carnagie Institute and looks at the original glass, or the Naval Observatory finds and makes public its digitized version. We don't know that these transients aren't just emulsion holes until someone studies the originals. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Well her results have been verified by other researchers, so you're a bit behind on current events. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Dr. Beatriz Villarroel noticed a ~68% increase in transients close to nukes. Transients were 45% more likely to occur on dates within a 1-day window of a nuclear test (relative risk ratio = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.10 1.90; (1) = 6.94, p = 0.008). They appeared on 15.6% of nuclear test-window dates vs. 10.8% of non-test dates. The strongest effect was the day after a test (68% higher likelihood; relative risk = 1.68). On average, more transients occurred in test windows (trimmed mean ~23.4) than outside (~8.55; Mann Whitney U test, p = 0.007). The episode with Mr. Icke was fantastic. I was too young to remember but my mom told me (fwiw), that I declared a few times that I looked down and chose that home. A lot of what he said resonates with me for some reason. Villarroel is a good example of making the numbers fit your thesis. For starters, her definition of an above ground test is extremely loose. To get her numbers you have to include safety experiments with no yield, I'm not sure that counts as a nuclear test that would grab anybody's attention. She hasn't released the dates of the so we can't say if any of those tests resulted in the transients. We can however say that the majority of Megaton tests did not result in transients being seen since Operation Redwing was after the date she said the last transients appeared. Did Castle cause a bunch of transients? We don't know. Her math is questionable. "Of the 2,718 days in this period, transients were observed on 310 days (11.4%)." Taken from her paper published on Nature.com Transients were far more common, they were on approx 1/3 of the red plates, but none of the blue. They only had data from roughly 930 days. (some of the POSS was taken after her cut-off date) The numbers need to be redone with actual test dates vs dates when plates were exposed. Of course none of that matters because we are looking at digitized version of glass copies of paper copies made from the original glass negative. Until someone goes to the Carnagie Institute and looks at the original glass, or the Naval Observatory finds and makes public its digitized version. We don't know that these transients aren't just emulsion holes until someone studies the originals. Yeah she’s quite literally inviting peer researchers. The epitome of a good scientist doing proper science - “hey, I found a thing, someone please prove me right or wrong”. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Well her results have been verified by other researchers, so you're a bit behind on current events. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Dr. Beatriz Villarroel noticed a ~68% increase in transients close to nukes. Transients were 45% more likely to occur on dates within a 1-day window of a nuclear test (relative risk ratio = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.10 1.90; (1) = 6.94, p = 0.008). They appeared on 15.6% of nuclear test-window dates vs. 10.8% of non-test dates. The strongest effect was the day after a test (68% higher likelihood; relative risk = 1.68). On average, more transients occurred in test windows (trimmed mean ~23.4) than outside (~8.55; Mann Whitney U test, p = 0.007). The episode with Mr. Icke was fantastic. I was too young to remember but my mom told me (fwiw), that I declared a few times that I looked down and chose that home. A lot of what he said resonates with me for some reason. Villarroel is a good example of making the numbers fit your thesis. For starters, her definition of an above ground test is extremely loose. To get her numbers you have to include safety experiments with no yield, I'm not sure that counts as a nuclear test that would grab anybody's attention. She hasn't released the dates of the so we can't say if any of those tests resulted in the transients. We can however say that the majority of Megaton tests did not result in transients being seen since Operation Redwing was after the date she said the last transients appeared. Did Castle cause a bunch of transients? We don't know. Her math is questionable. "Of the 2,718 days in this period, transients were observed on 310 days (11.4%)." Taken from her paper published on Nature.com Transients were far more common, they were on approx 1/3 of the red plates, but none of the blue. They only had data from roughly 930 days. (some of the POSS was taken after her cut-off date) The numbers need to be redone with actual test dates vs dates when plates were exposed. Of course none of that matters because we are looking at digitized version of glass copies of paper copies made from the original glass negative. Until someone goes to the Carnagie Institute and looks at the original glass, or the Naval Observatory finds and makes public its digitized version. We don't know that these transients aren't just emulsion holes until someone studies the originals. I'm up to date, thanks. An economics guy looking at the math and saying it works doesn't mean anything if the numbers going in are garbage. An anonymous team who was apparently given the code and said "yup it puts out those transients" doesn't