Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Pandemic planning (Page 1 of 2)

Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
6/16/2008 7:24:19 PM EDT
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The H5N1 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.

6/17/2008 4:11:12 PM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.




source??
6/17/2008 4:40:26 PM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.



The actual govt. plan can be found on the Dept of homeland security website. Also check your state .gov website for their plan as well. The Fed plan is a strategic outline for all of the states to follow. They will have limited resources and 99% of the population will not be ready. You however have have taken the first step by acknowleging there is a potential problem. Now, Don't panic. There is still time to educate yourself about a Pandemic. They have happened throughout history and will happen again. Most scientist say we are due and H5N1 has potential to be the one. BUT there are other flu virus types out there that could just as easily be the one. Look into the H7 type viruses. You have Ebola, MRSA, TB, and a few others that could spin out of control. Acquiring knowledge about Pandemic potential viruses is the most important step in preparing for them.

The are some great websites devoted to Pandemic flu. FluWiki is the best one I have seen and you can get most of the info you need.

AccurateOne
6/17/2008 4:41:48 PM EDT
[#3]
I learned alot by attending a NIMS 300 & 400 class, and attending a few EMA meetings. I will not be counting on help if a pandemic occurs.
6/17/2008 4:47:40 PM EDT
[#4]
im a banker and we were required by the fed to create a pandemic plan/policy that will be reviewed at our next examination.  most of the bank employees took this as a joke i.e. last man standing take the money is what they liked to say.  not my job to educate them i guess and due to my fore thought and planning, i figure i would be the last man.......
6/17/2008 5:04:30 PM EDT
[#5]
a month or so back there were some articles in the main stream media reporting computer simulations the .gov did regarding the spread of a virus.  the .gov's plan was to quarantine the infected neighborhood/city.  the computer indicated that quarantining would stop the spread at epidemic levels and prevent a pandemic.  good luck w/ that quarantine when the sheeple's food runs out.
6/17/2008 6:21:57 PM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

source??

I am on the committee. The Fed govt has the websites as AccurateOne stated. I don't have all the info with me, and we are still trying to get as much accurate info together before putting together a public information packet for our county.

The quarantine may work in theory, but with most of the sheeple thinking they are more important than everybody else and controlling the outbreak, I just have my doubts most people would stay quarantined for more than a day. The plan calls for about a two week period of quarantine.

Good luck stopping people from going to the store and trying to buy something. That is why in a pandemic, the CDC has the authority to shut the businesses in an area down for whatever length of time deemed necessary to control the situation.
6/17/2008 6:56:58 PM EDT
[#7]
Here is a great information video you can watch online, they used to send out free copies on DVD, seems like they ran out.

Business Not As Usual:
Preparing for a Pandemic Flu


link

Enjoy
6/17/2008 7:04:43 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.



You really need to back up statements like this with sources that are real as well as peer-reviewed (preferably). Sure as hell don't point us to a Wikipedia entry. This sort of statement needs spell checking as its H5N1 but nonetheless: The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human. needs some sort of support independent of your own claims. Do you have a CDC source or NIH reference or perhaps a WHO report?
6/17/2008 7:32:14 PM EDT
[#9]
H3N2 + H5N1 would be bad juju. Sadly one or two mutations it could be real. A protein here and there and boom,,pandemic. I have searched for any news of the combo and have not read anything new.

And BTW, the shelter in place planning speaks of weeks and months, not just 2 weeks. When the officials I thought had all the answers told me, if a pandemic happens YOU better have your shite' together, it grabbed my attention. Theirs is simply NOT ENOUGH resources to handle a large scale pandemic.
6/17/2008 8:09:36 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
H3N2 + H5N1 would be bad juju. Sadly one or two mutations it could be real. A protein here and there and boom,,pandemic. I have searched for any news of the combo and have not read anything new.

And BTW, the shelter in place planning speaks of weeks and months, not just 2 weeks. When the officials I thought had all the answers told me, if a pandemic happens YOU better have your shite' together, it grabbed my attention. Theirs is simply NOT ENOUGH resources to handle a any scale pandemic.
6/18/2008 4:28:23 PM EDT
[#11]
www.fluwikie.com

This is a great starting point to the basics about Pandemic Flu. Dr. Michael Oosterholm is a very respected scientist who has been very outspoken when it comes to a Pandemic. As far as the OP's comment about H5N1 and H3N2 combining I haven't seen anything to confirm that. I know that there are some scientists who have been trying to guess what H5N1 is going to do next. They have been trying to find out what would be the right combo to make H5N1 Pandemic capable. I would assume they have tried to combine the top suspect combinations in the lab by now.

There are plenty of good reference points on the web. The basic science is pretty easy to understand for most anyone. Just basic science and biology class. If you understand the basics then that will help you look for the bubbles in the Pandemic pot. There are people all over the world who are watching this. We will know on the web way before we get any confimation from any government or agency. Indonesia has officially stopped reporting H5N1 deaths. Myanmar has never oficially reported a death yet they are next to Indonesia. The financial ramifications to a country with widespread high path H5N1 can be and has been financially devastating. No country wants to be the one where the pandemic boils over.

AccurateOne
6/18/2008 8:14:53 PM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.



You really need to back up statements like this with sources that are real as well as peer-reviewed (preferably). Sure as hell don't point us to a Wikipedia entry. This sort of statement needs spell checking as its H5N1 but nonetheless: The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human. needs some sort of support independent of your own claims. Do you have a CDC source or NIH reference or perhaps a WHO report?



An experiment mating H5N1 avian flu viruses and a strain of human flu in a laboratory produced a surprising number of hybrid viruses that were biologically fit, a new study reveals.

And while none of the offspring viruses was as virulent as the original H5N1, about one in five were lethal to mice at low doses, showing they retained at least a portion of the power of their dangerous parent.

The work suggests that under the right circumstances - and no one is clear what all of those are - the two types of flu viruses could swap genes in a way that might allow the H5N1 virus to acquire the capacity to trigger a pandemic. That process is called reassortment.

...

This work, done at the CDC, was conducted to study the reassortment potential of H5N1 and H3N2 viruses. H3N2 is one of two human influenza A viruses that cause disease during flu season.

The study was published in PLoS Pathogens, one of the Public Library of Science journals.


link

this not a field that i am at all familiar w/, but the article seems to support what eng208 stated.

edit:  more info, specifically info on research article discussed in above link.


Genetic Compatibility and Virulence of Reassortants Derived from Contemporary Avian H5N1 and Human H3N2 Influenza A Viruses

Li-Mei Chen#, C. Todd Davis#, Hong Zhou, Nancy J. Cox, Ruben O. Donis*
Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

Abstract

The segmented structure of the influenza virus genome plays a pivotal role in its adaptation to new hosts and the emergence of pandemics. Despite concerns about the pandemic threat posed by highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses, little is known about the biological properties of H5N1 viruses that may emerge following reassortment with contemporary human influenza viruses.

In this study, we used reverse genetics to generate the 63 possible virus reassortants derived from H5N1 and H3N2 viruses, containing the H5N1 surface protein genes, and analyzed their viability, replication efficiency, and mouse virulence.

Specific constellations of avian–human viral genes proved deleterious for viral replication in cell culture, possibly due to disruption of molecular interaction networks. In particular, striking phenotypes were noted with heterologous polymerase subunits, as well as NP and M, or NS.

However, nearly one-half of the reassortants replicated with high efficiency in vitro, revealing a high degree of compatibility between avian and human virus genes. Thirteen reassortants displayed virulent phenotypes in mice and may pose the greatest threat for mammalian hosts.

Interestingly, one of the most pathogenic reassortants contained avian PB1, resembling the 1957 and 1968 pandemic viruses. Our results reveal the broad spectrum of phenotypes associated with H5N1/H3N2 reassortment and a possible role for the avian PB1 in the emergence of pandemic influenza.

These observations have important implications for risk assessment of H5N1 reassortant viruses detected in surveillance programs.

Author Summary

The influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968 were caused by hybrid viruses consisting of a mixture of human and avian influenza genes. The introduction of avian genes resulted in a sudden change of the virus surface antigens, allowing its worldwide spread due to lack of immunity in the population.

The highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus has continued its spread in domestic and wild birds in Asia, Europe, and Africa. Although H5N1 infection in humans is rare and person-to-person transmission is very inefficient, the steady accumulation of human cases has raised concern over the possible reassortment between H5N1 and human seasonal influenza resulting in a virus with new surface antigens and pandemic potential.

In this study, we used recombinant DNA technology to generate a systematic collection of hybrid viruses (with genes from human and avian viruses) bearing H5N1 surface antigens and analyzed their properties in cell culture and in mice.

