Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 3
Next Page
1/18/2009 6:54:23 PM EDT
I have fired two Taurus firearms fairly extensively - the 92 copy and the 24/7 and both functioned flawlessly. Their fit/finish might not be as nice as some, but those pistols are hard to beat for the price. Are they that bad?
1/18/2009 6:56:47 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
I have fired two Taurus firearms fairly extensively - the 92 copy and the 24/7 and both functioned flawlessly. Their fit/finish might not be as nice as some, but those pistols are hard to beat for the price. Are they that bad?


Yes.  My revolver is a piece of shit.  I sent it back to Taurus.  They said they fixed it, but they didn't.  Fuck Taurus.
1/18/2009 6:56:56 PM EDT
[#2]
Taurus = Bull
Taurus = shitty ford car
1/18/2009 6:56:57 PM EDT
[#3]
No hate here. Some of their polymer pistols tend to be problematic, but their revolvers and alloy frame autos are good guns and an good value.

I had a PT-92 that was a great gun and I liked it much better than my Beretta 92.
1/18/2009 6:57:33 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
I have fired two Taurus firearms fairly extensively - the 92 copy and the 24/7 and both functioned flawlessly. Their fit/finish might not be as nice as some, but those pistols are hard to beat for the price. Are they that bad?



I have two Taurus handguns... You know how many times they failed and caused me grief??




Oh thats right.... THEY HAVENT!

I like their stuff... Besides, I like the safety lever or the 92 on the taurus rather than the Beretta.

The Airlite or whatever its called (cant remember right now... Have a fucking migraine) has been pretty accurate.
1/18/2009 6:57:41 PM EDT
[#5]
My 85 was a piece of junk, never again.
1/18/2009 6:59:58 PM EDT
[#6]
I've had my pt92 for almost a quarter century and it still works great.
1/18/2009 7:00:18 PM EDT
[#7]
I've often wondered why so many people dislike Taurus as well. My Model 85 revolver has served me extremely well, without any problems.

1/18/2009 7:01:31 PM EDT
[#8]
My 85 is great!

I got the pimptastic one with the rosewood grips and the "gold" accents.
1/18/2009 7:01:57 PM EDT
[#9]
There isn't enough of a price difference between a lightly used Glock or 92FS (or whatever) and a new Taurus to justify going with the Taurus.
1/18/2009 7:03:36 PM EDT
[#10]
I've carried a PT-99F for many years, it's worked flawlessly with Taurus mags and some modified Sig 226 mags (my "range mags").  The only misfeed I ever had was with some Ramline mags.  Tossed those.
1/18/2009 7:06:36 PM EDT
[#11]
Big fan of Taurus here.  In the past I have owned two Taurus autoloaders and three Taurus revolvers (is that five total Tauruses or Tauri?), never a glitch with any of them and the value for cost was phenomenal.  

Not to start a shit-storm, but I have had more issues with Springfield Armory as a brand than I ever have had with Taurus.

Note: I still love SA, I just don't buy their lower-end 1911s –– my XD Rocks though!
1/18/2009 7:07:54 PM EDT
[#12]
Honestly Taurus got it's reputation as a lower quality firearm before the internet was invented. Some things are hard to shake.

In the early 80's when they bought the Barretta factory, I think they probably got some employees who help them improve their quality.

My first .357 revolver was a Taurus and it is one of the few new guns I ever bought that was a total piece of shit.
1/18/2009 7:08:39 PM EDT
[#13]
I went to a friends house to do some shooting.  We finished up and went inside to watch tv and clean our guns.  Guy says "Hey Basp, what do you think about this?"  The frame of his Taurus 9mm pistol was cracked.  Of course I told him to send it back for repair. (This was his ccw.)  This dumbass knew it was cracked, shot it and carried it for defence anyway.  
1/18/2009 7:09:57 PM EDT
[#14]
I'm a lucky one. My M85 is sweet. Better trigger than my S&W638.

I have handled other M85's that were awful.
1/18/2009 7:11:00 PM EDT
[#15]
I am thinking of buying either a taurus or a hi-point.