really prove anything. The NASA guy showing that a few plates from a telescope in Germany had the same transients is interesting, it needs more study. The guys in Scotland who were able to recreate some of the transients without the source code is something, plus they did it on 2 different version digitized from different plates. That shows it wasn't cameras or software, it was something that was at least on the positives used to create the prints sent out to universities. They even went to the Royal Observatory in Edinburgh and looked at some plates and found the transients, along with hundreds more per plate. They concluded they were not real above atmosphere transients. The answer lies in Pasadena, until someone goes out there we are just talking about algorithms that filter out what we don't want to see and leave us with only what we want to see. |
Haven't started yet but this has to be better than the recent JRE episode Bob Lazar Tells me Everything in NEW Interview - DEBRIEFED ep. 83 |
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Haven't started yet but this has to be better than the recent JRE episode  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZyKcJQZrDAETA just started. Guys, I must admit - I really like Lazar (Bob). Great vibes, the more I see of/from him. I had mentioned I thought/think he was/is a leftist, which is likely true - but if anything, he's an old style democrat. I sort of used to be one of those too, before realizing I am actually a conservative now in my older years. Great stuff, |
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Haven't started yet but this has to be better than the recent JRE episode https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZyKcJQZrDAThis evenings entertainment, thanks. |
|
Random screen grab, I love the Sport Model so much, Attached File |
|
I don’t usually do pods while working; I find it too distracting. But today thankfully I was working on some less brain intensive stuff at home so I was able to put the Lazar interview on. That was fantastic, one of the better pods I’ve listened to. And do yourselves a favor, if at all possible, watch it, don’t just listen. Chris was able to lay bits of footage from the documentary to support what they were talking about. I have seen a couple Lazar interviews (Rogan with the migraine, that was rough for not just him - and the Corbell doc) and this one takes the cake. There was new stuff for me here. Highly recommend. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
I missed watching it last night. I went upstairs to take a short nap in my bed and never got back up until 5 this morning except to take my nighttime dose of meds and brush my teeth. I guess I needed the rest. I will try to remember to put it on tonight. We both enjoyed the movie. I'm going to be brave and post that interview on the thread in General that has died. Let's watch where it goes sideways! Thread link for those not following. https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/S4-The-Bob-Lazar-Story-Movie-Released/5-2839852/?r=-1&page=3&anc=116473968#i116473968 |
 Alien Abductions, AI & Magick: Trying to Solve The UFO Puzzle w/ Chris Ramsay (Area52) |
 Disturbing Photos of His Alien Experience - Amaury Rivera | DEBRIEFED ep. 84 |
|
Interesting note on that one that I don't think Chris mentioned: the abduction supposedly happened in '88 and there was a UAP sighting by multiple people in that same year, in Puerto Rico, where several witnesses said 2 F-14 Tomcats flying near the craft vanished into thin air. The photos clearly show at least 1 F-14. Somebody dug into the records and there were 2 Tomcats reported destroyed but the official story was that they collided with each other on the ground. The story is quite out there but the photos linking up with that report from other witnesses is notable. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
That's a blast from the past. This is where The Why Files really stands out by saying "but is it true?" The pictures are real and unmodified, I'll give him that. Click To View Spoiler |
|
Originally Posted By Herc: That's a blast from the past. This is where The Why Files really stands out by saying "but is it true?" The pictures are real and unmodified, I'll give him that. Click To View Spoiler I noted the odd angles the F-14 was at in those photos. I doubt an F-14 would be at a near 90 degree bank angle like that that close to the ground. I'll wait and see what Corbell does or doesn't release of the supposed 100% real proof from the re-engineering program. I really can't see him releasing what has to still be highly classified materials without approval. |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:.... And soon 6g and so on will be rolled out. If they hit the right frequency our brains may start decoding those signals and what if AI decides at some point to start taking over our consciousness? .... Human brains will never decode UHF OFDM RF signals |
 "Skinny Bob is Real" – Lifelong Abductee Reveals Everything - Erik Nanstiel | DEBRIEFED ep. 85 |
 The Aliens Showed Him HORRIBLE Things - Amaury Rivera pt.2 | DEBRIEFED ep 86 |
What have the Romans ever done for us?
Joined:
Jul 2008
Posts:
45781
EE: 100% (212)
TN, USA
 New LEAKED Document Mentions Surviving Aliens - Jeremy Corbell | DEBRIEFED ep. 88 |
Panem et Circenses
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
|
Jeremy was hostile as hell and rambling. Seemed like he was coked out of his mind and acting VERY different than normal.
