Posted: 10/28/2025 3:13:27 PM EDT
|
Anyone have one? What do you think about them? Other than being an sig. I like the optic and suppressor ready idea and the 20 round mags. Thoughts? |
" Don't cry, nobody shoots Glocks anymore."
"But the new Admin. is a Master in IDPA"
"MASTER in IDPA..."
"is like C Class in IPSC!"
"But the new Admin. is a Master in IDPA"
"MASTER in IDPA..."
"is like C Class in IPSC!"
|
I like mine. Some magazines work better loading 15 instead of 20, at least in my experience. I shoot it with a Holosun 507 and YHM Phantom. Super fun to shoot. Some had had an issue with light primer strikes. Not sure if this has been fixed with newer models or not. I’ve had mine for a few years now. If you have this issue, follow this fix. I haven’t had a light strike since putting a spacer in. https://youtu.be/4VNqR9ltHnk?si=oft8G85eX-ftUOhE |
Joined:
Apr 2024
Posts:
82
EE: 0% (0)
"Such predicaments! I must forge ahead!"
Joined:
Jul 2023
Posts:
256
EE: 100% (2)
| I bought one a couple months ago and it was an absolute jammatic. It would jam consistently with all 3 mags that it came with until the mags got down to about 10 rounds or so and it would run the rest just fine. I watched all the YouTube videos to make sure I was loading the rounds correctly. I would load one round at a time and only pull the follower down enough for the one round to fit. Rounds would just not feed. They'd run up the feed ramp partially and get jammed into the top of the barrel hood. I called Sig and explained the issue so they issue the repair tag and I sent the gun back. I got it back in less than two weeks and the repair slip said nothing was wrong with the pistol and they couldn't replicate any malfunctions. I tried the gun again and still had the same issues. I had my wife take a video of me shooting the gun and showing the constant malfunctions. I emailed the video clip to the person who emailed me the shipping label. I never got a response back. So that was enough to turn me off from Sig big time. I ended up taking a big hit on selling it, but I wouldn't feel right not letting the new buyer know it was problematic. |
|
I have had one for a few years now. I posted about it here a couple of times when I first got it and was super enthused by it, putting a bunch of different types of ammo through it and testing it. Since then I have shot the snot out of it. It did require some tweaks to get it to 100% initially. I had to shim the hammer spring to get reliable ignition. I had to file the slide stop to get it to engage as it should. You have to load the mags properly as has been state above already. The 25-round magazines never worked reliably for me, but the 20s were fine. Once that was done it ran fine for several thousands of rounds. May very well be in the 10s of thousands. It was not uncommon for me to take it to the range and put 500-750 rounds through it once or twice a month with no problems. This year it started developing feeding problems. I replaced the recoil spring, but it didn't help. I tried the "HV" ammo recoil spring, got worse. Tried the lightened recoil spring from ISMI, even worse. New factory spring back in, slightly better but still not good. The mag springs may be worn out at this point but I haven't found them for sale anywhere. The plastic mags will bow and swell out on the sides over time. The passive safety levers inside the slide's breech block are a highly convoluted and piss-poor design. There is one lever that is pushed aside by the hammer as it strikes the firing pin, which allows the firing pin to move forward. That lever broke quite a while ago. There's a second lever that is pushed up by a plunger that is supposed to block the hammer if the gun is out of battery. It's a practically microscopic design and I can't imagine it would survive many wacks, but fortunately in normal operation it shouldn't have to. Both of these could be replaced by a typical plunger-style FPB activated by the trigger bar like essentially every modern handgun has but for some reason Sig went with the convoluted and extremely delicate mess the P322 has instead. The rear sight is cheesy as hell but I can't say it doesn't work but adjusting it can be finicky. Overall, initially I was really enthused by the 322, but I've since soured on it a bit. It's not a piece of crap, but it's also not a "lifetime" design like a Ruger or Buckmark...something you can have for decades and shoot indefinitely. It WAS a LOT of fun when it worked well, but frankly I think I've just worn it (or at least the mags) out. I could buy more mags and see if it works well again, but I think I'm just going to hold out and try a different double-stack .22LR. |
"The two things men never get to old to play with, electric trains and boobies." - substandard
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain
|
