Now streaming on Prime: ‘THE AGE OF DISCLOSURE’ (Page 3 of 8)
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: The movie is a perfect summary to show your friends and family. While watching, the little spontaneous voice in my head with an infallible record of predictions chimed in to say official disclosure is coming from Trump. My intuition is off the fucking charts so take it for what you will. |
Pour over coffee is best coffee.
|
Originally Posted By jafrush: I disagree. That was the best presentation of the information in a clear, concise, and highly believable format that doesn't feel like a tin foil production. This is a huge step forward in the push for truth. Yes, if you've been following it closely there's not a whole lot of new information, but I still picked up on some new stuff. For those of us who have followed it, this is 100% accurate. It isn’t revelatory. It is a synopsis for 99.9% of the population who need to hear it. The message carriers are the most senior officials possible. Dan Farah could have gone MUCH further. Imagine Diane Pasulka and a Vatican rep explaining that the foundations of ALL religions derive from the Phenomenon. Christianity would be in turmoil. Islam would react.... poorly. |
Behave Yourself
|
Dan Farah was on Rogan and said: "Trump is pissed about how much has been concealed from the White House. He has tasked Tulsi Gabbard to get him as much information as possible. He's aware of the film and he's low-key interested in the topic. I think he'll be the one to make the announcement, and soon." "Musk definitely knows more than he's letting on." One thing I noticed was the nearly-identical statements from Clapper and Brennan. It's like they are allowed an official CIA talking point and stick to it. They're both colossal pieces of shit. "It's not rational to think we're the only life in the universe, so it's possible some of this phenomenon represents an intelligence that's not human." That's not an admission, more of a wishy-washy opinion. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Utahshooting: For those of us who have followed it, this is 100% accurate. It isn't revelatory. It is a synopsis for 99.9% of the population who need to hear it. The message carriers are the most senior officials possible. Dan Farah could have gone MUCH further. Imagine Diane Pasulka and a Vatican rep explaining that the foundations of ALL religions derive from the Phenomenon. Christianity would be in turmoil. Islam would react.... poorly. Originally Posted By Utahshooting: Originally Posted By jafrush: I disagree. That was the best presentation of the information in a clear, concise, and highly believable format that doesn't feel like a tin foil production. This is a huge step forward in the push for truth. Yes, if you've been following it closely there's not a whole lot of new information, but I still picked up on some new stuff. For those of us who have followed it, this is 100% accurate. It isn't revelatory. It is a synopsis for 99.9% of the population who need to hear it. The message carriers are the most senior officials possible. Dan Farah could have gone MUCH further. Imagine Diane Pasulka and a Vatican rep explaining that the foundations of ALL religions derive from the Phenomenon. Christianity would be in turmoil. Islam would react.... poorly. "Hey that stuff we told you was the truth has been disproven through better science. Obviously, God wanted us to know this new truth and guided these scientists to this discovery. Praise God, keep sending money." But only after they persecuted some of the scientists. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Solo_: Just finished. I won 'my' battle (with my wife) only halfway, she remains... partially skeptical. As for me, I loved every second of it. Call me naive, that's perfectly fine. I am a dreamer, I am an optimist - I know this, all of this, is simply true. Love this place, Bro Fil  Honestly, this is a lot for a “normie” to take in all at once. And that’s just the “are we alone/the government is covering it up” part… When you get into the harder/deeper stuff that is tangentially related, like soul containers, etc., it gets really “out there” and might be overwhelming for those not familiar with it, who have had a slower drip of knowledge vs. jumping right in. Props for getting her started, and sticking with it. I know my wife has this hard stop built in to her based on a strict Christian upbringing, where she’ll just go “nope” after a certain point. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: One thing I noticed was the nearly-identical statements from Clapper and Brennan. It's like they are allowed an official CIA talking point and stick to it. They're both colossal pieces of shit. "It's not rational to think we're the only life in the universe, so it's possible some of this phenomenon represents an intelligence that's not human." That's not an admission, more of a wishy-washy opinion. I noticed this as well. Clapper went a bit further and admitted that the Air Force had/has an office to investigate this during his tenure. Most folks dont realize he was a 3 star Air Force general before becoming head of DIA and later, DNI. |
Behave Yourself
|
