UPDATE - Mistrial declared! Lindsay Clancy Killed her Kids - I’m having second thoughts. (Page 12 of 37)
|
So the fact that she admitted to killer her kids. And her defense admits she killed her kids. Yet some people want to blame the husband? Did they check their charts like the women stating someone with her sign could never do that? |
Fighting for underscores everywhere.
Member
Joined:
Apr 2023
Posts:
3943
EE: 0% (0)
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By JestersHK: I'm approaching this as I am fully aware I do not 100% know all the facts of this case. I'd like to know a few things and would like to understand or see proof of the following. When officers arrived on scene was the father ever questioned on why they found 2 dead children and a 3rd almost dead along with a woman who appeared to have jumped, fallen, or thrown from a window? If so was there ever body cam footage of these interactions? If I was an officer responding I'd definitely want to approach things as if this could be anything from a domestic assault to a home invasion, to her murdering her kids. Did they question any of the above scenarios or jump right to man this mom must of killed the kids and jumped out the window. Was there not an autopsy of the children? Even 5 year old can cause defensive wounds to an assailant. What evidence existed that they deemed it wasn't necessary to determine exact cause and time of death for a crime that potentially had no witnesses or a witness who was crazy enough to attempt to take her own life and jump out a window. Was the husband ever suspected at all in the beginning when the murders first happened and if so was the jury shown evidence of this questioning? Was the husband's alibi, and phone and computer forensic ever shown to the jury? These are all allegations on why the conspiracy theories are running rampant on social media. Me personally I believe she killed her kids while suffering from PPD which I've experienced 1st hand as my wife suffered through it with our middle child. It's not a made up condition and if anything the amount of drugs and different types she was prescribed is pretty crazy and deserves it's own scrutiny of how she was treated. My wife who is farther right and conservative than even I am and also a nurse has gone all in on this trial and she and I have had rational conversations on what we believe or don't believe, but she definitely feels there are allot of unanswered questions in this case and how it was handled and that there are some pretty glaring signs that we're not getting the full story with the husband. There are 3 instances in particular where the husband's testimony contradicts itself. There are questions like those listed above if the answers were there it would shut down all the dumb social media tiktok shit. The father testified she told him she was having thoughts about killing the children, why did he not take that seriously given all the signs and medication she was on? Removing those kids from someone who says they are going to harm them seems logical no? At the end of the day those kids are all dead and likely experienced an unimaginable terrible death. Were there guard rails or guidance in place to help prevent this? Apparently not enough. You’re letting how your wife feels influence your thinking. The husband has been gone over endlessly. He’s on video elsewhere at the time because she sent him away on errands as part of her premeditated plan to murder her kids. She also shopped around doctors to help build her case for an insanity plea to spread blame, garner sympathy, and excuse her crime. It appears to be working on the gullible. She killed them because she hated them. It’s that simple. |
Joined:
Jul 2026
Posts:
284
EE: 0% (0)
TN, USA
|
Originally Posted By xd341: its scary as fuck actually. let's summarize the situation. woman with mental health issues kills her 3 children after sending her husband on an errand, then tries to kill herself. Gets arrested, case gets investigated, charges filed, I assume a grand jury indicted her, her legal team doesn't deny she did it, she doesn't deny she did it, there is no credible evidence anyone else did it, yet primarily women that are social media users, primarily tik tok have constructed an entire narrative making her the victim and the husband the killer. We're not disagreeing with evidence presented by one side or the other. Its not a "the glove don't fit" situation. Thats just normal criminal jury trial stuff. Nobody is presenting the husband as the killer in court as a way to create reasonable doubt, there is no reasonable doubt as to who the killer is. This is an entire narrative that no one involved in the case is presenting. This is a social media invention. Not an element of a structured legal argument. The legal argument is over how long she goes away for, and in what type of institution. Guilt is not the legal question in the actual real world. Yet, women have been mentally captured by what I can only safely assume is an intentional influence operation, a psyop. if that is the case, a social media campaign is manipulating the bedrock structure of our legal system, which is a foundational element of a stable, safe(ish) and productive society. Gee I wonder who would want to see the American society crumble? This is a sociological five alarm fire. A house divided against itself, cannot stand. Well stated, by someone who get's it. - Excellent Post - |