The H5N1 hybrid viruses revealed a broad range of viability and multiplication capacity in cell cultures. In addition, several H5N1 hybrid viruses were highly virulent in mice. Results from this systematic analysis provide important insight to support risk assessment of reassortant H5N1 avian influenza viruses.

Citation: Chen L-M, Davis CT, Zhou H, Cox NJ, Donis RO (2008) Genetic Compatibility and Virulence of Reassortants Derived from Contemporary Avian H5N1 and Human H3N2 Influenza A Viruses. PLoS Pathog 4(5): e1000072. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000072

Editor: Adolfo Garcia-Sastre, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, United States of America

Received: February 21, 2008; Accepted: April 15, 2008; Published: May 23, 2008

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.

Full study here:  link  
6/19/2008 5:13:33 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.



You really need to back up statements like this with sources that are real as well as peer-reviewed (preferably). Sure as hell don't point us to a Wikipedia entry. This sort of statement needs spell checking as its H5N1 but nonetheless: The HN51 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human. needs some sort of support independent of your own claims. Do you have a CDC source or NIH reference or perhaps a WHO report?


Look, noone wants to be the person that put this out on the web. I probably should not have mentioned it. I just wanted to put the awareness out there that this is a very real probability. As for my source, like I said, I am on a planning committee and my source is a representative of the state health organization. Look at my state if you must You might get better results and less defensiveness from people if you change the attitude that your writings reflect. And while you are ridiculing me for making the mistake of hitting the N before the 5, you need to capitalize the N in Need at the beginning of a sentence after a period.
6/19/2008 5:31:02 AM EDT
[#14]
Thanks eng208 for sharing the info you had. I follow H5N1 somewhat close and I had not seen the test report. Don't let people get under your skin here. Just keep your eyes and ears open for any news. It seems you may be in a position to get some good info. I for one do appreciate it. Knowledge is power and because of your first post I will be digging into the test results and bouncing them off of some of my contacts. Thank You!

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 6:23:36 AM EDT
[#15]
If the government was admitting that H5N1 and H3N2 had mutated into a single flu strain that was communucable to humans, not only would we have heard of it before this, but it would be here already. Something like that would spread accross the globe like wildfire.

6/19/2008 6:55:49 AM EDT
[#16]
I think what the article says above is that when they made possible combinations in the lab that 50 of those combinations did not prove to have Pandemic potential. However, 28 of the combos did have Pandemic potential.

Many scientists say the traits that H5N1 needs to acquire will make it less deadly. The problem is that the high death rates happening in some countries is way high. Indonesia and Vietnam rates have been higher than 65% death rate in confirmed cases. Even if H5N1 does become less deadly and say it has a sustained death rate of say 10% then the world as we know it will change during and after a Pandemic. In 1918 the fatality rate was only like 2%. Even at that rate today you would be talking about 10's of millions dead.

If H5N1 was boiling in a modern country like the US then it would be easier to monitor. One of the biggest problems with H5N1 now is that it is bubbling away in these 3rd world countries that do not have a solid medical infrastructure or agriculture system. If and when H5N1 or any pandemic potential virus boils over .gov will be way behind. The chances of stopping it at any border in SE Asia or China will be virtually zero. There is up to a 3 day incubation period with H5N1. People will be walking around infecting other people for many days before any govt knows what is happening. The next Pandemic virus will be on the next plane out and then we will have exponential spread via the airlines.

Build your preps, make a plan and acquire as much knowledge as you can about the threats that face us. "The Great Influenza" by John Barry is a great read.

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 7:04:54 AM EDT
[#17]
Pandemic is man made, assisted and is coming soon. Nobody is going to like what the aftermath holds in store.

Read about what Celeste Bishop has to say about pandemic here in the US. She has worked with emergency management in a high slot federal (fema) level, state level and local level. Anyone want info on the subject, visit her site. It has more info than one could possibly only wish for. I have also listened to her live in several interviews. She is privy to most all the government "Plans". She in turn makes that info available to you.
6/19/2008 9:36:15 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
If the government was admitting that H5N1 and H3N2 had mutated into a single flu strain that was communucable to humans, not only would we have heard of it before this, but it would be here already. Something like that would spread accross the globe like wildfire.


the .gov is not admitting that H5N1 and H3N2 mututated, what they are admitting is that they are attempting to combine it to see how likely it is that the two will combine.

6/19/2008 10:00:43 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
Pandemic is man made, assisted and is coming soon. Nobody is going to like what the aftermath holds in store.

Read about what Celeste Bishop has to say about pandemic here in the US. She has worked with emergency management in a high slot federal (fema) level, state level and local level. Anyone want info on the subject, visit her site. It has more info than one could possibly only wish for. I have also listened to her live in several interviews. She is privy to most all the government "Plans". She in turn makes that info available to you.


Pandemics are not man made. Pandemics happen naturally and have occurred frequently throughout history. The Pandemic of 1918 happened before modern medicine. In fact it is because of that Pandemic that our medical knowledge increased exponentially in this century. Biological warfare can happen. Not many countries out there want to unleash an Ebola or or even a Flu Virus because they cannot control it.

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 10:07:29 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The H5N1 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.



So your saying this is a planned event!! That will be hard to prove..depopulation at it's finest, and plausible to say the least!!
6/19/2008 10:36:33 AM EDT
[#21]
Gammagoat,  Post a link to her, google brings up kook stuff with that name, adding FEMA to the search doesn't help much.
6/19/2008 11:08:44 AM EDT
[#22]
fluwikie.com is not part of the wikipedia network. It is a site much like AR15.com. It is a knowledge base for people looking to learn more about H5N1 and other strains of Influenza. I am not affiliated with them at all. The forums are frequented by many scientists and they can answer most any questions you have. The people who run the site rub elbows with all of the top scientists and .gov reps. If you want to learn about Pandemic Influenza this is a great starting point. The scientific articles are broken down into laymens terms. They have an excellent survival network and many great ideas that they share. I have learned many things about prepping the home for medical emergencies. Spend some time there if you want to learn more about Pandemic Influenza. The first page has a link to getting started with H5N1.

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 11:17:41 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

So your saying this is a planned event!! That will be hard to prove..depopulation at it's finest, and plausible to say the least!!


That is not what I was saying. I am saying that the govt. has speculation that this will occur in the future, based on lab testing of the mutation of the H5N1 virus.  If, or when it happens, then the population that has not taken steps to make plans for the event will not find assistance from the fed govt due to the lack of resources to handle a nation or most likely a worldwide pandemic event.  With international travel and an incubation period of 2-3 days, then a surface life of a couple of days, (meaning the virus from an infected person that touches a door knob, telephone, or any of the thousands of surface contacts we make), the spread would be so fast and so effective that few would be left to take care of the situation. The old would almost automatically be written off, many of the young would also succumb to the virus. The only solution to keep yourself well or overcome the virus is a well taken care of immune system, lots of fluids, wash hands with good soap, and keep yourself away from other people.

I made no reference to a conspiracy of population control.
6/19/2008 11:18:37 AM EDT
[#24]
The following may not be Celeste Bishop’s actual website; however, she is posting here.

http://www.nonaiswa.org/
6/19/2008 12:13:12 PM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:

So your saying this is a planned event!! That will be hard to prove..depopulation at it's finest, and plausible to say the least!!


That is not what I was saying. I am saying that the govt. has speculation that this will occur in the future, based on lab testing of the mutation of the H5N1 virus.  If, or when it happens, then the population that has not taken steps to make plans for the event will not find assistance from the fed govt due to the lack of resources to handle a nation or most likely a worldwide pandemic event.  With international travel and an incubation period of 2-3 days, then a surface life of a couple of days, (meaning the virus from an infected person that touches a door knob, telephone, or any of the thousands of surface contacts we make), the spread would be so fast and so effective that few would be left to take care of the situation. The old would almost automatically be written off, many of the young would also succumb to the virus. The only solution to keep yourself well or overcome the virus is a well taken care of immune system, lots of fluids, wash hands with good soap, and keep yourself away from other people.

I made no reference to a conspiracy of population control.



Ok! The whole fucking with it in a lab threw me off. And someone will prolly turn the shit loose anyway...
6/19/2008 1:09:06 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The H5N1 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.



BS on the red.  While there has been at least one confirmed human to human transfer of the virus, it's hardly there yet.  And a combination of those two would most likely result in a virus that is less virulent than H5N1.  Its still something to be concerned about, but we have almost a year before we need to even worry about it again.

I've done stuff with FEMA, I've done the CERT stuff and yes, if it DOES happen as bad as everyone thinks it will (which it won't), FEMA/.gov isn't going to be able to do squat.
6/19/2008 2:03:25 PM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

Quoted:

So your saying this is a planned event!! That will be hard to prove..depopulation at it's finest, and plausible to say the least!!


The old would almost automatically be written off, many of the young would also succumb to the virus. The only solution to keep yourself well or overcome the virus is a well taken care of immune system, lots of fluids, wash hands with good soap, and keep yourself away from other people.


