Math corner. . . . . . . > General Discussion

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:17:50 PM EDT

Here is your quiz:

1. Find the slope of the line y=3

2. Find the slope of the line y=-3

3. Find the slope of the line x=3

4. Find the slope of the line x=-3

5. Find slope of following: 2x-12=-3y

6. Find slope of following: 1. (7,7) 2. (3,3) Remember-we read a graph left to right in the US!!

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:19:21 PM EDT

[#1]

0, 0, undefined, undefined, -2/3, 1

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:19:51 PM EDT

[#2]

1. 0
2. 0
3. infinity
4. infinity
5. -2/3
6. 1

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:20:16 PM EDT

[#3]

Where's the calculus?

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:20:26 PM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:
1. 0
2. 0
3. infinity
4. infinity
5. -2/3
6. 1

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:21:10 PM EDT

[#5]

Math is for suckas!

3.14
3.14
3.14
3.14
3.14
3.14

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:21:40 PM EDT

[#6]

1. 0

2. 0

3. infinite slope / divide by zero error

4. infinite slope / divide by zero error

5. -2/3

6. 1

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:23:08 PM EDT

[#7]

Her is what?

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:28:22 PM EDT

[#8]

Thats not real math

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:31:09 PM EDT

[#9]

0.9bar = 1

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:47:50 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
Thats not real math

True. Here's a good one:

Any p-series of p > 1, the sum of n^(-p) over n=0 to ∞ converges to the Riemann Zeta function ζ(p). Provide a unique proof for this.

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:51:13 PM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Thats not real math

True. Here's a good one:

Any p-series of p > 1, the sum of n^(-p) over n=0 to ∞ converges to the Riemann Zeta function ζ(p). Provide a unique proof for this.

don't make me dig out my old Calc 2 notes

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:53:12 PM EDT

[#12]

I jumped in trying to score some meth, sorry wrong thread.

Posted: 4/16/2008 7:54:11 PM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Thats not real math

True. Here's a good one:

Any p-series of p > 1, the sum of n^(-p) over n=0 to ∞ converges to the Riemann Zeta function ζ(p). Provide a unique proof for this.

don't make me dig out my old Calc 2 notes

I think it's a little beyond calc 2. I'm in calc 2 now and he said the proof that the p-series of p = 2 converging to (pi^2)/6 would pretty much be beyond us until we took complex analysis. Of course, he also said that he didn't think anybody knew what any convergent p-series converged to besides p = 2, so he could easily be wrong.

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Math corner. . . . . . .

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Math corner. . . . . . .