I think the quality us about the same.
1/18/2009 7:11:23 PM EDT
[#16]
simply because they earned it.
1/18/2009 7:14:23 PM EDT
[#17]
I have two guns, a revolver and semi auto pistol, from Taurus and I haven't had any issues with either. Obviously, snobs will not care for less expensive guns.
1/18/2009 7:18:00 PM EDT
[#18]
I hear a lot of people like their taurus 92s over the berettas. I love the hell out of my pt1911ar. It shoots better then I can.
1/18/2009 7:22:52 PM EDT
[#19]
I'll let you in on a little secret - the Taurus models PT92, PT99, and 917 are in my opinion - (and yes, we are blessed to own a more than a few Berettas) - every bit as good or better than the Beretta 92 type pistols at a lot less cost, but there are tons of folks out there that are either flat out Beretta snobs (God knows I was was one till I finally broke down and bought a PT92), or have had bad experiences with either their revolvers or polymer guns, and they then luv to trash the folks that 'did them wrong'.  Admittedly, when you buy a 92 type Taurus, inspect it well for function, because Taurus customer service is close to non-existant.  (I once order ten grip screws thru Taurus Florida, and I swear it took 4 moths to get them).  

Like WalMart, I luv Taurus 92 type pistols for all that they are -and I say this owning a Beretta 92 Brigadeer Inox, a 92 compact Inox, and  90-two (which are also all very very fine guns)
1/18/2009 7:26:13 PM EDT
[#20]
I bought a used Taurus model 82 4" .38spl. It's action is better than my S&W model 64. I've never had a problem with It. POI is dead on with POA at 25yds. with 158gr. rds. My S&W shoots 1" right at 25yds. I know that's no big deal, But It is what It is.
1/18/2009 7:28:55 PM EDT
[#21]
Every gun you buy is a roll of the dice, regardless of whether it's a Taurus or a Nighthawk.  Manufacturing isn't perfect, not matter what the attention to detail applied.  The difference however, is when you buy a Taurus, your odds of getting a pile of crap are much greater than if you buy a Beretta or Smith and Wesson.

Every manufacturer puts out a lemon now and then.  The higher priced manufacturers usually fix the problem quickly and efficiently, and it is usually a minor problem to begin with.  The lower priced manufacturers will put the same amount of attention into fixing your problem as they did in creating the problematic piece to begin with.

It comes down to how much grief you're willing to deal with to save a few bucks, and how lucky you are when you roll dice.  Spending more money generally stacks the odds in your favor.
1/18/2009 7:32:26 PM EDT
[#22]
yeah for me it is mostly looks, they have to put their name in bold fuckin letters everywhere, it just looks cheesy

it is not so much that they are second rate as much as they look second rate

i know, shallow
1/18/2009 7:33:32 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
yeah for me it is mostly looks, they have to put their name in bold fuckin letters everywhere, it just looks cheesy

it is not so much that they are second rate as much as they look second rate

i know, shallow


I agree
1/18/2009 7:38:33 PM EDT
[#24]
My brother has a PT145 and even though it seems cheap and the trigger is crap, I found it to be extremely controllable in rapid fire due to the large front sight.  I can't think of any other 10rd .45 that small that costs less than $400.  I don't know how durable or reliable it is though.
1/18/2009 7:49:12 PM EDT
[#25]
The Taurus PT-945 is one of the best shooting, most balanced .45 handguns ever made. I got one in 2004 at a gunshow for $325 brand new. I also have a PT92 and a PT-145 that have been great, never had any issue with them. I prefer the the Taurus 92 over the Beretta mainly because of the safety, on the frame is much better than on the slide.
1/18/2009 7:51:26 PM EDT
[#26]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have fired two Taurus firearms fairly extensively - the 92 copy and the 24/7 and both functioned flawlessly. Their fit/finish might not be as nice as some, but those pistols are hard to beat for the price. Are they that bad?


Yes.  My revolver is a piece of shit.  I sent it back to Taurus.  They said they fixed it, but they didn't.  Fuck Taurus.


me too, but not before they lost it.
1/18/2009 7:51:51 PM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
My brother has a PT145 and even though it seems cheap and the trigger is crap, I found it to be extremely controllable in rapid fire due to the large front sight.  I can't think of any other 10rd .45 that small that costs less than $400.  I don't know how durable or reliable it is though.


I paid $279 for mine NIB at a gunshow in 2005, I carry it everyday, not a hiccup in the last 3-4 years.

1/18/2009 7:55:00 PM EDT
[#28]
I think it's simply beciause they are hit or miss. I've owned one Taurus revolver, which was flwless. I've handled one Taurus 1911, which was a piece of shit.
1/18/2009 7:55:44 PM EDT
[#29]
I have kaboomed 6 Taurus pistols using Wolf ammo.

1/18/2009 7:58:56 PM EDT
[#30]
My SS 608 and titanium 85 have been flawless.
1/18/2009 8:00:42 PM EDT
[#31]
My Taurus PT 1911 keeps functioning flawlessly despite what many here will tell  you.  I bought it as a cheap entry into 1911 ownership, and I think I'll stop there as I actually prefer revolvers.
My friend has two WWII era Colts that fail to fire every 3 or 4 rounds. My Taurus is much more accureate and never fails to fire. Just my experience with them.
1/18/2009 8:04:52 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
I have kaboomed 6 Taurus pistols using Wolf ammo.



