[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Jack Chick dead at 92... (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 10/25/2016 10:22:42 AM EDT
|
May the Lord have mercy on his soul.
...and that's all I'll say at this point. |
|
Agreed. May God have mercy on him. |
|
Quoted: Pretty sure it wasn't Catholics handing out his comic strips in Pensacola in the early 90s Quoted: Quoted: I had never heard of him either, except on this site, and, only from Catholics. Pretty sure it wasn't Catholics handing out his comic strips in Pensacola in the early 90s A buddy of mine from Florida said that when working at Red Lobster as a waiter during college, they'd occasionally get left as tips. |
|
Quoted:
A buddy of mine from Florida said that when working at Red Lobster as a waiter during college, they'd occasionally get left as tips. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I had never heard of him either, except on this site, and, only from Catholics. Pretty sure it wasn't Catholics handing out his comic strips in Pensacola in the early 90s A buddy of mine from Florida said that when working at Red Lobster as a waiter during college, they'd occasionally get left as tips. How thoughtful of them...
|
|
It's funny how some threads can have just that right mix of people who:
A) Try to insinuate that a given person or argument is a strawman meant to distort or malign. B) Outwardly make a case in support of a given person or argument on a way the former group suggests isn't done. And, inevitably, both groups ignore the other because it doesn't fit their particular narrative. This thread appears to be heading in that direction. |
|
Quoted:
This thread is all kinds of Haters gonna hate I guess. Sig line is appropriate.
I'm a follower of Jesus Christ today because of him. God Bless him and his work. Re: Your sig line. The RCC never once said it hated Jack Chick. Nor has anyone here. If anyone hated, it was Mr. Chick, as demonstrated through his own words and images. So I posit that your sig line is accurate, but not in the way you think it is... |
|
Quoted:
Re: Your sig line. The RCC never once said it hated Jack Chick. Nor has anyone here. If anyone hated, it was Mr. Chick, as demonstrated through his own words and images. So I posit that your sig line is accurate, but not in the way you think it is... The fact you disagree with what he said doesn't mean he hated you. |
|
Quoted:
Jack Chick preached a message of hate while Jesus taught a message of love. If you can't see the hate in Jack's tracts, then you're either blind or full of hate yourself. I'm guessing you never read one, and probably don't understand anything Jesus taught. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Re: Your sig line. The RCC never once said it hated Jack Chick. Nor has anyone here. If anyone hated, it was Mr. Chick, as demonstrated through his own words and images. So I posit that your sig line is accurate, but not in the way you think it is... The fact you disagree with what he said doesn't mean he hated you. lol http://www.catholic.com/sites/default/files/images/documents/Image24%5B1%5D.gif |
|
Quoted: Ah yes, the catholic brigade has arrived to inform everyone that all criticism of the RCC is hate speech. ) to not see the hate emanating from Jack Chick's work. |
|
Quoted:
Not a Catholic, I grew up in the Baptist church. I don't profess any religion at all. But it takes a blind man (or a Chief, same thing ) to not see the hate emanating from Jack Chick's work.
you can pick and choose things out of anything to support any position -- you can even find "hate speech" in the Bible, even in the words of Jesus if you want to take things out of context and create an agenda to be butthurt about. |
|
Quoted: It's almost like Chick is ignorant of the fact that the Vatican gave shelter to thousands of Jews during World War II. Ignorant or hatefully lying about it. http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/wp-content/blogs.dir/445/files/2012/04/i-8c8f347543bd796f2ad95833106070cb-Chickpreview.jpg It's not like there is anything in the historical record like Rome's chief rabbi, Israel Zolli, converting to Roman Catholicism after World War II. Or that Catholic officials issued tens of thousands of fake baptismal certificates to Jews during WWII to help them escape persecution, among other things. |
|
Quoted:
Or that Catholic officials issued tens of thousands of fake baptismal certificates to Jews during WWII to help them escape persecution, among other things. Quoted:
Quoted:
It's almost like Chick is ignorant of the fact that the Vatican gave shelter to thousands of Jews during World War II. Ignorant or hatefully lying about it. http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/wp-content/blogs.dir/445/files/2012/04/i-8c8f347543bd796f2ad95833106070cb-Chickpreview.jpg It's not like there is anything in the historical record like Rome's chief rabbi, Israel Zolli, converting to Roman Catholicism after World War II. Or that Catholic officials issued tens of thousands of fake baptismal certificates to Jews during WWII to help them escape persecution, among other things. See - the Vatican just lies |
|
Quoted: you can pick and choose things out of anything to support any position -- you can even find "hate speech" in the Bible, even in the words of Jesus if you want to take things out of context and create an agenda to be butthurt about. Quoted: Quoted: Not a Catholic, I grew up in the Baptist church. I don't profess any religion at all. But it takes a blind man (or a Chief, same thing ) to not see the hate emanating from Jack Chick's work.you can pick and choose things out of anything to support any position -- you can even find "hate speech" in the Bible, even in the words of Jesus if you want to take things out of context and create an agenda to be butthurt about. Oh please, his work is full out everything from half truths to outright lies. Like his claim that "IHS" stands for names of Egyptian gods. |
|
Quoted: Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". Quoted: Quoted: Oh please, his work is full out everything from half truths to outright lies. Like his claim that "IHS" stands for names of Egyptian gods. Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". Lies are not criticism. This kind of shit is not simple disagreement or criticism: https://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0074/0074_01.asp |
|
Quoted:
Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh please, his work is full out everything from half truths to outright lies. Like his claim that "IHS" stands for names of Egyptian gods. Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". Interesting position given that you are the first poster in this thread to use the term "hate speech" in this post Ah yes, the catholic brigade has arrived to inform everyone that all criticism of the RCC is hate speech.
