Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
7/12/2017 9:12:21 AM EDT



Mod Zero is coming out with a adjustable picatinny rail system. You zero your optic of choice then swap the optic to another rifle with the Mod Zero rail system. You zero the rail and then you can swap the optic across multiple guns that have the Mod Zero rail.
View Quote
Attached File


Attached File
7/12/2017 9:57:09 AM EDT
[#1]
I cannot see how this is different than zeroing a scope on a flat top and then putting it on another flat top.

I mean, maybe their tolerances are tighter/consistency?

But, I imagine there would still be some sort of POI shift.

I could be wrong, maybe I am thinking about this the wrong way.
7/12/2017 10:03:08 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Quoted:
I cannot see how this is different than zeroing a scope on a flat top and then putting it on another flat top.

I mean, maybe their tolerances are tighter/consistency?

But, I imagine there would still be some sort of POI shift.

I could be wrong, maybe I am thinking about this the wrong way.
View Quote
Zero a scope on a flat top and put it on another flat top and see if it shoots to zero.  It won't.
So you use this on the second flat top to zero instead of adjusting the scope.  Then your scope dials say zero on both rifles.
I'm tired of the word zero now.
7/12/2017 10:07:30 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Quoted:
Zero a scope on a flat top and put it on another flat top and see if it shoots to zero.  It won't.
So you use this on the second flat top to zero instead of adjusting the scope.  Then your scope dials say zero on both rifles.
I'm tired of the word zero now.
View Quote
That's the theory anyway.

If you buy one of these for each guns instead of an optic, maybe you need to take a look at your priorities...
I tend to shy away from adding MORE moving parts to anything that I want to hold zero.
7/12/2017 10:09:36 AM EDT
[#4]
7/12/2017 10:11:55 AM EDT
[#5]
Looks like it'll make for a pretty high optic.
7/12/2017 10:13:51 AM EDT
[#6]
I put a post on my post about this mount on a mount.
7/12/2017 10:14:16 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:
Looks like it'll make for a pretty high optic.
View Quote
pffft..



7/12/2017 10:15:24 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
Zero a scope on a flat top and put it on another flat top and see if it shoots to zero.  It won't.
So you use this on the second flat top to zero instead of adjusting the scope.  Then your scope dials say zero on both rifles.
I'm tired of the word zero now.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I cannot see how this is different than zeroing a scope on a flat top and then putting it on another flat top.

I mean, maybe their tolerances are tighter/consistency?

But, I imagine there would still be some sort of POI shift.

I could be wrong, maybe I am thinking about this the wrong way.
Zero a scope on a flat top and put it on another flat top and see if it shoots to zero.  It won't.
So you use this on the second flat top to zero instead of adjusting the scope.  Then your scope dials say zero on both rifles.
I'm tired of the word zero now.
I am still not understanding this fully, but I do not think it is your fault.

I do maintain that there would still be a POI shift.

I have zeroed scopes/RDS on one rifle and switched it to the other. There is a POI change, but sometimes it's negligible sometimes it is not. I assume you would have the same issue with this, but it may be consistently less of a POI shift.
7/12/2017 10:18:55 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Quoted:


I am still not understanding this fully, but I do not think it is your fault.

I do maintain that there would still be a POI shift.

I have zeroed scopes/RDS on one rifle and switched it to the other. There is a POI change, but sometimes it's negligible sometimes it is not. I assume you would have the same issue with this, but it may be consistently less of a POI shift.
View Quote
I think you're missing the point.

The mount in question has vertical and horizontal adjustments built in so that you can zero the optic to the rifle without actually adjusting the turrets.
You are essentially dialing the rifle to the optic.
That way when you go back to the original rifle, the scope is still zeroed.

I'm not saying it's repeatable, but that's the goal.
7/12/2017 10:24:43 AM EDT
[#10]
Totally unnecessary.

Haven't you guys seen the assassin movies where the dude's rifle is all broken down and stowed in a case for transport and deployment?

