Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
7/27/2026 11:38:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: thedownzero][Edited]
Purchased a new (non-blem) lower, it arrived with a defect/obvious cosmetic issue. After providing customer service with images, I was told that "QC determined this is normal artifact and covered under the general disclaimer regarding manufacturing defects".

Interestingly, when inquiring about the point of "blemula" products if standard non-blem products can have defects according to that disclaimer, I was told that it's based on size. Can you share the specifications/size requirements of what constitutes a blem product vs accepted defects on standard items? I'm genuinely curious as to what the guidelines actually are as I have blem items that are visually flawless vs standard items that made it through "QC" that have obvious issues.
7/27/2026 12:08:49 PM EDT
[#1]
Blem should mean blemish.
Blemishes are cosmetic.
No way to measure a blem.

Dimensions are specifications (specs).
Wrong dimensions = out of spec.

7/27/2026 12:19:33 PM EDT
[Last Edit: thedownzero][Edited] [#2]
Quote History
Originally Posted By hotdog250j:
Blem should mean blemish.
Blemishes are cosmetic.
No way to measure a blem.

Dimensions are specifications (specs).
Wrong dimensions = out of spec.

View Quote

They explicitly stated that they are measured to determine if it becomes a "blem" product vs standard product with acceptable "manufacturing marks"
7/27/2026 5:03:32 PM EDT
[#3]
We can’t share specifics for our QC process, but we do have an evaluation process that is as objective as possible. With the nature of machining, finishing and anodizing, some level of variation is typically inherent in the process. We'd be happy to take it in for an inspection if you'd like, to set that up please reach out to [email protected]. -GACS
7/28/2026 11:06:15 AM EDT
[#4]
I've built probably 8-10 G$ rifles out of blem receiver/rail kits. I've never had an issue with any. Even cosmetic blemishes were just different shades of colors vs the norm. I've had KAC and other company's NON-blem products, come looking worse than a G$ blem...you could always have Bill call you.
7/28/2026 4:47:01 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Newbombz:
I've built probably 8-10 G$ rifles out of blem receiver/rail kits. I've never had an issue with any. Even cosmetic blemishes were just different shades of colors vs the norm. I've had KAC and other company's NON-blem products, come looking worse than a G$ blem...you could always have Bill call you.
View Quote

I agree, I have G$ blems that look better than this G$ NON-blem.
7/30/2026 8:31:55 AM EDT
[Last Edit: the-answer-is-42][Edited] [#6]
I'm convinced 'blem' in the firearms world these days just means 'overstock' as a way to sell excess inventory and MAYBE a few that dont meet specs/etc.

I'm also convinced that Geissele, much like KAC, is a company focused on LEO/mil contracts rather than the hassle that is retail 'civilian' sales (regardless of how they want to portray that) due to how pedantic most gun owners are hence why you see so many perceived blems in non-blem products. Their contract customers wouldnt care.
7/30/2026 8:25:23 PM EDT
[#7]
I've built two SD's and both of them have a mix Blemula parts. Neither has parts that were out of spec. One was a little light on the ODG stripped upper's anodizing and the other's MK4 rail was a tad darker than any other DDC parts I've seen. But not by much. Those were the only "flaws" I could find in them, anyway. I chalk it up to that being the nature of anodizing. I like anodizing much better than Cerakote, so you'll hear no gripes from me.
RIP TSgt Jason Norton and SSgt Brian McElroy. KIA 22 Jan 06, near Taji, Iraq.
LaRue Armorer, Colt 1911 Armorer, Colt M16/AR15 Armorer, Glock Armorer
8/1/2026 1:27:44 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Originally Posted By the-answer-is-42:
I'm convinced 'blem' in the firearms world these days just means 'overstock' as a way to sell excess inventory and MAYBE a few that dont meet specs/etc.

I'm also convinced that Geissele, much like KAC, is a company focused on LEO/mil contracts rather than the hassle that is retail 'civilian' sales (regardless of how they want to portray that) due to how pedantic most gun owners are hence why you see so many perceived blems in non-blem products. Their contract customers wouldnt care.
View Quote

My blems from G had very clear blems on them. Weird stripes in the anodizing or actual metal impacts that don’t affect function. I like my Count Blemula guns.
Esstac’s Retarded Social Media Influencer
8/1/2026 11:43:36 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Originally Posted By NachoDip:

My blems from G had very clear blems on them. Weird stripes in the anodizing or actual metal impacts that don’t affect function. I like my Count Blemula guns.
View Quote


Same here
RIP DigDug
8/3/2026 9:28:09 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By CATM:
I've built two SD's and both of them have a mix Blemula parts. Neither has parts that were out of spec. One was a little light on the ODG stripped upper's anodizing and the other's MK4 rail was a tad darker than any other DDC parts I've seen. But not by much. Those were the only "flaws" I could find in them, anyway. I chalk it up to that being the nature of anodizing. I like anodizing much better than Cerakote, so you'll hear no gripes from me.
View Quote


Yeah unforunately it's not a shade variation. The first was a weird "tie die" like stripes/swirls in the finish. Even though it had been inspected and initialed by someone in QC, they then claimed QC said it was out of spec and replaced it. A few weeks later , the next one shows up and it had a 1/8"-1/4" chip/piece of anodizing missing. That is the one that they said was not a blem per the measurements.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In