Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/30/2016 9:47:10 PM EDT
Here's a link to a poll that is running prior to a debate between  a Field and Stream editor and some Humane Society of the US drones.

If you feel like hunting is a positive force for wildlife conservation, please take a second and vote for this poll.  (Anti's are in the lead at the moment)

Thanks!

http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/upcoming-debates/item/1496-hunters-conserve-wildlife&tab=2

link left cold
3/30/2016 9:57:19 PM EDT
[#1]
The anti-hunting crowd is clueless when it comes to habitat preservation, population control, etc. They show their ignorance quickly and have no reasonable plans to support their agenda. I hunt and have hunted on several continents, my money is on the programs that the organizations I belong to promote. The Safari Club International, for one, has done more good for animals than they have done for hunters and I am behind them 100%.
3/30/2016 10:13:11 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Quoted:
The anti-hunting crowd is clueless when it comes to habitat preservation, population control, etc. They show their ignorance quickly and have no reasonable plans to support their agenda. I hunt and have hunted on several continents, my money is on the programs that the organizations I belong to promote. The Safari Club International, for one, has done more good for animals than they have done for hunters and I am behind them 100%.
View Quote



Definitely could not agree more about SCI and the other pro hunting orgaizations.     Anti hunters have no clue about pittman-robertson or the amazing success story that even deer hunting in the US is.
3/31/2016 12:56:36 AM EDT
[#3]
Online Voting Results

45% for 1663 votes |

55% against 2042 votes
3/31/2016 1:01:54 AM EDT
[#4]
I literally had some PETA types fly a drone over me whilst hunting yr before last. On private property.  I would have bludgeoned that fucker if I caught them.  Fuck those aholes.
3/31/2016 1:13:11 AM EDT
[#5]
Voted.  I hope the members of this site end up being helpful.  Sadly we have a good number of PETA types in our presence.  
3/31/2016 1:51:20 AM EDT
[#6]
Hit. We're still down 300+ votes



For 46%, Against 54%.
3/31/2016 2:22:41 AM EDT
[#7]
Tagged to hit later.
Im not tech savvy enough to get a cold link opened on my phone.
eta:hit
3/31/2016 3:38:27 AM EDT
[#8]
Hit

Online Voting Results
47% for1786 votes | 53% against2054 votes
3/31/2016 3:50:32 AM EDT
[#9]
I must be a dumbass because I can't tell from the site whether I'm for or against the "motion".  What "motion" are we voting on?
3/31/2016 3:51:25 AM EDT
[#10]
If not for hunters & fishermen, there would be no outdoors for people to enjoy.  At least we pay our own way.
3/31/2016 4:03:25 AM EDT
[#11]
Hit it but, the antis are still winning.
3/31/2016 4:04:21 AM EDT
[#12]

Quote History
Quoted:


I must be a dumbass because I can't tell from the site whether I'm for or against the "motion".  What "motion" are we voting on?
View Quote
You click on the tabs above where you vote.



 
3/31/2016 9:56:57 AM EDT
[#13]
Bump
3/31/2016 9:59:34 AM EDT
[#14]
The tide has turned.

53% FOR (2,420 votes)
47% AGAINST (2,130 votes)
3/31/2016 10:01:52 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Quoted:
I must be a dumbass because I can't tell from the site whether I'm for or against the "motion".  What "motion" are we voting on?
View Quote


In this case "For the Motion" is pro hunting, "Against the Motion" is pro PETA.
3/31/2016 10:08:36 AM EDT
[#16]
"for"