Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/6/2026 3:46:59 PM EDT
Honest to God, hand on the bible...It doesn't make sense to me either. But brand new you can buy this for $325 right now and with a trigger and a 24 cent #2 split ring this handgun's trigger feels like a nice 2011. Trigger pull was 4lbs 9oz before the #2 split ring and after it I am averaging 3lbs 5oz and a very crisp break and Glock like trigger reset.

Unreal

6/6/2026 3:52:07 PM EDT
[#1]
Apex FSS in M&Ps and the Canik Rival triggers are about as good as it gets (for ME, YMMV) before 1911/2011 triggers...
6/6/2026 5:03:26 PM EDT
[#2]
It's not straight back. That's the best feature of a 1911/2011 trigger.

6/6/2026 5:36:13 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Originally Posted By dmk0210:
It's not straight back. That's the best feature of a 1911/2011 trigger.

View Quote


There is next to no take up and you cannot perceive the difference with the break being so short.
6/6/2026 10:50:35 PM EDT
[#4]
ok

6/6/2026 11:06:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DVCER][Edited] [#5]
A #2 split ring, somewhere in there.  Not for me thanks.
Have you actually shot a tuned 1911 trigger?
If life was easy nobody would quit.
6/6/2026 11:32:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: NN300BLK][Edited] [#6]
While I prefer a duty weight trigger in any handgun that is not a pure target gun (including 1911's/2011's-- 4.5-5.5 lb), I have shot a few well-tuned 1911's and that trigger pull is really hard to beat for a target gun (Buckmark gives them a good run for the money). I guess I'll have to try a tuned Canik.
6/7/2026 8:12:49 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Originally Posted By DVCER:

Have you actually shot a tuned 1911 trigger?
View Quote


Sure have

Tuned 1911s, STI 2011s, Staccatos, etc.
6/7/2026 8:47:17 AM EDT
[Last Edit: -OdieGreen-][Edited] [#8]
The Canik is good for a striker trigger, but no. Absolutely nothing beats a good 1911 trigger.
6/7/2026 2:28:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: leelaw][Edited] [#9]


I have some doubts.
6/8/2026 1:41:49 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By -OdieGreen-:
The Canik is good for a striker trigger, but no. Absolutely nothing beats a good 1911 trigger.
View Quote


A good Sig P210 trigger.

Hinged, has a little creep, but it's fantastic.
6/8/2026 3:43:25 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Originally Posted By leelaw:


A good Sig P210 trigger.

Hinged, has a little creep, but it's fantastic.
View Quote

Can someone explain why straight pull is so widely considered better than a pivoted trigger? I mean I've never heard someone complain about a Colt SAA trigger compared to a 1911. Even with some semiautomatic SAOs with pivoted triggers, the difference in performance can be negligible.
6/8/2026 9:57:00 AM EDT
[Last Edit: dmk0210][Edited] [#12]
Quote History
Originally Posted By NN300BLK:Can someone explain why straight pull is so widely considered better than a pivoted trigger? I mean I've never heard someone complain about a Colt SAA trigger compared to a 1911. Even with some semiautomatic SAOs with pivoted triggers, the difference in performance can be negligible.
View Quote
There is nothing wrong with a pivoting trigger. SA revolvers can have wonderful triggers that are the chef's kiss.

But a pivoting trigger is moving in two directions, horizontally and vertically, since it is moving in an arc.

Straight back is only moving horizontally straight back.

You can have a heavy, gritty 1911 trigger like anything else. Design is just one factor in the equation. But with polished components, proper weight springs and crisp break, a good 1911 trigger is special to most people who have tried one.

Part of the charm may be because it is unique. Not many handguns have a straight pull trigger.

Trigger feel is very personal and subjective. Part of it may be how it makes you feel, and with that miniscule differences matter. But even if you are being subjective and comparing performance in speed and accuracy, we all have different hands. What is best for one person may be different for someone else. Performance wise, it's also difficult to separate the trigger from gun it's in, bore axis, recoil system, and how the grip design works for you (or doesn't).