|
Originally Posted By Mars87: Originally Posted By Porcupine55: What if we just make it legal for parents to kill their own kids up until 18 years old? I think the crime statistics for theft, vandalism, etc.. would greatly improve at least... https://media3.giphy.com/media/s7WpBgkLd9FNPEi72c/200.webp?cid=8dc8958cbrf5ns5qgk3y9bc1w81qy2s3gol4vlat1frn8da5&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200.webp&ct=g Right? I mean, I'm only about 20% serious. But I am about 20% serious... As someone with no kids, I like the idea of empowering people with the nuclear option if it comes to it... |
Joined:
Jul 2026
Posts:
285
EE: 0% (0)
TN, USA
|
Originally Posted By Kharn: The husband and his new wife were caught by paparazzi in NYC yesterday and the pictures are on Fox News, etc. She's heavily pregnant, which is going to launch TikTok conspiracy morons to the moon. Good for him!! This guy by all accounts, did nothing wrong. In fact, he appeares to have done everything he could to support and help Lindsay. He is entitled to try and move on and try to have a Life, despite the shambles and long term consequences she left him with. Do you even remotely think this is easy for him, or that he wanted this?He is the aggrieved party here, who's life was left in shambles and now must try to pick up the pieces. Anyone that argues otherwise, is batshit crazy. |
|
Originally Posted By VeryAverage: You’re letting how your wife feels influence your thinking. The husband has been gone over endlessly. He’s on video elsewhere at the time because she sent him away on errands as part of her premeditated plan to murder her kids. She also shopped around doctors to help build her case for an insanity plea to spread blame, garner sympathy, and excuse her crime. It appears to be working on the gullible. She killed them because she hated them. It’s that simple. I can promise you there is no influence of feels.  Like I said I have only been on the side lines here partially engaged in the trial and was just looking to have the questions above answered. I'm not a Lindsey sympathizer by any means. I stated I fully believe she killed her kids, there are just questions I did not know the answer to as I like to question things which apparently is a thought crime. |
|
Originally Posted By xd341: its scary as fuck actually. let's summarize the situation. woman with mental health issues kills her 3 children after sending her husband on an errand, then tries to kill herself. Gets arrested, case gets investigated, charges filed, I assume a grand jury indicted her, her legal team doesn't deny she did it, she doesn't deny she did it, there is no credible evidence anyone else did it, yet primarily women that are social media users, primarily tik tok have constructed an entire narrative making her the victim and the husband the killer. We're not disagreeing with evidence presented by one side or the other. Its not a "the glove don't fit" situation. Thats just normal criminal jury trial stuff. Nobody is presenting the husband as the killer in court as a way to create reasonable doubt, there is no reasonable doubt as to who the killer is. This is an entire narrative that no one involved in the case is presenting. This is a social media invention. Not an element of a structured legal argument. The legal argument is over how long she goes away for, and in what type of institution. Guilt is not the legal question in the actual real world. Yet, women have been mentally captured by what I can only safely assume is an intentional influence operation, a psyop. if that is the case, a social media campaign is manipulating the bedrock structure of our legal system, which is a foundational element of a stable, safe(ish) and productive society. Gee I wonder who would want to see the American society crumble? This is a sociological five alarm fire. A house divided against itself, cannot stand. |
|
Originally Posted By JestersHK: I can promise you there is no influence of feels. Like I said I have only been on the side lines here partially engaged in the trial and was just looking to have the questions above answered. I'm not a Lindsey sympathizer by any means. I stated I fully believe she killed her kids, there are just questions I did not know the answer to as I like to question things which apparently is a thought crime. Originally Posted By JestersHK: Originally Posted By VeryAverage: You’re letting how your wife feels influence your thinking. The husband has been gone over endlessly. He’s on video elsewhere at the time because she sent him away on errands as part of her premeditated plan to murder her kids. She also shopped around doctors to help build her case for an insanity plea to spread blame, garner sympathy, and excuse her crime. It appears to be working on the gullible. She killed them because she hated them. It’s that simple. I can promise you there is no influence of feels. Like I said I have only been on the side lines here partially engaged in the trial and was just looking to have the questions above answered. I'm not a Lindsey sympathizer by any means. I stated I fully believe she killed her kids, there are just questions I did not know the answer to as I like to question things which apparently is a thought crime. If it helps you understand a little better. Two important bits of the case that don't get talked about enough. First she had to strangle them one by one and brought them to the basement to do so. Her apple watch was able to document her vigorous activity. During the process her husband called to ask a question about things he was picking up. Which she answered or called back to answer while killing them. The children were also not all located in the same place. One of them attempted to run away and escape but was unsuccessful. Two, the 911 call was not released to public because of upsetting and haunting it was. As he initially called because he found his wife injured on the front lawn. But during the call he finds his children murdered. |