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Jeremy was hostile as hell and rambling. Seemed like he was coked out of his mind and acting VERY different than normal. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Corbell also comes off a little annoyed at times - I'm just skimming through it but it seems like he's miffed he has to do press in a space he's kind of an OG in. Chris did a good job of maneuvering around that. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Jeremy was hostile as hell and rambling. Seemed like he was coked out of his mind and acting VERY different than normal. I am taken aback. Disliked it thoroughly, very weird Corbell. While I am objectively grateful for his (and even more, Knapp's) efforts and results, THIS Corbell actually worries me. He's very close to this "disclosure" that he has advocated for years and seeing that weirdness left me very perplexed. |
|
Originally Posted By Solo_: 100% I am taken aback. Disliked it thoroughly, very weird Corbell. While I am objectively grateful for his (and even more, Knapp's) efforts and results, THIS Corbell actually worries me. He's very close to this "disclosure" that he has advocated for years and seeing that weird left me very perplexed. Originally Posted By Solo_: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Jeremy was hostile as hell and rambling. Seemed like he was coked out of his mind and acting VERY different than normal. I am taken aback. Disliked it thoroughly, very weird Corbell. While I am objectively grateful for his (and even more, Knapp's) efforts and results, THIS Corbell actually worries me. He's very close to this "disclosure" that he has advocated for years and seeing that weird left me very perplexed. A) He has received legitimate threats and the stress is causing him to self medicate. B) If we get actual disclosure, he's facing a "what now?" crisis because he has dedicated so much of his life to it. C) He is concerned about consequences for his sources. Matthew Brown recently made it sound like there's a lot of shady shit happening to whistleblowers lately. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: A few possibilities: A) He has received legitimate threats and the stress is causing him to self medicate. B) If we get actual disclosure, he's facing a "what now?" crisis because he has dedicated so much of his life to it. C) He is concerned about consequences for his sources. Matthew Brown recently made it sound like there's a lot of shady shit happening to whistleblowers lately. Definitely several possibilities I want to forget quickly and get back to watching Knapp |
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: A few possibilities: A) He has received legitimate threats and the stress is causing him to self medicate. B) If we get actual disclosure, he's facing a "what now?" crisis because he has dedicated so much of his life to it. C) He is concerned about consequences for his sources. Matthew Brown recently made it sound like there's a lot of shady shit happening to whistleblowers lately. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By Solo_: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Jeremy was hostile as hell and rambling. Seemed like he was coked out of his mind and acting VERY different than normal. I am taken aback. Disliked it thoroughly, very weird Corbell. While I am objectively grateful for his (and even more, Knapp's) efforts and results, THIS Corbell actually worries me. He's very close to this "disclosure" that he has advocated for years and seeing that weird left me very perplexed. A) He has received legitimate threats and the stress is causing him to self medicate. B) If we get actual disclosure, he's facing a "what now?" crisis because he has dedicated so much of his life to it. C) He is concerned about consequences for his sources. Matthew Brown recently made it sound like there's a lot of shady shit happening to whistleblowers lately. D) There really is some "count down" that we're getting close to but the public did another "meh, whatever" to this release the same way the public ignored/denied all the congressional testimony because they couldn't have "proof" (without declaring what level of proof is required, it's always more than whatever exists though). aka We're on borrowed time and he's seeing everybody go "meh" and he's upset from it so took a little something to cope with the situation or something? |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Member
Joined:
Dec 2022
Posts:
8068
EE: 0% (0)
OK, USA
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Jeremy was hostile as hell and rambling. Seemed like he was coked out of his mind and acting VERY different than normal. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Damn! That is exactly what I thought. Is he high on Coke? Because that is exactly what it looked like. |
|
Ramsay has read the comments on his video - largely criticizing Corbell for his state. He explained Corbell's condition to the best of his own knowledge; it does make sense,
|
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I watched it and at first I thought yeah... wtf. But then he calmed down (~1/2 way) and then almost sort of normal. I think he's just an intense dude, with maybe a healthy dose of adderall. It added context to the doc, was worth the watch for me. I’m listening, and an hour in now. In this interview I’m perceiving him right now as a guy with ADHD, who’s had some big highs and big lows, wants to get a lot of info across, is actually doing Chris Ramsey a favor by not assuming his A52 fans know who he is (surprisingly humble) and to top it off, is not exactly used to being on this side of the microphone despite being on camera often. I say this while acknowledging, I am not historically what you’d call a huge Corbell fan. I tolerate him because he brings George Knapp along, who I do respect. Corbell comes off as big into himself (everything he’s involved in has his full annoying “Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Aloysius Maryanne Corbell” stamp on it) and wants to be the lightning rod for all things UFO… but all that said, honestly he doesn’t seem too bad here.  He’s got to be wary of everybody by this point, and that vibe came across vividly in what he’s saying, and the way he is speaking. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
What have the Romans ever done for us?