6/8/2026 4:56:47 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote History
Originally Posted By NN300BLK:

Can someone explain why straight pull is so widely considered better than a pivoted trigger? I mean I've never heard someone complain about a Colt SAA trigger compared to a 1911. Even with some semiautomatic SAOs with pivoted triggers, the difference in performance can be negligible.
View Quote


I don't think one is inherently better than the other, but they have a distinctly different feel, even when comparing excellent versions of each type.
6/8/2026 5:51:43 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RogueSpear2023][Edited] [#14]
My Timney trigger with the Johnny Glock shoe is just under 3lbs with almost zero travel. It feels similiar to my 1911 trigger. That's also because the striker is precocked and the trigger bar is just falling straight out of it's way.
6/8/2026 6:45:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: -OdieGreen-][Edited] [#15]
Quote History
Originally Posted By NN300BLK:

Can someone explain why straight pull is so widely considered better than a pivoted trigger? I mean I've never heard someone complain about a Colt SAA trigger compared to a 1911. Even with some semiautomatic SAOs with pivoted triggers, the difference in performance can be negligible.
View Quote

It’s the physics. With a pivoting trigger one of two things is going to happen. Your trigger finger is going to have to slide on the trigger, or you’re not actually pulling straight back.

While the amount is minimal and may not even be noticeable to most, it scales the heavier a trigger gets and is often going to cause real world hit factor loss at speed. So in a 3 pound trigger it may not be as noticeable, but a 5 pound trigger you might be seeing some loss of consistency.

A lot of people pick up a gun and do a slow trigger pull and judge every sliver of an inch. The reality is when you’re trying to shoot as quick and accurate as possible, that’s when shooter error is actually coming into play and you’re seeing an entirely different approach from slow fire. A straight pull trigger is easier to be consistent with less thought process or fine motor skill, but that can be trained around.

And just a side note, this is why I think Glock made their Gen 6 trigger the way they did. After having used a trigger with a shoe, I think every trigger having a clear indexing point is beneficial to all skill levels. One less thing to worry/think about doesn’t hurt.
6/8/2026 9:07:39 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Originally Posted By dmk0210:
There is nothing wrong with a pivoting trigger. SA revolvers can have wonderful triggers that are the chef's kiss.

But a pivoting trigger is moving in two directions, horizontally and vertically, since it is moving in an arc.

Straight back is only moving horizontally straight back.

You can have a heavy, gritty 1911 trigger like anything else. Design is just one factor in the equation. But with polished components, proper weight springs and crisp break, a good 1911 trigger is special to most people who have tried one.

Part of the charm may be because it is unique. Not many handguns have a straight pull trigger.

Trigger feel is very personal and subjective. Part of it may be how it makes you feel, and with that miniscule differences matter. But even if you are being subjective and comparing performance in speed and accuracy, we all have different hands. What is best for one person may be different for someone else. Performance wise, it's also difficult to separate the trigger from gun it's in, bore axis, recoil system, and how the grip design works for you (or doesn't).


View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By dmk0210:
There is nothing wrong with a pivoting trigger. SA revolvers can have wonderful triggers that are the chef's kiss.

But a pivoting trigger is moving in two directions, horizontally and vertically, since it is moving in an arc.

Straight back is only moving horizontally straight back.

You can have a heavy, gritty 1911 trigger like anything else. Design is just one factor in the equation. But with polished components, proper weight springs and crisp break, a good 1911 trigger is special to most people who have tried one.

Part of the charm may be because it is unique. Not many handguns have a straight pull trigger.

Trigger feel is very personal and subjective. Part of it may be how it makes you feel, and with that miniscule differences matter. But even if you are being subjective and comparing performance in speed and accuracy, we all have different hands. What is best for one person may be different for someone else. Performance wise, it's also difficult to separate the trigger from gun it's in, bore axis, recoil system, and how the grip design works for you (or doesn't).




Originally Posted By -OdieGreen-:

It’s the physics. With a pivoting trigger one of two things is going to happen. Your trigger finger is going to have to slide on the trigger, or you’re not actually pulling straight back.

