Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/30/2007 8:48:08 PM EDT
I am going to buy a new solar radio soon, and was wondering, if there was an EMP, would this wave of energy fry my radio or flashlight (which I only bought for such an occasion)?
I was thinkin,(scary, I know)  what if I were to put things such as my Walkie Talkie set, solar radio, and (shakeable) flashlight in a steel ammo box, would this shield these things? Or do these types of electronics have a succeptability to EMP attack?
Thanx for the info ahead of time.
D.
3/31/2007 8:34:26 AM EDT
[#1]
www.google.com/search?q=emp+effects


Or to stay in our own little sand box:

www.google.com/search?q=emp+effects+site%3Aar15.com


Or in a less-than-polite manner:

JustFuckingGoogleIt.com
3/31/2007 10:18:38 AM EDT
[#2]
height=8
Quoted:
www.google.com/search?q=emp+effects


Or to stay in our own little sand box:

www.google.com/search?q=emp+effects+site%3Aar15.com


Or in a less-than-polite manner:

JustFuckingGoogleIt.com


None of that answers,
A) Whether it will fry an unplugged radio,
B) Whether an ammo box will protect it.
3/31/2007 10:24:26 AM EDT
[#3]
There are two basic ways to protect or harden items against EMP effects. The first
method is metallic shielding. Shields are made of a continuous piece of metal such as
steel or copper. A metal enclosure generally does not fully shield the interior because of
the small holes that are likely to exist. Therefore, this type of shielding often contains
additional elements to create the barrier. Commonly, only a fraction of a millimeter of a
metal is needed to supply adequate protection. This shield must completely surround
the item to be hardened.

Sounds like you need to weld the box shut.
3/31/2007 10:37:44 AM EDT
[#4]
An electromagnetic pulse is a highly dynamic force that have many, many major variables. Things as distance from the POI and the inductive properties of the item in question come to mind right away. Just because an event is classified as an EMP dose not mean that it will have all of the same properties of another event classified as an EMP.

The simple answer is that there is NO WAY for you to know if you are protected from an EMP without an applied physics lab studying a specific item in relation to a specific type of EMP.

ARJedi (an EE and very smart guy when it comes to this) said it best with his wave and boat analogy. If I can find it I'll post it.

Just remember that no matter how well you think you are shielded from an EMP there is no way (short of that above physics lab) to tell how the wave will affect you.

LTC


Jedi???........help.
3/31/2007 12:58:31 PM EDT
[#5]
Best way to propare for the EMP efects of a nuke, it to make sure none of the things you are gonna rely on can be fried by said EMP. You could build faraday boxes for small 2 way radios, weather radios, or GPS's. But will it be worth it? Your 2 way radios will come in usefull because your family can keep in touch, But probably nobody else within range of your radios will heave had the foresite to protect thier radios and they wont pick up military frequencies as they are encripted. But say a weather radio, what goods it gonna be? Cause the stations that broadcast on it are probablygona be fried. Maybe a GPS, but your chancing on the statalites it uses not getting fried, but if you have room in one I would say throw it in there. I dont know how accurate this is, But I have read in a couple of articles that a large EMP in the atmosphere over the US would knock the whole country out.

I am going to be building some faraday boxes pretty soon, mostly because I have access to the stuff to build them, and really nothing better to do when I have down time at work. Some things that I plan on building boxes for are 2 way radios, for comm with my family and anyone else I decide to take on, there are a few people in my neighborhood that were in the marines. An international radio, our are probably gonne be fried, But maybe I can get some info from europe as to what has happened. and I will probably use the one for the radios to store my GPS, just incase the sats still work.

A couple other things I may build one for are my laptop, and my wifes PSP, these would be fashioned to look more like regular carrying cases with handles. I know I wont have internet. But just incase some military unit rolled into town and had need for one for some govvie internet that was still up, It would put me in their graces, and the PSP would keep the kids happy.
3/31/2007 3:28:54 PM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
None of that answers,
A) Whether it will fry an unplugged radio,
B) Whether an ammo box will protect it.


i disagree.  two of the linked pages discuss EXACTLY (A) and (B) above.

(A)
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=123&t=521338&page=2

(B)
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=123&t=492699

and finally, in
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=123&t=521338&page=3
RjSteed provides a nice little list of external links where you can learn some more.

ar-jedi

3/31/2007 3:33:08 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
Jedi???........help.


about halfway down
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=123&t=521338&page=3

ps:
don't get distracted by the brunettes.  i always do and i wrote it!

ar-jedi

3/31/2007 3:36:58 PM EDT
[#8]
This is the best answer I have yet seen on the SF. ARJedi posted a while back.

READ THIS AND LEARN!


ARJedi:
i've been thinking about how to answer this question and others like it ("will X survive a NEMP?") for the past few days. i finally concluded that it might be a useful exercise to turn the situation into a physical, palpable one -- where you can see/feel the situation under discussion.

imagine you are financially very well-off, retired in style from the money you made by shorting Enron shares at their peak. you are currently on a large ocean-going sailboat somewhere in the pacific, stretched out in a hammock in your bathing suit drinking sumptuous red wine out of a hefty glass. several brunette models from the Dutch Institute of Modeling are sunbathing on the foredeck, and a few blond beauties from Norway are playing drunk patty-cakes on the aft deck. life is good.

about 1000 miles away, a meteorite the size of a house traveling over 25,000mph slams into the pacific ocean. like the proverbial stone thrown into a pond, large waves radiate outward from the point of impact. an immense first wave and smaller subsequent waves approach your far away boat.