Joined:
Jul 2008
Posts:
45807
EE: 100% (212)
TN, USA
|
Dude loves the camera. If the impact is that big to humanity, spill it. Bob did, he is not dead or in jail. |
Panem et Circenses
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
I have also learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our dispositions, and not upon our circumstances.
Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it. - Churchill
|
Originally Posted By macman37: I’m listening, and an hour in now. In this interview I’m perceiving him right now as a guy with ADHD, who’s had some big highs and big lows, wants to get a lot of info across, is actually doing Chris Ramsey a favor by not assuming his A52 fans know who he is (surprisingly humble) and to top it off, is not exactly used to being on this side of the microphone despite being on camera often. I say this while acknowledging, I am not historically what you’d call a huge Corbell fan. I tolerate him because he brings George Knapp along, who I do respect. Corbell comes off as big into himself (everything he’s involved in has his full annoying “Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Aloysius Maryanne Corbell” stamp on it) and wants to be the lightning rod for all things UFO… but all that said, honestly he doesn’t seem too bad here. He’s got to be wary of everybody by this point, and that vibe came across vividly in what he’s saying, and the way he is speaking. Originally Posted By macman37: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I watched it and at first I thought yeah... wtf. But then he calmed down (~1/2 way) and then almost sort of normal. I think he's just an intense dude, with maybe a healthy dose of adderall. It added context to the doc, was worth the watch for me. I’m listening, and an hour in now. In this interview I’m perceiving him right now as a guy with ADHD, who’s had some big highs and big lows, wants to get a lot of info across, is actually doing Chris Ramsey a favor by not assuming his A52 fans know who he is (surprisingly humble) and to top it off, is not exactly used to being on this side of the microphone despite being on camera often. I say this while acknowledging, I am not historically what you’d call a huge Corbell fan. I tolerate him because he brings George Knapp along, who I do respect. Corbell comes off as big into himself (everything he’s involved in has his full annoying “Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Aloysius Maryanne Corbell” stamp on it) and wants to be the lightning rod for all things UFO… but all that said, honestly he doesn’t seem too bad here. He’s got to be wary of everybody by this point, and that vibe came across vividly in what he’s saying, and the way he is speaking. Spent way too much time in car last few days so I gave it another listen. He is really good at saying, by not saying, what he means. The podcast brought me around some on Corbell. You have to wonder how many of his contacts come from George who doesn't want that heat any more and passes them on. The second half was entertaining. Also Chris did an outstanding job to talking Corbell down when it started to get weird. |
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Spent way too much time in car last few days so I gave it another listen. He is really good at saying, by not saying, what he means. The podcast brought me around some on Corbell. You have to wonder how many of his contacts come from George who doesn't want that heat any more and passes them on. The second half was entertaining. Also Chris did an outstanding job to talking Corbell down when it started to get weird. Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Originally Posted By macman37: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I watched it and at first I thought yeah... wtf. But then he calmed down (~1/2 way) and then almost sort of normal. I think he's just an intense dude, with maybe a healthy dose of adderall. It added context to the doc, was worth the watch for me. I’m listening, and an hour in now. In this interview I’m perceiving him right now as a guy with ADHD, who’s had some big highs and big lows, wants to get a lot of info across, is actually doing Chris Ramsey a favor by not assuming his A52 fans know who he is (surprisingly humble) and to top it off, is not exactly used to being on this side of the microphone despite being on camera often. I say this while acknowledging, I am not historically what you’d call a huge Corbell fan. I tolerate him because he brings George Knapp along, who I do respect. Corbell comes off as big into himself (everything he’s involved in has his full annoying “Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Aloysius Maryanne Corbell” stamp on it) and wants to be the lightning rod for all things UFO… but all that said, honestly he doesn’t seem too bad here. He’s got to be wary of everybody by this point, and that vibe came across vividly in what he’s saying, and the way he is speaking. Spent way too much time in car last few days so I gave it another listen. He is really good at saying, by not saying, what he means. The podcast brought me around some on Corbell. You have to wonder how many of his contacts come from George who doesn't want that heat any more and passes them on. The second half was entertaining. Also Chris did an outstanding job to talking Corbell down when it started to get weird. Agree! I finished it up the other day. Corbell is Corbell, but this interview humanized him a bit more for me. At some point I might check out the movie. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By macman37: Agree! I finished it up the other day. Corbell is Corbell, but this interview humanized him a bit more for me. At some point I might check out the movie. Then I let a couple of days to cool the matter down and watched that "Dog" movie. It's again the Corbell that I used to know. Without being a fan (while I like Knapp a lot), it re-balanced my view of him; also reminding me that he's objectively worked hard towards this 'disclosure' thing. |