Originally Posted By TheShootingAnvil: I bought one a couple months ago and it was an absolute jammatic. It would jam consistently with all 3 mags that it came with until the mags got down to about 10 rounds or so and it would run the rest just fine. I watched all the YouTube videos to make sure I was loading the rounds correctly. I would load one round at a time and only pull the follower down enough for the one round to fit. Rounds would just not feed. They'd run up the feed ramp partially and get jammed into the top of the barrel hood. I called Sig and explained the issue so they issue the repair tag and I sent the gun back. I got it back in less than two weeks and the repair slip said nothing was wrong with the pistol and they couldn't replicate any malfunctions. I tried the gun again and still had the same issues. I had my wife take a video of me shooting the gun and showing the constant malfunctions. I emailed the video clip to the person who emailed me the shipping label. I never got a response back. So that was enough to turn me off from Sig big time. I ended up taking a big hit on selling it, but I wouldn't feel right not letting the new buyer know it was problematic. I hate it when this happens. I had the same thing happen with a Springfield Loaded 1911. I will say that THAT gun taught me a hell of a lot about 1911s. I am the one that finally got it to work, under the tutelage of a really really good 1911 guy. I have never purchased another Springfield firearm UNLESS it's made in Croatia. I am so sorry you had a such a bad experience with your Sig. |
"Such predicaments! I must forge ahead!"
|
Originally Posted By Chris_1522: I have had one for a few years now. I posted about it here a couple of times when I first got it and was super enthused by it, putting a bunch of different types of ammo through it and testing it. Since then I have shot the snot out of it. It did require some tweaks to get it to 100% initially. I had to shim the hammer spring to get reliable ignition. I had to file the slide stop to get it to engage as it should. You have to load the mags properly as has been state above already. The 25-round magazines never worked reliably for me, but the 20s were fine. Once that was done it ran fine for several thousands of rounds. May very well be in the 10s of thousands. It was not uncommon for me to take it to the range and put 500-750 rounds through it once or twice a month with no problems. This year it started developing feeding problems. I replaced the recoil spring, but it didn't help. I tried the "HV" ammo recoil spring, got worse. Tried the lightened recoil spring from ISMI, even worse. New factory spring back in, slightly better but still not good. The mag springs may be worn out at this point but I haven't found them for sale anywhere. The plastic mags will bow and swell out on the sides over time. The passive safety levers inside the slide's breech block are a highly convoluted and piss-poor design. There is one lever that is pushed aside by the hammer as it strikes the firing pin, which allows the firing pin to move forward. That lever broke quite a while ago. There's a second lever that is pushed up by a plunger that is supposed to block the hammer if the gun is out of battery. It's a practically microscopic design and I can't imagine it would survive many wacks, but fortunately in normal operation it shouldn't have to. Both of these could be replaced by a typical plunger-style FPB activated by the trigger bar like essentially every modern handgun has but for some reason Sig went with the convoluted and extremely delicate mess the P322 has instead. The rear sight is cheesy as hell but I can't say it doesn't work but adjusting it can be finicky. Overall, initially I was really enthused by the 322, but I've since soured on it a bit. It's not a piece of crap, but it's also not a "lifetime" design like a Ruger or Buckmark...something you can have for decades and shoot indefinitely. It WAS a LOT of fun when it worked well, but frankly I think I've just worn it (or at least the mags) out. I could buy more mags and see if it works well again, but I think I'm just going to hold out and try a different double-stack .22LR. I can relate and I am sure we’ve all experienced this on others things. Lots of things are good new and you are so happy and give glowing reviews. Then long term use kicks in, issues comes up, then you find out they didn’t design it to be end user serviceable or simple to service. You can’t find parts. Not to mention Sig always discontinuing products. How many .22 pistols have Sig dropped before not to mention other guns. You are right. This thing is not a lifetime gun like a MK4 or a Buckmark. |
|
I went and looked and handed one. Didn’t really get me excited. Very light though. I honestly like my kimber.22 upper on a 1911 better. |
" Don't cry, nobody shoots Glocks anymore."