up to now folks have asked EMP-related questions which can be compared to "will a meteorite hitting the ocean spill the wine in my glass?"

there are a million variables which affect the answer... the depth of the water at point of impact, the approach angle of the meteorite, the density of the meteorite, the makeup of the bottom of the ocean at point of impact, the varying depth of water as the wave progresses towards your boat, the prevailing wind, the shape of the wave when it arrives at the boat, the size of your boat, the orientation of the boat with respect to the wave, the center of gravity of the boat, the mass of the boat, the boat's current heel, the natural frequency of you in your hammock, the size and shape of your wine glass, the viscosity of the wine, your reaction time and reaction to the wave, and so on and so forth.

put into nice, easy, phsyical terms, the above may help folks understand that there is no single answer to "will my Aimpoint fail?" or "will my ham radio fail" due to an EMP -- the same way we can't answer the question regarding the red wine above. there is also no way to create a protection scheme where the wine will NEVER spill (for example, if the boat itself overturns you will certainly lose the wine). moreover, there are condtions which would appear to be safe but in reality will cause loss of the red wine. a small seemingly "safe" wave with the right peak-to-trough distance may excite the dynamic system that is made up of you, the hammock, and the boat. your hammock will overturn despite the fact that the wave, from strictly an amplitude (height) perspective, seemed "safe".

to continue the comparison with NEMP, it is therefore not enough to say that an RF field of "less than 200 V/m" will not cause an Aimpoint to fail. again, there are simply too many variables to conclude this. a field of 100V/m at a given frequency (or more appropriately, risetime) may be far more destructive than a 500V/m field at other frequencies.

which leads me to this, as others who have BTDT (like CWO) will agree: there is a little black magic to go along with science in anything to do with this area. approaches to protection you think will work turn out not to, and vice versa. and knowing what will work is a matter of many years of experience and careful testing methods. even after the reports are written you know that given the right cicrcumstances, failures can still be induced. most any manufacturer who declares, "our product is EMP-proof" can be quickly found to be unknowing in this discipline.
3/31/2007 5:19:36 PM EDT
[#9]
The only way to find out if a specific nuke will fry your specific electronics would be to try it out by detonating that weapon at the expected location and see what happens. If your electronics survive, then you're ok. If not, try better shielding, get another nuke and repeat the process.
In other words, there are a LOT of unknowns with EMP. What they do know is that keeping the antennas disconnected when they're not in use helps, and a Faraday Cage seems to be a good idea, too.
3/31/2007 10:07:08 PM EDT
[#10]
height=8
Quoted:
This is the best answer I have yet seen on the SF. ARJedi posted a while back.

READ THIS AND LEARN!

height=8
ARJedi:
i've been thinking about how to answer this question and others like it ("will X survive a NEMP?") for the past few days. i finally concluded that it might be a useful exercise to turn the situation into a physical, palpable one -- where you can see/feel the situation under discussion.

imagine you are financially very well-off, retired in style from the money you made by shorting Enron shares at their peak. you are currently on a large ocean-going sailboat somewhere in the pacific, stretched out in a hammock in your bathing suit drinking sumptuous red wine out of a hefty glass. several brunette models from the Dutch Institute of Modeling are sunbathing on the foredeck, and a few blond beauties from Norway are playing drunk patty-cakes on the aft deck. life is good.

about 1000 miles away, a meteorite the size of a house traveling over 25,000mph slams into the pacific ocean. like the proverbial stone thrown into a pond, large waves radiate outward from the point of impact. an immense first wave and smaller subsequent waves approach your far away boat.

up to now folks have asked EMP-related questions which can be compared to "will a meteorite hitting the ocean spill the wine in my glass?"

there are a million variables which affect the answer... the depth of the water at point of impact, the approach angle of the meteorite, the density of the meteorite, the makeup of the bottom of the ocean at point of impact, the varying depth of water as the wave progresses towards your boat, the prevailing wind, the shape of the wave when it arrives at the boat, the size of your boat, the orientation of the boat with respect to the wave, the center of gravity of the boat, the mass of the boat, the boat's current heel, the natural frequency of you in your hammock, the size and shape of your wine glass, the viscosity of the wine, your reaction time and reaction to the wave, and so on and so forth.

put into nice, easy, phsyical terms, the above may help folks understand that there is no single answer to "will my Aimpoint fail?" or "will my ham radio fail" due to an EMP -- the same way we can't answer the question regarding the red wine above. there is also no way to create a protection scheme where the wine will NEVER spill (for example, if the boat itself overturns you will certainly lose the wine). moreover, there are condtions which would appear to be safe but in reality will cause loss of the red wine. a small seemingly "safe" wave with the right peak-to-trough distance may excite the dynamic system that is made up of you, the hammock, and the boat. your hammock will overturn despite the fact that the wave, from strictly an amplitude (height) perspective, seemed "safe".

to continue the comparison with NEMP, it is therefore not enough to say that an RF field of "less than 200 V/m" will not cause an Aimpoint to fail. again, there are simply too many variables to conclude this. a field of 100V/m at a given frequency (or more appropriately, risetime) may be far more destructive than a 500V/m field at other frequencies.

which leads me to this, as others who have BTDT (like CWO) will agree: there is a little black magic to go along with science in anything to do with this area. approaches to protection you think will work turn out not to, and vice versa. and knowing what will work is a matter of many years of experience and careful testing methods. even after the reports are written you know that given the right cicrcumstances, failures can still be induced. most any manufacturer who declares, "our product is EMP-proof" can be quickly found to be unknowing in this discipline.




Perfect.....
Thanx....
D.