Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
7/14/2025 6:05:03 PM EDT
I recently ordered 500 rds of what was advertised as Winchester Service Grade 9mm ammo which also showed a picture of the flat nosed 9mm round similar to the M1152 used in the M17/18 pistol series. What I received was 500 rds of Winchester 9mm 115 grain Full Metal Jacket ammo with the round FMJ type round found in WWB. Has Winchester changed their packaging and Contruction? Both the advertised box picture and the boxes I received are brown.
7/14/2025 6:15:15 PM EDT
[#1]
The service grade in a 115gr flat point at 1300fps
7/14/2025 6:18:11 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Originally Posted By wvfarrier:
The service grade in a 115gr flat point at 1300fps
View Quote


Mine has been sold as SGW50, in these little square bulk pack boxes, which are awesome because you can fit more ammo in a pouch of the range bag.

I use it in my comped pistols and it works great.

7/14/2025 7:52:17 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sdacbob][Edited] [#3]
The ammo I received is not flat nosed. I can't seem to be able to upload a picture.
7/14/2025 9:57:29 PM EDT
[#4]
I have been getting the SG9W in the 500 rounds cases, runs great in G17 with PMM Ultra comp and gun is super flat. it has always been the flatnose 115 and chronos just over 1300.
7/16/2025 5:32:36 PM EDT
[#5]
everything i have seen -- the 'service grade' is flat nose at a higher velocity than regular fmj

if you received regular round nose ball -- they sent you a different SKU imo
7/23/2025 12:27:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sdacbob][Edited] [#6]
I was able to return that case for a refund and ordered another 500 rds from a different vendor which I received today. Same thing, same boxes and same round nosed bullet type. I have emailed Winchester and will see what their response will be. Both boxes were marked SG9W which should be the flat nose bullet type.https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipO3ntD3nYs2ITiUA7TKkD1hmE5JL9q_mYz6fXHe
7/24/2025 8:19:16 AM EDT
[#7]
interesting.  thanks for the update.   everything i see on the internet shows the flat point bullet as the projectile in that SKU

wonder if they got some production / packaging mistaken or something during a production run
7/25/2025 10:43:03 PM EDT
[#8]
It's been 3 days and still no response from Winchester Customer Service.
7/25/2025 11:11:01 PM EDT
[#9]
I went and looked at mine for you

SG9W50




7/26/2025 2:47:24 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sdacbob][Edited] [#10]
The headstamp on the ammo I received is JAG 9mm Luger and round nose bullet style like WWB.
7/29/2025 10:30:00 PM EDT
[Last Edit: spydercomonkey][Edited] [#11]
Quote History


This is what I've been getting in my SG9W50, which is just repacked M1152.

Shoots really well, this was at 25yd last week. White dot is 1.5"

7/29/2025 10:49:39 PM EDT
[#12]
Not the ammo I received. I sent another message to Winchester today since I never received a response from last week's message. Wondering if there has been a mixup in packaging.
7/30/2025 2:57:07 PM EDT
[#13]
Received a response from Winchester today.

This letter is about your submission to Winchester Ammunition.

We greatly appreciate that you are reaching out to us. We wanted to let you know there was a change in the ammunition. Service grade isn’t necessarily bound to using flat nose or round nose, just whatever is most available. We switched to round nose in a recent batch to make sure we were getting product out to customers. The ammunition should work as expected.
7/30/2025 5:30:14 PM EDT
[#14]
Are you able to chrono the round nose Service Grade to see if it's really pushing higher velocities?
7/30/2025 5:51:52 PM EDT
[#15]
Unfortunately not.
8/1/2025 8:45:35 AM EDT
[#16]

thanks for the update.
8/2/2025 10:12:59 AM EDT
[#17]
Thanks for passing along the info from Winchester, that's good to know. I'm almost through my second 500-round case of this ammo. It's definitely hot but shoots well, so I plan to buy more in the future. That would have been concerning to open it up and find the round nose bullets instead of the flat version I'm used to, not knowing otherwise.
8/2/2025 4:23:25 PM EDT
[#18]
Yes it was, I even returned the first 500 rd case. When the second case arrived from a different vendor I thought maybe Winchester had a mishap and packaged the wrong ammo or possibly made an unannounced change to the bullet style so I contacted them.
12/6/2025 8:15:23 PM EDT
[#19]
Just adding onto this thread some measurements I took for the 115gn FMJ ball SG9W. Mine also has the JAG headstamp.