|
Originally Posted By Bacon_Grease: If it helps you understand a little better. Two important bits of the case that don't get talked about enough. First she had to strangle them one by one and brought them to the basement to do so. Her apple watch was able to document her vigorous activity. During the process her husband called to ask a question about things he was picking up. Which she answered or called back to answer while killing them. The children were also not all located in the same place. One of them attempted to run away and escape but was unsuccessful. Two, the 911 call was not released to public because of upsetting and haunting it was. As he initially called because he found his wife injured on the front lawn. But during the call he finds his children murdered. I was wondering why the 911 call was never released. Who determines that? The judge? |
|
Originally Posted By JestersHK: I can promise you there is no influence of feels. Like I said I have only been on the side lines here partially engaged in the trial and was just looking to have the questions above answered. I'm not a Lindsey sympathizer by any means. I stated I fully believe she killed her kids, there are just questions I did not know the answer to as I like to question things which apparently is a thought crime. Asking questions is one thing. Asking them without realizing she admitted to killing the kids, and he was on video somewhere else when it happened is something else entirely.... |
Now fellate me, as I eat this expensive ham.
Joined:
Aug 2007
Posts:
48604
EE: 100% (161)
USA
|
Fat old white woman (Act Blue member) smugly doxxes jury Quoting Asmongold here, but it would be crazy if she gets more time in prison than Lindsey Clancy. She's facing 20 years  She just doxxed the whole jury.. |
Look, yes, I have banged HUNDREDS of broads. INTERNATIONALLY. But know this - I wrap my rascal, TWO TIMES, cuz I like it to be joyless and without sensation. It's a way of punishing supermodels.
|
Originally Posted By The_Master_Shake: Fat old white woman (Act Blue member) smugly doxxes jury Quoting Asmongold here, but it would be Originally Posted By The_Master_Shake: Fat old white woman (Act Blue member) smugly doxxes jury Quoting Asmongold here, but it would be Originally Posted By marlinfan: My wife at dinner the other night “the more I look into this Clancy trial, I’m starting to think….” I told her to stop. I didn’t want us arguing about some crazy bitch that murdered her kids. She hasn’t said a word to me about it since. Yeah, it's not worth losing an otherwise successful marriage over. I would, however, kick a fiancee to the curb without second thoughts if she jumped on the Lindsay bandwagon. This is as evil as being a barking moonbat Hamasshole, except Hamassholes don't normally advocate for the murder of my babies and preschoolers. Originally Posted By Kharn: My wife says "it isn't worth explaining" to me about what evidence convinced her the husband did it and why she believes that once she's found not guilty (not due to lack of criminal responsibility, completely not guilty), the judge will announce the husband's charges and his trial will immediately begin. TikTok programming is real.  It's not worth explaining because there is no language in this world which can explain it in a way that a logical listener would agree with her. I'm sorry for your loss. |
Exposure to views that distress and offend is a form of education unto itself. -U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Reges v Cauce
|
Originally Posted By JestersHK: I was wondering why the 911 call was never released. Who determines that? The judge? I'm not a legal expert in anyway but my understanding is yes, the Judge. Their key responsibility here is to make sure this whole thing is tried fairly and correctly. They want as little influence from the outside of the case as possible. I imagine it's distressing enough to be posted everywhere and would greatly affect the actions of others. It's already bad enough women are protesting and doxxing jurors. Don't needs guys looking for them to intimidate them further. |
|