This statement is not quite on par with the science that is out there. When someone is infected with H5N1 the body immediately starts to fight it. Your body starts what is called a cytokine storm. The influenza virus is constantly infecting new cells within the lungs. Your body has to kill the cells to kill the virus. This ovewhelming response actually destroys your lungs. Many people who survive H5N1 eventually die of pnuemonia or other respiratory diseases. Encephalitis was another major cause of death during the 1918 Pandemic. If they do live they are never the same. Now back to the cytokine storm. In the Pandemic of 1918 the majority of the people that died were young healthy adults. There were fewer deaths in the very young, babies and elderly. The reason is because their immune systems were less developed or less healthy. Therefore the cytokine storm produced by the body was less severe and less damage done to the lungs. Social Distancing is the key to surviving a Pandemic. Until 1918 shaking hands was the formal way to greet someone. Once people learned that the virus spread through contact gentlemen started tipping their caps. The 1918 Pandemic hit in four 6-8 week periods. It came and went in waves. Unfortunately, no one knew when the wave was coming so if you guessed wrong on the day to go to church or the market you probably didn't come home.

Anyone heard of the kids game Ring around the Rosy? That started during the 1918 Pandemic. The stench from rotting bodies waiting to be buried and the fires that burned the bodies was so strong that people carried around a pocket full of posies to put over their face. The ashes, ashes we all fall down part was the ash from the death funaces spreading in the air. The we all fall down part means you were dead..............My kids do not play this game!

Guys the science behind H5N1 isn't hard to understand or find. You will be better prepared if you will take a little time to do a small amount of research. Not knocking anyone just concerned for my fellow man.

Someone posted that we do not have to worry about it until next year. Not true. H5N1 is a disease in migrating birds. They can and have carried this desease to over 1/2 of the earth. The crucial mutation may be waiting for them on a lake in China of in the middle of Africa we do not know. The birds never stop moving. SE asia has been the hotspot. Egypt concerns me greatly. The birds brought the hot form of H5N1 from Quinghai Lake, China and introduced it into N. Africa. The disease seems to be very bad there. If that goes further south into Somalia and other shit hole countries it could get bad very quick.

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 2:03:36 PM EDT
[#28]
i love these threads.

could bird flu be bad, sure. but honestly there are MUCH worse bugs to worry about that are already in the population.
6/19/2008 2:07:09 PM EDT
[#29]
something you guys need to keep in mind.

most of these scientist live off of grant money.  while there is good valid information there, there is also a bit of fear mongering used to get them research/grant money to stop the next pandemic. i watched this on a regular basis by researchers at usamriid.

yes it's possible but read this stuff with a bit of this in mind.
6/19/2008 2:14:18 PM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:

most of these scientist live off of grant money.  while there is good valid information there, there is also a bit of fear mongering used to get them research/grant money to stop the next pandemic. i watched this on a regular basis by researchers at usamriid.




+1k

Whether it's bird flu, global warming today or the coming ice age of forty years ago, there's a lot of money to be made in "hard science."
6/19/2008 2:17:40 PM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
i love these threads.

could bird flu be bad, sure. but honestly there are MUCH worse bugs to worry about that are already in the population.


True enough. But let's take ebola for example. Ebola kills its host to quickly therefore it burns out very quickly. If ebola was able to infect birds but not kill them then I would say that one may be the apocalypse. A human killer with the ability to spread across the globe. But, in its current form ebola is to efficient. Influenza viruses are different in that they can adapt to different hosts. The virus is actually looking for its nirvana, a host in which it can live in harmony. Yet, they change because they become intermingled with different types. If we were able to seperate all of gods creatures and keep them that way then the Influenza viruses could find a compatible host and thrive. However, since that isn't possible Influenza viruses will continue to exchange proteins and alter their own DNA to keep seeking its perfect host.

There are other diseases out there that are worrisome. If H5N1 doesn't become a Pandemic strain then there will be another right on its heals. H7N2 could be the next candidate. The new Super TB, MRSA and a few more are out there and we will be dealing with them soon enough.

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 2:35:44 PM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:

Quoted:

most of these scientist live off of grant money.  while there is good valid information there, there is also a bit of fear mongering used to get them research/grant money to stop the next pandemic. i watched this on a regular basis by researchers at usamriid.




+1k

Whether it's bird flu, global warming today or the coming ice age of forty years ago, there's a lot of money to be made in "hard science."


I agree with you. I am one who believes about 10 percent of what I read. H5N1 is a little different.

1. Pandemics happen
2. We have an Influenza virus that has jumped to humans and kills humans very effectively.
3. Has shown the ablity to be passed from human to human. Although not very effectively yet.
4. Has jumped to multiple species and therefore can pick up more traits from other mammals. Not all Influenza viruses can infect cats and weesels. This one has. The jump to cats was a trigger point for many scientists. The more mammals it exchanges proteins with the more of a chance H5N1 picks up the necessary mutations to easily pass between humans.

AccuarateOne
6/19/2008 3:43:59 PM EDT
[#33]
AccurateOne, you seem to be very well educated on this type of problem. I am just beginning.

You are correct on the way that the virus attacks the host and the immune response. The problem with the old is that most older patients have chronic respiratory problems to begin with. The additional stress that a serious form of the flu places on them is many times unbearable and exacerbates an underlying compromise. Compromise the respiratory system too much and you have respiratory failure, leading to death. The problem with kids results from the metabolic activity of a normal kid is such that the respiratory system is so important of getting rid of the carbon dioxide from the cells in the body. That is one of the reasons a kid has a faster respiratory rate than an adult. Another is the size of their lungs being of course smaller. Compromise the ability to get rid of built up CO2 and the body becomes acidotic, which can result in kidney failure, liver failure, and the body can not survive acidosis long term. Also dehydration plays a huge role in the mortality/morbidity rate of infected individuals.

The adults that do survive often time have ARDS. Adult (sometimes called acute) Respiratory Distress Syndrome that makes them short of breath and remodels the lungs to where they become much less efficient.

I would like to meet you one day, I am sure we could discuss many interesting things.

As for Rkclmbr that referred to "BS to that in red". I don't really care whether you "think" it is BS or not. Just because you read it on the internet does not necessarily make it true, but just because you can't find it on the internet does not mean it is BS either. If it is BS, a pretty good source from the state is spreading it
6/19/2008 5:19:40 PM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:
Gammagoat,  Post a link to her, google brings up kook stuff with that name, adding FEMA to the search doesn't help much.


you will find that although interesting, much of what gamaggoat posts is "kook stuff".  
6/19/2008 5:25:32 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I have been a member here for a while, but don't cover the SF forum everyday.

I know SHTF can be a multitude of scenarios. Do most of you know that the Fed. Govt is planning on an influenza pandemic over the next 5-10 yrs? The H5N1 virus has officially combined with the H3N2 common influenza virus in the lab to make the deadly Avian flu virus communicable human to human.

Any idea what kind of contingency plan the govt has?  I can guarantee you it is not pretty. The feds are not planning to help. All local govt and facilities are on their own as far as resources are concerned. If your local authorities do not plan for this and anticipate it, it will be very bad for anyone in that area. It is going to be bad anyway, but planning will help.

The basic survival mindset is the main thing. Those that rely on others to help can pretty much guarantee their own demise. Those that bug in to their planned locations with a month or two of supplies will come out pretty good, and in a whole lot less populated area than what they remembered it being before.



BS on the red.  While there has been at least one confirmed human to human transfer of the virus, it's hardly there yet.  And a combination of those two would most likely result in a virus that is less virulent than H5N1.  Its still something to be concerned about, but we have almost a year before we need to even worry about it again.

I've done stuff with FEMA, I've done the CERT stuff and yes, if it DOES happen as bad as everyone thinks it will (which it won't), FEMA/.gov isn't going to be able to do squat.


re: your calling BS on the red, you're actually wrong.  go read the long post i made on the first page where i actually link to a study where they did indeed combine H5N1 and H3N2 w/ varying degrees of success.
6/19/2008 5:29:43 PM EDT
[#36]
sorry for the triple tap - this forum really needs a multiquote function.


Quoted:
something you guys need to keep in mind.

most of these scientist live off of grant money.  while there is good valid information there, there is also a bit of fear mongering used to get them research/grant money to stop the next pandemic. i watched this on a regular basis by researchers at usamriid.

yes it's possible but read this stuff with a bit of this in mind.


agreed.  what i worry about is that in the name of preventing or, better said, "studying" the likelihood of the combining of the two viruses, man gives the whole process a boost.  in other words research to prevent/investigate the probability of a pandemic actually leads to said pandemic.  of course i trust that there are a ton of safety protocols to prevent a release of the deadly mix, i also believe whole heartedly in the law of unintended consequences.
6/19/2008 6:02:25 PM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:
i love these threads.

could bird flu be bad, sure. but honestly there are MUCH worse bugs to worry about that are already in the population.


