Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/5/2016 11:36:17 PM EDT
I have a Canon 7D MKII, i have various lenses that cover me from 17mm to 250mm.  I am looking at the following two.  Do any of you have any input on these or reasoning not to get one or the other.  I am looking to stay around $1000 +/- 200.

Canon 400mm F5.6L
Sigma 150mm - 600mm F5.6 - 6.3
ETA: Possibly also the Canon 100mm - 400mm F4.5-5.6


[color=#ff0000]Update 12/14/16
I think i have now narrowed down my selection. I dont want to be stuck
at 400mm so i have decided to look more at the Canon EF 100-400mm
f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens and the Sigma 150mm - 600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM
"Contemporary" Lens. They both have IS, the Canon is a little faster but
the Sigma have a little more reach. Neither is weather proof. I hear
the Canon referred to as a dust pump but from what i can tell from
reading this is not really an issue. I know there is a new Canon MKII
but it is not in my price range. he Sigma is heavier. Any reason to
choose one over the other other than cost as it looks like i can get the
Sigma for a better deal.

Has anyone seen recently these lenses for a good price? I have seen the
Canon for $1299 and the Sigma for $989 including the docking station.
[/color]

Thanks
12/5/2016 11:54:15 PM EDT
[#1]
The 400mm f/5.6 is the one lens that has seriously tempted me to jump ship to Canon.

If it wasn't for the absolutely backwards controls on their cameras, I would have already done it.
12/5/2016 11:55:35 PM EDT
[#2]
If you want a 150-600, check out the Tamron offering.
12/6/2016 3:15:25 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Quoted:
If you want a 150-600, check out the Tamron offering.
View Quote


It really is a great lens for the money.  Only big issue is the body isn't dust sealed so they do suck a lot of airborne crud into the lens body.  I hear the gen 2 fixed a fair bit of that, but can't confirm.  That is an awesome lens though.  We literally couldn't keep them in stock when they came out.  I think we sold ~10+ for Nikon and Cannon the first week, and whatever shipments we'd get after were gone within a day or two during the summer.
12/6/2016 9:30:56 AM EDT
[#4]
Added another lens in the mix in the original post. 
12/6/2016 2:44:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Quoted:


It really is a great lens for the money.  Only big issue is the body isn't dust sealed so they do suck a lot of airborne crud into the lens body.  I hear the gen 2 fixed a fair bit of that, but can't confirm.  That is an awesome lens though.  We literally couldn't keep them in stock when they came out.  I think we sold ~10+ for Nikon and Cannon the first week, and whatever shipments we'd get after were gone within a day or two during the summer.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you want a 150-600, check out the Tamron offering.


It really is a great lens for the money.  Only big issue is the body isn't dust sealed so they do suck a lot of airborne crud into the lens body.  I hear the gen 2 fixed a fair bit of that, but can't confirm.  That is an awesome lens though.  We literally couldn't keep them in stock when they came out.  I think we sold ~10+ for Nikon and Cannon the first week, and whatever shipments we'd get after were gone within a day or two during the summer.



I recently bought the, 150-600 G2 f/5-6.3 version for Canon.  My local camera store was holding an event and there were Rep's from different Mfg's there.
The Tamron Rep. explained in detail the numerous upgrades and improvements over the previous version, one of which includes improved dust and water sealing.
The G2 is about $200.00 more than previous but, the added features are well worth the price, especially when Tamron's G2 is knocking at the door of Sigma's 150-600 Sport offering at the cost of $1999.00 in comparison.

The funny part about this, is that I went to the camera store to buy a 10-18 wide angle lens but, returned home with a 150-600 tele



JP


12/6/2016 11:00:31 PM EDT
[#6]
This is the G1 version

DSCN2041-D7100_Tamron150 by FredMan, on Flickr

DSCN2043-D7100_Tamron600 by FredMan, on Flickr

Results

DSC_9059-Moon 20161010 Sunset by FredMan, on Flickr

Afternoon Doe by FredMan, on Flickr

DSC_0739-Mallard Drake Overflight by FredMan, on Flickr

DSC_8585-Hover by FredMan, on Flickr
12/6/2016 11:16:11 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:



I recently bought the, 150-600 G2 f/5-6.3 version for Canon.  My local camera store was holding an event and there were Rep's from different Mfg's there.
The Tamron Rep. explained in detail the numerous upgrades and improvements over the previous version, one of which includes improved dust and water sealing.
The G2 is about $200.00 more than previous but, the added features are well worth the price, especially when Tamron's G2 is knocking at the door of Sigma's 150-600 Sport offering at the cost of $1999.00 in comparison.