Originally Posted By JestersHK: I can promise you there is no influence of feels. Like I said I have only been on the side lines here partially engaged in the trial and was just looking to have the questions above answered. I'm not a Lindsey sympathizer by any means. I stated I fully believe she killed her kids, there are just questions I did not know the answer to as I like to question things which apparently is a thought crime. Originally Posted By JestersHK: Originally Posted By VeryAverage: You’re letting how your wife feels influence your thinking. The husband has been gone over endlessly. He’s on video elsewhere at the time because she sent him away on errands as part of her premeditated plan to murder her kids. She also shopped around doctors to help build her case for an insanity plea to spread blame, garner sympathy, and excuse her crime. It appears to be working on the gullible. She killed them because she hated them. It’s that simple. I can promise you there is no influence of feels. Like I said I have only been on the side lines here partially engaged in the trial and was just looking to have the questions above answered. I'm not a Lindsey sympathizer by any means. I stated I fully believe she killed her kids, there are just questions I did not know the answer to as I like to question things which apparently is a thought crime. The questions asked and manner of asking could be taken as an indication of one's state of mind on the subject like confirmation bias or "spin". It seems odd that one questions the process but not the conclusion. Odd, just odd. Maybe you'd really like to see a different conclusion? |
|
Originally Posted By Porcupine55: What if we just make it legal for parents to kill their own kids up until 18 years old? I think the crime statistics for theft, vandalism, etc.. would greatly improve at least... |
“I find your lack of faith disturbing….”
|
Originally Posted By Bacon_Grease: I'm not a legal expert in anyway but my understanding is yes, the Judge. Their key responsibility here is to make sure this whole thing is tried fairly and correctly. They want as little influence from the outside of the case as possible. I imagine it's distressing enough to be posted everywhere and would greatly affect the actions of others. It's already bad enough women are protesting and doxxing jurors. Don't needs guys looking for them to intimidate them further. I was young when the internets were wild and free, I've seen and heard some stuff I wish I hadn't. This sounds like one of those things. |
|
I just now read up on this case. Yeah, she's guilty and should serve time. All her doctors are guilty as hell too with all the meds they gave her. I personally hate all psychiatrists after dealing with them regarding my wife who became addicted to ambien. I even told one face to face she doesn't need it and why and that bitch still wrote her a prescription for it after that. Now things are good but addiction is a horrible thing and these damn doctors don't give a shit about helping that part and enable them. |
|
Originally Posted By memsu: I just now read up on this case. Yeah, she's guilty and should serve time. All her doctors are guilty as hell too with all the meds they gave her. I personally hate all psychiatrists after dealing with them regarding my wife who became addicted to ambien. I even told one face to face she doesn't need it and why and that bitch still wrote her a prescription for it after that. Now things are good but addiction is a horrible thing and these damn doctors don't give a shit about helping that part and enable them. She killed her 3 kids. Let's stop all of this accountability deflection. She killed her 3 children. Brutally. In a very calculated manner. Fuck her. She should be executed. I don't give a shit about what doctors may have prescribed her. |
|
Originally Posted By Network_Daddy: So the fact that she admitted to killer her kids. And her defense admits she killed her kids. Yet some people want to blame the husband? Did they check their charts like the women stating someone with her sign could never do that? By today’s lack of standards, you’d have retards arguing that Chris Benoit did nothing wrong. |
|
Originally Posted By Glck1911: She killed her 3 kids. Let's stop all of this accountability deflection. She killed her 3 children. Brutally. In a very calculated manner. Fuck her. She should be executed. I don't give a shit about what doctors may have prescribed her. Originally Posted By Glck1911: Originally Posted By memsu: I just now read up on this case. Yeah, she's guilty and should serve time. All her doctors are guilty as hell too with all the meds they gave her. I personally hate all psychiatrists after dealing with them regarding my wife who became addicted to ambien. I even told one face to face she doesn't need it and why and that bitch still wrote her a prescription for it after that. Now things are good but addiction is a horrible thing and these damn doctors don't give a shit about helping that part and enable them. She killed her 3 kids. Let's stop all of this accountability deflection. She killed her 3 children. Brutally. In a very calculated manner. Fuck her. She should be executed. I don't give a shit about what doctors may have prescribed her. BTW supposedly she doctor shopped to different additional doctors to get all these meds, (appears she was drug seeking). If true that would explain a bit  But no that would involve holding her accountable, so that gets a fraction of the time of discussion. |
Indelible in the Hippocampus, the Sylvan
Joined:
Nov 2000
Posts:
102108
EE: 100% (7)
CA, USA
|
A lot of pre-meditation planning going into killing the little kids She was also on 11 meds. My first thought is who prescribed these meds (likely Psychiatrist) and are there counter-reactions between some meds. Both Psychiatrists and MDs don't know meds that well. Glad I'm not on the jury. |