He checks into a hotel room (alias), sets the case in the bed and opens it, pieces together the rifle (with optic), and shoots his target stone cold dead.  

I mean the optic is already zeroed for pinpoint accuracy rendering this totally obsolete.
7/12/2017 10:43:19 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:


Zero a scope on a flat top and put it on another flat top and see if it shoots to zero.  It won't.
So you use this on the second flat top to zero instead of adjusting the scope.  Then your scope dials say zero on both rifles.
I'm tired of the word zero now.
View Quote
They should print that out and put it on the website for this product.  And print it again and put it in the box.

I can see a use for this for cheap folks.  I've got a handful of AR's with various red dots, irons, and glass on them.  Most of them are range optics, but I have some Aimpoints and ACOG's.  I can see the point of being able to move the ACOG or whatever expensive ass optic you have around without (theoretically) having to re-zero so you can use it on.

Not that I would do it.  But I see the point.
7/12/2017 10:46:35 AM EDT
[#12]
7/12/2017 10:53:02 AM EDT
[#13]
It's interesting.  I would be worried that it wouldn't hold zero though.
7/12/2017 10:54:55 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Quoted:


I think you're missing the point.

The mount in question has vertical and horizontal adjustments built in so that you can zero the optic to the rifle without actually adjusting the turrets.
You are essentially dialing the rifle to the optic.
That way when you go back to the original rifle, the scope is still zeroed.

I'm not saying it's repeatable, but that's the goal.
View Quote
If it works it might be alright to buy one high end scope that you can use on multiple ARs instead of each having its own. 
7/12/2017 10:56:41 AM EDT
[#15]
This only works if the rail holds a zero, and the optic mount itself can mount in a repeatable manner.

While the former seems plausible, I don't think the latter is.  At least not to the degree I'd be happy with.
7/12/2017 10:59:29 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Quoted:
This only works if the rail holds a zero, and the optic mount itself can mount in a repeatable manner.

While the former seems plausible, I don't think the latter is.  At least not to the degree I'd be happy with.
View Quote
If you use the same process for attaching the mounts every time and use a torque limiter, you should be pretty repeatable.  Always push forward on the scope, always tighten the bolts in the same order and always return to the same torque.
7/12/2017 11:01:19 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
Quoted:
Looks like it'll make for a pretty high optic.
View Quote
That's what I was thinking. AR optics are already high over the bore.

If you have to move a scope from rifle to rifle, it seems to me like it would be a lot easier just to set the turrets to zero for the rifle you use the most, write down the DOPE for the other rifles, and dial the scope when you switch.
7/12/2017 11:09:55 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote History
Quoted:
It's interesting.  I would be worried that it wouldn't hold zero though.
View Quote
I figure there's a reason that with modern scopes as many moving parts as possible get put inside metal tubes. One decent bump to the scope is likely to throw that thing off zero.
7/12/2017 11:20:41 AM EDT
[#19]
It would be simpler to zero your optic on one gun, and set your turrets ti zero, and then zero for the second, and mark the turrets for the zero there as well.


There are turrets that let you zero to more than one gun as well.

The Leatherwood / Hi Lux Uni Dial is one of them. You can independently set zero for three different guns on one scope.

Better yet, instead of wasting money on all this, and introducing more variables and more pieces and complications, save up and get optics for each gun.
7/12/2017 12:04:18 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote History
Quoted:

They should print that out and put it on the website for this product.  And print it again and put it in the box.

I can see a use for this for cheap folks.  I've got a handful of AR's with various red dots, irons, and glass on them.  Most of them are range optics, but I have some Aimpoints and ACOG's.  I can see the point of being able to move the ACOG or whatever expensive ass optic you have around without (theoretically) having to re-zero so you can use it on.