Seems like a fairly normal loading, though I don't know the powder type and I didn't chronograph it. It's some fine flake variety, though I'm really doubting its military WPR 289. Definitely not in the ballpark of 6+ grains of powder that is seen with the flat nose M1152.

OAL 1.1255"
Case Length .7475"
Case Wgt w/ Primer 56.89 gn
Bullet Wgt 114.63 gn
Bullet Diam .3550"
Bullet Length .5685"
Powder Charge ~4 gn
12/6/2025 8:30:37 PM EDT
[#20]
I'm definitely bringing the chronograph next time I go to the range.  The last time, I was chronographing what I thought was the service grade stuff, and got very low velocities.  Lower than even the Brown Bear steel-cased.

Since it had been pre-loaded into a magazine months before, I could very well have been mistaken.  Definitely going to re-check.  I bought a bunch of this stuff expecting it to be "real" Service Grade".
And then, he arrives at the last item on his bucket list...
12/8/2025 9:01:41 AM EDT
[#21]
The flat nose brown box stuff does seem kinda hot compared to WWB.

The Romulus likes it. Glocks like it. Feeds good.

Will buy more.
12/8/2025 10:47:27 PM EDT
[#22]
I was averaging 1303.67 FPS (Caldwell chrono) out of a 5” Prodigy.
1/21/2026 9:18:25 PM EDT
[Last Edit: jhon][Edited] [#23]
Just picked up 10k of the SG9W50 from Target Sports. So far looks good; WMA 25 head stamp, 115gr FMJ flat nose, primers crimped and sealed. .22 CPR with Ammo+ made it an easy buy. If I can swing another 10k, I plan to.

I think Target Sports has their description of this stuff wrong. Says 1190 FPS which is definitely not correct.
1/21/2026 9:41:35 PM EDT
[#24]
I bought a couple thousand from buds a few years ago.  Its my favorite training ammo.
1/24/2026 10:42:01 PM EDT
[#25]
I went to a show a couple weeks ago and was looking around for this ammo. One dealer had 500 round cases of the traditional 50-round boxes, which is how I’ve bought it in the past. He let me open up a box, and it had the round nose bullets discussed here. A couple other dealers had new 1000-round cases with the smaller square boxes (the ones with the rounds stacked with no internal packaging). Those had the usual flat nose bullets. I bought one of those cases. Just throwing this observation out there.
1/26/2026 11:48:09 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote History
Originally Posted By 3ACR_Scout:
I went to a show a couple weeks ago and was looking around for this ammo. One dealer had 500 round cases of the traditional 50-round boxes, which is how I’ve bought it in the past. He let me open up a box, and it had the round nose bullets discussed here. A couple other dealers had new 1000-round cases with the smaller square boxes (the ones with the rounds stacked with no internal packaging). Those had the usual flat nose bullets. I bought one of those cases. Just throwing this observation out there.
View Quote


Be interesting if OP's ammunition was in the traditional 50 round tray and not the small square boxes. The SG9W in traditional boxes ships in a 500 round case that is physically the same size as the 1000 round case SG9W50.

The SG9W50 I bought came in the small boxes, reminds me of what 7.62x39 shipped in. I like it, less trash to deal with.

Shot some through my 43X today. Really like how well this ammunition shoots out of everything I've tried it in so far (Glock 17, 19, and 43x). I'm going to keep stocking up on it. It is hot, but we're still
2/9/2026 11:40:21 PM EDT
[#27]
Yes, it came in the traditional 50 rd flat brown boxes!  I recently picked up a SIG M17 and ran a mag of my "Service Grade" round nose ammo thru it, had 4 malfunctions where the pistol short stroked. I fired another mag with some Monarch 9mm Nato. Functioned just fine and I could feel the difference in power too.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In