One thing to keep in mind is that dismissing something as doomsday-saying does not invalidate the warning.

If you've worked at USAMRIID you know that millions of dollars are spent each year for the bio-terror agent detection and identification systems.  I work at Idaho Technology, which has the JBAIDS contract, and understand what the cash looks like.  This is millions of dollars being spent for a mostly negative world.  H5N1 has been proven to be spreading.  Hopefully it stays in the mostly negative realm, yet the same attention at the same intensity isn't being paid to H5N1.

I've met people at AFIP and WRAIR that believe H5N1 is a threat and more attention needs to be paid to it.  These are also people who don't have grants that they've put in regarding H5N1.  Last time I was at AFIP there was only one  researcher who expressed interest in Idaho Tech's H5N1 PCR assay on the JBAIDS for field surveillance in the Eastern Block Countries.

Also, something must be said about the speed in which the FDA approved the H5N1 vaccine.  Reading the study report one could show that previous vaccines had better rates of sero-conversion, with stronger responses, and were still turned down.  The vaccine had a lot of time put into it and also lots of $$$.  Someone saw enough of a need for something that may never materialize.  Why don't we have the same stock piles of vaccines for Ebola, Marburg, VEE, WEE, EEE?  Yet the CDC has ~193 million doses of the Vaccinia virus vaccine stockpiled.
6/19/2008 6:05:08 PM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:
AccurateOne, you seem to be very well educated on this type of problem. I am just beginning.

You are correct on the way that the virus attacks the host and the immune response. The problem with the old is that most older patients have chronic respiratory problems to begin with. The additional stress that a serious form of the flu places on them is many times unbearable and exacerbates an underlying compromise. Compromise the respiratory system too much and you have respiratory failure, leading to death. The problem with kids results from the metabolic activity of a normal kid is such that the respiratory system is so important of getting rid of the carbon dioxide from the cells in the body. That is one of the reasons a kid has a faster respiratory rate than an adult. Another is the size of their lungs being of course smaller. Compromise the ability to get rid of built up CO2 and the body becomes acidotic, which can result in kidney failure, liver failure, and the body can not survive acidosis long term. Also dehydration plays a huge role in the mortality/morbidity rate of infected individuals.

The adults that do survive often time have ARDS. Adult (sometimes called acute) Respiratory Distress Syndrome that makes them short of breath and remodels the lungs to where they become much less efficient.

I would like to meet you one day, I am sure we could discuss many interesting things.

As for Rkclmbr that referred to "BS to that in red". I don't really care whether you "think" it is BS or not. Just because you read it on the internet does not necessarily make it true, but just because you can't find it on the internet does not mean it is BS either. If it is BS, a pretty good source from the state is spreading it


eng208: I will be the first to admit that I am not a scientist or in the medical profession. It seems that you may be more trained than I when it comes to the respiratory system. I am willing to, and need to learn more about it. Maybe you can help me learn more about why the Pandemic strain in 1918 killed fewer children and the elderly. i have always read that it was a lower cytokine storm response by the body. If i am wrong then I would be interested in the correct info. Thanks for starting this thread.

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 6:27:43 PM EDT
[#39]
eng208: Just went on to fluwikie.com

Left side of page: Influenza Science

Left side of page: Epidemiology

Middle of page: Demographics of H5N1
                      Demographics of H5N1 in Indonesia
                      Demographics of 1918 virus

This data shows that the young are susceptible to H5N1 just not as highly as 20-40 year olds. The curve goes way down at 40 and beyond. Something interesting is that in Indonesia it seems that there has been only 1 out of 57 to die in the 40+ age group. That would put 40 year olds alive before the last Pandemic of 1968-69. Maybe people alive in Indonesia prior to 1969 show some immunity to H5N1?

AccurateOne
6/19/2008 7:09:07 PM EDT
[#40]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Gammagoat,  Post a link to her, google brings up kook stuff with that name, adding FEMA to the search doesn't help much.


you will find that although interesting, much of what gamaggoat posts is "kook stuff".  


Gee, thanks. You mean 'Kook' stuff like the weather wars taking place right now between China and the United States? Nicola Tesla was no kook. That kook stuff is gonna take a few by surprise.

Celeste claims, through documents she has uncovered and viewed across her desk while at FEMA  level that things will get very interesting, very soon. Many will be forced to make a critical choice or choices. The food supply is to be used in a certain way to achieve a certain result. Pandemic will be used as a cover to advance certain other things and programs. That's why I say this pandemic has a human hand in it. There is only one reason to exhume and splice 1918 to H5n1.  You'll see.
6/19/2008 7:10:12 PM EDT
[#41]
That is really interesting. It may hold some truth in the belief that most all of the current strains are derivatives of the 1918 flu. If the body has some immunity to the core virus, or at least recognizes it early and acts appropriately it may help prevent the 1918 reponse where the lung cells (the alveoli) basicly ruptured from all of the fluid that was brought as an immune response after the virus had a good start in the body. I think that is what caused the rapid decline in health that ocurred overnight and the pink frothy sputum that led to the demise of many of those flu victims. I have been unable to find any good research that shows WHY the old and young fared better than the middle age people, but the statistics show they did in that particular outbreak, which was unusual.

I have looked, but I cannot find what makes the 1918 and the H5N1 strains so deadly to otherwise healthy individuals and the older fair much better, which is completely opposite of normal influenza outbreaks.
6/19/2008 9:42:18 PM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:

2. We have an Influenza virus that has jumped to humans and kills humans very effectively.

Yes, but it is not yet being transmitted human-to-human with any real frequency if at all. That is to say, we've not yet seen a strain that is very lethal and very transmissible.

3. Has shown the ablity to be passed from human to human. Although not very effectively yet.

Same point as above-- the two traits (lethality and H-to-H transmissibility) are so far mutually exclusive except possibly in rare cases. H-to-H transmissibility is determined through epidemiological data rather than genetic markers, so it's not exactly quantifiable.

4. Has jumped to multiple species and therefore can pick up more traits from other mammals. Not all Influenza viruses can infect cats and weesels. This one has. The jump to cats was a trigger point for many scientists. The more mammals it exchanges proteins with the more of a chance H5N1 picks up the necessary mutations to easily pass between humans.

I've got to nit-pick a little here. Traits aren't gotten from animals, but rather are selected for or against as the various genetically distinct strains and mutants of virus pass through a population. Also, the virus isn't receiving proteins from mammals. Its genetic code may change over time as the virus adapts to a new host, but it isn't picking up mammalian proteins. This does happen in some pathogens, as in the case of some bacteria and parasites that mask themselves by wearing their host's proteins, but not in influenza. You also cannot say that if it passes through more species the odds of it mutating to become transmissible H-to-H increase. Some hosts are dead-ends evolutionarily, and some are just dead-ends on the path toward efficient transmission H-to-H. Viruses that coexist in a host can exchange genetic material and thus gain new traits-- this may be what you mean.

AccuarateOne
6/20/2008 3:05:56 AM EDT
[#43]
i. Get every vaccination you are. Ironic if you survive the superbug only to get knocked over by something like the flu.
ii. Remote BoB
iii. Stock of antivirals and disinfectants.
6/20/2008 4:26:25 AM EDT
[#44]
i am not dismissing this at all. i am however asking you guys to keep a skeptical eye on what is "reported."

we have a much higher chance of a tb or "x" pox epidemic than we do bird flu. mother nature has a long history or "cleaning the planet" every few hundred years.

the average man on the street is NOT going to be able to stop it, nor will you be able to realistically prepare/ quaranteen yourself from it. by the time you have been made aware it's in your area, your either exposed and on your way down, or your exposed and not symptomatic. either way there is VERY little one can do to prep for such things barring living in a bubble 24x7.

i simply do not worry about things i simply can not contain and control. the chances of getting hit by a tornado or earthquake are FAR higher than anyone here contracting birdflu in the next 5 years.
6/20/2008 5:49:22 AM EDT
[#45]

Quoted:

Quoted:


I've got to nit-pick a little here. Traits aren't gotten from animals, but rather are selected for or against as the various genetically distinct strains and mutants of virus pass through a population. Also, the virus isn't receiving proteins from mammals. Its genetic code may change over time as the virus adapts to a new host, but it isn't picking up mammalian proteins. This does happen in some pathogens, as in the case of some bacteria and parasites that mask themselves by wearing their host's proteins, but not in influenza. You also cannot say that if it passes through more species the odds of it mutating to become transmissible H-to-H increase. Some hosts are dead-ends evolutionarily, and some are just dead-ends on the path toward efficient transmission H-to-H. Viruses that coexist in a host can exchange genetic material and thus gain new traits-- this may be what you mean.