"But the new Admin. is a Master in IDPA"
"MASTER in IDPA..."
"is like C Class in IPSC!"
"But the new Admin. is a Master in IDPA"
"MASTER in IDPA..."
"is like C Class in IPSC!"
|
Was excited to buy one as research revealed nothing but positive reviews. Bought one and ran into issues. Posted and received a lot of feedback on how you have to be very very very careful when loading the mags. Quick summary. Shoots great. Accurate. Fun to shoot. If I known about how you have to be meticulous in loading the mags, I would have not purchased it. |
This upgraded web site sucks!!!
|
Originally Posted By JThompson: Was excited to buy one as research revealed nothing but positive reviews. Bought one and ran into issues. Posted and received a lot of feedback on how you have to be very very very careful when loading the mags. Quick summary. Shoots great. Accurate. Fun to shoot. If I known about how you have to be meticulous in loading the mags, I would have not purchased it. Just to add..... Took it out to the range this weekend. Loaded about 10 mags and only 1 malfunction. Not sure if general issue or related to the mag. Getting better at loading as was able to get a little faster than previous range trips and no issues. Long story shot. It does take some practice loading the mags and am getting quicker. It is fun and accurate. Have yet to run it with a suppressor yet. |
This upgraded web site sucks!!!
|
I've got one. It's been solid and I've had no real issues. In fact, I had it out the other day with a couple of 1911s I was messing with. I polished off a tub of Federal bulk ammo I had. Probably a couple of hundred rounds with no malfunctions. It's one of those guns I don't take out very often, but when I do I remember how much fun it is. |
Nobody is coming. It's up to you.
|
Originally Posted By JThompson: Just to add..... Took it out to the range this weekend. Loaded about 10 mags and only 1 malfunction. Not sure if general issue or related to the mag. Getting better at loading as was able to get a little faster than previous range trips and no issues. Long story shot. It does take some practice loading the mags and am getting quicker. It is fun and accurate. Have yet to run it with a suppressor yet. Hit the range again this weekend. Loading of the mags is getting easier each time. Only 1 feed issue, but not due to loading the mag but instead a random feed issue. Liking this pistol a little more with each trip to the range. |
This upgraded web site sucks!!!
|
I’ve had one for a few years. I like the feature set (easy to suppress, optic ready, higher mag capacity) but I don’t really like the trigger and I’ve had reliability issues. Even loading mags carefully its got a bad habit of jamming. I’ve had fun with it, but it’s a gun I’d sell. |
Joined:
Jul 2023
Posts:
247
EE: 0% (0)
Joined:
Jul 2023
Posts:
248
EE: 0% (0)
|
Originally Posted By bballman25: I like mine. Some magazines work better loading 15 instead of 20, at least in my experience. I shoot it with a Holosun 507 and YHM Phantom. Super fun to shoot. Some had had an issue with light primer strikes. Not sure if this has been fixed with newer models or not. I’ve had mine for a few years now. If you have this issue, follow this fix. I haven’t had a light strike since putting a spacer in. https://youtu.be/4VNqR9ltHnk?si=oft8G85eX-ftUOhE I forgot to mention I tried this 2 mm hammer spring spacer fix in mine in the youtube video above and was still getting failure to eject & failure to fire problems when shooting suppressed with CCI Standard Velocity, so I tried a 1 mm flat washer spacer instead of a 2 mm one and now it's reliable. Also the Armory Craft adjustable trigger really helps vs the cheap spoungy feeling stock trigger, highly recommend it. |
|
I have about 2k rounds through my p322. Its accurate and reliable. I kept the 322 and sold my taurus tx22. If however I was buying today, id buy the Taurus over the Sig. The Sig is a better gun, but not twice the price better. |
Trusting your life to the benevolence of an armed criminal is not a strategy, it is stupid!