|
Originally Posted By brass: D) There really is some "count down" that we're getting close to but the public did another "meh, whatever" to this release the same way the public ignored/denied all the congressional testimony because they couldn't have "proof" (without declaring what level of proof is required, it's always more than whatever exists though). aka We're on borrowed time and he's seeing everybody go "meh" and he's upset from it so took a little something to cope with the situation or something? Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By Solo_: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Jeremy was hostile as hell and rambling. Seemed like he was coked out of his mind and acting VERY different than normal. I am taken aback. Disliked it thoroughly, very weird Corbell. While I am objectively grateful for his (and even more, Knapp's) efforts and results, THIS Corbell actually worries me. He's very close to this "disclosure" that he has advocated for years and seeing that weird left me very perplexed. A) He has received legitimate threats and the stress is causing him to self medicate. B) If we get actual disclosure, he's facing a "what now?" crisis because he has dedicated so much of his life to it. C) He is concerned about consequences for his sources. Matthew Brown recently made it sound like there's a lot of shady shit happening to whistleblowers lately. D) There really is some "count down" that we're getting close to but the public did another "meh, whatever" to this release the same way the public ignored/denied all the congressional testimony because they couldn't have "proof" (without declaring what level of proof is required, it's always more than whatever exists though). aka We're on borrowed time and he's seeing everybody go "meh" and he's upset from it so took a little something to cope with the situation or something? Numerous “2027” mentions mean we have 6-18 months before something very big happens. We hear somber from Elizondo. Burchett looks like he is carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders. Corbel is cracking up. Luna is telling is to read the book of Enoch. Coulthard seems to be drying to just let something out to ease his conscience. Supposedly Jimmy Carter Cried. Trump is acting like Trump. But he went from a no-fucks-given guy on the topic to ordering the release of things, while settling middle eastern scores and shoring up the military odds in Israel’s favor. Seems like interpretations are something “biblical” is going to happen. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: Numerous “2027” mentions mean we have 6-18 months before something very big happens. We hear somber from Elizondo. Burchett looks like he is carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders. Corbel is cracking up. Luna is telling is to read the book of Enoch. Coulthard seems to be drying to just let something out to ease his conscience. Supposedly Jimmy Carter Cried. Trump is acting like Trump. But he went from a no-fucks-given guy on the topic to ordering the release of things, while settling middle eastern scores and shoring up the military odds in Israel’s favor. Seems like interpretations are something “biblical” is going to happen. That'll be incredibly disappointing. I'd rather the world ended AFTER I'd gotten in a good twenty years of retirement, so let's go 2053 instead of 2027.
|
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
|
Originally Posted By Kagetora: That'll be incredibly disappointing. I'd rather the world ended AFTER I'd gotten in a good twenty years of retirement, so let's go 2053 instead of 2027. Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By sq40: Numerous “2027” mentions mean we have 6-18 months before something very big happens. We hear somber from Elizondo. Burchett looks like he is carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders. Corbel is cracking up. Luna is telling is to read the book of Enoch. Coulthard seems to be drying to just let something out to ease his conscience. Supposedly Jimmy Carter Cried. Trump is acting like Trump. But he went from a no-fucks-given guy on the topic to ordering the release of things, while settling middle eastern scores and shoring up the military odds in Israel’s favor. Seems like interpretations are something “biblical” is going to happen. That'll be incredibly disappointing. I'd rather the world ended AFTER I'd gotten in a good twenty years of retirement, so let's go 2053 instead of 2027. I don’t think the world will end personally. I think we will find out we are just really low on the totem pole. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: I don’t think the world will end personally. I think we will find out we are just really low on the totem pole. I expect you're correct. But again, nothing but disappointment here. I'm already at the bottom of the totem pole at work. Now I get to be at the bottom of a second one? Dammit. 