Not that I would do it.  But I see the point.
View Quote
Not even just cheap folks.  Put a $2500 Nightforce or Razor solidly on your long range 7-300-338 Magnum rifle, and then for another $200-400 you can have the exact same scope on your practice .223-Grendel-Creedmore.
You don't need to be cheap for $2900 to be a lot better than $5000.
If it costs more than $400, then yeah they're not going to go too far
7/12/2017 12:07:44 PM EDT
[#21]
Not sure about this but I don't have any bragging rights so my opinion isn't worth shit. This like QC barrels? - Virtually useless feature for the overwhelming majority?
7/12/2017 12:19:41 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote History
Quoted:


Not even just cheap folks.  Put a $2500 Nightforce or Razor solidly on your long range 7-300-338 Magnum rifle, and then for another $200-400 you can have the exact same scope on your practice .223-Grendel-Creedmore.
You don't need to be cheap for $2900 to be a lot better than $5000.
If it costs more than $400, then yeah they're not going to go too far
View Quote
You're placing a lot of confidence in the rigidity of this thing...
Not to mention you'd end up with a different cheek weld with or without it. I
7/12/2017 12:25:05 PM EDT
[#23]
I met the guy behind the mod zero engineering at a PA gun range and got to talk with him for a while


https://www.modzerodefense.com

7/12/2017 12:29:42 PM EDT
[#24]
7/12/2017 12:46:08 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote History
Quoted:


You're placing a lot of confidence in the rigidity of this thing...
Not to mention you'd end up with a different cheek weld with or without it. I
View Quote
Yeah I'm kind of a mechanical optimist
7/12/2017 12:57:13 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote History
Quoted:
I met the guy behind the mod zero engineering at a PA gun range and got to talk with him for a while
https://www.modzerodefense.com
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57f26e3b414fb59afd69a50e/t/5965409d78d1710689679d16/1499807939806/?format=2500w
View Quote
That's the theory, how is it in (real world) practice?  That's the real question.
7/13/2017 9:40:52 AM EDT
[#27]
Hi everyone!

My name is Luke and I'm the head of development for our M0 Scope Mount. I'm the guy that doc_Zox ran into in PA, the guy in the video, and the guy who's done the majority of the engineering.

I need to first confirm that I am financially connected to the company Mod Zero and that we are not yet an industry member of this site. Our funds are tight at the as we prepare for launch, so we cannot at the moment afford the 6 month membership minimum to advertise. Therefore some of my answers may be inadequate. If so, please feel free to email me at [email protected]
<a href="mailto:[email protected]?Subject=AR15.com Followup" target="_top">Email Luke</a>
Background: this project started 1-2 years ago as a part of my independent research at Penn State. The purpose of the research was to create a method in which scopes can be shared between rifles without the need to rezero the scope. The solution we came to was that it was possible if the proprietary zero of the rifle was stored in the picatinny rail of that rifle. So we built the first zeroable picatinny rail. Our engineering and manufacturing has had many talented people involved to design the best possible version of this. Recently, the development of this technology has shifted from Penn State to MIT.

In principle, if each rifle and scope in an array are zeroed to the same common zero (as described in the graphic above), those scopes and rifles can be swapped freely while remaining properly zeroed. 3 combinations from 3 scopes and 3 rifles now becomes 9 by the addition of two of our mounts. Yes this can be a PIA to describe and the original quote is poorly described. I think that's old phrasing from our FB?

The pictures you see in the OP are our final preproduction version. It's the 3rd physical iteration on the design, but probably the 20th+ from various other testing methods (CAD, Simulation, subassembly testing). In terms of the design, we essentially took everything we liked from the ELCAN and other optical systems, left out the bad parts, and threw in some novel approaches.

Ok, less generic stuff because I'll ramble on.
Quoted:
Looks like it'll make for a pretty high optic.
View Quote
Our mount adds 0.6 inches in height. I have had 3DP mock ups for a few months to demonstrate the height. Not one of the 100+ shooters I have tested found a scope or red dot (standard height mount) to be harder to look through. However everyone's head structure is different. Our second physical iteration was 0.82" high and that was definitely was too high. Rather than launching that we completely redesigned the mount from the ground up to get lower.