|
|
Quoted:
I never said "hate speech". His work was full of hate, not hate speech. https://kgmadman.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/chick-tract-god.jpg Same difference. You are contending that the Gospel is hate - that particular panel is a quote from the words of Jesus as I recall. That tells me you either have no comprehension of it or have simply rejected it. Either way - your assessment of his work is false. |
|
Quoted:
Lies are not criticism. This kind of shit is not simple disagreement or criticism: https://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0074/0074_01.asp The fact you disagree doesn't make it any less criticism. Everyone knows the Catholics here dislike and disagree with him. That doesn't make his work "hate". |
|
Quoted: Same difference. You are contending that the Gospel is hate - that particular panel is a quote from the words of Jesus as I recall. That tells me you either have no comprehension of it or have simply rejected it. Either way - your assessment of his work is false. No, I said earlier, that panel applies to him in my opinion. And yes, it is a quote from Jesus. He was the one picking and choosing, using the hateful portions of the gospel to spread a message of hate. Yes there is hate in the Bible, but the overall message is not hate. I never accused Jack Chick of hate speech, I said his message was one of hate. There is a difference. |
|
Quoted: The fact you disagree doesn't make it any less criticism. Everyone knows the Catholics here dislike and disagree with him. That doesn't make his work "hate". Quoted: Quoted: Lies are not criticism. This kind of shit is not simple disagreement or criticism: https://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0074/0074_01.asp The fact you disagree doesn't make it any less criticism. Everyone knows the Catholics here dislike and disagree with him. That doesn't make his work "hate". I didn't say that it wasn't criticism. I said that it's not simple disagreement OR criticism. Chick's work goes way beyond criticism and well into the realm of hateful vitriol. |
|
Quoted: These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren. <snip> Protestants believe that the Lord's Supper is symbolic? Somebody forgot to tell Martin Luther. |
|
Quoted: Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". Quoted: Quoted: Oh please, his work is full out everything from half truths to outright lies. Like his claim that "IHS" stands for names of Egyptian gods. Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". And yet you were the first one to bring that term into the discussion. |
|
Quoted:
And yet you were the first one to bring that term into the discussion. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh please, his work is full out everything from half truths to outright lies. Like his claim that "IHS" stands for names of Egyptian gods. Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". And yet you were the first one to bring that term into the discussion. I guess it really is SJW-speak |
|
Quoted:
I guess it really is SJW-speak Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh please, his work is full out everything from half truths to outright lies. Like his claim that "IHS" stands for names of Egyptian gods. Again... Criticism isn't "hate speech". "hate speech" is sjw speak for "I disagree with you". And yet you were the first one to bring that term into the discussion. I guess it really is SJW-speak I see what you did there. |
|
Quoted:
The fact you disagree with what he said doesn't mean he hated you. Quoted:
Quoted:
Re: Your sig line. The RCC never once said it hated Jack Chick. Nor has anyone here. If anyone hated, it was Mr. Chick, as demonstrated through his own words and images. So I posit that your sig line is accurate, but not in the way you think it is... The fact you disagree with what he said doesn't mean he hated you. To be clear, I'm talking about Chick, not the poster. And considering what he said about my Church and its members, he definitely did. |
Haters gonna hate I guess. Sig line is appropriate.



) to not see the hate emanating from Jack Chick's work.




