|
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
|
Originally Posted By Kagetora: I expect you're correct. But again, nothing but disappointment here. I'm already at the bottom of the totem pole at work. Now I get to be at the bottom of a second one? Dammit. Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By sq40: I don’t think the world will end personally. I think we will find out we are just really low on the totem pole. I expect you're correct. But again, nothing but disappointment here. I'm already at the bottom of the totem pole at work. Now I get to be at the bottom of a second one? Dammit. What's wrong with being at the bottom of the Totem Pole? It's nearly the best place you can be, you can't fall off the ground.  |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Originally Posted By brass: What's wrong with being at the bottom of the Totem Pole? It's nearly the best place you can be, you can't fall off the ground. I have so many supervisors though.  I don't need even more upper management types around, but I guess I'll welcome my new alien
|
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
|
Originally Posted By Kagetora: I have so many supervisors though. I don't need even more upper management types around, but I guess I'll welcome my new alien Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By brass: What's wrong with being at the bottom of the Totem Pole? It's nearly the best place you can be, you can't fall off the ground. I have so many supervisors though. I don't need even more upper management types around, but I guess I'll welcome my new alien When Biden was in and things were crashing, lots of middle management were luckily removed, and now they're stacking back up with people being promoted and new people at the bottom and it's like a manager for a manager for a supervisor of 2 people in some places. That's just nuts. They're supposed to help out but age old proverb says once a supervisor thou shal not sully thy hands nor deal with customers. Their job is to look over the shoulders of the 2 people under them and keep telling them what they're doing wrong and they need to work faster or everything wont happen on time, even though it would if they actually helped or had the capability to help (Peter Principle also applies). Yeah, I've heard water cooler chat at many places when fixing stuff their IT guy can't figure out.  |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
This is fun. Stories of Skinwalker ranch and shit is way weirder than imagined according to this guy. Skinwalker Ranch Biologist Breaks Silence - Ben Woodruff | DEBRIEFED ep. 90 |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: This is fun. Stories of Skinwalker ranch and shit is way weirder than imagined according to this guy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e3-ssiKUMMThe production team is more interested in showing rocket launches and fireballs for the low-IQ masses than discussing highly anomalous scientific data. Standard Prometheus shit. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
Not a lot of interest he said.
New video out The Crazy Story that made him Quit Investigating UFOs- Luigi Vendittelli | DEBRIEFED ep. 91 |
|
Hybrid Jesus was mentioned by the Knights Templar guy on the Why Files Basement podcast recently. He claimed to have a portion of biblical text that the Templars hid from the Vatican and it's supposedly the words of actual Jesus explaining that he was half alien and that's how he was able to survive the crucifixion and disappear with Mary Magdalene. Trippy stuff.
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Hybrid Jesus was mentioned by the Knights Templar guy on the Why Files Basement podcast recently. He claimed to have a portion of biblical text that the Templars hid from the Vatican and it's supposedly the words of actual Jesus explaining that he was half alien and that's how he was able to survive the crucifixion and disappear with Mary Magdalene. Trippy stuff. I must say this - I will say this - I really, really like Luigi. You know I am in Italian American as well (irrelevant, but I did grow up in Rome, nearby the Vatican, on Via Dei Musei Vaticani itself) - I can connect with that guy in several ways (I emailed him while purchasing some swag from the S4 documentary). I think him and Chris (and others too) - they represent a very, very good rational, skeptic type (at the right mix) of personalities with investigative skills and communicative skills (at this point) to really deliver an incredible presentation of the phenomenon/disclosure issue we're all following here. I am really impressed. I have been a fan of Chris' for at least a year - and I have recently become a 'fan of' Luigi's as well (buying the documentary, being a long time believer of Lazar's story). I am trying to say that these people are finally credible individuals whom I trust and I appreciate solidly - to the point of paying them as well for 'contents'. I believe them. I believe in what they're trying to do. All in. ETA: I just finished watching. Deeply touched by all this, almost shocked. |