Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/14/2015 4:25:18 PM EDT
Started loading Berger Classic Hunter 168 Grains for my .308. Probly a dumb question, but what is the G1 with BC of .496, and G7 with BC of .254 referring to? I understand BC , what is the G1 and G7?
2/14/2015 5:02:52 PM EDT
[#1]
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.
2/15/2015 10:17:37 AM EDT
[#3]
Thanks
2/16/2015 9:03:21 AM EDT
[#4]
Good link.  Bottom line (TL:DR) is this:

The G1 model uses a flat-based projectile (think 125gr Hornady SST or Winchester 180gr Cor-lokt) as a perfect 1.000

The G7 model uses a boat tail projectile (think a 168/175gr SMK) as a perfect 1.000

This means the G7 is more accurate in modeling the velocity loss and wind deflection of modern long range rifle projectiles than the G7, and the most noted difference is in the trans-sonic and subsonic areas where the performance curves are very different (that is from Litz's book, not from the link).  If you're not going into the trans sonic or subsonic region it shouldn't make much difference to you which you use.  You can also successfully use programs that solve for G1 coefficients at differing velocities to get basically the same effect (if you can get this information).
2/17/2015 1:35:13 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.
View Quote


That's odd. When I first tried using my app with my info I had it set to G1 and came up with 3.1 mils at 400yds. Wasn't anywhere around a 12" gong. Changed it to G7 and called for 2.5 mils. Dialed that in, and first round hit. And a hit everytime after that.
2/17/2015 2:25:54 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Quoted:


That's odd. When I first tried using my app with my info I had it set to G1 and came up with 3.1 mils at 400yds. Wasn't anywhere around a 12" gong. Changed it to G7 and called for 2.5 mils. Dialed that in, and first round hit. And a hit everytime after that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.


That's odd. When I first tried using my app with my info I had it set to G1 and came up with 3.1 mils at 400yds. Wasn't anywhere around a 12" gong. Changed it to G7 and called for 2.5 mils. Dialed that in, and first round hit. And a hit everytime after that.

Did you use these BCs for the 175 gr SMKs? G1: .496 / G7: .243
2/17/2015 6:01:13 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:


That's odd. When I first tried using my app with my info I had it set to G1 and came up with 3.1 mils at 400yds. Wasn't anywhere around a 12" gong. Changed it to G7 and called for 2.5 mils. Dialed that in, and first round hit. And a hit everytime after that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.


That's odd. When I first tried using my app with my info I had it set to G1 and came up with 3.1 mils at 400yds. Wasn't anywhere around a 12" gong. Changed it to G7 and called for 2.5 mils. Dialed that in, and first round hit. And a hit everytime after that.


You put the wrong number in somewhere as my 400 yard load is 2.3 mils. Garbage in, garbage out. Make sure to use the right BC.
2/17/2015 7:57:30 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.
View Quote


Why not just switch to using G7 models as they are clearly a better solution for what you are shooting?
2/17/2015 10:39:24 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Quoted:


Why not just switch to using G7 models as they are clearly a better solution for what you are shooting?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.


Why not just switch to using G7 models as they are clearly a better solution for what you are shooting?


Because I know what I am using works. I stick with things that are tried and tested by me and work for me. Same with gear. I am fine with trying new things but I won't abandon something that works for the latest thing the internet says I have to use. I have used G1s out to 1650 yards with my 300WM and hit. They work. People read things that say they don't and  then all of a sudden they don't work anymore? Nope they work just fine.
2/17/2015 3:51:19 PM EDT
[#10]
I'm in the same boat of using G1 with the 6.5 CM. Works great for me too.
2/17/2015 6:10:17 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:


Because I know what I am using works. I stick with things that are tried and tested by me and work for me. Same with gear. I am fine with trying new things but I won't abandon something that works for the latest thing the internet says I have to use. I have used G1s out to 1650 yards with my 300WM and hit. They work. People read things that say they don't and  then all of a sudden they don't work anymore? Nope they work just fine.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.


Why not just switch to using G7 models as they are clearly a better solution for what you are shooting?


Because I know what I am using works. I stick with things that are tried and tested by me and work for me. Same with gear. I am fine with trying new things but I won't abandon something that works for the latest thing the internet says I have to use. I have used G1s out to 1650 yards with my 300WM and hit. They work. People read things that say they don't and  then all of a sudden they don't work anymore? Nope they work just fine.


Not saying you can't make it work, just that the G7 model is much closer to the actual bullets you are shooting.
2/17/2015 7:41:16 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote History
Quoted:


You put the wrong number in somewhere as my 400 yard load is 2.3 mils. Garbage in, garbage out. Make sure to use the right BC.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.


That's odd. When I first tried using my app with my info I had it set to G1 and came up with 3.1 mils at 400yds. Wasn't anywhere around a 12" gong. Changed it to G7 and called for 2.5 mils. Dialed that in, and first round hit. And a hit everytime after that.


You put the wrong number in somewhere as my 400 yard load is 2.3 mils. Garbage in, garbage out. Make sure to use the right BC.


You're right. I didn't realize you have to change the BC when going between drag models. I still had .247 in when I changed it to G1. I put in .496 and it got me closer. Called for 2.2 mils instead of 3.1 lol. But the G7 calls for 2.5 and works so far. I'll keep with the G7 for me.
2/17/2015 8:09:29 PM EDT
[#13]
What was your velocity with the 175 SMK?
2/17/2015 9:39:47 PM EDT
[#14]
G1 has been, in my experience accurate where G7 is optimistic.
2/18/2015 3:05:58 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Quoted:
Just different drag models. They say the G7 is better for long range boat tail bullets but I have used G1, and continue to, for my long range loads and they have always been on for me. Most I have ever been off is .2 mils at 1000 yards. That's about 7". Not too shabby.

Something to remember though with ballistics programs, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is very much in effect. Make sure you put in all the right data from bullet, environmentals, sight height etc. If not then the program won't help much.
View Quote


Same here...
3/2/2015 9:27:26 AM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Started loading Berger Classic Hunter 168 Grains for my .308. Probly a dumb question, but what is the G1 with BC of .496, and G7 with BC of .254 referring to? I understand BC , what is the G1 and G7?
View Quote


I am not shooting that particular bullet, but I just picked up Bergers reloading manual and I noticed that on virtually every load data page they explicitly recommend use of G7 and provide G7 BC.  I suspect they know what works best with their bullets.
3/2/2015 10:53:20 AM EDT
[#17]
guys, the difference in experiences here is not easily explained, but is due to the fact that the various ballistic calculators use different underlying formulas.   those formulas all need a 'constant' that represents the resistance of air on the bullet, but they don't all use it the same way because they are not all based on the classic drag models.

some well respected ballistic calculators, like field firing solutions, only use "G1" but it's really just a number and you have to calculate it yourself using tools that come with the program.   Others like litz/pejsa prefer G7.  

this article may help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_coefficient#The_G_Model

my advice would be to use the one recommended by whomever wrote your ballistic calculator.


the differences in experience are also partially explained by different expectations about how close a calculator is supposed to be.  i.e. how large the target is
3/17/2015 10:46:49 AM EDT
[#18]
Guys,
In Bryan Litz's book APPLIED BALLISTICS FOR LONG-RANGE SHOOTING chapter 2 "The Ballistic Coefficient " explains what the G1 and G7 are based on and gives added information on "form factors' and such that affect the bullets BC. Very good read with lots of information. Also in the FAQ drop down under the INFORMATION tab on the main page is a shorter explanation. Hope this helps!
Take care,
Phil Hoham
Berger Bullet Tech