Originally Posted By macman37: ... I know my wife has this hard stop built in to her based on a strict Christian upbringing, where she'll just go "nope" after a certain point. I grew up Catholic, saw a lot of wrong doing there, detached - remained Christian (at least culturally) and went on my own spiritual journey which is not at all detached from or incompatible with Christianity AND the possibility of not being alone (I think it's the exact contrary). I am seeing a lot of core Christianity get in the way of being willing to learn about NHI among my (Christian) friends. And me being a conservative, I am drenched in it. Often I just have to remain in silence, I don't want to stir anything. I love my friends, I just know they mean well - I just go on my own path when I see this happening. ETA as for my wife, she's a former Roman Catholic girl. She used to be a model, naturally beautiful AND was abused by a priest when young. I was as well - that's how we quickly detached back then. She's still stubbornly refractive to NHI, but that's because she's a... blonde Attached File |
This is a great interview with some more info. Among UFO doc’s revelations: Russia recovered nonhuman ‘Tic Tac’ craft | Elizabeth Vargas Reports |
Groush was on Fox. SHOCKING UFO findings revealed: ‘WE HAVE PROOF’ |
|
I enjoyed it and thought it was worth the price of admission. I’m not as familiar with the topic of current research/disclosure and who’s who in the UFO/NHI/UAP world as some of the posters in this forum. My interest has waxed and waned over the last 40+ years. So I was surprised at how many people that I did know and how much of the information that I was familiar with. That’s not to say there weren’t revelations for me in the film. Both info and the people in it. Maybe it was a misinterpretation on my part, but the constant messaging of they are a national security threat was unsettling. That seemed to be a hard selling point to the overall message. Cracking the code to the technology by us vs our adversaries is in our best national security interest. But to definitively imply that the NHI are a threat I found to be a stretch. Then again I don’t know what they know. This topic would not have been spoken about 10-15 years ago by many in this film publicly in the manner that they do. The jobs that some of these people currently hold or previously held puts a lot of power behind this film. Regardless of what I think of many of them as human beings. In my opinion. |
|
Originally Posted By HighlanderI: Maybe it was a misinterpretation on my part, but the constant messaging of they are a national security threat was unsettling. That seemed to be a hard selling point to the overall message. Cracking the code to the technology by us vs our adversaries is in our best national security interest. But to definitively imply that the NHI are a threat I found to be a stretch. Then again I don't know what they know. Lue Elizondo and I believe Christopher Mellon have both mentioned the "national security threat" angle is the only one that works in getting the relevant government entities interested and involved. It's basically a marketing message aimed at the system. Elizondo has made comments in interviews that sound like he isn't concerned. Statements to the effect that they have been here a LONG time and are so far ahead of us, technologically, that if they meant us harm, they probably would have already done so. He's also mentioned the very real possibility of huge benefits to humanity, if we can figure out the technology. |
Pour over coffee is best coffee.
|
Originally Posted By corwin1968: Lue Elizondo and I believe Christopher Mellon have both mentioned the "national security threat" angle is the only one that works in getting the relevant government entities interested and involved. It's basically a marketing message aimed at the system. That’s a better take on it than my pre morning coffee pessimism. I like it. A psyop against the psyop…. |
I think this guys analysis about what is about to happen is spot on. Especially with all the other whistleblowers that are lined up waiting for their Non-discloser contracts to be torn up including Eric Davis that knows almost EVERYTHING! And James Fox's Documentary pt2 about the Brazil incident is due out any day now as well with undeniable witnesses. Hal Putoff and many others have also stated they will spill the beans if given the legal ability. Our world is about to change guys like it or not.  Trump is About to Disclose |
|
One thing they got completely wrong is Senator Harry Reid didn't secure the $22M for AATIP. Elizondo knows this but allows the confusion to perpetuate because it makes AATIP seen more relevant. AAWSAP was the forerunner to AATIP and was the recipient of the funds through BASS. AATIP had nothing to do with it and was not the recipient of ANY of the $22M in funding. AATIP was a very small DoD effort. AAWSAP was a much larger effort through DIA where Jim Latatski was the sponsor within DIA and Robert Bigelow's BASS was awarded the contract. AAWSAP drafted 38 highly technical research papers on the phenomenon. The unclassufied ones are available on the internet. I cringed every time I heard them glorify AATIP and never mention AAWSAP. Huge oversight and completely wrong. |
Behave Yourself
|
Originally Posted By Utahshooting: One thing they got completely wrong is Senator Harry Reid didn't secure the $22M for AATIP. Elizondo knows this but allows the confusion to perpetuate because it makes AATIP seen more relevant. AAWSAP was the forerunner to AATIP and was the recipient of the funds through BASS. AATIP had nothing to do with it and was not the recipient of ANY of the $22M in funding. AATIP was a very small DoD effort. AAWSAP was a much larger effort through DIA where Jim Latatski was the sponsor within DIA and Robert Bigelow's BASS was awarded the contract. AAWSAP drafted 38 highly technical research papers on the phenomenon. The unclassufied ones are available on the internet. I cringed every time I heard them glorify AATIP and never mention AAWSAP. Huge oversight and completely wrong. |
Pour over coffee is best coffee.