"We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared so we may always be free." Ronald Reagan 1984
"Mitch the almost dead democrat bitch"
2026, the bigger better democrat election fraud
"Mitch the almost dead democrat bitch"
2026, the bigger better democrat election fraud
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: BTW supposedly she doctor shopped to different additional doctors to get all these meds, (appears she was drug seeking). If true that would explain a bit But no that would involve holding her accountable, so that gets a fraction of the time of discussion. I have heard that but haven't personally seen anything official about it, so I left it out. |
|
Originally Posted By Glck1911: I have heard that but haven't personally seen anything official about it, so I left it out. Originally Posted By Glck1911: Originally Posted By Geralt55: BTW supposedly she doctor shopped to different additional doctors to get all these meds, (appears she was drug seeking). If true that would explain a bit But no that would involve holding her accountable, so that gets a fraction of the time of discussion. I have heard that but haven't personally seen anything official about it, so I left it out. I'm just amazed by this whole shit show, the case and the OJ-ification of the trial by women on social media Un Fucking Believable. 
|
|
Originally Posted By diesel1: The questions asked and manner of asking could be taken as an indication of one's state of mind on the subject like confirmation bias or "spin". It seems odd that one questions the process but not the conclusion. Odd, just odd. Maybe you'd really like to see a different conclusion? I am trying to understand facts versus the fiction that's out there. I think every parent myself included would like to see justice here. If you Google 'did she admit to killing her kids?' You get a wide array of responses with the general consensus saying she had never come out and fully admitting she murdered them, but also not denying that fact she did so. Same for her defense. Which way is it? There's either proof she admitted to killing them or not which would shut up all of the stupid social media theories. I still feel she did it. As others mentioned if there were any evidence at all someone else did it everyone would be screaming that out. As for different conclusion, not sure what you mean by that? I have zero empathy for anyone who harms children. The only different conclusion i would wish for would of been for her her mother or husband to have listened to her when she threatened harm against those kids and saved them. It's amusing the reaction here to questioning the process of what we see through the eyes of others. GD gonna GD I guess. |
Member
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
501
EE: 0% (0)
GA, USA
|
I started on the she did it side.... im am now 95% convinced it was Patrick. Whole thing stinks to high heaven. Wifi just happens to no be working thus fucking all the houses cameras. She has a heart rate of 57 the last time her apple watch logs it. (Because of the large dose of seroquel in her wine tumbler that Patrick just happened to randomly know about in the bedroom). Dude goes to CVS and calls her to ask about if generic pedialax is ok (his story) and then still brings home name brand. I dont think this conversation ever took place. I think he called her and self answered it with her apple watch that he got off of her when the seroquel knocked her out. Which also logged a flight of stairs each time he walked through the air curtain. Apple watch is later found in night stand... So much other shit... It stinks. |
|
Originally Posted By d0z3r: I started on the she did it side.... im am now 95% convinced it was Patrick. Whole thing stinks to high heaven. Wifi just happens to no be working thus fucking all the houses cameras. She has a heart rate of 57 the last time her apple watch logs it. (Because of the large dose of seroquel in her wine tumbler that Patrick just happened to randomly know about in the bedroom). Dude goes to CVS and calls her to ask about if generic pedialax is ok (his story) and then still brings home name brand. I dont think this conversation ever took place. I think he called her and self answered it with her apple watch that he got off of her when the seroquel knocked her out. Which also logged a flight of stairs each time he walked through the air curtain. Apple watch is later found in night stand... So much other shit... It stinks. not sure if serious |
Member
Joined:
Apr 2023
Posts:
3944
EE: 0% (0)
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By JestersHK: I am trying to understand facts versus the fiction that's out there. I think every parent myself included would like to see justice here. If you Google 'did she admit to killing her kids?' You get a wide array of responses with the general consensus saying she had never come out and fully admitting she murdered them, but also not denying that fact she did so. Same for her defense. Which way is it? There's either proof she admitted to killing them or not which would shut up all of the stupid social media theories. I still feel she did it. As others mentioned if there were any evidence at all someone else did it everyone would be screaming that out. As for different conclusion, not sure what you mean by that? I have zero empathy for anyone who harms