|
Originally Posted By shotar: I have about 2k rounds through my p322. Its accurate and reliable. I kept the 322 and sold my taurus tx22. If however I was buying today, id buy the Taurus over the Sig. The Sig is a better gun, but not twice the price better. 3rd week in a row at the range and each week I post a reply here.😁 Will say it is well balanced and one of my more accurate .22s The week was the first time using a suppressor. Still accurate but a bit more Smokey that other pistols. Could be the other .22s are on 10 rounds and the 322 is going through 20-25 rounds. |
This upgraded web site sucks!!!
| I have about 400 rds thr mine, not really enough to judge anything at this moment, but so far no jams. Was shooting CCI Blazers, Aguila Super Extra, and Federal Auto match. It ate everything. The gun is suprisringly very accurate. |
|
Originally Posted By BoomBoom: Not to mention Sig always discontinuing products. How many .22 pistols have Sig dropped before not to mention other guns. You are right. This thing is not a lifetime gun like a MK4 or a Buckmark. Sig also leaves customers of discontinued products SOL. Sig is a goat rodeo now |
__________________
"KAC drip feeds their stockholm-syndrome-customer-base with bland and old products to keep them going with the Rolex company model of business to keep everything scarce and high priced" the_answer_is_42
"KAC drip feeds their stockholm-syndrome-customer-base with bland and old products to keep them going with the Rolex company model of business to keep everything scarce and high priced" the_answer_is_42
|
Originally Posted By Blacktoothgrin: Sig also leaves customers of discontinued products SOL. Sig is a goat rodeo now I’ll admit, I must be the biggest idiot. I own a Sig 522 rifle and love it. It’s accurate and not picky on ammo. Sig discontinued it. If I break something like a firing pin the rifle done. Already knowing that I somehow convinced myself into buying a Sig 322. |
|
Originally Posted By BoomBoom: I’ll admit, I must be the biggest idiot. I own a Sig 522 rifle and love it. It’s accurate and not picky on ammo. Sig discontinued it. If I break something like a firing pin the rifle done. Already knowing that I somehow convinced myself into buying a Sig 322. Hey, it happens Ruger needs to get their 20rd MKIV to market. |
__________________
"KAC drip feeds their stockholm-syndrome-customer-base with bland and old products to keep them going with the Rolex company model of business to keep everything scarce and high priced" the_answer_is_42
"KAC drip feeds their stockholm-syndrome-customer-base with bland and old products to keep them going with the Rolex company model of business to keep everything scarce and high priced" the_answer_is_42
|
Originally Posted By Blacktoothgrin: Hey, it happens Ruger needs to get their 20rd MKIV to market. That could be happening sooner rather than later... https://www.ar15.com/forums/handguns/The-Ruger-MkIV-Needs-a-Capacity-Upgrade-12-2025-PATENT-APPROVED-IT-S-HAPPENING/50-214377/ |
|
Originally Posted By Plumber576: That could be happening sooner rather than later... https://www.ar15.com/forums/handguns/The-Ruger-MkIV-Needs-a-Capacity-Upgrade-12-2025-PATENT-APPROVED-IT-S-HAPPENING/50-214377/ I have a MKV and like it fine with its 10 rds capacity. Now that I have the Sig 322 and seeing how a double stack .22 mag works, I can see why it’s an issue if its not loaded carefully. You just can’t pull the loading tab all the way down and quickly drop rounds in like you can with the MKV mags. Besides, the MKV is a target gun. If one wants a higher capacity .22 there are plenty of options. Just understand that those double stack .22 likely all have there own quirks with loading. I for one think the MKV is fine the way it is. If Ruger wants to do a double stack MKV it should be done right with a new ground up design and not trying to shoe horn a double stack grip into the current MKV upper. I understand a lot of people want it that way so they can just slap in a double stack lower, but I don’t think that’s going to work out to well. |




