Posted: 12/7/2025 12:22:42 PM EDT
[Last Edit: R_S][Edited]
|
So I've been reading Deep Survival: Who Lives, Who Dies, and Why by Laurence Gonzales Like many of us, I have been following the topic of Survival for a lot of years, but Laurence Gonzales is positively obsessed by the subject and took his research to new levels. I'd recommend the entire book, but one of the key points he hits on is mindset is far more important than all else. He boils this down to an essential list of things that survivors do: 1. Perceive, believe (look, see, believe). Even in the initial crisis, survivors’ perceptions and cognitive functions keep working. They notice the details and may even find some humorous or beautiful. If there is any denial, it is counterbalanced by a solid belief in the clear evidence of their senses. They immediately begin to recognize, acknowledge, and even accept the reality of their situation. “I’ve broken my leg, that’s it. I’m dead,” as Joe Simpson (chapter 13) put it. They may initially blame forces outside themselves, too; but very quickly they dismiss that tactic and recognize that everything, good and bad, emanates from within. They see opportunity, even good, in their situation. They move through denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance very rapidly. They “go inside.” Bear in mind, though, that many people, such as Debbie Kiley (chapter 11), may have to struggle for a time before they get there. 2. Stay calm (use humor, use fear to focus). In the initial crisis, survivors are making use of fear, not being ruled by it. Their fear often feels like and turns into anger, and that motivates them and makes them sharper. They understand at a deep level about being cool and are ever on guard against the mutiny of too much emotion. ‘They keep their sense of humor and therefore keep calm. 3. Think/analyze/plan (get organized; set up small, manageable tasks). Survivors quickly organize, set up routines, and institute discipline. In successful group survival situations, a leader emerges often from the least likely candidate. They push away thoughts that their situation is hopeless. A rational voice emerges and is often actually heard, which takes control of the situation. Survivors perceive that experience as being split into two people and they “obey” the rational one. It begins with the paradox of seeing reality—how hopeless it would seem to an outside observer—but acting with the expectation of success. 4. Take correct, decisive action (be bold and cautious while carrying out tasks). Survivors are able to transform thought into action. They are willing to take risks to save themselves and others. They are able to break down very large jobs into small, manageable tasks. They set attainable goals and develop short-term plans to reach them. They are meticulous about doing those tasks well. They deal with what is within their power from moment to moment, hour to hour, day to day. They leave the rest behind. 5. Celebrate your successes (take joy in completing tasks). Survivors take great joy from even their smallest successes. That is an important step in creating an ongoing feeling of motivation and preventing the descent into hopelessness. It also provides relief from the unspeakable stress of a true survival situation. 6. Count your. blessings (be grateful—you’re alive). This is how survivors become rescuers instead of victims. There is always someone else they are helping more than themselves, even if that someone is not present. One survivor I spoke to, Yossi Ghinsberg, who was lost for weeks in the Bolivian jungle, hallucinated about a beautiful companion with whom he slept each night as he traveled. Everything he did, he did for her. 7. Play (sing, play mind games, recite poetry, count anything, do mathematical problems in your head). Since the brain and its wiring appear to be the determining factor in survival, this is an argument for expanding and refining it. The more you have learned and experienced of art, music, poetry, literature, philosophy, mathematics, and so on, the more resources you will have to fall back on. Just as survivors use patterns and rhythm to move forward in the survival voyage, they use the deeper activities of the intellect to stimulate, calm, and entertain the mind. Counting becomes important, too, and reciting poetry or even a mantra can calm the frantic mind. Movement becomes dance. One survivor who had to walk a long way counted his steps, one hundred at a time, and dedicated each hundred to another person he cared about. Stockdale cites “love of poetry” as an important quality for enduring. “You thirst to remember,” he wrote. “The clutter of all the trivia evaporates from your consciousness and with care