To recap Stewart, very briefly:
The challenge brings forth the notion that the federal MG ban works under the Commerce Clause, which regulates INTERSTATE commerce only. An MG manufactured in a given state, and
that never leaves that state, can not be said to have had any involvement with interstate commerce
and hence is exempt from the Commerce Clause as long as it does not leave that state as part of
any commercial transaction. Hence, if no state law specifically restricts you, you could make your
own MG as long as it stays in-state. It can't leave the state as part of any commercial transaction.
I guess you could take it with you when on vacation, if the ATF approves. You could sell it to
someone else as long as it stayes in your state. But you can't sell it outside the state.
That's the supposition.
It would be nice to see it upheld by the Supremes.
CJ