Hey red on black. I am always willing to learn something. As I understand it our genetic code is made up of proteins. The Influenza virus has the ability to strip down and seperate a cells DNA and RNA and take away proteins that will help it along its journey. I understand these to be mutations. So when an Influenza virus infects a host it strips down a cells genetic makeup and can acquire certain amino acids to make it easier to infect the host. This happens during the incubation period of the virus. Once the virus has the new "keys" it proceeds to spread rapidly throughout the host. So let's say someone in Indonesia becomes infected with H5N1. They hop on a plane and go to France where the common current year strain of the flu in prevalent. The Indonesian person shakes hands, hugs and kisses the person from France. The French person now becomes infected. The H5N1 Influenza virus may now be passed through different French hosts until it meets up with the current year strain. The two Influenza viruses swap DNA at the most basic level.  If H5N1 picks up the current strains ability to easily infect humans then we could have a Pandemic.

Here is a document that I use to help me understand the Influenza virus. If you see something in this document that I am misreading, please point it out so I can understand this more clearly:

The disease influenza is caused by a virus (as opposed to a bacterium or a parasite or a fungus). Bacteria, parasites and fungi are clearly living agents, but there is controversy about whether a virus is alive or not, since it doesn’t have the ability to reproduce on its own but must hijack the machinery of a living host cell.

In fact that’s all the virus does, reproduce. From its point of view, you are just a way to make another virus. If making you sick is an efficient way to do that, it will, but if making you too sick interferes with its ability to reproduce, it will change to be nicer to you. Likewise, if your body doesn’t like the way the virus has chosen to use you to reproduce (say by making you cough and sneeze virus for weeks on end), you react in various ways to get rid of it, for example by having your immune system make antibodies to neutralize the virus’s ability to infect you. We have developed defense mechanisms because, just like the virus, without them we wouldn’t get a chance to reproduce and if that happened too often we wouldn’t be here as a species. So mostly we get better, but that doesn’t mean we have ‘won.’ If the virus has found a way to infect another host it has accomplished its purpose, even if you have eliminated or neutralized the ones that took up housekeeping in your respiratory tract. That’s the big picture. What about the details? If the virus has only one end in view, how does it do it?

Influenza viruses are actually a family of viruses (called the orthomyxoviridae) which has three members, types A, B and C. All three types infect people, but type A is the one that causes influenza pandemics, so we will concentrate on it. Influenza A is a medium sized virus, as viruses go, but all viruses are extremely small, much smaller than bacteria. They were first characterized infectious agents so small they could pass through the very fine filters which stopped all other known micro-organisms (hence the older term, ‘filterable viruses’). Compared to almost any other micro-organism viruses are also simple in structure, consisting of little else than genetic material that specifies how the virus is built and any accessory structures it needs to trick a host cell to build a new copy of itself from this blueprint. In effect, it wants to turn the host cell into a xerox machine for influenza virus.

Commandeering a host cell for this purpose is called infection. The consequences for the host cell might be small (new copies of a harmless virus are made) or catastrophic (the host cell dies and viral copies are loosed to infect and kill more cells). Because our bodies try to defend against bad consequences we have defenses which are in turn countered by viral counter-defenses, which the virus builds into its structure. Thus the influenza virus has both the means to replicate itself and some tools and strategies to interfere with the host cell’s ability to prevent it from accomplishing its objective.

↑ top ↑


General structure of the virus
All viruses have a core of genetic material (the blueprint for its structure) which is surrounded by a protective covering of protein (called a capsid). The genetic material is not the same in all viruses. The genetic material in influenza A is a single-stranded ribonucleic acid (ssRNA), in contrast to the genetic material in our cells which is double-stranded desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), the two strands coiled around each other in the famous double-helix configuration.

In addition to the capsid, many viruses add covering materials (envelopes) that have sugars and fats on them. Influenza A is an enveloped virus. This basic visual model may help those new to the basic structure. When the virus infects a cell its objective is to get the DNA cell’s molecular machinery to make a new ssRNA virus with its genetic material, capsid and envelope, just as if you were to go to someone else’s workshop with a blueprint and get them to put their work aside and use their tools and materials to make many copies of what you wanted at their expense.

To accomplish this the virus must solve several problems. It needs to gain access to the host cell’s equipment and materials, it needs to trick it into working on a virus instead of things useful for the cell and the organism generally, and it needs to get the copies out of the cell and into other cells so they can make copies of themselves in other cells.

↑ top ↑

Getting access to the host cell’s equipment and materials
For the moment we assume the intact viral particle (also called a virion) has arrived in the respiratory tract. It is still on the ‘outside,’ however. It needs to get into a cell where the equipment is located to make a new virus. It is time to take a closer look at the viral envelope which has a protein sticking through it that is important for getting the virus into the host cell.

The envelope is a lipid (fatty) and protein layer containing some sugars that overlies the protein capsid. The hard shell-like capsid is made of the virus’s own protein (designated M1 protein), but the lipid-protein (lipoprotein) layer enveloping it comes from material stolen from the outer cell wall of the previously infected host cell when the virus ‘budded’ through its surface. Technically it is a phospholipid bilayer typical of cell membranes. But the envelope also has viral protein spikes with sugars (carbohydrates) attached sticking through it.

The protein-sugar combination is called a glycoprotein. Three such glycoproteins specified by (‘coded for’) the viral genetic material are called hemagglutinin (HA), neuraminidase (NA), and M2. Since they are on the viral surface, the immune system ‘sees’ them and can make antibodies against them for immunity. There are 16 broad immune classes of HA glycoprotein and 9 different NA immune classes. (Antibodies to M2 also exist, but their role in immunity is not clear at the moment.) The different HA immune classes are designated H1 to H16 and the 9 NA immune classes, N1 to N9. These are the basis for the different influenza virus subtypes like H1N1 or H3N2. The former has HA protein spikes of immune class H1, the latter of immune class H3, and similarly for the NA immune classes.

Within each immune class there may be larger or smaller variation which will affect how well antibodies directed against one H1 glycoprotein will work against another H1 glycoprotein that looks slightly different to the immune system. These differences give rise to the different strains of the virus that arise from year to year, but they are not as large as the differences between the major classes.

Here is an analogy. Dogs come in various broad classes (Saint Bernards, Collies, Dachshunds, etc.) that are very different from each other. They are all dogs, but they don’t look much alike. These are the H1, H2, etc. and N1, N2, etc. classes of glycoproteins. Within each breed there are also smaller variations: some variation in size, hair color, pattern, etc. These are the strains of virus within each H–N subtype combination. If the only dog you know is a black Saint Bernard with a rough coat you may be a bit confused when confronted with a red Saint Bernard with a smooth coat, and if you encounter a chihuahua you may not even recognize the animal before you is a dog. Similarly your immune system may be slow and ineffective in recognizing different strains of the same viral subtype and not even ‘see’ a different subtype at all. Our immune systems have no experience with the H5 subtype of influenza A virus, which is one of the main reasons public health officials are so concerned: one of our main defense systems, the immune system, may be ineffective until it learns to recognize this subtype, and the learning only takes place after infection. In the case of previous infections with the same subtype, even if the strain is different, there may some recognition and the response, while delayed, may still have some effectiveness. But with the H5 subtype, the virus will reproduce unhindered for much longer and your immune system may not have enough time to make antibodies at all.

The importance of the HA glycoprotein goes beyond the immune system response. If the HA and NA proteins only function was to be a target for the immune system the virus would have no use for them and in fact they would be a detriment. The HA protein also functions as the key to getting in to the locked door of the host cell. Here’s how it works.

The HA glycoprotein of the virus has a special region, called the receptor binding site, that can attach to a host cell if that cell has a specific receptor molecule. Host respiratory cells also have lipid bilayers studded with glycoproteins. The receptor molecule for influenza A virus is a host cell glycoprotein with a side chain tipped with a particular kind of sugar called a sialic acid. The specific sialic acid characteristic of human cells is N-acetylneuraminic acid (NeuAc) and when attached to the cell’s glycoprotein via yet another sugar called galactose it is a potential receptor for attachment of the influenza A virus via the HA protein spike. It is ‘potential’ because there is one additional subtlety here. It depends upon how the NeuAc sialic acid is attached to the galactose. There are several possible linkages, of which two, the α-(2,3) and the α-(2,6) linkages, are important for influenza virus recognition. The numbers and the Greek letter tell which atoms are connected to which on the sialic acid and the galactose.

