Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/8/2026 11:45:22 AM EDT
I'm looking for a decent quality mount, but there seems to be a wide variety of hole patterns for different SKUs on these guns. I'd rather install a dedicated mount to keep the sight low, rather than use the picatinny rail which I've removed.

While we're at it, is there any mount out there to install a light under the barrel? Thanks!

" />
" />
" />
2/8/2026 1:43:56 PM EDT
[#1]
I’m using the factory rail for my 507, but these guys are liked.

https://lobos-industries.com/products/ruger-mark-series-low-profile-mount
If life was easy nobody would quit.
2/8/2026 6:44:19 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Originally Posted By DVCER:
I'm using the factory rail for my 507, but these guys are liked.

https://lobos-industries.com/products/ruger-mark-series-low-profile-mount
View Quote

^^This^^
USMC 85-93
2/8/2026 10:28:47 PM EDT
[#3]
First off, to the best of my knowledge, there is no "wide variety of hole patterns for different SKUs on these guns". All MKIV's have the same hole locations and use the same mounts. The only exception to that (that I know of) is the Silencer Shop model and even with that one, only if you get the one that comes with a pic rail. Apparently SS released another version that comes with direct mount rail for shield optic footprint (RMSc?) and that one uses the same hole spacing as any other MKIV

Lobos gets a lot of love but personally I like the MaddMacs mounts a little better and like that they have options to mount further back using the factory dovetail or further out over the ejection port if you prefer Maddmacs Holosun mounts

There are other options as well from places like EGW, FarrowTech, C&H Precision, Rucker Machine and probably more. Comes down to where you want to mount the optic, which one looks better to you and how much you want to spend?
On going to war over religion: "You're basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend." - Richard Jeni
2/12/2026 9:13:02 PM EDT
[#4]
I have the Lobos mount and would say it is a good choice.
2/12/2026 10:05:02 PM EDT
[#5]
I also have the Lobos mount it has a small footprint and looks good.
2/12/2026 10:08:02 PM EDT
[#6]
Thanks for the Lobos recommendations, guys. They're out of stock at the moment, so I went ahead and ordered an Armadyne mount. If it's not satisfactory to me, I'll order a Lobos.

https://armadynemfg.com/shop/optic-plate/ruger-mark-iv-skeletonized-holosun-407k-507k-adapter-plate/
2/13/2026 10:35:07 AM EDT
[#7]
I used 2 different Lobos mount. First one was for the RMR. Mounted the Holosun 407C to it and loved it. Then OCD kicked in and felt like the deck hight on the 407C made it sit high. Got another Lobos mount for the 507k footprint.  Then bought an OSight SE enclosed optic. It’s perfect with this optic now. Sits lower.
2/13/2026 11:06:02 AM EDT
[#8]
I put a pic rail on mine.  Don't have to worry about a specific footprint now.
2/13/2026 11:53:11 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Originally Posted By airgunner:
First off, to the best of my knowledge, there is no "wide variety of hole patterns for different SKUs on these guns". All MKIV's have the same hole locations and use the same mounts. The only exception to that (that I know of) is the Silencer Shop model and even with that one, only if you get the one that comes with a pic rail. Apparently SS released another version that comes with direct mount rail for shield optic footprint (RMSc?) and that one uses the same hole spacing as any other MKIV

Lobos gets a lot of love but personally I like the MaddMacs mounts a little better and like that they have options to mount further back using the factory dovetail or further out over the ejection port if you prefer Maddmacs Holosun mounts

There are other options as well from places like EGW, FarrowTech, C&H Precision, Rucker Machine and probably more. Comes down to where you want to mount the optic, which one looks better to you and how much you want to spend?
View Quote

Well dang, this site just cost me more money.

Thanks for the link!
2/13/2026 12:01:49 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Vague:

Well dang, this site just cost me more money.

Thanks for the link!
View Quote


MaddMacs gets my vote. He makes them for the Silencer Shop Host too. It is just hard to find on his site.
2/14/2026 8:07:31 PM EDT
[#11]
My ArmaDyne arrived today. It seems pretty decent. I didn't consider that the skeletonized nature leaves the battery of my Romeo Zero exposed. Obviously a Holosun has that sealed tray, not a bottom mounted battery. Should I put a sealing plate under there? Another damn thing to buy.

" />
" />
2/20/2026 1:12:25 AM EDT
[Last Edit: NorthPolar][Edited] [#13]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ELittlefield:
Thanks for the Lobos recommendations, guys. They're out of stock at the moment, so I went ahead and ordered an Armadyne mount. If it's not satisfactory to me, I'll order a Lobos.

https://armadynemfg.com/shop/optic-plate/ruger-mark-iv-skeletonized-holosun-407k-507k-adapter-plate/
View Quote


Be VERY careful on torque for the Armadyne mounts, as they don't have a helicoil insert.  I had him custom make a few for a holosun SCS (I wanted it as low to bore as possible) and accidentally stripped the threads on one of them.  7 inch pounds dry or 5 wet for max torque, per their email to me.  (I just checked)

Edit: apparently they are a regular run item now.  Neat
2/20/2026 7:08:16 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Originally Posted By NorthPolar:


Be VERY careful on torque for the Armadyne mounts, as they don't have a helicoil insert.  I had him custom make a few for a holosun SCS (I wanted it as low to bore as possible) and accidentally stripped the threads on one of them.  7 inch pounds dry or 5 wet for max torque, per their email to me.  (I just checked)

Edit: apparently they are a regular run item now.  Neat
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By NorthPolar:
Originally Posted By ELittlefield:
Thanks for the Lobos recommendations, guys. They're out of stock at the moment, so I went ahead and ordered an Armadyne mount. If it's not satisfactory to me, I'll order a Lobos.

https://armadynemfg.com/shop/optic-plate/ruger-mark-iv-skeletonized-holosun-407k-507k-adapter-plate/


Be VERY careful on torque for the Armadyne mounts, as they don't have a helicoil insert.  I had him custom make a few for a holosun SCS (I wanted it as low to bore as possible) and accidentally stripped the threads on one of them.  7 inch pounds dry or 5 wet for max torque, per their email to me.  (I just checked)

Edit: apparently they are a regular run item now.  Neat

Thank you.
6/15/2026 7:25:12 PM EDT
[#15]
I decided to go swap it for the Farrowtech. I think it's a more solid mount, positioned further back. I'm delighted so far.

The Romeo Zero has its own built in back up sight, which is a decent trade off for removing the factory rear sight.
It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.
6/15/2026 7:30:49 PM EDT
[#16]
It just presents better for me. Not awkward like the previous forward mount.

" />
It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In