User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/1/2016 12:42:39 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Ciraxis:
cuomo, fuck him right in the ass And thanks. |
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 12/2/2016 1:54:44 PM EDT
[#2]
Thank you. Keep us posted please!!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2016 2:30:30 PM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2016 6:46:17 PM EDT
[#4]
Did anything happen yet?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2016 9:03:49 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sdsquad1:
Did anything happen yet? soooooooooooooooooon.......... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2016 11:47:39 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
soooooooooooooooooon.......... 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 1:40:35 AM EDT
[#7]
All these "upgrades" but no "like" button....
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 8:13:53 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryI use to get like that when I was a teenager. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 8:17:02 PM EDT
[#9]
New York has been filed.
In Albany Federal District Court. ANDREW M. CUOMO, in his Official) Capacity as Governor of the State of New) York, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, in his ) Official Capacity as Attorney General of ) New York and LT. COL. GEORGE ) BEACH in his Official Capacity as ) Superintendent of the New York State Police) ) Defendants. ) I won't have a "filed" copy of the complaint until Monday, but the defendants are listed above. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 8:26:43 PM EDT
[#10]
You're killing us, we have to wait until monday to find out what it's about?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 8:30:33 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BenC:
You're killing us, we have to wait until monday to find out what it's about? It's a taser/stun gun case. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 8:33:14 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
New York has been filed.
In Albany Federal District Court. ANDREW M. CUOMO, in his Official) Capacity as Governor of the State of New) York, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, in his ) Official Capacity as Attorney General of ) New York and LT. COL. GEORGE ) BEACH in his Official Capacity as ) Superintendent of the New York State Police) ) Defendants. ) I won't have a "filed" copy of the complaint until Monday, but the defendants are listed above. Merry Christmas Cuomo..... And a happy fuck you! 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 8:39:08 PM EDT
[#13]
COUNT I
U.S. CONST., AMEND. II, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS The Defendants prohibit Plaintiffs from acquiring, possessing and using a defensive arm in common use, i.e., a Taser. As such it violates Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights. Defendants’ laws, customs, practices and policies generally banning the acquisition, possession, carrying and use of Tasers and other electronic arms violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, facially and as applied against the Plaintiffs in this action, damaging Plaintiffs in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against such laws, customs, policies, and practices. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 8:50:53 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
COUNT I U.S. CONST., AMEND. II, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS The Defendants prohibit Plaintiffs from acquiring, possessing and using a defensive arm in common use, i.e., a Defendants’ laws, customs, practices and policies generally banning the acquisition, possession, carrying and use of Tasers and other electronic arms violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, facially and as applied against the Plaintiffs in this action, damaging Plaintiffs in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against such laws, customs, policies, and practices. Fixed it for ya |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 9:51:54 PM EDT
[#15]
Awesome!
thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2016 11:35:10 PM EDT
[#16]
If we win this is there a possibility that the safe act could be overturned ?
|
|
|
|
BLZ
|
Posted: 12/4/2016 3:27:33 AM EDT
[#17]
TAG!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 1:16:09 PM EDT
[#18]
this should be a slam dunk...SCOTUS ruled on it....
I predict they just regulate them and somehow add them to our pistol permits. How about a case where counties get smacked down for 2 year waits to turn in a pistol permit app? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 1:19:40 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Jmo371:
this should be a slam dunk...SCOTUS ruled on it.... I predict they just regulate them and somehow add them to our pistol permits. How about a case where counties get smacked down for 2 year waits to turn in a pistol permit app? one at a time! I should have the complaint ready for posting sometime later today. They are processing everything now. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 1:29:33 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sdsquad1:
If we win this is there a possibility that the safe act could be overturned ? Maybe after season 3 of walking dead. |
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 2:13:49 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -FiveFiveSIx-:
Fixed it for ya Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -FiveFiveSIx-:
Originally Posted By NoloContendere:
COUNT I U.S. CONST., AMEND. II, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS The Defendants prohibit Plaintiffs from acquiring, possessing and using a defensive arm in common use, i.e., a Defendants’ laws, customs, practices and policies generally banning the acquisition, possession, carrying and use of Tasers and other electronic arms violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, facially and as applied against the Plaintiffs in this action, damaging Plaintiffs in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against such laws, customs, policies, and practices. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 2:19:05 PM EDT
[#22]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 2:53:49 PM EDT
[#23]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 7:00:43 PM EDT
[#24]
If the taser ban goes away, doesn't it make sense that the list of deadly weapons such as nunchucks, switchblades, billy clubs, pilum ballistic knives, gravity knives and such would also be deregulated?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 8:16:48 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Aimless]
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 41magluva:
If the taser ban goes away, doesn't it make sense that the list of deadly weapons such as nunchucks, switchblades, billy clubs, pilum ballistic knives, gravity knives and such would also be deregulated? What, and have the scourge of sword canes loose in NY again? They just got machetes back on the naughty list, but with an exemption for illegal aliens, jesus christ I can feel my blood pressure rising fucking fucker fucks |
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 9:02:30 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
I am coming to do what I do. Sue the government. Get 'em
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/5/2016 9:28:49 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Aimless:
What, and have the scourge of sword canes loose in NY again? They just got machetes back on the naughty list, but with an exemption for illegal aliens, jesus christ I can feel my blood pressure rising fucking fucker fucks I hope my top hat shillelagh isn't in danger... 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/6/2016 9:11:09 AM EDT
[#28]
Good luck .