you can make deep excursions into past recollections. ... Verses were hoarded and gone over each day. . . . [T]he person who came into this experiment with reams of already memorized poetry was the bearer of great gifts.” Survivors often cling to talismans. They search for meaning, and the more you know already, the deeper the meaning. They engage the crisis almost as a game. They discover the flow of the expert performer, in whom emotion and thought balance each other in producing action. “Careful, careful,” they say. But they act joyfully and decisively. Playing also leads to invention, and invention may lead to a new technique, strategy, or a piece of equipment that could save you. 8. See the beauty (remember: it’s a vision quest). Survivors are attuned to the wonder of the world. The appreciation of beauty, the feeling of awe, opens the senses. When you see something beautiful, your pupils actually dilate. This appreciation not only relieves stress and creates strong motivation, but it allows you to take in new information more effectively. 9. Believe that you will succeed (develop a deep conviction that you'll live). All of the practices just described lead to this point: Survivors consolidate their personalities and fix their determination. Survivors admonish themselves to make no more mistakes, to be very careful, and to do their very best. They become convinced that they will prevail if they do those things. 10. Surrender (let go of your fear of dying; “put away the pain”). Survivors manage pain well. Lauren Elder (chapter 15), who walked out of the Sierra Nevada after surviving a plane crash, wrote that she “stored away the information: My arm is broken.” That sort of thinking is what John Leach calls “resignation without giving up. It is survival by surrender.” Joe Simpson recognized that he would probably die. But it had ceased to bother him, and so he went ahead and crawled off the mountain anyway. 11. Do whatever is necessary (be determined; have the will and the skill). Survivors have meta-knowledge: They know their abilities and do not over- or underestimate them. They believe that anything is possible and act accordingly. Play leads to invention, which leads to trying something that might have seemed impossible. When the plane in which Lauren Elder was flying hit the top of a ridge above 12,000 feet, it would have seemed impossible that she could get off alive. She did it anyway, including having to down-climb vertical rock races with a broken arm. Survivors don’t expect or even hope to be rescued. They are coldly rational about using the world, obtaining what they need, doing what they have to do. 12. Never give up (let nothing break your spirit). There is always one more thing that you can do. Survivors are not easily frustrated. They are not discouraged by setbacks. They accept that the environment (or the business climate or their health) is con- stantly changing. They pick themselves up and start the entire process over again, breaking it down into manageable bits. Survivors always have a clear reason for going on. They keep their spirits up by developing an alternate world made up of rich memories to which they can escape. They mine their memory for whatever will keep them occupied. They come to embrace the world in which they find themselves and see opportunity in adversity. In the aftermath, survivors learn from and are grateful for the experiences they’ve had. These are all explained in much more detail in the book along with vivid examples. Strong recommend. |
per aspera ad astra
|
I had ChatGPT identify complementary books and had it do comparisons with another evidence based survival book: How does the data in The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes — and Why Amanda Ripley conflict with Deep Survival? ChatGPT said: Deep Survival and The Unthinkable cover overlapping terrain — human behavior in extreme environments — but they come from very different disciplines. As a result, some of their conclusions appear to conflict. Below is a detailed, head-to-head comparison showing where Ripley’s data-based framework diverges from Gonzales’ narrative-psychology approach. ⚠️ 1. Individual Psychology vs Population Patterns Gonzales (Deep Survival) Emphasizes individual mindset, personality traits, and cognitive habits. Focuses on survivors who demonstrate self-awareness, adaptability, and the ability to regulate emotion. Much of the argument is built from anecdotes, personal stories, and neuroscience metaphors (“the emotional brain hijacks the rational brain,” etc.). Ripley (The Unthinkable) Uses large-scale data, population surveys, official disaster reports, and interviews with emergency researchers. Prioritizes statistical patterns over individual psychological uniqueness. Shows that most people are not defined by heroic or mindful behavior — they’re defined by predictable, repeatable phases. Conflict: Gonzales implies survival is a kind of personal mastery; Ripley shows that group behavior follows reproducible laws, and individual “survival personality” traits matter less than situational and structural factors. ⚠️ **2. Gonzales: “Calm thinking saves you.” Ripley: “Thinking is often impossible at first.”