|
Originally Posted By HighlanderI: I enjoyed it and thought it was worth the price of admission. I'm not as familiar with the topic of current research/disclosure and who's who in the UFO/NHI/UAP world as some of the posters in this forum. My interest has waxed and waned over the last 40+ years. So I was surprised at how many people that I did know and how much of the information that I was familiar with. That's not to say there weren't revelations for me in the film. Both info and the people in it. Maybe it was a misinterpretation on my part, but the constant messaging of they are a national security threat was unsettling. That seemed to be a hard selling point to the overall message. Cracking the code to the technology by us vs our adversaries is in our best national security interest. But to definitively imply that the NHI are a threat I found to be a stretch. Then again I don't know what they know. This topic would not have been spoken about 10-15 years ago by many in this film publicly in the manner that they do. The jobs that some of these people currently hold or previously held puts a lot of power behind this film. Regardless of what I think of many of them as human beings. In my opinion. If they had the capability to manipulate gravity and move at 40,000+ mph in space/air/water, it's game over. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By dirtyboy: Space is too vast to traverse, time travel more likely. In a quantum universe time actually does not exist. Everything is happening all at the same time. Don't ask me to explain it because it is way way way over my head. Time exist only in our 3D world as an illusion. |
|
Originally Posted By dirtyboy: Space is too vast to traverse, time travel more likely. How do you travel through time without also being able to arrive at a specified point in space? Everything is always moving. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: If time travel is a thing, the vastness of space is irrelevant. How do you travel through time without also being able to arrive at a specified point in space? Everything is always moving. Space travel not an 'issue', provided our ramblings have any possible foundation in some theory. |
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Dan Farah was on Rogan and said: "Trump is pissed about how much has been concealed from the White House. He has tasked Tulsi Gabbard to get him as much information as possible. He's aware of the film and he's low-key interested in the topic. I think he'll be the one to make the announcement, and soon." "Musk definitely knows more than he's letting on." One thing I noticed was the nearly-identical statements from Clapper and Brennan. It's like they are allowed an official CIA talking point and stick to it. They're both colossal pieces of shit. "It's not rational to think we're the only life in the universe, so it's possible some of this phenomenon represents an intelligence that's not human." That's not an admission, more of a wishy-washy opinion. |
I don’t want unity. I want them defeated and subjugated, and I never want them to be a threat to me or my people ever again. - J. Grey
|
I watched it this am. Mostly the same stuff we have all heard, but in a well-made presentation. I think it was worth the $25. I have to say though, while I would like to see full disclosure for myself, the world is in no way ready. The religious zealots and many others would simply lose their minds. It’s a bad idea. |
|
Originally Posted By corwin1968: Some of the people in this movie had interviews published yesterday and based on Grusch (sp?) in particular, I think Trump is actually considering it. Watching it with my wife. I think it’s swaying her to that there is a strong probability that we are not alone. She had always dismissed any of it due to a conflict with her faith. She was in the car with our daughters when I spotted a disc about 100’ hovering over an abandoned Uranium mine in no man’s land Wyoming. She just looked and shrugged it off. As a Christian, I’m definitely open minded to NHI. I know that I don’t know what possibilities are out there and to think otherwise is a demonstration of hubris. |
|
Attached File Attached File So I've been watching this thread for a while and thought I'd post a reply. Being a Gen Xer and growing up during the Apollo era I've always been interested in space. I've had these two books since elementary school just as a side note. As such like most folks who grew up in an era where we spent lots of time outside I've seen aerial phenomena I couldn't identify. Including once when I was a grunt near Eilson AFB. However I guess I'm one of the religious "zealots " mentioned several times already. I'm an Independent Baptist KJV guy so yes I take the Bible literally as the word of God. So how does this relate? I believe people are absolutely seeing phenomena they can't explain. I believe the government very likely knows there are "entities " operating in the earths atmosphere that they can't do anything about. I guess the closest explanation I can see is the inter-dimensional angle. From scripture we are told that Lucifer and his fellow rebels were forced from heaven and he is "ruler of the air". I believe that the fallen angels / demons may be the explanation for "aliens". The main reason lots of believers in Christ including myself don't believe in an alien race would be the fact that scripture teaches Christ died once for man's sin. Not multiple times on multiple worlds, for those who aren't believers that's what I believe based on scripture. Anyway don't want to cause thread drift or start arguments and I'll likely buy the program and see what I think about the information provided. |
