Posted: 12/12/2008 6:06:46 PM EDT
|
Hey,
I was wondering how good/bad in terms of quality Taurus 1911s are compared to Springfields and Kimber. They seem to be pretty inexpensive, but I dunno about the quality. I'm specifically looking @ this model: http://www.impactguns.com/store/725327605430.html |
|
SEARCH...lots of topics on em
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=26&t=67902 http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=67961 http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=67961 http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=67935 owned one...it worked very reliably; had some trouble w/ the leaf spring after a little over 1K in rnds; ended up trading it off for a G35 for the price (then), they were worth it; now...i would probably consider a SA, SW, etc over it YMMV |
i own taurus ,s&w and springfield taurus shoots with either one. in this economy taurus is a good buy.
| I bought mine new for $430, shot it for two years, and traded up to a different 1911. It was a great entry level 1911 for me, but there are other choices out there at the prices they are getting for them now. Also, Taurus Customer Service seems suspect, and if you have problems they seem not to be in a real hurry to fix problems. |
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.