Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
PSA
Member Login

Page / 33
Link Posted: 11/9/2014 12:27:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/9/2014 1:19:38 AM EDT by Holden_McRoyne]



Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:




All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own.
Shoot or don't it's up to you.
View Quote






 


I'm not trying to be argumentative.  You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call.  It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations.  But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me.  




Can you tell me whether this is allowed?

















Thanks.


 
Link Posted: 11/9/2014 1:31:36 AM EDT
Didnt take pics at the range today.











Remington .223 700 Varmint







Timney trigger


HS Precision stock (5R take off)


Timney rail


Warne rings


Zeiss 6.5-20X Conquest


50 gr V-max


26.1 H4895







First time to the range after putting this rifle together.







First five shot group after sighting it in.














And five five shot groups













 
Link Posted: 11/10/2014 8:31:21 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Holden_McRoyne:

  I'm not trying to be argumentative.  You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call.  It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations.  But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me.  

Can you tell me whether this is allowed?

http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/


Thanks.
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Holden_McRoyne:
Originally Posted By akethan:
All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own.

Shoot or don't it's up to you.

  I'm not trying to be argumentative.  You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call.  It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations.  But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me.  

Can you tell me whether this is allowed?

http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/


Thanks.
 



That would be fine.
Link Posted: 11/10/2014 10:10:43 AM EDT

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:
That would be fine.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:



Originally Posted By Holden_McRoyne:


Originally Posted By akethan:

All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own.



Shoot or don't it's up to you.


  I'm not trying to be argumentative.  You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call.  It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations.  But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me.  



Can you tell me whether this is allowed?



http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/





Thanks.

 






That would be fine.




 
Sweet.  Thank you!
Link Posted: 11/10/2014 7:46:40 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/21/2014 3:43:08 PM EDT by Face454]
SPR division, 100 yards. Face454 Noveske Afghan 5.56 with PA 4-16 scope. 77 grain Winchester match. 1.559", 1.548", 1.162", 2.487", 2.766"  Average = 1.9044"  MOA Average = 1.8189"




Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr

Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr
Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr

Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr
Link Posted: 11/11/2014 4:02:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/11/2014 4:06:41 PM EDT by avboiler11]
avboiler11: 700 "Rem-Age" 6.5 Creedmoor w/ Manners T2 Mini-Chassis - Vortex HST 4-16x44 - Factory 140 A-Max.  100 yard groups: 0.67"/0.44"/0.95"/1.00"/0.84"/0.83".  Average = 0.788" or 0.753 MOA

*group sizes above measured center-to-center, prior to me discovering this thread

*four groups shot prone with bipod and sand sock rear rest, two groups shot from a bench with bipod and sand sock rear rest





Link Posted: 11/11/2014 4:06:29 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/11/2014 4:15:53 PM EDT by avboiler11]
avboiler11: Savage 110 223 Ackley Improved with McMillan A5 - Vortex HST 4-16x44 - 80gr Amax over 24.9gr 8208XBR.  100 yard groups: 0.55"/0.72"/0.72"/0.72"/0.75"/0.50".  Average = 0.66" or 0.63 MOA

*group sizes above measured center-to-center, prior to me discovering this thread

*all groups shot prone with bipod and sand sock rear rest





Link Posted: 11/11/2014 4:48:05 PM EDT
avboiler11 you are missing your pic of the target at range.
Link Posted: 11/11/2014 5:02:57 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:avboiler11 you are missing your pic of the target at range.
View Quote


Yeah, I don't have that as I didn't discover this thread until after I got back from the range today (ie. didn't know it was a "rule") and was too busy shooting before the rain moved in to take pictures of the target downrange.

However, the power of the interwebs had me find this photo of the range I was at (Clark State Forest, Henryville IN):



I was shooting prone to the right of this exact bench, with the targets paced on the far berm just to the left of the vertical log over the man in the yellow shirt's left shoulder.

Link Posted: 11/11/2014 7:42:41 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/11/2014 7:54:54 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:

Pulled from the wall of claim ...



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:

Pulled from the wall of claim ...




M4HK33: No need to. (join in the MOA thread) There are already plenty of rifles in that thread that outshoot OBR's at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost.

He likes to run his mouth and make fun but won't man up and post his own entry.


You know how it is.
Link Posted: 11/11/2014 9:28:27 PM EDT
I actually posted the last sentence about said poster.
Link Posted: 11/11/2014 9:45:11 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/12/2014 1:54:47 PM EDT

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:
That would be fine.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:



Originally Posted By Holden_McRoyne:


Originally Posted By akethan:

All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own.



Shoot or don't it's up to you.


  I'm not trying to be argumentative.  You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call.  It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations.  But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me.  



Can you tell me whether this is allowed?



http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/





Thanks.