** Gonzales He puts a heavy emphasis on cognitive control: Recognizing reality Remaining calm Avoiding denial Using conscious focus to override panic Ripley Her research shows that in real disasters, the brain rarely goes straight to calm problem-solving. She identifies a three-stage process almost everyone goes through: Denial Deliberation Decisive Moment Across fires, air crashes, and mass emergencies, data shows that most people: Freeze Underreact Wait for social cues Fail to move even when danger is obvious Conflict: Gonzales praises cases where individuals immediately recognize danger and act rationally. Ripley demonstrates that such instantaneous clarity is statistically uncommon, and expecting it is unrealistic for most people. ⚠️ **3. Gonzales: Survival traits are personal. Ripley: Survival outcomes depend more on systems and preparation.** Gonzales Attributes survival to personality factors like: Mindfulness Humility Ability to stay present Acceptance of reality Emotional regulation He frames survival almost like a spiritual discipline. Ripley Shows that survival odds improve more from: Practice and drills Familiarity with exits Clear instructions Public education Simple effective building design Example: People escape fires faster if they’ve walked the exit path one time before. This contradicts the emphasis on mystic “survivor traits.” Conflict: Gonzales focuses on the inner life. Ripley shows that environment and training matter more than personality, especially in mass emergencies. ⚠️ **4. Gonzales emphasizes personal stories; Ripley emphasizes systematic errors.** Gonzales Loves case studies where individual decisions influence survival: one climber, one pilot, one sailor. Ripley Shows that many deaths are caused by systemic issues: Bad signage Poor training Leadership failure Crowd dynamics Lack of smoke alarms Human factors engineering failures Conflict: Gonzales makes survival seem like a hero’s journey. Ripley’s view is almost bureaucratic but realistic: improve systems and training → improve outcomes for thousands. ⚠️ **5. Gonzales: Death often comes from the “emotional brain.” Ripley: Death often comes from predictable social behavior.** Gonzales Frames loss of control through neuroscience metaphors — amygdala hijack, primitive responses, emotional vs rational brain. But he does not deeply quantify how often these responses occur. Ripley Documents the distribution of responses across crowds: ~10–15% remain calm ~75% become stunned or slow ~10% panic irrationally Many follow social proof even when dangerous Conflict: Gonzales offers compelling stories about emotional misfires. Ripley provides numbers showing which reactions dominate — and it’s usually neither heroism nor terror, but paralysis. ⚠️ **6. Gonzales suggests certain personalities are “natural survivors.” Ripley shows that most survivors simply followed the drill.** Gonzales Talks about people with a “survivor personality” — flexible, humble, curious, calm. Ripley Highlights cases where kids survived fires because they had practiced exit drills office workers survived 9/11 because their companies had rehearsed evacuations airline passengers survived because they paid attention to safety briefings No special personality required — just rehearsal. Conflict: Gonzales elevates exceptionalism; Ripley elevates repetition. 🧭 Overall Conclusion The biggest conflict is this: Gonzales: Survival relies on exceptional inner traits. Ripley: Survival relies on predictable human behavior + preparation. Gonzales gives you a philosophical “how to be the kind of person who lives.” Ripley gives you a disaster-research “how people actually behave, statistically.” They complement each other — but they do not describe the same world. here is a deep, structured breakdown of how Deep Survival and The Unthinkable align and diverge, organized into three sections just as you requested: Where they agree Which book is more accurate for different types of disasters A synthesized “best practices” model that combines both sets of insights This will give you a complete, cross-disciplinary picture. ✅ 1. Where Deep Survival and The Unthinkable Agree Even though they emphasize different mechanisms, the two books share several core