While the amount is minimal and may not even be noticeable to most, it scales the heavier a trigger gets and is often going to cause real world hit factor loss at speed. So in a 3 pound trigger it may not be as noticeable, but a 5 pound trigger you might be seeing some loss of consistency.

A lot of people pick up a gun and do a slow trigger pull and judge every sliver of an inch. The reality is when you’re trying to shoot as quick and accurate as possible, that’s when shooter error is actually coming into play and you’re seeing an entirely different approach from slow fire. A straight pull trigger is easier to be consistent with less thought process or fine motor skill, but that can be trained around.

And just a side note, this is why I think Glock made their Gen 6 trigger the way they did. After having used a trigger with a shoe, I think every trigger having a clear indexing point is beneficial to all skill levels. One less thing to worry/think about doesn’t hurt.


I get what both of you're saying from a theoretical standpoint in terms of the trigger moving in two axes and I get the idea that a straight pull cares less about trigger finger position, but I rarely see it in practice for me. I will admit that my example Colt SAA generally has a very light and crisp trigger without take up, which obviously minimizes and issues that occurs from said movement; and this often true of many SAO guns except having minimal take up. I also have a lot of controlled pairs under my belt, so perhaps I have somewhat trained around it.

I agree with you -OdieGreen- that the indexing is very important/helpful which I appreciate on my Echelon and Hellcat since my finger finds "home" every time.

I also agree with you dmk0210 that the internal polish and quality of the trigger components play a large role in trigger pull quality as well. With certain firearms, you get this from the factory and other firearms see a big improvement after the break in period because we're doing "deburring through wear" by putting 50-500 rounds through the gun.
6/9/2026 11:15:07 AM EDT
[Last Edit: dmk0210][Edited] [#17]
Quote History
Originally Posted By NN300BLK:I get what both of you're saying from a theoretical standpoint in terms of the trigger moving in two axes and I get the idea that a straight pull cares less about trigger finger position, but I rarely see it in practice for me. I will admit that my example Colt SAA generally has a very light and crisp trigger without take up, which obviously minimizes and issues that occurs from said movement; and this often true of many SAO guns except having minimal take up... I also agree with you dmk0210 that the internal polish and quality of the trigger components play a large role in trigger pull quality as well. ...
View Quote
When you have a nicely tuned trigger, smooth, crisp, with short over travel, reset and takeup, you care less about any deficiencies in design.

It's kind of like when a girl is smoking hot and good in bed, you care less about her being narcissistic and neurotic.
6/9/2026 11:39:14 AM EDT
[#18]
Also, straight pull trigger makes it trivial to make different length shoes to fit the shooter's hand. Swappable backstraps aren't the same because they affect the grip as well.
6/9/2026 6:16:09 PM EDT
[Last Edit: NN300BLK][Edited] [#19]
Quote History
Originally Posted By dmk0210:
When you have a nicely tuned trigger, smooth, crisp, with short over travel, reset and takeup, you care less about any deficiencies in design.

It's kind of like when a girl is smoking hot and good in bed, you care less about her being narcissistic and neurotic.
View Quote

It's true. On the first point... on a 1911, I can't reach the mag catch without breaking my grip and they are heavy! But man are they fun to shoot. With the XDM Elite, the grip was always too blocky for me, but I could really shoot that gun well. The only reason I sold it was because the Echelon was just that much better.

On the second point, no comment except... what was I thinkin'.
6/10/2026 12:23:35 PM EDT
[#20]
I’m going to have to ask, where does the split ring go?
If life was easy nobody would quit.
6/12/2026 12:14:55 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Originally Posted By DVCER:
I’m going to have to ask, where does the split ring go?
View Quote


Trigger bar to trigger return spring. But I have since removed it as the trigger pull got too light for my taste. Put everything back to stock and changed out the factory striker spring for a Glock 6lb heavy duty spring and now the trigger is about perfect.
6/28/2026 4:03:41 PM EDT
[#22]
I've got a G19 with a Glock Performance Trigger kit w/ Johnny Glock Vex Shoe. It's nice but it's still a Glock.  The 1911/2011 triggers are much better.
“‘It ain’t dying I’m talking about, it’s living,’ Augustus McCrae

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In