 






That would be fine.
Should probably update the rules post with a list of currently approved rear bags. It would likely help avoid future discussions. At a minimum, take out the reference to a softball. That's too far off the current size requirement. Softball size would also be too small/low to support the rear of many rifles on a bipod and keep it level.



 
Link Posted: 11/12/2014 3:34:40 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:
This challenge has been running for a while. I'm not the originator just the current caretaker.

I do believe the inspiration for it came from SH.  
View Quote

You are correct good sir
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 3:40:48 PM EDT
I know its not official, im printing out a sheet and shooting next week for my official spot.







Link Posted: 11/14/2014 4:50:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/14/2014 4:55:13 PM EDT by JmacAr]
Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag...
This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL.
**Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html
Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official
Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference.





 
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:15:28 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JmacAr:
Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag...

This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL.

**Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html

Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official

Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference.

http://i60.tinypic.com/2yy9grb.jpg  
View Quote



Too big
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:15:41 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/15/2014 5:36:07 PM EDT by SpeyRod]
Question:

I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target?

1st submission:

SPR, Spey Rod, LaRue Predatobr 16" 5.56, Burris signature select 3-12, Handloaded 77gr SMK over Varget, Groups: 1.583, 1.010, 1.081, 1.148, .879 = Average 1.1402 - .224 = .9161/1.047=.8751

Range set up:
Rear bag and 4x6


Target on 100 yd board:




Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:19:15 PM EDT

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:
Too big
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:



Originally Posted By JmacAr:

Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag...



This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL.



**Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html



Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official



Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference.



http://i60.tinypic.com/2yy9grb.jpg  






Too big
Well that sucks. I'll need to figure something out then...not sure a sock filled with rice would even be big enough for me to squeeze to get the rifle level. Off to the drawing board....



 
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:19:43 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SpeyRod:
Question:

I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target?

Placeholder for later submission:

<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg</a>
View Quote



of course
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:33:53 PM EDT
Makes me happy to see more people participating.
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:42:57 PM EDT
I changed some of the bag requirement wording and added some already approved bags.
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:43:16 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:48:51 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:57:02 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:



Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating.



Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place.



Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task!
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 5:59:45 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mike_P:


Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating.



Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place.



Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task!



You two get a room or post in the old GD thread.

















































Link Posted: 11/14/2014 6:02:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/14/2014 6:03:48 PM EDT by JmacAr]
Akethan,





I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list.





Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across





Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across





The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across





Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this



 
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 6:15:17 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JmacAr:
Akethan,

I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list.

Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across

Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across

The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across

Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this
 
View Quote



Post a pic of it in your hand.
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 6:23:58 PM EDT


Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:
Post a pic of it in your hand.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:





Originally Posted By JmacAr:


Akethan,





I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list.





Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across





Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across





The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across





Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this


 

Post a pic of it in your hand.



Here ya go, if I need to post the measurements of the bag I will, but it's definitely 6x4, just like the other bag .










 
 
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 6:26:25 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 6:38:30 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 7:06:44 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JmacAr:

Here ya go, if I need to post the measurements of the bag I will, but it's definitely 6x4, just like the other bag .

http://i59.tinypic.com/2nu58c7.jpg
   
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JmacAr:
Originally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By JmacAr:
Akethan,

I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list.

Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across

Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across

The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across

Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this
 



Post a pic of it in your hand.

Here ya go, if I need to post the measurements of the bag I will, but it's definitely 6x4, just like the other bag .

http://i59.tinypic.com/2nu58c7.jpg
   



Uhhhhhhg.  

Okay

Link Posted: 11/14/2014 11:15:56 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mike_P:


Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating.



Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place.



Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task!


I mounted a Leupold 1.25-4 VXR on my Tar after load development. It shot just as well….
Link Posted: 11/15/2014 9:08:42 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/15/2014 9:09:09 AM EDT by InfiniteGrim]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:



Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating.



Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place.


There is no reason to try save yourself the ammo and send it to me, when I finally get back to the range after a year or so I will take my first place spot back, since I still am the longest to be in first
Link Posted: 11/15/2014 5:22:50 PM EDT
My entry in the 22 division for any 22 with iron sights at 25 yds.






Lichter50: Mossberg M44US - Stock Iron Sights - CCI Standard Velocity 40gr Groups: 0.3285 + 0.4695 + 0.271 + 0.603 + 0.5135 = 0.4371 avg
Link Posted: 11/22/2014 4:18:00 PM EDT
tag , for later it just started raining
Link Posted: 11/29/2014 9:41:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/1/2014 4:19:50 PM EDT by cms81586]
TRG-22 in .308win with a US Optics SN-3 3.7-17x44 with GAP reticle.
Handloads are 178gr Hornady HTBP's over 43gr of Varget in TAA 7.62 NATO brass and Fed 210M primers
Was shot off the bipod and a drop pouch under the rear.  It still required consistent hand pressure as per the rules.  I left my sand sock in the truck.  If it don't count let me know and I'll go reshoot.  Tactical comforter since my shooting mat is also in the truck.  













