Crap. WI law still disallows suppressors without federal registration, possibly allows SBRs/SBS'. (Page 2 of 2)
|
Originally Posted By rfb45colt: I met him over 20 years ago, before he ran for any office. He would stop in at the coffee klatch at the local diner from time to time. That group included 2 state troopers, the Vilas county judge, 2 DNR wardens, local city cops, a state arson cop, ex county D.A., a bunch of hunting/fishing guides, 2 township chairmen, & some local business owners like myself. He was just another one of the guys. He always backed concealed carry, long before we had it. Upstanding guy, and as down to earth as he appears in his commercials. He's leading the charge to delist the wolves too. He's one politician I actually really like for a change. Had 6 or 7 of them in the backyard tonight all around the house howling up a storm...most I have ever heard. |
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
Any word at all yet Or are they just stalling waiting to see who gets elected? |
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
Originally Posted By 9divdoc: Any word at all yet Or are they just stalling waiting to see who gets elected? Nothing from the state AG nor DOJ that I've seen or heard. The companies named as plaintiffs are being extremely cautious involving the other plaintiffs in the states that have some suppressor regulations in state law, and not dealing NFA items in any of those states (without form 4s) until there's official clarification. Nor are FFLs willing to either (don't blame them at all, I would hold off too). In the states that say they must be registered, that's pretty much black & white. No. But in states that say you must comply fed regs, like ours, there's valid "opinions" both ways, and it's more "grey". Stephan Halbrook, a well know constitutional law & gun law expert says we are GTG in his opinion, as plaintiffs' federal registration & licensing requirements have been changed by the permanent injunction. But that's all they are this point, are opinions. Opinions are like assholes. everyone has one.  So we wait. And wait. And wait... for something official. And if nobody is prodding, nobody is moving to give official legal guidance. WTF, it's been 92 years of NFA B.S., what's another year? 
|
|
Originally Posted By rfb45colt: Nothing from the state AG nor DOJ that I've seen or heard. The companies named as plaintiffs are being extremely cautious involving the other plaintiffs in the states that have some suppressor regulations in state law, and not dealing NFA items in any of those states (without form 4s) until there's official clarification. Nor are FFLs willing to either (don't blame them at all, I would hold off too). In the states that say they must be registered, that's pretty much black & white. No. But in states that say you must comply fed regs, like ours, there's valid "opinions" both ways, and it's more "grey". Stephan Halbrook, a well know constitutional law & gun law expert says we are GTG in his opinion, as plaintiffs' federal registration & licensing requirements have been changed by the permanent injunction. But that's all they are this point, are opinions. Opinions are like assholes. everyone has one. So we wait. And wait. And wait... for something official. And if nobody is prodding, nobody is moving to give official legal guidance. WTF, it's been 92 years of NFA B.S., what's another year? I watched a Halbrook video on the subject... For now I'll just keep making more noise in the yard...pretty good deterrent so far... BTW saw your protege's vehicle with dog in it at the grocery store today...must have been going out as we were going in though... |
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
Originally Posted By 9divdoc: I watched a Halbrook video on the subject... I watched another video last night, about the situation in Florida with SBS & SBR, that is very similar to ours with suppressors. FL law says they are legal as long as you comply with federal regulations. Same basic thing ours says about suppressors. The FL AG has been asked for his opinion & guidance. It'll be interesting what that is. However, he is a pro-gun Republican, not a Josh Kaul. But it still would set some sort of precedence if he gives the OK. If the injunction is still standing after the 60 day deadline for appeals expires, I envision a lawsuit here in WI, if Kaul opposes. Unless he loses the election of course. Step #1... elect Tom Tiffany & Eric Toney. |