Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/5/2014 6:30:05 PM EDT
Watching a 3 gun video of the Proam at Rockcastle and noticed the shooters rifle without the forward assist.  The upper had the mount but the plunger and catch we're not installed. What would be the reason for this or is it a personal preference issue?  I don't recall reading about this or seeing it anywhere before in regard to a competition  rifle.


http://youtu.be/2Ttg90tvL6c
2/5/2014 6:31:59 PM EDT
[#1]
It should go, worthless appendage.  And no, you don't need it for press checks.
You keep comparing yourself to someone that people actually liked, and I think that's where you first stepped off. -TREETOP
2/5/2014 7:45:46 PM EDT
[#2]
It should go

It's just excess weight
2/7/2014 6:20:08 PM EDT
[#3]
I don't have any use whatsoever for the forward assist so I lobbied hard and got John at Rainier Arms to make an upper without forward assist.

I have them on all of my ARs, except the ones with the vintage M16 uppers that also lack the forward assist.
“What, indeed, is more brutal than a thought?" Paul Valery
9/29/2014 5:21:11 PM EDT
[#4]
If he had a plug in there taking up space my guess is he has a light weight bolt carrier group where they do not have the serrations for the forward assist to catch on so no need to have it on there as it wont have anything to push on so EGW has a plug to fill the space.  I have them in some and in some i got without the forward assist.  I can say I have never used it and if it dosent close im not gonnna push it in with a forward assist
6/9/2015 9:55:10 PM EDT
[#5]
Just build one using a 9mm upper.  You may need to drill the hole for the gas tube, but otherwise it should all be plug 'n play.

6/9/2015 10:56:13 PM EDT
[#6]
Lightweight is more useful .
6/10/2015 1:40:49 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Originally Posted By OTTOSEAR:
Lightweight is more useful .
View Quote


With a multi pound lead weight in the butt, how do you justify a one ounce weight reduction as "lightweight"?
6/14/2015 3:46:44 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:


With a multi pound lead weight in the butt, how do you justify a one ounce weight reduction as "lightweight"?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:
Originally Posted By OTTOSEAR:
Lightweight is more useful .


With a multi pound lead weight in the butt, how do you justify a one ounce weight reduction as "lightweight"?


I can tell which competition you prefer.
You can find meanness in the least of creatures, but when God made man the Devil was at his elbow. -CM
6/14/2015 8:50:53 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:


I can tell which competition you prefer.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:
Originally Posted By OTTOSEAR:
Lightweight is more useful .


With a multi pound lead weight in the butt, how do you justify a one ounce weight reduction as "lightweight"?


I can tell which competition you prefer.


Precision rather than blasting.
6/14/2015 8:56:20 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:


Precision rather than blasting.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:
Originally Posted By OTTOSEAR:
Lightweight is more useful .


With a multi pound lead weight in the butt, how do you justify a one ounce weight reduction as "lightweight"?


I can tell which competition you prefer.


Precision rather than blasting.


I'm glad you enjoy your gun game, but that's no reason to mock anyone elses hobby.
You can find meanness in the least of creatures, but when God made man the Devil was at his elbow. -CM
6/15/2015 1:12:15 PM EDT
[Last Edit: ArmyOrdGuy][Edited] [#11]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:

I'm glad you enjoy your gun game, but that's no reason to mock anyone elses hobby.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:
Originally Posted By Combat_Jack:
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:
Originally Posted By OTTOSEAR:
Lightweight is more useful .


With a multi pound lead weight in the butt, how do you justify a one ounce weight reduction as "lightweight"?


I can tell which competition you prefer.


Precision rather than blasting.

I'm glad you enjoy your gun game, but that's no reason to mock anyone elses hobby.
 

It's neither. It's a profession.
8/10/2015 7:36:29 PM EDT
[#12]
Stuck < Very Stuck.
Obamas Fault.
8/10/2015 7:45:58 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ArmyOrdGuy:
It's neither. It's a profession.
View Quote


AMU? Still a gun game, even if what AMU does in general isn't playing.
The end of the world isn't in my plan, but circling the wagons is. -Andres Duany.
8/10/2015 7:48:47 PM EDT
[#14]
Another fad. If you need it and don't have it you'll be unscrewing the receiver extension
8/12/2015 1:21:08 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Originally Posted By hellmann9655:
Another fad. If you need it and don't have it you'll be unscrewing the receiver extension
View Quote


Or not.

Are you telling me that you are going to force ammunition into the chamber if it won't go into battery by itself?

What good will that do?
The end of the world isn't in my plan, but circling the wagons is. -Andres Duany.
8/12/2015 1:23:36 AM EDT
[#16]
Useful for hunting
Somewhat useful for serious use

Not very useful for competition.

No real reason to have, or not have it
TCFL

Originally Posted By revottuneda4:
This. I don't know whats going on but i want to see weird shit.
9/2/2015 8:10:50 AM EDT
[#17]
in comp (3 gun type) the last thing you want to do is try and force feed a round that did go into battery normally. You eject that round and continue.  FA 9/10 just makes things worse.
2/12/2016 3:08:01 PM EDT
[#18]
I've used the FA in the military. Helped me if there was sand grains in the upper contacting the bcg. In a life or death situation I'd rather have it and be able to use it.
2/12/2016 3:33:01 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote History
Originally Posted By army11b:
I've used the FA in the military. Helped me if there was sand grains in the upper contacting the bcg. In a life or death situation I'd rather have it and be able to use it.
View Quote


I used mine in the Army too.  There was so much sand in it that it wouldn't close until I ran the charging handle once.

Funny how that works.
The end of the world isn't in my plan, but circling the wagons is. -Andres Duany.
2/12/2016 3:48:54 PM EDT
[#20]
Never used it once.  Didn't see the point in slamming the bolt on a jammed receiver.
ContrarianIndicator:
"Put a plate carrier over your bath robe and go see what's up". 1-11-16

Advice given to a fellow Arfcom member related to LEO being across the street for hours.
3/9/2016 1:46:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: mechanicuss][Edited] [#21]
deleted
4/24/2021 12:42:10 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote History
Originally Posted By EKUJustice:
If he had a plug in there taking up space my guess is he has a light weight bolt carrier group where they do not have the serrations for the forward assist to catch on so no need to have it on there as it wont have anything to push on so EGW has a plug to fill the space.  I have them in some and in some i got without the forward assist.  I can say I have never used it and if it dosent close im not gonnna push it in with a forward assist
View Quote

This is even more retarded than not having one.

So you have the thing sticking out, plus the weight of the plug, but it doesn't do anything?

Why not actually have the FA, at least you have utility
11/14/2023 3:30:45 PM EDT
[#23]
It was the wrong solution to a problem. Yet decades later, the FA still exists. It should go.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In