[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Question (Page 1 of 5)
Posted: 6/6/2005 4:28:46 PM EDT
|
I have a question for all of you, Belloc is of the mind that the Pink Pistols are gay agenda smoke screen. This is the post in question "Ignore them, they're rather a witless lot. In the same way one should ignore "Pederasts with Pistols" if they existed, or loons with long arms, recalcitrants with rifles, and silly twits with slingshots. That was just having a little fun with you. The simple fact is that even the name "pink pistols" undermines the cause intrinsically by removing from the discussion, by it's very name, the seriousness and dignity any debate for preserving the God given rights of man deserves, requires, and demands. The very fact that those who make the conscience choice to engage in acts of sodomy and who believe in the RKBA feel the need to link the two is itself quite revealling. They are simply trying to use a legitimate fight to push their agenda. I don't know if it is more tragic, or pathetic." Now how do you all see us? A. Gay agenda group B. 2nd Amend supporters |
I don't care what Belloc thinks...but I'm interested in how this board views the Pistols. This is one of the largest gun boards on the web after all. |
| Both. Dude, if I led a pro 2nd ammendment group, you would be more than welcome as a member. I can find no good reason to form a group called "Straight Shooters" and imply that it's members are heterosexual. Doing so would not further my goals, as a person's sexual identity and their place in society are of no consequence to my right to keep and bear arms. |
|
C. Both of the above. They are a pro-gun gay/lesbian group, seems like a real easy answer to me. I really don't care if they are gay/lesbian as long as they don't shove it in my face. I do think they are a fantastic counter-leftist group. The lefties can't attack them too much with out contradicting themselves worse than usual. |
And you a welcome in the Pistols now, but most mainstream LGBT don't get the 2nd admenment message and thinks the NRA wants them dead....so "we" try to disspell that. |
|
Ah the age old questions: Is the enemy of my enemy my friend? Is the friend of my enemy my enemy? Funny I haven't heard a question like this brought up about the JPFO or the SAS. As in is the JPFO a Jewish agenda group or are the SAS a womens rights organization. Believe it or not there are Gays who lean toward conservativism and we're not talking about NAMBLA here. I voted B. |
Nope.....she voted Libertarian |
That proves my point then. You could have easily called it Gays for guns or Homo's for Handguns. But you didn't. You choose a VERY gay sounding name to make sure that everyone knew how gay the org is. SGatr15 |
|
OK, I've read your site and I'm changing my answer to "B". Incidentally, because of your site, I learned what happened at Stonewall Columbus. You guys did good, and should be applauded. The central theme on your site is pro 2nd ammendment, and little attention is given to "Pink" causes. With that, I see that you are primarily a pro 2nd ammendment group and are therefore just fine by me, even if your lifestyle gives me the willies. 
|
Ok..... a. I didn't start the group....so I didn't pick the name. b. Homo's for Handguns doesn't sound as gay as Pink Pistols to you ? 
|
|
I think the OBVIOUS answer is both. They are clearly interested in the Second Amendment and they are clearly interested in Gay Rights. Now do I think they are a smokescreen group trying to trick us with their second amendment stance? Well that is absurd and only an idiot would think it. |
There too many different gay rights groups as it is [IMO] |
The Gwen [Pistol media goddess] is working on a updated site which will have more gay input. But here is a link to the Guys with Guns site Kacer and I are running. http://usp45usp.proboards42.com |
yep..........but it shoots blanks. 
|
|
I have no problem at all with viewing 'The Pink Pistols' as Friends of the Second Amendment! If I were gay, you'd damn well better believe that I would support the RKBA! Frankly, I never liked the idea of confusing someone's sexual preferences with their true selves. I just wish some gay folks would see it that way, as well. Sexuality doesn't define my life, why should it define anyone's? Eric The(Straighter'nMoses)Hun 
|
|
I voted 2nd ammendment. There are some sick twisted folks out there that would like to do nothing but kill people based purely on thier sexual preferance.The more of those fucks that run into one of you,and you squeeze the trigger and end the life of that person,you did everyone a favor. I'm not pro-gay or anti-gay,I just hate ignorance and stupidity. One question though: Why do some gays feel the need to stick tongues down each other's throats in public ? Is it for the "Hey I'm gay I don't care what you say" agenda ? Because that shit right there is just inviting people to fuck with you. Anyway,more power to you. Sidenote: If I was a girl,I would be a lesbian. |
It doesn't mine either....but that is the subject of another thread. Which I'm sure will be starting as soon as Belloc gets back online 
|
I imagine it is an issue because others have at times made it an issue. If heterosexuality were not the norm and it became an "issue" for me to be heterosexual I would be more defined by it. That said, I understand and completely agree with your point. I wish it was NOT an issue because frankly I'm tired of dealing with the promotion of that agenda. |