Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/19/2016 12:34:48 PM EDT
I am no expert on bonds what so ever but was wanting some opinions on two that are offered by my 401k.
Since I was in a target date fund when this 401k started part of that fund allocation went to a Pimco bond fund.
A couple of years ago they dropped the fund and brought in Prudential's Total Bond Fund;Q (PTRQX).
I have recently gotten out of the target fund and so I am now invested in three stocks but I still own a considerable amount of the Prudential bonds.
They also brought in this year Vanguard's Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund-Admiral (VBILX)
So my question is which of the two would be the better investment?
The cost of the Vanguard currently is $11.52 a share vs the Prudential that is $14.09 a share.
They both pay a daily dividend of 0.03
The big difference is the fees.
The Vanguard being $1.00 per $1000 vs the Prudential of $4.90 per $1000.
That in itself is pretty big with the amount of shares that I own.
The yield on the Vanguard bond is 2.69% vs Prudential's 3.24%.
Those figures of yields was what I read on Market Watch this morning.
From what I have read both are good bonds but they are invested in different ways and I am unsure if one carry's more risk than the other.
I know this part of the forum doesn't get a lot of attention but any ideas on the matter are appreciated.
2/19/2016 2:38:33 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
So my question is which of the two would be the better investment?
The cost of the Vanguard currently is $11.52 a share vs the Prudential that is $14.09 a share. This is irrelevant.  Price per share has nothing to do with your decision.
They both pay a daily dividend of 0.03
The big difference is the fees.
The Vanguard being $1.00 per $1000 vs the Prudential of $4.90 per $1000. Vanguard is a clear winner.
That in itself is pretty big with the amount of shares that I own.
The yield on the Vanguard bond is 2.69% vs Prudential's 3.24%. This just underscores that Vanguard is the winner after expenses are taken in to account.
View Quote

Of the choices you presented I would be in the Vanguard bond fund.  My plan has a fixed income alternative that is paying guaranteed 3.5%, which works out better than any bond fund for the time being, it's not a bad option if available.
2/19/2016 3:13:25 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Quoted:

Of the choices you presented I would be in the Vanguard bond fund.  My plan has a fixed income alternative that is paying guaranteed 3.5%, which works out better than any bond fund for the time being, it's not a bad option if available.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
So my question is which of the two would be the better investment?
The cost of the Vanguard currently is $11.52 a share vs the Prudential that is $14.09 a share. This is irrelevant.  Price per share has nothing to do with your decision.
They both pay a daily dividend of 0.03
The big difference is the fees.
The Vanguard being $1.00 per $1000 vs the Prudential of $4.90 per $1000. Vanguard is a clear winner.
That in itself is pretty big with the amount of shares that I own.
The yield on the Vanguard bond is 2.69% vs Prudential's 3.24%. This just underscores that Vanguard is the winner after expenses are taken in to account.

Of the choices you presented I would be in the Vanguard bond fund.  My plan has a fixed income alternative that is paying guaranteed 3.5%, which works out better than any bond fund for the time being, it's not a bad option if available.



Thanks for your input Nick.
One of the reasons I mentioned the share price difference was that if I did sell the Prudential Bonds to purchase the Vanguard Bonds I would be getting more shares for less money.
If both bonds are reasonably in the same risk range as well as the consideration of lower fees then it's clearly a no brainer to purchase the Vanguard.
I am not really sure how much if any the pay out difference would be between the two over the next 2-3 years when I finally retire and carry the 401k to another place.
However,there is the much higher fee I am forced to pay for my current holdings.

My 401k also has a Guaranteed Income fund that carries almost no risk at all and pays a guaranteed 2% a year.
I keep 30% of my portfolio there and I can use it instead of shares from another fund to buy more stock or bonds depending on the prices.
I currently have 34% in the Prudential bond fund and so at age 63 the two funds are my 64% security blanket so to speak.