principles. A. The Mind Is the First Tool You Use in a Crisis Both authors assert that survival is not primarily about gear or physical strength. They agree on: The critical role of attention The dangers of denial The importance of recognizing the reality of a situation quickly The need to break through the initial shock phase Gonzales frames this as a personal cognitive battle. Ripley frames it as an instinctive, stepwise psychological progression. But both say: If your brain doesn’t “wake up,” you’re dead. B. Training Changes Outcomes Dramatically Both books argue that preparation rewires the brain. Gonzales: training integrates rational and emotional brain systems Ripley: training reduces time stuck in denial and speeds transition to deliberation Both emphasize the idea that in a crisis, you don’t rise to the occasion — you fall to your level of training. C. Clear Thinking Under Stress Is Extremely Rare Without Practice Both authors confront the myth of instant heroism. Gonzales uses individual stories of pilots and climbers who suppress panic. Ripley uses crowd data showing how few people can do this spontaneously. Both conclude: Calmness is a trained skill, not a natural reaction. D. Emotional Management Determines Success or Failure Both books note that: Panic is lethal Overconfidence is lethal Freezing is lethal Survivors manage emotions effectively — through experience, training, or certain personality traits. E. Situational Awareness is King Both highlight cases where people: Didn’t know where exits were Misread the environment Clung to false mental models Became task-fixated Tried to retrieve items (common cause of death) Both conclude: Survival is primarily cognitive. 🔍 2. Which Book Is More Accurate for Different Scenarios Each book excels in different domains because they use different methodologies. A. Wilderness Survival (backcountry, mountaineering, lost-person scenarios) More accurate: Deep Survival Why: Wilderness survival is deeply influenced by personal mindset, emotional control, and adaptability Incidents involve small groups or single individuals Systemic or structural failures matter less than personal psychology Gonzales analyzes climbers, sailors, and solo wilderness incidents — his strongest material Ripley’s large-scale population data doesn’t transfer as well here. B. Urban Disasters (building fires, evacuations, crowd behavior) More accurate: The Unthinkable Why: Urban disasters involve crowds → population patterns matter Freeze/denial phases are extremely common in these scenarios Building design, signage, and drills have massive impact Ripley’s sources come from NIST fire studies, evacuation data, crowd dynamics research Gonzales’ individual “hero-narratives” don’t predict crowd outcomes well. C. Aviation Accidents More accurate: The Unthinkable Why: Aviation is dominated by procedural training and human-factors engineering Most survivability hinges on evacuation behavior, crew response, and training Ripley uses data from actual crash evacuations, drills, and airline behavior studies Gonzales’ anecdotes are compelling but uneven in analytical precision. D. Maritime Disasters (storms, capsizing, abandonment at sea) Depends on the scale: Solo/small crew incidents → Deep Survival Ferry or cruise ship disasters → The Unthinkable Why the split: Individual sailing challenges map to Gonzales’ analysis Large-vessel disasters behave like urban evacuations (panic, denial, social proof) E. Combat, Tactical, Police-Involved Shootings Both are partially applicable, but: More accurate: Deep Survival for individual cognitive response More accurate: The Unthinkable for organizational factors (training, drills, communications) Neither book is specifically about combat, but the cognitive frameworks align strongly with contemporary human-performance research. F. Industrial Accidents (chemical plant explosions, warehouse fires) More accurate: The Unthinkable Why: These events involve groups and response protocols Leadership failures and communication issues dominate outcomes Denial and delay behaviors match crowd data Gonzales’ framework doesn’t address organizational failure modes. 