[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Pelosi says House will vote on Iran resolution this week to restrict Trump’s ability to attack Iran (Page 2 of 5)
|
Quoted:
If a foreign country killed our vice president who they considered a terrorist would you not consider that an act of war? 8nBAIT Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. 8nBAIT |
|
Quoted:
If our vice president was involved in clandestine terrorist activities against another nation then No, I would not consider it an act of war. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. 8nBAIT |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, then you are already at war. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. 8nBAIT |
|
Wonder if this is specifically to attack Iran unprovoked, or any military action on Iranian soil, or how it will be worded.
Trump doesn't seem interested in starting anything, but he will definitely respond. If Pelosi et al are going to stop the President from being able to retaliate against attacks on the US... |
|
Quoted:
Wonder if this is specifically to attack Iran unprovoked, or any military action on Iranian soil, or how it will be worded. Trump doesn't seem interested in starting anything, but he will definitely respond. If Pelosi et al are going to stop the President from being able to retaliate against attacks on the US... |
|
Quoted:
He has to be contained. he's off the leash. He can't see the bigger picture. Like impeachment. I've heard of such things. It's imperative, right? Something we shouldn't delay? |
|
Quoted:
Wonder if this is specifically to attack Iran unprovoked, or any military action on Iranian soil, or how it will be worded. Trump doesn't seem interested in starting anything, but he will definitely respond. If Pelosi et al are going to stop the President from being able to retaliate against attacks on the US... |
|
Quoted:
Their objective is to get a narrative going that the president is trying to start a war with Iran and that democrats are the responsible ones trying to stop the bad orange man from taking aggressive action. Politicians being far too concerned about politics and not enough about America. |
|
Quoted:
And if a single American dies because of this rhetoric, they should be tried for treason. Just my opinion. Politicians being far too concerned about politics and not enough about America. Quoted:
Quoted:
Their objective is to get a narrative going that the president is trying to start a war with Iran and that democrats are the responsible ones trying to stop the bad orange man from taking aggressive action. Politicians being far too concerned about politics and not enough about America. Count on it. |
|
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution.  82nd Airborne Division Review 2011 you stay under your mom's apron Let the real men do the real work all I got left for you is aginst COC 
|
|
Quoted:
hey 19er go have intercourse with yourself @ MarsRising:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFBkq3gnpDk
you stay under your mom's apron Let the real men do the real work all I got left for you is aginst COC Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFBkq3gnpDk
you stay under your mom's apron Let the real men do the real work all I got left for you is aginst COC Your mom's apron is getting a bit threadbare while the US dicks around with non-contenders in the ME. South China Sea wake up call gramps. Congrats on the new dentures. |
|
Quoted:
Wouldn't it make more sense to restrict his ability to attack Iraqi targets, seeing as that's where this asshole was camped out when he was killed? 
It's disgusting how much influence Iran has accumulated in our government. They fail to see connections because they are blinded by their preconceived biases and personal vendettas. This is why they are downright dangerous and shouldn't hold any seat in our congress. |
|
Quoted:
Does your husband know you're on a men's forum? Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. He shows up to display his TDS every time. |
|
I really want Trump to write a no holds barred tell all, name names, dates, and places book after his second term, heavily annoted with who was against him, and why-where there checks were coming from, and things like this. Obama has how many drone strikes in how many countries? Just lay it all out, added points for random "best burn tweets by me, 2016-2025". |
|
Quoted:
is GD back to fellating neocons even after 18 constant years of failures? Quoted:
Quoted:
<- DU is that way, Farhad They attacked first and killed a contractor and injured others. We retaliated and blew up a base. They organized a violent protest against our embassy in Iraq. We sent troops to protect it and killed their Mastermind general behind the scenes. |
|
Quoted:
You're in the Philippines? Your mom's apron is getting a bit threadbare while the US dicks around with non-contenders in the ME. South China Sea wake up call gramps. Congrats on the new dentures. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFBkq3gnpDk
you stay under your mom's apron Let the real men do the real work all I got left for you is aginst COC Your mom's apron is getting a bit threadbare while the US dicks around with non-contenders in the ME. South China Sea wake up call gramps. Congrats on the new dentures. That's going to have long term consequences. |
|
Quoted:
Taking out select terrorist leaders with a drone, that have killed many americans is not the same as going to war. Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. Nick |
|
Quoted:
If a foreign country killed our vice president who they considered a terrorist would you not consider that an act of war? 8nBAIT Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. 8nBAIT |
|
Quoted:
AND is actively coordinating a CURRENT attack on our embassy to boot. How is that shit getting whitewashed? Nick Quoted:
AND is actively coordinating a CURRENT attack on our embassy to boot. How is that shit getting whitewashed? Nick https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/03/soleimani-imminent-attacks-brian-hook/ https://www.reuters.com/article/iraq-security-blast/irans-soleimani-was-planning-imminent-attack-on-u-s-facilities-says-top-u-s-official-on-iran-idUSL8N29838D Gen. Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Iran’s elite Quds Force, was planning “imminent attacks” that could have killed hundreds of Americans prior to being killed in an airstrike near Baghdad’s airport Friday, a senior U.S. official said.
The planned attacks would have targeted American facilities and workers in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and other countries, U.S. Special representative for Iran Brian Hook told Al Arabiya TV, according to Reuters. “The President’s first responsibility is the safety of the American people. Qasem Soleimani was plotting imminent attacks in the region against Americans in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon that could have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people,” Hook said. |
|
Quoted:
is GD back to fellating neocons even after 18 constant years of failures? Quoted:
Quoted:
<- DU is that way, Farhad |
|
Quoted:
You're in the Philippines? Your mom's apron is getting a bit threadbare while the US dicks around with non-contenders in the ME. South China Sea wake up call gramps. Congrats on the new dentures. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Attacking Iran would be Neocon stupidity. Don't give a shit who stops it. Fuck the war-mongers and as Ike said: "the military-industrial complex" that puts its "interests" over those of the American people and of our Constitution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFBkq3gnpDk
you stay under your mom's apron Let the real men do the real work all I got left for you is aginst COC Your mom's apron is getting a bit threadbare while the US dicks around with non-contenders in the ME. South China Sea wake up call gramps. Congrats on the new dentures. |
|
Quoted:
And if a single American dies because of this rhetoric, they should be tried for treason. Just my opinion. Politicians being far too concerned about politics and not enough about America. |
|
Quoted:
Our enemies will take full advantage of Democrat rhetoric. Count on it. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their objective is to get a narrative going that the president is trying to start a war with Iran and that democrats are the responsible ones trying to stop the bad orange man from taking aggressive action. Politicians being far too concerned about politics and not enough about America. Count on it. |
|
Quoted:
He has to be contained. he's off the leash. He can't see the bigger picture. Quoted:
Quoted:
Wonder if this is specifically to attack Iran unprovoked, or any military action on Iranian soil, or how it will be worded. Trump doesn't seem interested in starting anything, but he will definitely respond. If Pelosi et al are going to stop the President from being able to retaliate against attacks on the US... Let's drain the swamp already, starting with the goop between Pelosi's ears. |
|
|
Quoted:
This year the Dems would condemn Trump for killing terrorists inside a grammar school in Kansas. |
|
Quoted:
I called it. I am convinced that the dems to include Obama want Iran to have nuclear weapons and for other ME countries to follow so we can no longer exert or power in the region. Latest from the President:
|