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/6/2016 8:23:59 PM EDT
[#29]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 2:31:31 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Aimless:
What, and have the scourge of sword canes loose in NY again? They just got machetes back on the naughty list, but with an exemption for illegal aliens, jesus christ I can feel my blood pressure rising fucking fucker fucks  Failed To Load Title |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 9:07:41 AM EDT
[#31]
OK, I don't get it.
If SCOTUS already rules stun guns are legal, why go after NY? Isn't the law thus null and void? Wouldn't the best thing to do is get busted and then sue the state? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 9:49:21 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Abom:
OK, I don't get it. If SCOTUS already rules stun guns are legal, why go after NY? Isn't the law thus null and void? Wouldn't the best thing to do is get busted and then sue the state? They ruled the MA law was unconstitutional, the NY law was never challenged. It would be the same if Maryland's AWB is overturned by SCOTUS the safe act wouldn't go away immediately, it would have to be challenged in court but this citing the new SCOTUS opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 10:43:38 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By snakes19:
They ruled the MA law was unconstitutional, the NY law was never challenged. It would be the same if Maryland's AWB is overturned by SCOTUS the safe act wouldn't go away immediately, it would have to be challenged in court but this citing the new SCOTUS opinion. So we should be focusing on helping Maryland fight against the AWB? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 11:39:24 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By snakes19:
It would be the same if Maryland's AWB is overturned by SCOTUS the safe act wouldn't go away immediately, it would have to be challenged in court but this citing the new SCOTUS opinion. Is their ban similar to the unsafe act? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 12:36:08 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By snakes19:
They ruled the MA law was unconstitutional, the NY law was never challenged. It would be the same if Maryland's AWB is overturned by SCOTUS the safe act wouldn't go away immediately, it would have to be challenged in court but this citing the new SCOTUS opinion. BUT if NYS elected to prosecute after the clear SCOTUS ruling, would that not leave the prosecutor open to legal action, such as malicious prosecution and recovery of legal costs since they should have known better? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 1:58:14 PM EDT
[#36]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/7/2016 3:47:01 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sdsquad1:
So we should be focusing on helping Maryland fight against the AWB? At this point I do not think it make much difference. The circuit court ruled against the ban but the state asked for a rehearing en banc which was granted, we are currently awaiting the result of that. The full circuit court will likely rule the AWB is legal at which point the next step is to go to the supreme court. Problem there is that the SC hasn't been touching similar 2nd amendment cases for the past few years and Trump's new justice will at best be as good as Scalia so it will be back to where we were a year ago. I don't see anything happening at the SC until one of the liberal justices is replaced and even though there are two old ones on the bench they are probably going to stay there till they die or a dem wins in 2020. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/8/2016 11:52:03 AM EDT
[#38]
It'll be great when our great-great-great-great-great-grandkids will be able to finally see the efforts of the work done today.
|
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 12/9/2016 11:45:38 AM EDT
[#39]
thats a part of the point.
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 12/9/2016 12:06:07 PM EDT
[#40]
It will be interesting to see what kind of defense they come up with. Are they going to try the "it wasn't around in 1787" argument that SCOTUS already shot down? Claim that they aren't in common use? I can't realistically see a "dangerous and unusual" claim when you can carry a handgun and these are less lethal alternatives.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2016 1:07:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: cviss]
[#41]
NY is a complete lost cause.. The only ways things will change in this state would be dragging them out of the capital and placing them on the liberty tree. That will not happen in this day in age.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/9/2016 1:07:56 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JPNY23:
thats a part of the point. Yea, I'm just sickened at the speed at which rights are taken away vs. how slowly they are restored, if at all. 
|
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 12/9/2016 5:42:25 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Doppleganger871:
Yea, I'm just sickened at the speed at which rights are taken away vs. how slowly they are restored, if at all. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Doppleganger871:
Originally Posted By JPNY23:
thats a part of the point. Yea, I'm just sickened at the speed at which rights are taken away vs. how slowly they are restored, if at all. Roger that brother. |
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 12/10/2016 4:52:59 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cviss:
NY is a complete lost cause.. The only ways things will change in this state would be dragging them out of the capital and placing them on the liberty tree. That will not happen in this day in age. 2 years. After that, all bets are off. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2016 5:24:20 PM EDT
[#45]
All defendants served. Answer due 12/29.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/10/2016 11:31:41 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
All defendants served. Answer due 12/29. Sweet. You go wih yer bad ass spandex outfit. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2016 9:58:00 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Doppleganger871:
Sweet. You go wih yer bad ass spandex outfit. Maximum effort! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/12/2016 1:35:33 AM EDT
[#48]
just saw this pop up all over social media..
nice work! good luck! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/12/2016 1:46:27 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shott8283:
just saw this pop up all over social media.. nice work! good luck! Someone pointed that out to me, I was all like, "Yea, known about this for days." 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/12/2016 2:05:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DaveM4P99]
[#50]
How SCOTUS can say tasers are protected with an 8-0 ruling, but semi-auto rifles and handguns aren't, is beyond me.
And how NY courts can ignore the taser ruling just boggles my mind. If tasers are covered, then guns of all kinds are as well. You simply can't ban them. But that would take an honest court. Not Skretny and the 2nd circuit asshats. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