It was thought that bird respiratory and intestinal tract cells had NeuAc- α-(2,3)-Gal linkages while human respiratory tract cells had NeuAc- α-(2,6)-Gal linkages, although it now appears human respiratory tracts have both, although on different cell types. It seems true, however that avian influenza viruses prefer the former and human influenza viruses the latter. Pigs have both types of linkages which is why they are thought to be an important mixing vessel for genetic reassortments and recombinations, since the pig can be co-infected by both human and avian viruses. Thus a change in the HA binding site via a mutation that would allow efficient binding to a human receptor could cause a virus that previously was efficiently transmitted among birds to be transmitted from person to person. This is rather neat, but unfortunately it isn’t the whole story. Other factors also seem to be involved in determining host specificity of influenza viruses. We also know avian viruses can infect humans, although less efficiently. Thus there is more to it and it is an unfinished story.

Things are already a bit complicated. To summarize, the influenza virus has a glycoprotein spike, the HA protein, on its surface that can dock to the right kind of receptor on the host cell’s surface. The HA glycoprotein is thus a key, or at least an important component of a key, that unlocks the door to the inside of the host cell, if it can find and fit the right address. That address is a cell surface glycoprotein with a protein-galactose- α-(2,3/6)-NeuAc (sialic acid) combination waving in the breeze.

The complications don’t end there. Once attached, the virus is engulfed by the host cell in a process where part of the cell surface (the ‘cell membrane’) is induced to form a deepening pit that encloses the virus, eventually pinching off to make a little enclosing bubble that transports the virus into the cell. At some point (exactly when and where isn’t completely clear), to be infective the HA glycoprotein has to be cut (‘cleaved’) into two pieces, HA1 and HA2. This is done by a special kind of enzyme called a protease, of which there are many varieties, some present only in specific tissues, others more common. The site on HA where this must occur (the cleavage site) is quite narrow so the variety of proteases that can trigger infectiveness is limited to those present on one or perhaps a few tissues, primarily respiratory and intestinal tissue in birds and respiratory tissue in humans. Avian viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes may have mutations that insert extra amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) at the cleavage site, widening it and allowing a larger variety of tissue proteases to perform the cleavage operation. Proteases like to work after specific kinds of amino acids, the ones with basic groups on their side chains (there are three such basic amino acids, lysine, arginine and histidine). The Low Pathogenic H5s have only one basic amino acid at the cleavage site. The ‘polybasic amino acids at the cleavage site’ are characteristic of the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) viruses that have devastated poultry in recent years, allowing infection of a wide variety of tissues (nervous system, kidney, heart) by the influenza virus. The extra basic amino acids are arginine and lysine, and the pattern for HPAI H5N1 in poultry has been fairly constant, but there is a variant that is missing either a lysine or an arginine. North Vietnam has such a variant missing an arginine, although it is still “polybasic.”

Again, such mutations are not the only or even necessary determinant of high pathogenicity (more properly virulence). Subtle variations in the configuration of the cleavage site and the presence or absence of sugar sidechains at various places may also play a major part, as recent analysis of remnants of the 1918 virus suggests. At this time, it is not possible to look at the sequence of a virus and predict ahead of time its pathogenicity (ability to cause disease) or virulence (ability to cause severe disease) for humans.

The importance of cleavage of the HA glycoprotein is that it is needed for what happens next. Once inside the bubble (called a vesicle), the internal environment of the (especially its acidity) causes the viral covering to fuse with the vesicle’s wall which releases the genetic material of the virus into the host cell, finally giving it access to the tool shop to make new copies of itself. This fusing with the vesicle is called ‘uncoating’ and requires cleavage of HA to happen.

↑ top ↑

The role of the M2 protein
Another important component in the uncoating is the viral M2 protein, called an ion channel. It is this protein that is the target of the antiviral drugs amantadine and rimantadine. Unfortunately, the virus can fairly easily change its M2 protein so that these drugs no longer prevent its function, thus producing drug resistance. However resistance in circulating viruses seems uncommon, although it emerges rapidly, often within two or three days of start of treatment. It may be that the mutant M2 is disadvantageous and back mutation also occurs readily. H5 viruses circulating in southeast asia are apparently resistant but not H5s elsewhere. Thus whether amantadine will have any place in treating avian influenza in humans is unclear at this time.

↑ top ↑

Commandeering the host cell’s machinery to make the components of new viruses
The viral construction program, encoded in single stranded RNA, is now inside the cell where it migrates to the nucleus, the location of the host cell’s own DNA blueprint. The uncoated viral RNA, which like DNA specifies proteins via a sequence of three-letter codes (‘the genetic code’), isn’t naked, but is complexed with some important viral proteins in a package referred to as ribonucleoprotein (RNP). One protein component (NP) is involved in stabilizing the shape of the RNA, anchoring it within the capsid before uncoating and transporting it to the right places inside the cell after uncoating. The code for NP is also in the viral RNA, so it is a viral product.

Now the viral RNA must accomplish two things. One is to make a copy of itself (replication). The other is to direct the host cell to manufacture the ten protein pieces of a new virus. We have already seen some of these pieces: the HA, NA, M1, M2 and NP proteins. The RNP complex also has another vital protein, RNA polymerase (abbreviated as PB1). This is an enzyme, also coded for by the virus, that both makes a template (messenger RNA or mRNA) used by the host cell to construct viral proteins; and also participates in making a copy of the viral RNA blueprint. Thus the viral RNA polymerase is key to both tasks, replication and viral protein production.

↑ top ↑

Replication
RNA polymerase doesn’t make an exact copy of RNA but instead a ‘code mirror image’ (complementary) copy. Viral RNA is replicated in two steps, one to make a mirror image copy of the RNA and a second step to make a mirror image of the mirror image, i.e., a duplicate of the original viral RNA. Errors can easily occur during this double duplication and the conventional view is that it is these errors that cause the many genetic variations seen as the virus replicates.

Digression – controversies over what drives genetic variation

Another view of what causes genetic change in influenza virus RNA, championed by Mark and Adrian Gibbs in Australia and Henry Niman in the US, holds that the driving force in genetic variation is not error-prone duplication but the process of recombination, where bits of genetic material from different genes in the virus or from similar genes of two different viruses swap pieces to produce hybrid genes. Thus there is evidence the HA glycoprotein of the 1918 virus is derived from both pig influenza virus and human influenza virus sources, with the beginning and ends of the HA from human flu virus and the middle part of the HA from a virus that was circulating in pigs. But the pathogenicity and virulence of influenza viruses is almost certainly multigenic, i.e. it requires cooperating changes in more than one gene. Thus the conclusion arrived at for the cleavage site above also holds true here: we can’t predict virulence at this time, although there are many tantalizing clues as to what might be going on. The question remains as to the relative contributions of mutation versus recombination as additional sources of genetic variation. It may be of more than theoretical interest if it turns out that one or the other enhances our ability to predict what kinds of change will be worrisome. This question remains unsettled.

In addition to mutation and recombination, there is another process that can produce major genetic variation: reassortment. The viral RNA is actually in the form of eight separate pieces, called segments, analogous to our chromosomes. Six of these segments code a protein each, while two segments code for two proteins each. An intact virus requires all eight RNA segments, but they can come from different viruses. If a host like a pig or a person is infected by both a bird virus and a human or pig virus the segments are in a common pool within the host cell and can become mixed, with some segments coming from one virus and some from another. This can produce another kind of hybrid between a bird and a human influenza virus. The difference between this mechanism and recombination is that the segments move en bloc as a single piece while in recombination bits and pieces of segments might be spliced together as in the human-pig HA example above rather than an HA from a pig or an HA from a human as in reassortment.

Since reassortment involving the HA segment would introduce a new subtype like H5 that doesn’t normally bind to human cells, it would not seem to be a plausible mechanism to start a pandemic by itself if easy transmissibility depended entirely on the receptor binding site. But as we have seen, this is a complicated picture and may depend on new combinations of the other segments. Since eight segments from two different viruses can make 256 different combinations, there is a plausible role for reassortment. Likely there is also some requirement for random mutation or recombination that might affect the binding site of HA. Reassortment is a known mechanism for producing major changes in an influenza virus, which together with other mechanism can produce the kinds of hybrid bird and mammal viruses involved in pandemics. Because we don’t know all the combinations of genetic changes that might produce virulence and their origins, there is more to learn about its relative importance.

↑ top ↑

Making the other parts of the virus
The RNA polymerase not only does the two step replication of viral RNA, but also makes the directions the host cell will use to construct viral proteins. It does this by making a messenger RNA (mRNA) template that moves outside the host cell’s nucleus to the parts of the cell where protein synthesis takes place. The mRNA uses the cell’s machinery to make all the viral proteins, which include, besides the ones we have already discussed, the RNA polymerase itself (PB1); an RNA polymerase accessory protein, PB2, that uses bits of host cell mRNA to get the viral construction process underway; another RNA polymerase component, designated PA, that is necessary for viral replication, but whose function is not yet understood; a protein called the nuclear export factor (NEP, formerly called NS2) needed to get the replicated viral RNA repackaged as RNP and then exported out of the nucleus; and finally a protein, called the non-structural protein, NS, that protects the virus from one of the host’s immediate defense mechanisms by interfering with a non-specific cytokine called interferon.