We should have been working on a vaccine for Liberalism rather than a vaccine for COVID. gunham
PFG # 195
PFG # 195
Member
Joined:
Aug 2024
Posts:
1688
EE: 0% (0)
TX, USA
|
I kinda get put off when I hear "we're not the only life in the universe". Well hell no! As huge beyond comprehension as the universe is, that is saying nothing. Why can't we narrow it down with "we're not the only life in our solar system", or "there is probably NHI on earth". That's what this is all about. Even most skeptics have accepted the probability of life in the universe based on the odds. |
|
Originally Posted By elmanotejas: I kinda get put off when I hear "we're not the only life in the universe". Well hell no! As huge beyond comprehension as the universe is, that is saying nothing. Why can't we narrow it down with "we're not the only life in our solar system", or "there is probably NHI on earth". That's what this is all about. Even most skeptics have accepted the probability of life in the universe based on the odds. |
Pour over coffee is best coffee.
|
Originally Posted By elmanotejas: I kinda get put off when I hear "we're not the only life in the universe". Well hell no! As huge beyond comprehension as the universe is, that is saying nothing. Why can't we narrow it down with "we're not the only life in our solar system", or "there is probably NHI on earth". That's what this is all about. Even most skeptics have accepted the probability of life in the universe based on the odds. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Drsalee: Well………..do I cough up the $24 ? Or not ? Absolutely not... Use your VPN and stream it for free on the OnStream app. No way in hell I'd pay to watch this. I'm halfway through now. It's not bad. Good production value. Not much new information. Still a bit PSYOP-y. I trust nothing of what comes out of the mouths of the Washington swamp rats throughout this documentary. Take what you hear with a grain of salt and make your own determination. |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: This is a great interview with some more info.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-8xkZjyIrwWatched this on my YT feed. Based on that, both Bush 43 and Trump decided against disclosure for fear of reaction from the public. That fear seems unfounded to me. Many people would be ready to accept it, given proof. |
| I saw one in 1980 and made the mistake of telling the mechanics I worked with the next day (Monday). They gave me so much shit that I was pissed so I rode my dirtbike back out there where I thought it landed after work to look for it again, and the entire area was full of military vehicles and lines of soldiers picking stuff up. Looks like we lost it. Two round balls connected to a tube like an old fashioned dumbbell. The tube was painted Fallon Navy grey. |
|
Originally Posted By PacNW5: Watched this on my YT feed. Based on that, both Bush 43 and Trump decided against disclosure for fear of reaction from the public. That fear seems unfounded to me. Many people would be ready to accept it, given proof. Originally Posted By PacNW5: Originally Posted By tnriverluver: This is a great interview with some more info. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-8xkZjyIrwWatched this on my YT feed. Based on that, both Bush 43 and Trump decided against disclosure for fear of reaction from the public. That fear seems unfounded to me. Many people would be ready to accept it, given proof. "We're not alone in the universe." Fine, sure. "The government has had the capability to provide clean, nearly-limitless energy for 80 years and we kept it a secret from humanity so we could weaponize it." Not so much. "There's a non-human intelligence interacting with the planet. We don't know who/what they are or where they are from, we just know they're much more advanced than we are and they operate with impunity." Hell no. The primary debate is likely "how much do we disclose?" and the nature of that disclosure, because no matter what they tell us, there will be a shitload of hard questions to follow and the last thing the government wants to say is "we don't know shit". |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: It's not so much that the NHI are a national security threat, it's the possibility of China reverse engineering the technology. If they had the capability to manipulate gravity and move at 40,000+ mph in space/air/water, it's game over. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By HighlanderI: I enjoyed it and thought it was worth the price of admission. I'm not as familiar with the topic of current research/disclosure and who's who in the UFO/NHI/UAP world as some of the posters in this forum. My interest has waxed and waned over the last 40+ years. So I was surprised at how many people that I did know and how much of the information that I was familiar with. That's not to say there weren't revelations for me in the film. Both info and the people in it. Maybe it was a misinterpretation on my part, but the constant messaging of they are a national security threat was unsettling. That seemed to be a hard selling point to the overall message. Cracking the code to the technology by us vs our adversaries is in our best national security interest. But to definitively imply that the NHI are a threat I found to be a stretch. Then again I don't know what they know. This topic would not have been spoken about 10-15 years ago by many in this film publicly in the manner that they do. The jobs that some of these people currently hold or previously held puts a lot of power behind this film. Regardless of what I think of many of them as human beings. In my opinion. If they had the capability to manipulate gravity and move at 40,000+ mph in space/air/water, it's game over. I think you’re probably right. When you frame it like the space race it makes sense. Especially if you have hit an academic and engineering wall due to secrecy and need to be able to bring more minds to it. |
“The eye sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend.” - Henri Bergson
|
Originally Posted By tawaggs: I watched it this am. Mostly the same stuff we have all heard, but in a well-made presentation. I think it was worth the $25. I have to say though, while I would like to see full disclosure for myself, the world is in no way ready. The religious zealots and many others would simply lose their minds. It’s a bad idea. Religion will adapt. It always does. Even the biggest religious institutions have been laying the groundwork for NHI/UAP for decades. |
“The eye sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend.” - Henri Bergson
|
Originally Posted By j_hooker: Watching it with my wife. I think it’s swaying her to that there is a strong probability that we are not alone. She had always dismissed any of it due to a conflict with her faith. She was in the car with our daughters when I spotted a disc about 100’ hovering over an abandoned Uranium mine in no man’s land Wyoming. She just looked and shrugged it off. As a Christian, I’m definitely open minded to NHI. I know that I don’t know what possibilities are out there and to think otherwise is a demonstration of hubris. So, just to unpack this, and no accusations made... If I had seen a 100' disc hovering anywhere and my wife had looked at it an shrugged it off due to her preconceived notions...well, the argument would have led to a swift divorce. Willful ignorance is something I can't tolerate. It seems like there's a whole lot of that going around. |
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
|
Originally Posted By Oldgold: Bottom line ..did they provide any proof? If you're waiting on "proof" from someone else, you're never going to be satisfied. Literally everything can be faked so if you're still in "this isn't real" mode, you're going to remain there for the foreseeable future. Hi-def video = "That's CGI" Clear photos = "Photoshop/AI" Documents= "Easy to fake" Testimony= "Liar/Part of a psyop" If Trump rolled an alien body out in the middle of a live press conference, slapped it around, then jumped in a tic-tac and darted off, a significant number of people would say "that was all fake and he's just lying about aliens to get more power!" |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Define proof. If you're waiting on "proof" from someone else, you're never going to be satisfied. Literally everything can be faked so if you're still in "this isn't real" mode, you're going to remain there for the foreseeable future. Hi-def video = "That's CGI" Clear photos = "Photoshop/AI" Documents= "Easy to fake" Testimony= "Liar/Part of a psyop" If Trump rolled an alien body out in the middle of a live press conference, slapped it around, then jumped in a tic-tac and darted off, a significant number of people would say "that was all fake and he's just lying about aliens to get more power!" I’ve been following this since project Bluebook. I watch the “experts” talk in circles. All they have to say is I’m standing here at Wright Patterson and here are two aliens. Or here is a crashed UFO. Not they have a tic Tac in thermal. Is it ours? Is it theirs? Is it extraterrestrial? Is it dimensional? Where are they from? Simple questions but no answers |
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
|