children. The only different conclusion i would wish for would of been for her her mother or husband to have listened to her when she threatened harm against those kids and saved them. It's amusing the reaction here to questioning the process of what we see through the eyes of others. GD gonna GD I guess. Originally Posted By JestersHK: Originally Posted By diesel1: The questions asked and manner of asking could be taken as an indication of one's state of mind on the subject like confirmation bias or "spin". It seems odd that one questions the process but not the conclusion. Odd, just odd. Maybe you'd really like to see a different conclusion? I am trying to understand facts versus the fiction that's out there. I think every parent myself included would like to see justice here. If you Google 'did she admit to killing her kids?' You get a wide array of responses with the general consensus saying she had never come out and fully admitting she murdered them, but also not denying that fact she did so. Same for her defense. Which way is it? There's either proof she admitted to killing them or not which would shut up all of the stupid social media theories. I still feel she did it. As others mentioned if there were any evidence at all someone else did it everyone would be screaming that out. As for different conclusion, not sure what you mean by that? I have zero empathy for anyone who harms children. The only different conclusion i would wish for would of been for her her mother or husband to have listened to her when she threatened harm against those kids and saved them. It's amusing the reaction here to questioning the process of what we see through the eyes of others. GD gonna GD I guess. She’s not alleging she didn’t do it. She’s pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. She isn’t asserting at all that she is not guilty in whole. She could have plead “not guilty” if she wasn’t admitting the established facts to be true. How about you stopping feeling if she did it and try thinking? |
|
Originally Posted By d0z3r: I started on the she did it side.... im am now 95% convinced it was Patrick. Whole thing stinks to high heaven. Wifi just happens to no be working thus fucking all the houses cameras. She has a heart rate of 57 the last time her apple watch logs it. (Because of the large dose of seroquel in her wine tumbler that Patrick just happened to randomly know about in the bedroom). Dude goes to CVS and calls her to ask about if generic pedialax is ok (his story) and then still brings home name brand. I dont think this conversation ever took place. I think he called her and self answered it with her apple watch that he got off of her when the seroquel knocked her out. Which also logged a flight of stairs each time he walked through the air curtain. Apple watch is later found in night stand... So much other shit... It stinks. To most people it sounds like this....  All of it requires the husband to a criminal genius mastermind and every single other adult in the process, including her own defense lawyer to be incompetent. |
|
Originally Posted By whiskey_bravo: not sure if serious Originally Posted By whiskey_bravo: Originally Posted By d0z3r: I started on the she did it side.... im am now 95% convinced it was Patrick. Whole thing stinks to high heaven. Wifi just happens to no be working thus fucking all the houses cameras. She has a heart rate of 57 the last time her apple watch logs it. (Because of the large dose of seroquel in her wine tumbler that Patrick just happened to randomly know about in the bedroom). Dude goes to CVS and calls her to ask about if generic pedialax is ok (his story) and then still brings home name brand. I dont think this conversation ever took place. I think he called her and self answered it with her apple watch that he got off of her when the seroquel knocked her out. Which also logged a flight of stairs each time he walked through the air curtain. Apple watch is later found in night stand... So much other shit... It stinks. not sure if serious Tiktok is ignoring things like: the actual 9-1-1 call where he finds what she did when he came home. Ghastly cries when he finds them in the basement |
|
Originally Posted By VeryAverage: You’re letting how your wife feels influence your thinking. The husband has been gone over endlessly. He’s on video elsewhere at the time because she sent him away on errands as part of her premeditated plan to murder her kids. She also shopped around doctors to help build her case for an insanity plea to spread blame, garner sympathy, and excuse her crime. It appears to be working on the gullible. She killed them because she hated them. It’s that simple. Yep, the crazy bitches supporting her now are arguing someone else told her she did it and that the husband actually did it. Remember facts and video evidence mean nothing to the crazy leftists. |
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Tiktok is ignoring things like: the actual 9-1-1 call where he finds what she did when he came home. Ghastly cries when he finds them in the basement I have heard those firsthand from parents finding out their kids were dead. No thanks. Enough bad shit in my head. |
WTF is up with this bullshit anti-bayo lug crap. Was there a group of irrate japanese guys bonzai charging disabled school children and puppies that I wasn't aware of?