Repeat-ability and POI shift are another great question and topic point. We are still in the process of comparing a M4 with a QD (ADM) mounted 4x ACOG vs the same M4 and scope with our mount. We have not found any notable increase in group size and that our mount is extremely consistent thus far. POI shift from adding/removing a scope from the Pic rail is a technical problem that's been worked on for decades. As touched upon, as long as you are using your scope mount per manufacturer directions, you shouldn't see any notable shift. There are plenty of threads/topics on QD mounts on best practice and manufacturer on AR15.com.

Quoted:
Not even just cheap folks... for another $200-400 you can have the exact same scope on your practice rifle. You don't need to be cheap for $2900 to be a lot better than $5000. If it costs more than $400, then yeah they're not going to go too far
View Quote
I can't mention price per rules. Mechanically similar products we've found come in around $400. But I 100% agree and we're coming in on the lower end of that spectrum.

The concern for holding zero and rigidity are completely valid. It's taken a lot of prototyping and tolerance reworking to get the design to where I feel comfortable with the mount. They are now rock solid and there is no perceivable play in the parts.

Another feature not mentioned is that our mount has a customizable range dial. This is still in the works, but the theory is that you can swap from a red dot to a LPV and to a night vision scope while having the same method for adjusting for range.

Thank you all for voicing your concerns, please keep the conversation, questions and concerns going so I can pass them on to the rest of the team. We are working on creating video demos and tests to prove the functionality of our product. If you have an external party you need/want to see test this. Let us know and we'll try to get one in their hands.

Oh and the memes. If you're going to do that you've got to at least make your own and put some effort in. We get a kick out of them, but to take 30 seconds and copy a URL is weak.
7/13/2017 9:45:22 AM EDT
[#28]
Most of my customers don't want to swap multiple upper between a single lower so I am pretty sure they aren't going to swap a scope between uppers.
7/13/2017 9:46:11 AM EDT
[#29]
I'm a hard pass on that one.
7/13/2017 9:46:57 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote History
Quoted:
If you have to move a scope from rifle to rifle, it seems to me like it would be a lot easier just to set the turrets to zero for the rifle you use the most, write down the DOPE for the other rifles, and dial the scope when you switch.
View Quote
Bingo! That is the easy way to do it. Bit ain't nobody got time to write stuff down anymore
7/13/2017 10:01:51 AM EDT
[#31]
Good luck but it doesn't fit my needs or wants.
7/13/2017 10:12:05 AM EDT
[#32]
Interesting. Seems to target the segment that is too poor to afford tier 1 optics for all their rifles but not poor enough to not spend money on a niche product.

I do like the idea of having a quick zero shift device to switch between ammo types or supers/subs. Not exactly what you have here but similar idea.

ETA: Also your meme game is not bad. Try doing some 'did someone tell you to go be poor somewhere else? now you dont have to!' infomercials imo.
7/13/2017 10:41:01 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote History
Quoted:
Interesting. Seems to target the segment that is too poor to afford tier 1 optics for all their rifles but not poor enough to not spend money on a niche product.

I do like the idea of having a quick zero shift device to switch between ammo types or supers/subs. Not exactly what you have here but similar idea.

ETA: Also your meme game is not bad. Try doing some 'did someone tell you to go be poor somewhere else? now you dont have to!' infomercials imo.
View Quote
Thanks! We have been working on dual-zero/multi-zero systems for the reason you mentioned. Whether it be for multiple barrels, ammo, suppressed, etc. Still in the works though.
7/13/2017 10:48:35 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote History
Quoted:
Repeat-ability and POI shift are another great question and topic point.
View Quote
7/13/2017 6:12:12 PM EDT
[#35]
Attached File