Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
8092
EE: 100% (7)
Posted: 2/8/2026 11:45:22 AM EDT
|
I’m using the factory rail for my 507, but these guys are liked. https://lobos-industries.com/products/ruger-mark-series-low-profile-mount |
If life was easy nobody would quit.
|
Originally Posted By DVCER: I'm using the factory rail for my 507, but these guys are liked. https://lobos-industries.com/products/ruger-mark-series-low-profile-mount ^^This^^ |
USMC 85-93
|
First off, to the best of my knowledge, there is no "wide variety of hole patterns for different SKUs on these guns". All MKIV's have the same hole locations and use the same mounts. The only exception to that (that I know of) is the Silencer Shop model and even with that one, only if you get the one that comes with a pic rail. Apparently SS released another version that comes with direct mount rail for shield optic footprint (RMSc?) and that one uses the same hole spacing as any other MKIV Lobos gets a lot of love but personally I like the MaddMacs mounts a little better and like that they have options to mount further back using the factory dovetail or further out over the ejection port if you prefer Maddmacs Holosun mounts There are other options as well from places like EGW, FarrowTech, C&H Precision, Rucker Machine and probably more. Comes down to where you want to mount the optic, which one looks better to you and how much you want to spend? |
On going to war over religion: "You're basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend." - Richard Jeni
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
8190
EE: 100% (7)
|
Thanks for the Lobos recommendations, guys. They're out of stock at the moment, so I went ahead and ordered an Armadyne mount. If it's not satisfactory to me, I'll order a Lobos. https://armadynemfg.com/shop/optic-plate/ruger-mark-iv-skeletonized-holosun-407k-507k-adapter-plate/ |
| I used 2 different Lobos mount. First one was for the RMR. Mounted the Holosun 407C to it and loved it. Then OCD kicked in and felt like the deck hight on the 407C made it sit high. Got another Lobos mount for the 507k footprint. Then bought an OSight SE enclosed optic. It’s perfect with this optic now. Sits lower. |
|
Originally Posted By airgunner: First off, to the best of my knowledge, there is no "wide variety of hole patterns for different SKUs on these guns". All MKIV's have the same hole locations and use the same mounts. The only exception to that (that I know of) is the Silencer Shop model and even with that one, only if you get the one that comes with a pic rail. Apparently SS released another version that comes with direct mount rail for shield optic footprint (RMSc?) and that one uses the same hole spacing as any other MKIV Lobos gets a lot of love but personally I like the MaddMacs mounts a little better and like that they have options to mount further back using the factory dovetail or further out over the ejection port if you prefer Maddmacs Holosun mounts There are other options as well from places like EGW, FarrowTech, C&H Precision, Rucker Machine and probably more. Comes down to where you want to mount the optic, which one looks better to you and how much you want to spend? Well dang, this site just cost me more money. Thanks for the link! |
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
8246
EE: 100% (7)
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
8258
EE: 100% (7)
|
Originally Posted By ELittlefield: Thanks for the Lobos recommendations, guys. They're out of stock at the moment, so I went ahead and ordered an Armadyne mount. If it's not satisfactory to me, I'll order a Lobos. https://armadynemfg.com/shop/optic-plate/ruger-mark-iv-skeletonized-holosun-407k-507k-adapter-plate/ Be VERY careful on torque for the Armadyne mounts, as they don't have a helicoil insert. I had him custom make a few for a holosun SCS (I wanted it as low to bore as possible) and accidentally stripped the threads on one of them. 7 inch pounds dry or 5 wet for max torque, per their email to me. (I just checked) Edit: apparently they are a regular run item now. Neat |
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
8421
EE: 100% (7)
|
Originally Posted By NorthPolar: Be VERY careful on torque for the Armadyne mounts, as they don't have a helicoil insert. I had him custom make a few for a holosun SCS (I wanted it as low to bore as possible) and accidentally stripped the threads on one of them. 7 inch pounds dry or 5 wet for max torque, per their email to me. (I just checked) Edit: apparently they are a regular run item now. Neat Originally Posted By NorthPolar: Originally Posted By ELittlefield: Thanks for the Lobos recommendations, guys. They're out of stock at the moment, so I went ahead and ordered an Armadyne mount. If it's not satisfactory to me, I'll order a Lobos. https://armadynemfg.com/shop/optic-plate/ruger-mark-iv-skeletonized-holosun-407k-507k-adapter-plate/ Be VERY careful on torque for the Armadyne mounts, as they don't have a helicoil insert. I had him custom make a few for a holosun SCS (I wanted it as low to bore as possible) and accidentally stripped the threads on one of them. 7 inch pounds dry or 5 wet for max torque, per their email to me. (I just checked) Edit: apparently they are a regular run item now. Neat Thank you. |
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
10520
EE: 100% (7)
|
I decided to go swap it for the Farrowtech. I think it's a more solid mount, positioned further back. I'm delighted so far. The Romeo Zero has its own built in back up sight, which is a decent trade off for removing the factory rear sight. |
It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
10521
EE: 100% (7)