ETA:   Bolt Division with magnified optics;  cms81586;  Sako TRG-22 in .308 Win;  Factory rifle with no modifications;  US Optics SN-3 3.7x17x44 mil/mil with GAP reticle;  Handloads using TAA 7.62 brass, 178gr BTHP, 43.0gr Varget, Fed 210M primers; Groups: 0.397"/0.269"/0.472"/0.597"/0.462" = avg. 0.439" = 0.419 MOA
Link Posted: 11/29/2014 10:42:18 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/29/2014 10:49:25 PM EDT by FALARAK]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:


Too big
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By JmacAr:
Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag...

This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL.

**Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html

Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official

Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference.

http://i60.tinypic.com/2yy9grb.jpg  


Too big


Many shooters on the wall have already used the Triad tactical rear bag, and it is exactly the same size as the bag you approved above on this same page.
Link Posted: 11/29/2014 10:47:31 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SpeyRod:
Question:

I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target?

1st submission:

SPR, Spey Rod, LaRue Predatobr 16" 5.56, Burris signature select 3-12, Handloaded 77gr SMK over Varget, Groups: 1.583, 1.010, 1.081, 1.148, .879 = Average 1.1402 - .224 = .9161/1.047=.8751

Range set up:
Rear bag and 4x6
<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg</a>

Target on 100 yd board:
<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg</a>

<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg</a>

<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg</a>
View Quote



If we are bagging on bags - then this bag which holds the rifle in a V is not cool, to my understanding.

Link Posted: 12/1/2014 10:47:54 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:

Pulled from the wall of claim ...



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:

Pulled from the wall of claim ...




M4HK33: No need to. (join in the MOA thread) There are already plenty of rifles in that thread that outshoot OBR's at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost.

He likes to run his mouth and make fun but won't man up and post his own entry.



submit for the CSASS, I'll submit for the AFRCOM challenge.  but like your views on the CSASS, its a waste of time
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 11:32:55 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/1/2014 11:39:34 AM EDT by LaRue_Tactical]
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 12:29:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/1/2014 3:27:30 PM EDT by ReconB4]
lol

congratulations you've bested MDMOORE99: Olympic Arms K8 5.56 - Primary Arms 4-14X44 Mil FFP Scope - Handloads. Groups .562/.876/.736/1.171/.724=avg .8138" = .777 MOA by .013

you did good

Although it has been stated, I'll remind everyone that this is not GD. Let's keep the posts in the tech forum from straying away from it's intended subject. These kind of statements can be taken to PM or GD. Let's stay on track guys. (ReconB4)
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 12:37:29 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/1/2014 12:41:45 PM EDT by LaRue_Tactical]
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 1:36:28 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By m4hk33:
lol

congratulations you've bested MDMOORE99: Olympic Arms K8 5.56 - Primary Arms 4-14X44 Mil FFP Scope - Handloads. Groups .562/.876/.736/1.171/.724=avg .8138" = .777 MOA by .013

you did good
View Quote



Post an entry and stop trolling or get out locked out of this forum. This isn't GD.
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 1:37:21 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FALARAK:



If we are bagging on bags - then this bag which holds the rifle in a V is not cool, to my understanding.

http://s10.postimg.org/gvzvo852x/screenshot_20.png
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FALARAK:
Originally Posted By SpeyRod:
Question:

I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target?

1st submission:

SPR, Spey Rod, LaRue Predatobr 16" 5.56, Burris signature select 3-12, Handloaded 77gr SMK over Varget, Groups: 1.583, 1.010, 1.081, 1.148, .879 = Average 1.1402 - .224 = .9161/1.047=.8751

Range set up:
Rear bag and 4x6
<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg</a>

Target on 100 yd board:
<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg</a>

<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg</a>

<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg</a>



If we are bagging on bags - then this bag which holds the rifle in a V is not cool, to my understanding.

http://s10.postimg.org/gvzvo852x/screenshot_20.png



No, it is not cool.
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 1:53:21 PM EDT
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot?
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 2:01:45 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By cms81586:
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot?
View Quote



I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format?

Link Posted: 12/1/2014 4:22:12 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:



I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format?

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By cms81586:
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot?



I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format?




Now updated with missing info at the bottom of the post added.
Link Posted: 12/1/2014 7:46:06 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/1/2014 7:47:32 PM EDT by akethan]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By cms81586:



Now updated with missing info at the bottom of the post added.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By cms81586:
Originally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By cms81586:
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot?



I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format?




Now updated with missing info at the bottom of the post added.


Good shooting! You are the first person I have removed from the Wall of Claim since I took over the thread on 8/10/2013.


Page / 33
Top Top