Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
149
EE: 100% (44)
Posted: 8/2/2024 11:15:24 AM EDT
[Last Edit: BlueShirtGuy][Edited]
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
150
EE: 100% (44)
|
Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy: Yep. The line is a raised area. Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy: Originally Posted By tortilla-flats: You can physically feel a variation where that line is? Yep. The line is a raised area. ---------------------------- In the theme of ARFCOM, "Have Samuel call me". |
Tom Sawyer.
"If The Rules brought us to this, what use are they?"
"If The Rules brought us to this, what use are they?"
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
151
EE: 100% (44)
|
Originally Posted By tortilla-flats: That doesn't seem right. I would contact Colt Customer Service and see what they say. https://www.colt.com/service/ ---------------------------- In the theme of ARFCOM, "Have Samuel call me". It's just cosmetic and it's a NFA item so even if they replaced it I would be out another $200. Another angle:
|
|
Originally Posted By oxford411: I suppose that is better than the grinder marks. Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By mad_mardigan: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/175932/20200416_104718_jpg-3283951.JPG Originally Posted By mad_mardigan: Originally Posted By oxford411: I suppose that is better than the grinder marks. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/175932/20200416_104718_jpg-3283951.JPG Attached File Also a factory SBR. |
Can't never could 'til try came along.
"All welchers should be removed from the EE".-Aimless
R.I.P. to the EE
"All welchers should be removed from the EE".-Aimless
R.I.P. to the EE
|
Originally Posted By oxford411: ^^^^ There it is, I was waiting for that pic. ![]() It kills me. I would have shit a turd if my order showed up looking like that. |
Can't never could 'til try came along.
"All welchers should be removed from the EE".-Aimless
R.I.P. to the EE
"All welchers should be removed from the EE".-Aimless
R.I.P. to the EE
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
153
EE: 100% (44)
|
Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy: It's just cosmetic and it's a NFA item so even if they replaced it I would be out another $200. Another angle: https://i.postimg.cc/SRxmb3sk/20240802-165203.jpg If everything else is fine and square… and that line is just a forging blem and not the result of something crushed/bent… I wouldnt care too much. |
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
156
EE: 100% (44)
|
Originally Posted By Frens: If everything else is fine and square… and that line is just a forging blem and not the result of something crushed/bent… I wouldnt care too much. As far as I can see everything is square and nothing is crushed or bent. That seam is the only thing noticeable telling me it's probably a forge die issue. |
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
158
EE: 100% (44)
|
Looks better than the line on my transferable lower. Attached File |
"I am not an Operator but I play one on AR15.com"
|
Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy: Serial # is CR8423**. Anyone have a close # to see if theirs have this issue? Bet there was an issue with the die and serials close to this one have the same thing. CR834** and nothing like that |
“If you want a glimpse of the future, imagine a clown shoe stamping on a human face. Forever.”
I want a perfect body, I want a perfect soul
Joined:
Dec 2000
Posts:
9980
EE: 100% (204)
|
It could be worse. I just came across this one on Gunbroker. Even with Colt doing Colt things, I'm surprised it made it out the door. https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1062613521 ![]() |
|
Originally Posted By uniquesnd: Looks better than the line on my transferable lower. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/347041/IMG_2017_jpeg-3288884.JPG Norrells reweld? Looks like one of his .....H&R front + Hydramatic rear |
|
Originally Posted By uniquesnd: Looks better than the line on my transferable lower. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/347041/IMG_2017_jpeg-3288884.JPG Who is shown as the Manufacturer on the Form 4? That looks like it might be a weld up of two destroyed lowers that was done before the '86 cutoff date. A number of Class 3/SOTs would buy batches of the lowers that the government had cut up. Parts would be chosen so that a viable lower could be readily welded up from two parts. John Norrell was the acknowledged master of such weldups. So much so that the BATFE had some of his lowers x-rayed as they did not believe that they were, indeed, weldups. I've never seen a weldup, but the typical weldups that I've seen in photos look similar to the posted photo. On the other hand, When your making as many M16s as Colt did in the Vietnam era, almost anything will go out the door. MHO, YMMV, etc. |


