Posted: 11/8/2024 5:13:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: panthermark][Edited]
![]() BREAKING NEWS: Illinois Assault Weapons Ban STRUCK DOWN!!! Stayed for 30 days. Ok, Freedom is on the horizon. How about that? |
| Paint me a skeptic. I’ve been told , yelled at, that FOID is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for 52 years. It ain’t going anywhere and either is the AWB. If you think SCOTUS is gonna rule for us and Illinois is gonna open the floodgates to MSRs you just don’t understand the anti gun states mindset. |
|
Originally Posted By LILGUY: Paint me a skeptic. I’ve been told , yelled at, that FOID is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for 52 years. It ain’t going anywhere and either is the AWB. If you think SCOTUS is gonna rule for us and Illinois is gonna open the floodgates to MSRs you just don’t understand the anti gun states mindset. 1. You just don't understand the state of the country with 2A do you. 2. Ah yes, like how we will never get CCW here. 3. No wonder you are despondent: you have already surrendered in mind with the retarded "MSR" term. |
|
Originally Posted By Upland1911: State already appealed? How can they that quickly? The opinion was like 160 pages. Im sure they will but curious to thinking of 30 stay. Betting it benefits us somehow over immediate injunction A notice of appeal is basically a 1 page document. It just starts the process. The appellate court will issue a briefing schedule and hearing date down the road. |
|
7th Circus shit on us again. FPC has the order: Judges: FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge, AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge |
-Let him bear the palm who has won it
|
Originally Posted By retired_11b: 7th Circus shit on us again. FPC has the order: Judges: FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge, AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge fuck the 7th. So now it has to go to the supreme court? |
|
Originally Posted By PorkchopSandwhiches: fuck the 7th. So now it has to go to the supreme court? No. The Supreme Court is going to have a conference on the MD case on Dec 13th. If they decide to take it, then the decison from that case (probably summer of '25) will presumably be applicable to IL. Thomas wants that one badly. Hell, if it were up to him, the NFA might be stricken in that decison. He needs three others to agree to take the case. Alito is in, and probably Gorsuch. Barrett has been a disappointment, and Roberts is a pussy who doesn't want to rock the boat. We need frat boy Kavanaugh to come out swinging for our side. |
|
Originally Posted By crazymoose: No. The Supreme Court is going to have a conference on the MD case on Dec 13th. If they decide to take it, then the decison from that case (probably summer of '25) will presumably be applicable to IL. Thomas wants that one badly. Hell, if it were up to him, the NFA might be stricken in that decison. He needs three others to agree to take the case. Alito is in, and probably Gorsuch. Barrett has been a disappointment, and Roberts is a pussy who doesn't want to rock the boat. We need frat boy Kavanaugh to come out swinging for our side. Originally Posted By crazymoose: Originally Posted By PorkchopSandwhiches: fuck the 7th. So now it has to go to the supreme court? No. The Supreme Court is going to have a conference on the MD case on Dec 13th. If they decide to take it, then the decison from that case (probably summer of '25) will presumably be applicable to IL. Thomas wants that one badly. Hell, if it were up to him, the NFA might be stricken in that decison. He needs three others to agree to take the case. Alito is in, and probably Gorsuch. Barrett has been a disappointment, and Roberts is a pussy who doesn't want to rock the boat. We need frat boy Kavanaugh to come out swinging for our side. Yeah, summer of 2025 (or at least whenever the Supreme Court rules on the MD case) is going to likely be a game changer for our rights and the firearms industry, one way or another! Assuming it is a win, I still think we are going to see a lot of states and localities continue to pass unconstitutional bans that still have to be struck down in drawn out court cases. Sven Manticore Arms |
Advanced Fighting Gear for the AR, AK, AUG, Tavor, and Scorpion EVO! www.manticorearms.com
Joined:
Aug 2023
Posts:
129
EE: 0% (0)
|
@Sven, I agree. As long as anti 2A state legislatures can use state coffers to defend blatantly unconstitutional laws that deny the rights of their citizens, this trend will continue. Anti gun state legislators should be banned from using tax dollars for court cases and instead use the monies in their re-election campaign war chests. Gary |
Join the Community
Your next conversation starts here.
Create your free account to join discussions, share your experience, save topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.
- Join discussions
- Follow topics and replies
- Connect with fellow enthusiasts
Already a member? Sign in
Stay informed by subscribing to our Newsletter
