Posted: 6/6/2008 12:20:09 PM EDT
|
So I was watching a show on drugs (primarily marijuana) on the history channel and they went over how the first federal ban on Marijuana was in the form of a tax stamp in 1937. They said that Harry Anslinger, the head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics who was pushing the ban got his idea from the NFA of 1934, and that in the case of the NFA they made little or no tax stamps available available for registering MGs. My BS flag immediately went up seeing as how so many people registered MGs up to the FOPA of 1986. So are they just outright lying, or did the federal government at first not issue any tax stamps for MGs. I also have to mention a line from the show that went something like "now Anslinger had to convince congress that a weed was as dangerous as a machine gun". 
|
|
AFAIK, and I may be completely wrong, the issue went to the supreme court and they where eventually told to issue the stamps. Edit: or is that how it was w/ the marijuana stamps? It used to take 6 - 12 months (and beyond) to approve a single stamp. That had to blow when you needed 2 stamps to transfer 1 gun due to it being out of state. Now its down to 30+ days |
I remember reading an article that indicated that none were registered in the first year, and only an handfull in the next few. |
Kharn |
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.