The other proteins don’t get as much attention as the HA and NA proteins, but it is known that variations in them can be important for virulence. Again, exactly what kinds of changes and how they work to make the virus more or less virulent remains to be worked out.

↑ top ↑

Assembling a new virus and budding from the host cell’s surface to gain access to other cells
At this point the viral RNP and the other viral proteins are now made. They assemble just inside the host cell’s outer wall (the cell membrane) and ‘bud’ through the surface, dragging some of the host cell’s membrane with them to make the viral lipoprotein envelope. This process is far from perfect. Sometimes more than eight segments get incorporated or the wrong eight get packaged together. Those viruses are no longer infective. It has been estimated that there is about 90% ‘spoilage’ in this step, but there are so many viral copies made that this inefficiency can be accommodated.

Now there is only one problem left for the virus to solve. The HA glycoprotein spike on the newly made copy can still grab onto the sialic acid receptor of the just exited cell and in effect try to re-infect it; or the viral particles that have sialic acid stuck to their HA from passing through the cell membrane can stick to each other and become immobilised in clumps. The virus solves this problem with the aid of its other viral glycoprotein spike, neuraminidase (NA), which is an enzyme that can clear sialic acid both from the cell surface and from the HA spike, thus allowing release of the newly produced virions. The neuraminidase inhibiting drugs oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza) work by preventing NA from releasing the budding virions.


Figure 1. Mechanism of Action of Neuraminidase Inhibitors. Panel A shows the action of neuraminidase
in the continued replication of virions in influenza infection. The replication is blocked by neuraminidase
inhibitors (Panel B), which prevent virions from being released from the surface of infected cells.
Source: Moscona, A. (2005). Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza. N Engl J Med 353: 1363-1373

Unlike the M2 protein inhibited by the antivirals amantadine and rimantadine, the NA enzyme seems to have less flexibility in mutating. Examples of resistant NA so far are also less effective, so the resistant virus itself, while infective, is much less so. Whether this will continue to hold true we don’t know.

The virus is now free to find another host cell to infect and begin this cycle again.





AccuarateOne
6/20/2008 9:02:23 AM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:

Hey red on black. I am always willing to learn something.

Glad to hear it. I certainly didn't mean any sort of flame, just wanted to clarify a bit.

As I understand it our genetic code is made up of proteins.

Our genes are encoded on DNA, which is the blueprint for life. It's a massive document and we still don't know what much of it means. We DO know that DNA in the nucleus of our cells is transcribed to RNA, which leaves the nucleus to perform several tasks outside the nucleus in the soup that makes up most of the cell. RNA makes up part of the ribosomes (which are little protein-making factories), recruits amino acids for use by the ribosomes to make proteins, and transmits information from the DNA to the ribosomes to tell them exactly what proteins to assemble. So, your genetic code is made of DNA and codes for the production of many different proteins. It also contains code that controls when proteins are made and how much. The simplest statement of the central dogma of molecular biology looks like this:

DNA ---> RNA ---> Proteins


The Influenza virus has the ability to strip down and seperate a cells DNA and RNA and take away proteins that will help it along its journey. I understand these to be mutations.

Not sure about this. Some viruses can write themselves into their host's DNA using an enzyme (protein) called reverse transcriptase. This is one of the things HIV does. Influenza does not (I think) incorporate host genes into its own genome, but it does wrap itself in some of its host cell's membrane. (I was wrong about this before-- this strategy is very similar to what some bacteria and parasites do to hide from the immune system.) What the immune system sees is a viral particle with host cell membrane (including some host membrane proteins) and viral proteins, too. However, this is not an act of mutation and does not result in a change in the viral DNA.

Now, a mutation is simply a change in an organism's DNA. It can be beneficial, neutral, or harmful. As an example, lets say that the virus' DNA encodes the protein ADHERE which allows it to enter host cells. ADHERE has several single-point mutations that generate the following mutants: ADHERQ, ADHEQE, ADHQRE, ADQERE. Each of the Qs represents a single amino acid in the protein's sequence that has been changed from the normal protein by a single changed letter (mutation) in the gene encoding the protein. There is normally a greater likelihood of the mutation having a neutral or harmful effect, so you need a large population size and lots of mutation events to generate a beneficial mutation. For a population of things like human this can take a long time. There just aren't very many of us. (This is an oversimplification.) Viruses, though, exist in unimaginable numbers even in a single host, and they have very short generation times. One human generation is measured in years, but a viral generation may be measured in hours or days. (E. coli bacteria in the lab can double in number every 30 minutes under ideal conditions.) Bottom line: mutations causing significant change in a virus' properties can occur quickly.


So when an Influenza virus infects a host it strips down a cells genetic makeup and can acquire certain amino acids to make it easier to infect the host.

It doesn't strip down the host's DNA to take on new genes, but it does use the host's molecular machinery and spare parts to assemble many copies of itself. Amino acids are the building blocks for proteins. There are about twenty different ones used by humans to make proteins, and the virus will appropriate these to make its own proteins.

This happens during the incubation period of the virus. Once the virus has the new "keys" it proceeds to spread rapidly throughout the host. So let's say someone in Indonesia becomes infected with H5N1. They hop on a plane and go to France where the common current year strain of the flu in prevalent. The Indonesian person shakes hands, hugs and kisses the person from France. The French person now becomes infected. The H5N1 Influenza virus may now be passed through different French hosts until it meets up with the current year strain. The two Influenza viruses swap DNA at the most basic level.  If H5N1 picks up the current strains ability to easily infect humans then we could have a Pandemic.

In short, yes. And there is also the effect of being passed multiple times through the human host. Often, multiple passages through hosts of the same species (ie, human-to-human, or guinea pig-to-guinea pig transmission) will cause the virus to mutate to become either more or less virulent. Likewise, swapping genes with other strains of H5N1 or other HxNy flus may do the same.

Here is a document that I use to help me understand the Influenza virus. If you see something in this document that I am misreading, please point it out so I can understand this more clearly:

<Snip>

That's a good article, and goes much deeper into the subject than I possibly can. I think where you may be getting tripped up is on the viral genes and protein vs. human genes and protein. For instance, HA and NA are both viral genes and are subject to mutation. They aren't human proteins that the virus is picking up from us. They are viral proteins that the virus is manufacturing by using the materials and machinery available in our cells along with its own set of blueprints (in the case of flu this is RNA.)

6/20/2008 10:41:12 AM EDT
[#47]

Quoted:


As for Rkclmbr that referred to "BS to that in red". I don't really care whether you "think" it is BS or not. Just because you read it on the internet does not necessarily make it true, but just because you can't find it on the internet does not mean it is BS either. If it is BS, a pretty good source from the state is spreading it


I don't care about what you think I "think" as well.  I'm a senior in microbiology, and as such have taken several virology classes.  The university I go to also has one of the largest Select Agent library's in the world.  Now, they may have perfected it in the last month or so, but during the last seminar I went to (May), H5N1 had combined with H3N2 (as well as several others), but does not a perfect combination.  The new strain is MORE virulent than your common flu, and transmission is good, but it's not like they've made it as bad as everyone thinks it could go.  Like I said, maybe they have done it, but they hadn't as of a month ago as far as the person speaking at my university knows.  It's possible they've finally done it.  I just want proof.  If it's been done to the level that the OP stated, it would make scientific news world wide, and I haven't heard anything.
6/20/2008 10:59:39 AM EDT
[#48]
How would one go about preparing for weaponized h5n1 variants hitting the scene? That would throw a wrench in a few plans, huh. Everyone that has the means is working on weaponizing it. Certain critters have been known in the past to 'leak' out into the real world.
6/20/2008 12:46:57 PM EDT
[#49]

Quoted:

Quoted:


As for Rkclmbr that referred to "BS to that in red". I don't really care whether you "think" it is BS or not. Just because you read it on the internet does not necessarily make it true, but just because you can't find it on the internet does not mean it is BS either. If it is BS, a pretty good source from the state is spreading it


I don't care about what you think I "think" as well.  I'm a senior in microbiology, and as such have taken several virology classes.  The university I go to also has one of the largest Select Agent library's in the world.  Now, they may have perfected it in the last month or so, but during the last seminar I went to (May), H5N1 had combined with H3N2 (as well as several others), but does not a perfect combination.  The new strain is MORE virulent than your common flu, and transmission is good, but it's not like they've made it as bad as everyone thinks it could go.  Like I said, maybe they have done it, but they hadn't as of a month ago as far as the person speaking at my university knows.  It's possible they've finally done it.  I just want proof.  If it's been done to the level that the OP stated, it would make scientific news world wide, and I haven't heard anything.


