Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
9/24/2006 10:34:28 AM EDT
ATI Radeon X850XT 256MB GDDR3

Or

ATI Radeon X1600PRO 512MB GDDR2


The current and most stressful video card application is to play BF2 at higher settings then is currently possible.

PC is:

Pentium 4 2.8C Northwood 2.8GHz Socket 478
1.5MB Ram
ASUS P4P800  Motherboard
ATI  9600 128MB DDR AGP  All-in-Wonder Video Card
WIN XP


9/24/2006 10:48:36 AM EDT
[#1]
I don't know, but when buying a hot new video card, check its power requirements. Some
of them are so power hungry that they use more power than the rest of the entire PC,
and you may need to upgrade your power supply.


CJ
9/24/2006 11:12:16 AM EDT
[#2]
i'm runing the x850pro on my current system

amd 64 3k+

1.5gb pc 3200 mem

160 sataII drive.

runs bf2 great.  

its does list that it requires a 350 watt or higher powersupply.  
9/24/2006 11:19:49 AM EDT
[#3]
My current power supply should be fine, but if in practice it turns out to not be I have one picked out to replace it with that should also be enough for a new system in the future.  
9/24/2006 11:37:49 AM EDT
[#4]
Check this site out, It has great info for every aspect of computing.

Tom's Hardware

With the VGA charts you can compare any two graphics cards with your choice of benchmark.

ETA: I would go with the X850, It smokes the X1600 in most of the benchmarks.

I used this when I bought my X1900XTX,  It came very close to what is shown here, consistently accurate with their findings as far as fps in the given benchmark.
9/24/2006 2:20:58 PM EDT
[#5]
Should add another option "Nvidia" =)

-d
9/24/2006 3:28:20 PM EDT
[#6]
I just got an ATI AIW X800XT 256MB AGP. It moves right along.
9/24/2006 4:53:05 PM EDT
[#7]


I'd looked at Toms Hardwares VGA chart and it seems that the benchmark I selected is just about the only one that doesn't have the X850XT anywhere on it.

I'm looking more now and it does score higher than the 1600Pro.

Bunny, although I'm not really looking at the AIW cards to replace the current AIW because I want to be able to move my TV Tuner package over to my next build when I do it and I'm changing to the Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-350 but if I decided to return to AIW the X800XT would be my choice.  That might not be such a bad idea at all.. I'll get you a latte in Puyallup.

Ok suggest a comparable Nvidia product at a similar price point (appx $180) (needs to have a DVI out and dual monitor support would be nice)

I've always been happy with ATI (other than one 16 hour trouble shooting session for my current AIW card because the at the time latest drive had a buggy scheduler)
9/24/2006 5:36:13 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:


I'd looked at Toms Hardwares VGA chart and it seems that the benchmark I selected is just about the only one that doesn't have the X850XT anywhere on it.

I'm looking more now and it does score higher than the 1600Pro.

Bunny, although I'm not really looking at the AIW cards to replace the current AIW because I want to be able to move my TV Tuner package over to my next build when I do it and I'm changing to the Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-350 but if I decided to return to AIW the X800XT would be my choice.  That might not be such a bad idea at all.. I'll get you a latte in Puyallup.

Ok suggest a comparable Nvidia product at a similar price point (appx $180) (needs to have a DVI out and dual monitor support would be nice)

I've always been happy with ATI (other than one 16 hour trouble shooting session for my current AIW card because the at the time latest drive had a buggy scheduler)


Are you serious?

If you just click the link in my previous post, I already have the comparison entered in....

The two cards being compared are the ones in BLUE, look at the chart that shows framerates. Higher is better, the X850XT AGP scores way higher than the X1600.

Those are the cards you specified, keep the cards the same and you can select the different benchmark from the drop down menu...

The X850XT is probably the most bang for buck you are going to find....

ETA: here is the link, click THIS and scroll down, look at the blue portions of the graph, those are the cards you specified.  
9/24/2006 6:32:24 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:


I'd looked at Toms Hardwares VGA chart and it seems that the benchmark I selected is just about the only one that doesn't have the X850XT anywhere on it.

I'm looking more now and it does score higher than the 1600Pro.

Bunny, although I'm not really looking at the AIW cards to replace the current AIW because I want to be able to move my TV Tuner package over to my next build when I do it and I'm changing to the Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-350 but if I decided to return to AIW the X800XT would be my choice.  That might not be such a bad idea at all.. I'll get you a latte in Puyallup.

