Posted: 1/2/2012 11:12:25 PM EDT
|
I just purchased a Rem. 700 SPS tactical from a member off the EE.
Walk me through the best way to work up a load for this rifle. I understand how to do and the theory behind the ladder test, but how do I know what powder,how many grains, and what bullet to start with. There is also another test where you load up 5 ea. of rounds in increments of around .3 gr's (I think) and shoot one shot of each load into different targets and then start over when you get to the end and shoot at the first target with the first load until you've fired 5 rounds into each target. (That's about as clear as I can make it. ) You don't choose the load that groups the tightest, but you look at the 3 targets that most resemble one another and choose the middle one. It seems like a better test, but I'm not convinced that it gives you enough advantage to make it worth the time. I also don't understand how it's gonna be the most accurate load if it wasn't the tightest group. I think the idea is that it's the most stable load for all types of shooting conditions. I'd like thoughts on that.
I purchased this rifle to use at the local club. The 3rd Sat. of the month a few of us get together and have a little friendly competition shooting off the bench. There are 5 targets each at 100 through 400 yards. The 100 yard has a target with a 1 inch hole that you must shoot 3 rounds through. I'd prefer a bullet that would also be a good choice for deer and coyote hunting. Does the 168 gr. HPBT fit this criteria? (seems to be the "go to" bullet)? |
|
168 308 is ok to 850y, beyond that, the 175/178 is a better bet.. and if you use the Amax it will be a monster on deer and coyotes... also cheaper then SMK's HPBT's can be hit or mis on expansion.. the amax is a better match/hunting load
http://www.hornady.com/store/30-Cal-.308-178-gr-A-MAX/ dont reinvent the wheel.. here is 12 pages of "best loads" for 308 http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=323517&nt=12&page=1 search each page for 175/178 copy the load into note pad when done, look at what the most use powder choice was then look at the most used load start there, work up/down .2 to fin tune it.. |
|
Some people have had good luck with the optimum charge weight method. Also here is a good read on getting started. |
MAL: “Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you.”
|
Originally Posted By mort:
Some people have had good luck with the optimum charge weight method. Also here is a good read on getting started. There are some very interesting concepts presented in the above links. I've been studying them over, and I think they are what I have been suspecting about barrel harmonics and accuracy nodes. I just never considered it would be based on longitudinal shock wave. |
|
Do not sell the Sierra 155 Palma short.
It was specifically designed for 1000 yard matches |
http://piccoloshash.blogspot.com/2009/12/my-feminine-side-blog-stays-pink.html
----------------------------------------
Vote "YES" on 'NO'!
For Captain Erick Foster, Wexford, PA KIA 29 Aug, 07.
Rangers lead the way.
----------------------------------------
Vote "YES" on 'NO'!
For Captain Erick Foster, Wexford, PA KIA 29 Aug, 07.
Rangers lead the way.
) You don't choose the load that groups the tightest, but you look at the 3 targets that most resemble one another and choose the middle one. It seems like a better test, but I'm not convinced that it gives you enough advantage to make it worth the time. I also don't understand how it's gonna be the most accurate load if it wasn't the tightest group. I think the idea is that it's the most stable load for all types of shooting conditions. I'd like thoughts on that.