🧠 3. Combined Synthesis: The Most Useful Survival Model If you blend the best insights from both books, you get a powerful, comprehensive survivability doctrine: A. Expect Denial — Train to Break Through It From Ripley: Most people freeze or act slowly You must actively “snap out of it” From Gonzales: Recognize reality quickly Force conscious attention onto the immediate environment Combined rule: ✔ In any unfamiliar environment (plane, building, ship), take five seconds to locate exits. ✔ Practice micro–mental rehearsals (“If X happens, I go to Y.”) B. Build Routines: They Replace Panic From Ripley: Drills save more lives than personality traits From Gonzales: Small, repeated habits help the rational brain stay online Combined rule: ✔ Practice evacuation or emergency actions until they become reflexive. C. Manage Emotion Like a Skill, Not a Gift From Gonzales: Breath control Self-talk Acceptance From Ripley: Emotional mastery accelerates movement from denial → action Combined rule: ✔ Emotional regulation is a trained, not innate, ability. D. Adaptability Wins Both authors emphasize adaptability but define it differently. Ripley: Adapting your behavior when the situation contradicts expectations Gonzales: Rewriting your “mental map” on the fly Combined rule: ✔ When the environment doesn’t match your expectations, immediately update your model. Don’t cling to the plan. E. Situational Awareness + Training > Heroism Ripley shows awareness failures kill crowds. Gonzales shows awareness failures kill individuals. Both agree awareness is the core skill. Combined rule: ✔ Pay attention, stay humble, notice anomalies, rehearse responses. 🧭 If You Want the Most Powerful Summary: Deep Survival = Why individuals live or die (inner psychology). The Unthinkable = Why groups live or die (human-factors science). Both combined = The most accurate, evidence-based survival doctrine available in popular literature. |
per aspera ad astra
|
This part from ChatGPT seems to be most critical to me: D. Adaptability Wins Both authors emphasize adaptability but define it differently. Ripley: Adapting your behavior when the situation contradicts expectations Gonzales: Rewriting your “mental map” on the fly Combined rule: ✔ When the environment doesn’t match your expectations, immediately update your model. Don’t cling to the plan. E. Situational Awareness + Training > Heroism Ripley shows awareness failures kill crowds. Gonzales shows awareness failures kill individuals. Both agree awareness is the core skill. Combined rule: ✔ Pay attention, stay humble, notice anomalies, rehearse responses. Lessons for life I'd also say that in the wilderness and ocean survival scenarios, having portable SATCOMS would have totally changed many of the extreme survival scenarios into something much more modest. |
per aspera ad astra
|
Originally Posted By R_S: This part from ChatGPT seems to be most critical to me: Lessons for life I'd also say that in the wilderness and ocean survival scenarios, having portable SATCOMS would have totally changed many of the extreme survival scenarios into something much more modest. There are a number of situations in the book where help would not have arrived in time even if that was available. Both books focus on being able to deal with a reality that does not match your assumptions (i.e. the mental map). And this is the biggest barrier, especially for people who live in a comfortable environment where risk is normalized for most of their time. |
In case you're wondering about the avatar pic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4ARGjbA14g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4ARGjbA14g
|
Tagged for more discussion when I have a chance. I've read this book and made notes in my e-book, I'll see if I can dig them up. It's an excellent treatise on mindset and its role in survival. One of the lessons I applied: "be here, now" i.e. pay attention to your surroundings |
I know I'll never go home.
So set fire to your ships, and past regrets, and be free.
So set fire to your ships, and past regrets, and be free.
|
Originally Posted By TNC: Years later I saw this and it resonated: "No one is coming to save you. Expect to self-rescue" There is a very delicate balance to this. First, I think you must always consider self-rescue; however, you need to balance that with risk. It's easy to make a bad situation worse without assessing and understanding the risks. There are plenty of anecdotes where self-rescue was the only survivable tactic and there are some situations where "waiting" for rescue ended up in disaster. I think it was Ron Hood (or I'll take credit  ) with his "survival of threes", that you only survive three seconds without thinking. Humor aside, it denotes the importance of always keeping your head in the game, able to critically think and look for solutions. Survival is very much about mindset.ROCK6 |
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson
|
Take a good look at people that live and survive in the cold climates. The Inuit and Yupik cultures had all kinds of mental and physical games and practices. One side of my great grandparents were Sami reindeer herders. Followed the herds on foot in Arctic climate. Sami Also had mental and physical games. Sadly a lot of the old ways have disappeared. 
|