Genetic Compatibility and Virulence of Reassortants Derived from Contemporary Avian H5N1 and Human H3N2 Influenza A Viruses

Li-Mei Chen#, C. Todd Davis#, Hong Zhou, Nancy J. Cox, Ruben O. Donis*
Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

Abstract

The segmented structure of the influenza virus genome plays a pivotal role in its adaptation to new hosts and the emergence of pandemics. Despite concerns about the pandemic threat posed by highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses, little is known about the biological properties of H5N1 viruses that may emerge following reassortment with contemporary human influenza viruses.

In this study, we used reverse genetics to generate the 63 possible virus reassortants derived from H5N1 and H3N2 viruses, containing the H5N1 surface protein genes, and analyzed their viability, replication efficiency, and mouse virulence.

Specific constellations of avian–human viral genes proved deleterious for viral replication in cell culture, possibly due to disruption of molecular interaction networks. In particular, striking phenotypes were noted with heterologous polymerase subunits, as well as NP and M, or NS.

However, nearly one-half of the reassortants replicated with high efficiency in vitro, revealing a high degree of compatibility between avian and human virus genes. Thirteen reassortants displayed virulent phenotypes in mice and may pose the greatest threat for mammalian hosts.

Interestingly, one of the most pathogenic reassortants contained avian PB1, resembling the 1957 and 1968 pandemic viruses. Our results reveal the broad spectrum of phenotypes associated with H5N1/H3N2 reassortment and a possible role for the avian PB1 in the emergence of pandemic influenza.

These observations have important implications for risk assessment of H5N1 reassortant viruses detected in surveillance programs.

Author Summary

The influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968 were caused by hybrid viruses consisting of a mixture of human and avian influenza genes. The introduction of avian genes resulted in a sudden change of the virus surface antigens, allowing its worldwide spread due to lack of immunity in the population.

The highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus has continued its spread in domestic and wild birds in Asia, Europe, and Africa. Although H5N1 infection in humans is rare and person-to-person transmission is very inefficient, the steady accumulation of human cases has raised concern over the possible reassortment between H5N1 and human seasonal influenza resulting in a virus with new surface antigens and pandemic potential.

In this study, we used recombinant DNA technology to generate a systematic collection of hybrid viruses (with genes from human and avian viruses) bearing H5N1 surface antigens and analyzed their properties in cell culture and in mice.

The H5N1 hybrid viruses revealed a broad range of viability and multiplication capacity in cell cultures. In addition, several H5N1 hybrid viruses were highly virulent in mice. Results from this systematic analysis provide important insight to support risk assessment of reassortant H5N1 avian influenza viruses.

Citation: Chen L-M, Davis CT, Zhou H, Cox NJ, Donis RO (2008) Genetic Compatibility and Virulence of Reassortants Derived from Contemporary Avian H5N1 and Human H3N2 Influenza A Viruses. PLoS Pathog 4(5): e1000072. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000072

Editor: Adolfo Garcia-Sastre, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, United States of America

Received: February 21, 2008; Accepted: April 15, 2008; Published: May 23, 2008

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.

Full study here:

http://www.plospathogens.org/articl...ED8A83268E05350

6/20/2008 12:50:02 PM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:

Quoted:


As for Rkclmbr that referred to "BS to that in red". I don't really care whether you "think" it is BS or not. Just because you read it on the internet does not necessarily make it true, but just because you can't find it on the internet does not mean it is BS either. If it is BS, a pretty good source from the state is spreading it


I don't care about what you think I "think" as well.  I'm a senior in microbiology, and as such have taken several virology classes.  The university I go to also has one of the largest Select Agent library's in the world.  Now, they may have perfected it in the last month or so, but during the last seminar I went to (May), H5N1 had combined with H3N2 (as well as several others), but does not a perfect combination.  The new strain is MORE virulent than your common flu, and transmission is good, but it's not like they've made it as bad as everyone thinks it could go.  Like I said, maybe they have done it, but they hadn't as of a month ago as far as the person speaking at my university knows.  It's possible they've finally done it.  I just want proof.  If it's been done to the level that the OP stated, it would make scientific news world wide, and I haven't heard anything.


Here it is again in plain english:

June 1, 2008

Study shows hybrids of bird flu, human flu viruses fit well

By Helen Branswell, Medical Reporter, THE CANADIAN PRESS


TORONTO - An experiment mating H5N1 avian flu viruses and a strain of human flu in a laboratory produced a surprising number of hybrid viruses that were biologically fit, a new study reveals.

And while none of the offspring viruses was as virulent as the original H5N1, about one in five were lethal to mice at low doses, showing they retained at least a portion of the power of their dangerous parent.

The work suggests that under the right circumstances - and no one is clear what all of those are - the two types of flu viruses could swap genes in a way that might allow the H5N1 virus to acquire the capacity to trigger a pandemic. That process is called reassortment.

"This study is just showing exactly that: There is a risk this virus can successfully reassort with a human virus," said Richard Webby, director of the World Health Organization's collaborating centre for influenza research at St. Jude Hospital in Memphis, Tenn.

"The problem is we don't know at this stage whether there's a benefit to these H5N1 viruses in doing that."

Nor can anyone say why, if the viruses swapped genes so readily in the laboratory, that hasn't seemed to have happened in the parts of the world where H5N1 has been circulating for years.

"This is the million dollar question," says senior author Dr. Ruben Donis, of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control's influenza division.

Reassortment is one of two ways in which a pandemic virus can evolve. The other is for a bird virus to acquire a number of mutations that allow it to more easily infect people and transmit among them.

The latter, called adaptive mutation, is thought to be the way the 1918 Spanish flu virus emerged. The viruses responsible for the milder pandemics of 1957 and 1968 arose through the mixing of human and avian flu virus genes.

This work, done at the CDC, was conducted to study the reassortment potential of H5N1 and H3N2 viruses. H3N2 is one of two human influenza A viruses that cause disease during flu season.

The study was published in PLoS Pathogens, one of the Public Library of Science journals.

Reassortment studies can be done one of two ways. One involves simultaneously infecting cells with the two viruses and seeing what nature produces. The other involves making viruses by piecing together combinations of synthesized human and avian genes.

"It's like Lego," Donis, head of the molecular virology and vaccines branch, says of this approach, which was the one used for this study.

But this is a game of Lego where it's not clear from looking at the pieces which will go together into a structure that will hold. "We really don't understand the rules of engagement for playing the Legos. We don't know what makes these things connect well or not connect well," he admits.

The researchers created 63 viruses representing the various potential combinations of human and avian internal genes, using an H5N1 virus that circulated in Thailand in 2004 and an H3N2 virus recovered in Wyoming in 2003.

All but one of the hybrids carried the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes - the H and N in a flu virus's name of H5N1. The remaining one used the neuraminidase from the human virus, creating an H5N2 virus that grew virtually as well as the H5N1 virus and was almost as lethal in mice.

Once the viruses were made they were placed in a medium to see if and how well they grew. Viruses were then harvested to use to infect mice, to test for virulence.

While 13 of the hybrid viruses either didn't grow or barely grew, the other 50 grew to some degree. And 28 replicated nearly as well as the original H5N1. Donis admits he was surprised by how well the avian and human gene combinations performed.

"I was expecting more incompatibility," he says.

By studying the combinations that succeeded and failed, the scientists were able to start to see patterns of which gene combinations are critical for an H5N1 virus to thrive.

When the most viable viruses were tested in mice, none was as nasty as H5N1. "That's the good news," Donis says, alluding to the fact that if reassortment turns H5N1 into a pandemic strain, the resulting virus could be less virulent than the current version.

Since late 2003 there have been 383 confirmed human cases of H5N1 infection and 241, or 63 per cent, of those people have died.

The virus that most closely matched H5N1 for virulence was one with three avian genes, the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, plus the PB1 gene combined with five genes from the human virus.

Both the viruses from the 1957 and 1968 pandemics carried an avian PB1 gene. The authors suggest that picking up an avian PB1 gene may be a critical step in a potential pandemic virus arising through reassortment.

But just because the viruses mated successfully in a laboratory doesn't mean those viruses could go on to trigger a pandemic. In order to have that potential, a virus would have to be able to transmit from person to person - a skill that has so far eluded H5N1.

"The bottom line is it comes back down to transmission really being the key," Webby says. "But to say that we understand what are the factors involved in transmission is certainly an overstatement."

Earlier work at the CDC on some H5N1-H3N2 reassortant viruses showed they failed to transmit from infected to uninfected ferrets, an animal often used in flu research.

Donis says his team hopes to test its reassortant viruses in ferrets as well, but is still going through the approvals process.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2...pf-5740766.html
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Pandemic planning (Page 1 of 2)