Ok suggest a comparable Nvidia product at a similar price point (appx $180) (needs to have a DVI out and dual monitor support would be nice)

I've always been happy with ATI (other than one 16 hour trouble shooting session for my current AIW card because the at the time latest drive had a buggy scheduler)


Are you serious?

If you just click the link in my previous post, I already have the comparison entered in....

The two cards being compared are the ones in BLUE, look at the chart that shows framerates. Higher is better, the X850XT AGP scores way higher than the X1600.

Those are the cards you specified, keep the cards the same and you can select the different benchmark from the drop down menu...

The X850XT is probably the most bang for buck you are going to find....

ETA: here is the link, click THIS and scroll down, look at the blue portions of the graph, those are the cards you specified.  


I didn't explain very well.

I was banging my head because before you posted I'd gone to Toms Hardware and looked at the comparisons but I selected a test that didn't have a result for the 850 (3D mark 1600x1200, 1280x1024) and stopped looking at that point.

Thank you for setting me straight.

The X850Xt does look to be good (now that Newegg has it back in stock)
9/25/2006 10:26:14 PM EDT
[#10]
Between the X850XT and the X1600Pro, the X850XT has more firepower.

Pipes: 16 vs 8
Bandwidth: 34GB vs 22GB

The X1600 is newer and has a newer shader model which helps it be a little more efficient per cycle...but it's no match for the horsepower of those 16 pipes on the X850.  RAM quantity isn't a factor in this fight as it's a measurement of capacity.  Sure...you need "enough", but even on an intensive game like HalfLife 2, FEAR, or Far Cry, the X850 will wipe the floor with the X1600, which is also reflected on Tom's "interactive" VGA charts.
9/28/2006 11:04:26 AM EDT
[#11]
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/26/the_best_gaming_video_cards_for_the_money/page5.html

interesting articles
9/28/2006 7:09:08 PM EDT
[#12]
Neither- trash mobo and get a mobo w/ pcie x16
good luck either way

here are my specs
------------------
System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 9/28/2006, 21:03:56
Machine name: BADROC1
Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2(2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: INTELR
System Model: AWRDACPI
BIOS: Phoenix - AwardBIOS v6.00PG
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory: 2046MB RAM
Page File: 288MB used, 3144MB available
Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904)
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
DxDiag Version: 5.03.2600.2180 32bit Unicode
---------------
Display Devices
---------------
Card name: Radeon X1600 Series
Manufacturer: ATI Technologies Inc.
Chip type: Radeon X1600 Series (0x71C2)
DAC type: Internal DAC(400MHz)
Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71C2&SUBSYS_23421002&REV_00
Display Memory: 512.0 MB
Current Mode: 1152 x 864 (32 bit) (70Hz)
Monitor: Dell E193FP
-------------
Sound Devices
-------------
Description: SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio [EE00]
Default Sound Playback: Yes
Default Voice Playback: Yes
Hardware ID: PCI\VEN_1102&DEV_0004&SUBSYS_20021102&REV_04
Manufacturer ID: 1
Product ID: 100
Type: WDM
Driver Name: ctaud2k.sys
Driver Version: 5.12.0001.0442 (English)
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
9/29/2006 10:53:00 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
Neither- trash mobo and get a mobo w/ pcie x16
good luck either way


That's not an option at this time.

I looked once and didn't find a suitable motherboard that would accept my Pentium 4 2.8C Northwood 2.8GHz Socket 478 Processor and RAM; a total upgrade isn't warranted just so that one game (currently) will look better.
9/29/2006 11:14:11 AM EDT
[#14]
SLI is the way to go.

I have an old AMD 2600+ with a 850XT (256), that I used to run BF@ on.

I've since upgraded to:

2x - Evga eGeforce 7600 GT KO (256 mb)
ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe NF570SLI
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ Orleans
Thermaltake CL-P0200 Silent 939 K8, CPU Fan
2 GB Corsair DDR2 800 Twin2X Matched RAM
NEC Dual Layer DVD+/-RW (ND3550A)
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 SATA, 320 GB
Hanns-G HC194D LCD Display
Thermotake Soprano case (2x - 120mm, 1x - 80mm fans)
Windoze XP x64

(I have to run XP for BF2, I have a Ubuntu box for crusin' the net)