The funny part about this, is that I went to the camera store to buy a 10-18 wide angle lens but, returned home with a 150-600 tele



JP

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you want a 150-600, check out the Tamron offering.


It really is a great lens for the money.  Only big issue is the body isn't dust sealed so they do suck a lot of airborne crud into the lens body.  I hear the gen 2 fixed a fair bit of that, but can't confirm.  That is an awesome lens though.  We literally couldn't keep them in stock when they came out.  I think we sold ~10+ for Nikon and Cannon the first week, and whatever shipments we'd get after were gone within a day or two during the summer.



I recently bought the, 150-600 G2 f/5-6.3 version for Canon.  My local camera store was holding an event and there were Rep's from different Mfg's there.
The Tamron Rep. explained in detail the numerous upgrades and improvements over the previous version, one of which includes improved dust and water sealing.
The G2 is about $200.00 more than previous but, the added features are well worth the price, especially when Tamron's G2 is knocking at the door of Sigma's 150-600 Sport offering at the cost of $1999.00 in comparison.

The funny part about this, is that I went to the camera store to buy a 10-18 wide angle lens but, returned home with a 150-600 tele



JP

HA, that sounds like something i would do.  I was recently looking for a CZ Scorpion EVO SBR and ended up with an HK VP9 Pistol.    Thanks for the input on the lens however.
12/6/2016 11:16:57 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
This is the G1 version

DSCN2041-D7100_Tamron150 by FredMan, on Flickr

DSCN2043-D7100_Tamron600 by FredMan, on Flickr

Results

DSC_9059-Moon 20161010 Sunset by FredMan, on Flickr

Afternoon Doe by FredMan, on Flickr

DSC_0739-Mallard Drake Overflight by FredMan, on Flickr

DSC_8585-Hover by FredMan, on Flickr
View Quote
Thanks for the input and feedback. 
12/6/2016 11:18:37 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Quoted:
The 400mm f/5.6 is the one lens that has seriously tempted me to jump ship to Canon.

If it wasn't for the absolutely backwards controls on their cameras, I would have already done it.
View Quote

I have seen many good things about this one Zack, i am surprised to see that it is not weather sealed however. 
12/6/2016 11:19:28 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Quoted:
If you want a 150-600, check out the Tamron offering.
View Quote

Thanks i will add this to the growing list of distractions. 
12/7/2016 2:09:19 PM EDT
[#11]
Of those, I'd get the Canon 100-400

I haven't owned one, but I've used one.

Once you get used to the push-pull thing, they're great esp if you're shooting in daylight. It's a little too slow for my tastes in low light.
12/8/2016 8:06:11 PM EDT
[#12]
The 400 is sharp with quick autofocus, but if you aren't shooting in good conditions you will want to rest it on something or use a tripod.

7D2 & 400:



Sending you an IM.
12/8/2016 8:12:35 PM EDT
[#13]
Btw, I posted a deal on the 150-600 for $800 in this subforum.  Good for a few more hours then it's gone.
12/8/2016 10:10:26 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Quoted:

Thanks i will add this to the growing list of distractions. 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you want a 150-600, check out the Tamron offering.

Thanks i will add this to the growing list of distractions. 


Welcome to the wonderful world of "Gear Acquisition Syndrome.

Take my word for it.  It's hard to stop at just one lens...or flash...etc...etc....
12/11/2016 11:23:19 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Quoted:


Welcome to the wonderful world of "Gear Acquisition Syndrome.

Take my word for it.  It's hard to stop at just one lens...or flash...etc...etc....
View Quote

Trust me i already know this, i have many tripods, bags, flashes, lenses etc. 
12/14/2016 11:46:10 PM EDT
[#16]
[color=#ff0000]Updated original post but added update here as well.
I think i have now narrowed down my selection. I dont want to be stuck
at 400mm so i have decided to look more at the Canon EF 100-400mm
f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens and the Sigma 150mm - 600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM
"Contemporary" Lens. They both have IS, the Canon is a little faster but
the Sigma have a little more reach. Neither is weather proof. I hear
the Canon referred to as a dust pump but from what i can tell from
reading this is not really an issue. I know there is a new Canon MKII
but it is not in my price range. he Sigma is heavier. Any reason to
choose one over the other other than cost as it looks like i can get the
Sigma for a better deal.

Has anyone seen recently these lenses for a good price? I have seen the
Canon for $1299 and the Sigma for $989 including the docking station.
[/color]

Thanks
12/15/2016 11:50:30 AM EDT
[#17]
One huge reason to choose the Canon is that it holds its value very well and you can sell it on Craigslist in an hour if you need to.