Posted: 5/18/2013 2:06:51 PM EDT
|
I'm curious to know how others are allocating their money.
I've been playing what I'll call 'catch up'.....I'm 41 and know I have plenty of years left (planning to work until well into my 60's)....at the same time I don't feel that I've invested enough to this point so I've been very aggressive with my allocation. There are the rules of thumb, like the 100 minus your age and the result is the percent of stock for your overall allocation. Then there are the traditional bond/stock models like these...Vanguard models... While I've been keeping the % of bonds fairly low, I do hedge all my 'paper' investments with PM's....but given the insane growth in the last 6 months, I'm starting to think its time to diversify a bit more. I still like stock funds, and I think over the long haul (20-30 years) that there will be a lot more growth to come (because I still believe in America). But....over the short term (next 6 months) is there any good reason to move money into a mother vehicle? Or even cash? A lot of folks are saying that bonds are peaked and will absolutely dive soon...others believe stocks will correct massively and bonds will only suffer minor fluctuation. I tend to think the whole system is linked intrinsically and the two move together at a slow pace. If you are willing to offer, what percent of bonds are your holding and how old are you? Curious to know if its the 'conservative' approach, or is it just as risky in the grand scheme of things? |
|
I'm around 75/20 stocks to bonds. 2-3% in cash. I'm 39. The great majority of the money is in index ETFs and mutual funds, mostly Vanguard. I own a few individual stocks. Some are down, most are up (AAPL, RST, F, BRK.B, INTC). Over the years, I've sold most of my individual stocks and I'm mostly sticking with the ETFs and funds. Bonds are VIPSX (TIPS), VWEHX (high yield) and BIV. Stock funds/ETFs are: VT, VTI, VB, VBR, VDE, VGK, VHT, VIG, VPL, VWO, VYM. Others: VNQ, VNQI (both REITs) and VGPMX and SLV (precious metals). Try the Morningstar X-ray portfolio analysis. You punch in all of your funds/ETFs and their values or percentage of your holdings, and it will give you a great big analysis of the how much you have in each market cap, bond risk, different sectors, etc. |
|
Quoted:
I'm around 75/20 stocks to bonds. 2-3% in cash. I'm 39. The great majority of the money is in index ETFs and mutual funds, mostly Vanguard. I own a few individual stocks. Some are down, most are up (AAPL, RST, F, BRK.B, INTC). Over the years, I've sold most of my individual stocks and I'm mostly sticking with the ETFs and funds. Bonds are VIPSX (TIPS), VWEHX (high yield) and BIV. Stock funds/ETFs are: VT, VTI, VB, VBR, VDE, VGK, VHT, VIG, VPL, VWO, VYM. Others: VNQ, VNQI (both REITs) and VGPMX and SLV (precious metals). Try the Morningstar X-ray portfolio analysis. You punch in all of your funds/ETFs and their values or percentage of your holdings, and it will give you a great big analysis of the how much you have in each market cap, bond risk, different sectors, etc. That's a nice little tool, although I'm able to do similar analysis with my brokers website. I ran my whole portfolio and it pretty much exactly matched the analysis I've done on my tool, which was nice as it validated what I thought. When calculating allocations, do you guys factor in things like PM's or collectible items like art? I'm guessing if it was statistically significant, one would take the expected cash value of the item and treat it as cash with respect to the portfolio, with the assumption that the market conditions affect the real value of the item. I think that could be significant....it might still be perfectly conservative to sit at 5% in bonds if you are sitting on 20% of your net worth in PM's. For the same reason, the opposite is true.....someone sitting on 90% in PM's might want to start getting into equity funds. |
|
I'm 36, and my usual allocations look something like this:
80% stocks 10% bonds 10% cash The money I keep in bonds is for a very specific purpose, so I don't care much about the yield. I've been buying I-Bonds since they first started selling them. There are, of course, index funds that deal primarily in corporate bonds that have better yields. But, I own stocks that are defined as "BDCs" that more or less generate similar, or better returns in a more streamlined process - without the middle-man. Right now, I'm getting close to having 20% in cash. A few of my favorite stocks have become very expensive, not in terms of P/E, but in terms of their dividend yields. I'm not waiting around for a huge crash or correction, but a 5-10% drop in the sectors I'm looking at will make those dividend yields a lot more attractive again. I sold off most of my PMs a couple years ago, but in general, I would probably never keep more than 10% of my portfolio in PMs. As far as art, or any other asset of that class, I would never include their values as a percentage of my portfolio. I prefer that my 'investment portfolio" only be comprised of assets whose value can be easily, and mathematically determined - almost down to the second of any day. I own a few antiques, but I have no idea what their value is on any given day. The only thing I know for sure is that they are probably worth less than I paid for them. |