Originally Posted By Oldgold: I've been following this since project Bluebook. I watch the "experts" talk in circles. All they have to say is I'm standing here at Wright Patterson and here are two aliens. Or here is a crashed UFO. Not they have a tic Tac in thermal. Is it ours? Is it theirs? Is it extraterrestrial? Is it dimensional? Where are they from? Simple questions but no answers Originally Posted By Oldgold: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Define proof. If you're waiting on "proof" from someone else, you're never going to be satisfied. Literally everything can be faked so if you're still in "this isn't real" mode, you're going to remain there for the foreseeable future. Hi-def video = "That's CGI" Clear photos = "Photoshop/AI" Documents= "Easy to fake" Testimony= "Liar/Part of a psyop" If Trump rolled an alien body out in the middle of a live press conference, slapped it around, then jumped in a tic-tac and darted off, a significant number of people would say "that was all fake and he's just lying about aliens to get more power!" I've been following this since project Bluebook. I watch the "experts" talk in circles. All they have to say is I'm standing here at Wright Patterson and here are two aliens. Or here is a crashed UFO. Not they have a tic Tac in thermal. Is it ours? Is it theirs? Is it extraterrestrial? Is it dimensional? Where are they from? Simple questions but no answers |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
I would like to have seen the pros and cons list that Hal mentioned that he and others went over during Bush 43. I wonder if it was the information in the list that was too negative/terrifying or was it just the knowledge of the people in the group being applied to general topics. Either way it was a group of people that determined “we” couldn’t handle the truth. It might be a neat idea for a thread of its own; to disclose or not with a poll. Someone much more intelligent than myself could make a list of what would be impacted by disclosure. Such as energy and transportation. The fact that internal combustion and jet engines would be obsolete if the tech is adaptable for commercial use. Which would lead to the collapse of the oil industry and what that would do to the world economy. |
|
Here's LA Marzullis take on the film. Spoiler warning: he sounds like a grifter because he pushes his DVDs/books and his "buy gold" sponsers, but he's been following the biblical narrative behind UFOs, abductions, cattle mutilations and implants for the last 20-30yrs on his own. He believes in a few religious doctrines I don't, but for the most part I think he's got it right what's behind this phenomenon, and what its endgame is. He seems mad throughout lol, and justifiably so, this film covers a LOT of things he's been sounding the alarm bells on for years. The 14:05-14:43min mark is where he says what is probably going to happen after a full disclosure or a world wide nuclear event. No I dont believe religions or people for the most part are going to freak out. On the contrary, I think the world has been prepped for this over the centuries, and everyone's going to buy into it. Even the vatican has tipped their hand on the subject. Also look at how many non-religious and atheist types are looking for intelligent life to come save us from ourselves....lead us into a "golden age". Its a deep spiritual need that permeates both sides.  Failed To Load Title |
|
Originally Posted By HighlanderI: I would like to have seen the pros and cons list that Hal mentioned that he and others went over during Bush 43. I wonder if it was the information in the list that was too negative/terrifying or was it just the knowledge of the people in the group being applied to general topics. Either way it was a group of people that determined “we” couldn’t handle the truth. It might be a neat idea for a thread of its own; to disclose or not with a poll. Someone much more intelligent than myself could make a list of what would be impacted by disclosure. Such as energy and transportation. The fact that internal combustion and jet engines would be obsolete if the tech is adaptable for commercial use. Which would lead to the collapse of the oil industry and what that would do to the world economy. Most I've heard him discuss of it- 48:00:  Joe Rogan Experience #2314 - Hal Puthoff |
|
Originally Posted By MARINE-ORDIE: I wonder if these may be a good greeting for them? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/276871/1000001820-3664071.jpghttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/276871/1000001820-3664071.jpg |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
I just watched it. The information wasn’t really anything earth shattering. A good compilation of interviews with pretty high up guys in the government, military and CIA/DOD. They all basically said ‘we know they exist, we have intelligent, non human beings. Yet the the government still denies it’. Watch Joe Rogans interview with Dan Farah. He basically talks all about with the documentary covers. |