[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Romney Vs Christie (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 10/3/2011 9:20:27 AM EDT
| Pretend that these are the only two GOP candidates. Who do you like more? Why? |
|
Chris Christie is no friend of gun owners or public sector workers. Also he believes in the global warming scams which undoubtedly means he wants to tax YOU to enrich government, with no gain for anyone but those in charge.
Public union busting is terribly popular right now, mainly with laid off or out of work private sector people who want revenge on public employees and their more secure jobs and pensions. When just 4 or so years ago these same private sector people were laughing at how shitty public pensions and pay were compared to their jobs and fabulous 401k's. |
|
I like Christie and I absolutely believe he is the right man for the NJ Governorship. As an America POTUS though? Not so much, IMO.
Romney, while having the economic background of running a business is a plus, he pretty much sucks in most every other regard. Given the choice, I'd probably go with Christie as I'd trust him more than Romney to do what's needed to get our financial house in order. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for obama before I voted for those clowns. Atleast with obama we can count on a republican controlled congress. Write in Ron Paul. Oh Im not going to vote for any of them, but if someone put a gun to my head that is how I would vote. I plan on voting for Paul if either of them are on the ballot. Last thing we need is a jackass republican to halt the conservative movement. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for obama before I voted for those clowns. Atleast with obama we can count on a republican controlled congress. Write in Ron Paul. Oh Im not going to vote for any of them, but if someone put a gun to my head that is how I would vote. I plan on voting for Paul if either of them are on the ballot. Last thing we need is a jackass republican to halt the conservative movement. I must be the only one who thinks a libertarian and a conservative are two completely different animals. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for obama before I voted for those clowns. Atleast with obama we can count on a republican controlled congress. Write in Ron Paul. Oh Im not going to vote for any of them, but if someone put a gun to my head that is how I would vote. I plan on voting for Paul if either of them are on the ballot. Last thing we need is a jackass republican to halt the conservative movement. I must be the only one who thinks a libertarian and a conservative are two completely different animals. Both are supposed to be for smaller government |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd vote for obama before I voted for those clowns. Atleast with obama we can count on a republican controlled congress. Write in Ron Paul. Oh Im not going to vote for any of them, but if someone put a gun to my head that is how I would vote. I plan on voting for Paul if either of them are on the ballot. Last thing we need is a jackass republican to halt the conservative movement. I must be the only one who thinks a libertarian and a conservative are two completely different animals. Both are supposed to be for smaller government I agree, but it's all the other baggage they carry that sets them apart. I'm a conservative, but support very few of the libertarian side shows. Either way, I'll vote for anyone running against Obama who has a chance of winning. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I'd vote for obama before I voted for those clowns. Atleast with obama we can count on a republican controlled congress. With 2 conservative SCOTUS judges being 75 years old? The liberals thank you. Say hello to Emperor Obama, a permanent AWB, amnesty for 12+ millions grateful new democrats.....and a true socialist America by executive order. Validated by the SCOTUS.  |
|
Quoted:
I'll stay home on election day if either of those two are on ballot in any way shape or form. If he did get in the race, the AWB and gun control would come up pretty damn fast and he would be forced to explain any comments about a national AWB. He could take the easy way out and call it "state rights" and use the argument that it's up to the individual states but has no place as a federal law. If he did that and came right out and said "I will not sign an AWB" that would do it for me anyway. |
That would have me staying at home.