I would have stopped after the fourth one, I learnz slow.

1/18/2009 8:05:38 PM EDT
[#33]
Because sometimes, you get what you pay for.

I have 4, and 2 of them have had serious malfunctions.

I'll never own another.  I prefer brands that have a lot higher success rate.  To be fair, their revolvers seem to be a lot better than their autos.
1/18/2009 8:11:37 PM EDT
[#34]
I have a 669.  The threaded part of the ejector works itself undone while shooting and jams the cylinder.  It's a POS, in other words.  No more Taurus anything for me.

1/18/2009 8:13:05 PM EDT
[#35]
Taurus is made in Brazil, a country well-known for their long and rich tradition in precision manufacturing.
1/18/2009 8:13:31 PM EDT
[#36]
I like my Taurus .357 better than my Colt King Cobra.




1/18/2009 8:15:31 PM EDT
[#37]
No hate here... One on my side everytime I leave the house. lol at all the haters.
1/18/2009 8:15:57 PM EDT
[#38]
PT140 owner.  It always goes bang when I pull the trigger.  Not great on looks, but then again, it's a tool.

A pretty hammer doesn't work any better than a ugly hammer.  

1/18/2009 8:18:23 PM EDT
[#39]
Only Tarus firearm I've dealt with had to go back to the factory twice.  YMMV (a .357 revolver)
1/18/2009 8:20:12 PM EDT
[#40]
I have had two PT92 pistols that where awesome and very accurate.
And the only wheel gun I currently own is a .357 Taurus.
I like them.
Phessor
1/18/2009 8:22:47 PM EDT
[#41]
Quoted:
I have fired two Taurus firearms fairly extensively - the 92 copy and the 24/7 and both functioned flawlessly. Their fit/finish might not be as nice as some, but those pistols are hard to beat for the price. Are they that bad?


Their wheel guns and knock off M9s are good stuff but what pisses me off is that door stop of a 1911

1/18/2009 8:34:08 PM EDT
[#42]
I had a PT109, it's the only gun I ever sold.  It failed to go bang often, once during a CHL class.  I sent it back, they said no problem.  It failed to go bang again.  I sold it.
1/18/2009 8:53:21 PM EDT
[#43]
At the range I saw a guy's millennium go BANG BANG click click. He asked if I could look at it. I didn't take it apart, but something had broken and the trigger wasn't resetting.

Back in October the gun store I work at got a 24/7 OSS. The dovetail on the slide for the rear sight was cut crooked. We sent it to Taurus and we haven't gotten it back yet.

Their revolvers seem ok though.
1/19/2009 2:50:36 AM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
I am thinking of buying either a taurus or a hi-point.

I think the quality us about the same.


Wrong.  Hi-Point's are better made.
1/19/2009 2:59:42 AM EDT
[#45]
My brother bought a 24/7 and it patterns like a shotgun.  We both shot a good hundred rounds through it and still couldn't get it to shoot the least bit accurately.  I'm not impressed with it, and I'm sure he's sold it off by now.
1/19/2009 3:29:07 AM EDT
[#46]
Copies of S&W revolvers with spotty quality...


Why bother when I can get the real deal and be happy with it. Nothing compares to a fine S&W revolver..it's like sitting around a campfire with a fine cigar
1/19/2009 3:49:06 AM EDT
[#47]
My wife's 85SS revolver developed a timing problem after about 5 years of service.  The cylinder would lock up after firing 3 of the 5 rounds.

We sent it in, they fixed it.  Total turnaround time was 28 days door-to-door.

That was almost 5 years ago and the little gun has run perfectly ever since.
1/19/2009 3:57:08 AM EDT
[#48]
Had one.  Hated it.  Not willing to give them another chance.

Fuck Taurus.

1/19/2009 4:17:04 AM EDT
[#49]
Taurus is not my fav however S&W and Colt have put out some serious crap as well. Colt 2000 anyone, anyone? I had a S&W 6906 that literally fell apart. Sigma, sigma why are you such shit. I had an HK 9mm that was a jaammmooomatic. Oh,let's not forget the Sigpro.
My point is that EVERY manufacturer has put out shit and if there is something even small wrong with a gun it can and will malf.
Taurus' problem is their employees rather than their product.
YMMV, if it doesn't', DIAF!
1/19/2009 4:18:46 AM EDT
[#50]
Had one that was a total POS and have a revolver that is actually pretty decent. I only bought it because I got it so cheap.
Previous Page
/ 3
Next Page