AR Sponsor
Posted: 9/8/2021 4:29:18 PM EDT
|
Nice write up. I have the Trijicon Reflex wirh the NSN number and 4.3moa dot. Decades ago I did a similar experiment but at 100 yards. Shot a well aimed group group from the prone on bags that was with filter open and aiming with my sighting eye. Zero was set for that manner of shooting. I then closed down the parallax filter and shot another group using the OEG method. I did notice a shift in the group point of aim and basically atrributed it to something akin to parallax or braon merging the dot. Good enough for up cloose shooting as well as possible low light shooting. But it has it's issues. |
|
There is an additional factor into it regarding the mechanics of the optic. One prism sight may have a few inches of deflection, another model may have a foot. No one I’ve asked has any idea what causes the discrepancies, but it’s definitely the worst with ACOG’s. |
|
I decided to buy a Armson OEG on a whim one day for my retro xm177e2 build and when I got it I finally figured out I've been using the acog BAC wrong the either time. I was doing what you said where I would be looking through it and just shooting fast. I'm able to shoot the BAC much better now by concentrating with my left eye looking at the target and the reticle appears as an overlay much like how the OEG works. However, once I "think" about it, it disappears and I'm seeing the black ring/shadow with the reticle in there. The only problem is your left eye has to see the target. The BAC was designed for the close quarter battles but I think in those situations your sight might be obstructed from time to time especially around corners so it makes the BAC somewhat hard to practice effectively at least in all given situations but at least if you can't see the target with both eyes, you can still see it through the black shadow somewhat. I also suspect the BAC is nothing special to the acog. I experimented myself with a couple other illuminated optics and found they all can work in that capacity so long as it is illuminated. I would take duct tape and just tape and they all worked similarly but once you start thinking about it, all you see is a black with the illumination. You need to shoot quick. Like don't think just shoulder it and fire. I'm thinking doing it that way you'll get a much better grouping to the center. |
|
The biggest issue with BAC is not phoria IMO, it is actually a form of parallax. Let me explain... It is the fact that tiny changes in your head rotation and tilt cause significant POI shifts. The amount of offset of your eyes (distance between) changes as you begin rotating your head left and right and express as left/right POI shifts. As head tilt changes (leaning to side) the groups move up and down. Or rather the head tilt shifts angle and rotation shifts distance of offset. The issue is one of true parallax between the eyes vs phoria. Parallax issues between the eyes are HUGE and independent of phoria using BAC. Phoria is only associated with precision when both head position and both eye positions are held perfectly still. The problem with BAC is the amount of offset changes with distance, but ALSO tiny changes in the way you mount the stock (EVEN WHEN YOUR DOMINANT EYE IS PERFECTLY CENTERED behind the scope) results in the nondominant eye being in a different position and you get large shot to shot POI shifts. To eliminate parallax with a traditional magnified optic you need only have the reticle and image at the same focal distance OR have the dominant eye perfectly centered behind the optic. With BAC you must have the same perfectly centered dominant eye, but ALSO have perfectly consistent non dominant eye position AND know your offsets for various ranges (3, 7, 10, 15, 25, and 50 yards) to be able to consistently hit a 2" target. It's damn near impossible under stress... good enough to 25 yards for body shots but not for fast head shots under stress and from akward positions. Even the best shooters change non dominant eye positions when mounting the rifle in awkward positions... it is simply not something anyone trains. I use BAC all the time with daylight bright reticle LPVO to get the target in my scope's FOV quickly at a distance... then make a small adjustment and take the shot with the dominant eye. I don't rely on it as a close range high speed aiming solution, because it is FAR worse than iron sights. |
|
Quoted: For those who dont know what an Armson OEG is: https://s.yimg.com/aah/yhst-89358177361248/armson-gen-ll-retro-m-16-carry-handle-mount-2.gif Reported to have been used in the Son Tay raid. ![]() ... |
|
Quoted: Reported to have been used in the Son Tay raid. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/oeg_in_son_tay_raid_01_JPG-2094196.jpg ... I had never heard of this battle before. Sounds like the tool was effective. |
|
Quoted: Bought an Armson OEG many years ago. Never could use the damn thing accuratly. It wasn't made for bench rest though, just quick both eyes open shots. And I still cant reliably use the "BAC" function of an acog. Makes my eyes all fucky For those who dont know what an Armson OEG is: https://s.yimg.com/aah/yhst-89358177361248/armson-gen-ll-retro-m-16-carry-handle-mount-2.gif I had one of those. Its around here somewhere but its long dead. |
AR Sponsor






