Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
7/1/2026 10:58:52 AM EDT
[Last Edit: billytehbob][Edited]
Hey all,

I'm fairly optic retarded, especially regarding MPVOs. My only real experience is with NX8s 2.5-20s, a Mk5HD 3.6-18, and my current Mk6.

Scope is non-illuminated FFP with the Mildot reticle. I really like the locking elevation and capped windage, not a huge fan of the reticle. I liked the NX8, but want locking/capped turrets. I did not like the Mk5 optically, the one I had exhibited a lot of CA and the image just didn't seem great. Would love useful illum, which the NX8 had. I've had a couple Razor 1-10s, which I liked, but wanted a larger objective for shooting in lower lighting conditions.


Rifle it would go on is a 13'' MR762, so would also like to keep the weight down (hence why I haven't tried the Razor Gen II 3-18..). I don't mind spending around $2000 for the right optic, new or used.


Is it worth replacing my Mk6 in favor of a different optic, or am I just looking for perfection when I've got good enough?



7/6/2026 1:06:02 PM EDT
[#1]
Originally Posted By billytehbob:
Hey all,

I'm fairly optic retarded, especially regarding MPVOs. My only real experience is with NX8s 2.5-20s, a Mk5HD 3.6-18, and my current Mk6.

Scope is non-illuminated FFP with the Mildot reticle. I really like the locking elevation and capped windage, not a huge fan of the reticle. I liked the NX8, but want locking/capped turrets. I did not like the Mk5 optically, the one I had exhibited a lot of CA and the image just didn't seem great. Would love useful illum, which the NX8 had. I've had a couple Razor 1-10s, which I liked, but wanted a larger objective for shooting in lower lighting conditions.


Rifle it would go on is a 13'' MR762, so would also like to keep the weight down (hence why I haven't tried the Razor Gen II 3-18..). I don't mind spending around $2000 for the right optic, new or used.


Is it worth replacing my Mk6 in favor of a different optic, or am I just looking for perfection when I've got good enough?
Have you looked at the Primary Arms PLxC 1.5-12?  Sounds like it might fit all of your needs.  To check it out click the LINK



View Quote
Primary Arms Social Team
www.primaryarms.com
Contact me at: [email protected]
7/6/2026 10:43:22 PM EDT
[#2]
I’ve run a Mk6 3‑18 with the H58 since 2014, and it’s stayed on various SPRs and gone through a bunch of elk hunts. The weight and glass are still hard to beat. The H58 isn’t common anymore, but it ranges well, and Hodnett’s original method made rapid corrections stupid‑easy. I wouldn’t like it nearly as much without the Christmas tree.

Downsides: no illumination, and the clicks aren’t Nightforce‑level. I’ve tried the Mk5 in similar magnification and it never felt as solid—maybe placebo, but the Mk6 just “handles” better. Vortex/Arken options are bricks by comparison.

Not a huge contribution other than long‑term use: the Mk6 has been good enough that nothing has pushed it off my rifles yet. Also curious what people think the actual upgrade path is.

@marksman14 and @remman for their smarter opinions.
7/7/2026 8:44:30 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Originally Posted By PrimaryArms:
View Quote



I have, but I’ve been struggling to see the value over an NX8 2.5-20. An interesting optic, for sure, that I’d love to see in person.
7/7/2026 12:31:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Originally Posted By likebuddah:
I’ve run a Mk6 3‑18 with the H58 since 2014, and it’s stayed on various SPRs and gone through a bunch of elk hunts. The weight and glass are still hard to beat. The H58 isn’t common anymore, but it ranges well, and Hodnett’s original method made rapid corrections stupid‑easy. I wouldn’t like it nearly as much without the Christmas tree.

Downsides: no illumination, and the clicks aren’t Nightforce‑level. I’ve tried the Mk5 in similar magnification and it never felt as solid—maybe placebo, but the Mk6 just “handles” better. Vortex/Arken options are bricks by comparison.

Not a huge contribution other than long‑term use: the Mk6 has been good enough that nothing has pushed it off my rifles yet. Also curious what people think the actual upgrade path is.

@marksman14 and @remman for their smarter opinions.
View Quote


Smarter?   I don’t know about that…..

The MK6 is best with a reticle designed for holds.  If that’s the intended use, it’s very hard to beat.  Mine was an H58, so it did what I needed it to do.

I wanted illumination (which I never use) and more importantly a tremor 3.  That’s the only reason I sold mine.  

Since you have a less than optimally paired reticle for what the scope inherently is, I get it.

My NX8 has been fantastic, even without the locking turret.  

If that’s a must, the ATACR 4-16 is a great option.  Pricey, but it has the features you want.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In