|
Originally Posted By NobodyHere: Well stated, by someone who get's it. - Excellent Post - Originally Posted By NobodyHere: Originally Posted By xd341: its scary as fuck actually. let's summarize the situation. woman with mental health issues kills her 3 children after sending her husband on an errand, then tries to kill herself. Gets arrested, case gets investigated, charges filed, I assume a grand jury indicted her, her legal team doesn't deny she did it, she doesn't deny she did it, there is no credible evidence anyone else did it, yet primarily women that are social media users, primarily tik tok have constructed an entire narrative making her the victim and the husband the killer. We're not disagreeing with evidence presented by one side or the other. Its not a "the glove don't fit" situation. Thats just normal criminal jury trial stuff. Nobody is presenting the husband as the killer in court as a way to create reasonable doubt, there is no reasonable doubt as to who the killer is. This is an entire narrative that no one involved in the case is presenting. This is a social media invention. Not an element of a structured legal argument. The legal argument is over how long she goes away for, and in what type of institution. Guilt is not the legal question in the actual real world. Yet, women have been mentally captured by what I can only safely assume is an intentional influence operation, a psyop. if that is the case, a social media campaign is manipulating the bedrock structure of our legal system, which is a foundational element of a stable, safe(ish) and productive society. Gee I wonder who would want to see the American society crumble? This is a sociological five alarm fire. A house divided against itself, cannot stand. Well stated, by someone who get's it. - Excellent Post - I agree that was probably one of the best posts in GD in a while. I hope you don't mind if I use that on social media! |
|
Originally Posted By Network_Daddy: So the fact that she admitted to killer her kids. And her defense admits she killed her kids. Yet some people want to blame the husband? Did they check their charts like the women stating someone with her sign could never do that? BUT MERCURY WAS IN RETROGRADE!! |
Joined:
Apr 2023
Posts:
3352
EE: 100% (10)
NH, USA
|
Originally Posted By d0z3r: I started on the she did it side.... im am now 95% convinced it was Patrick. Whole thing stinks to high heaven. Wifi just happens to no be working thus fucking all the houses cameras. She has a heart rate of 57 the last time her apple watch logs it. (Because of the large dose of seroquel in her wine tumbler that Patrick just happened to randomly know about in the bedroom). Dude goes to CVS and calls her to ask about if generic pedialax is ok (his story) and then still brings home name brand. I dont think this conversation ever took place. I think he called her and self answered it with her apple watch that he got off of her when the seroquel knocked her out. Which also logged a flight of stairs each time he walked through the air curtain. Apple watch is later found in night stand... So much other shit... It stinks. lol. You don’t think the police could’ve geolocated both his phone and her watch to determine that they weren’t in the same place at the time of the murders? This is an insane theory. |
Member
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
505
EE: 0% (0)
GA, USA
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Tiktok is ignoring things like: the actual 9-1-1 call where he finds what she did when he came home. Ghastly cries when he finds them in the basement Have you heard the call? Probably not. Me either. Can someone wail and cry over the phone to a dispatcher and sound legit? Probably. EMS said she couldn't even talk right? But Patrick gets to just say what she said to him and everyone's cool with that. Why was the wifi off and he said he couldnt get a call out to 911 for a few minutes even though im pretty sure a phone will call 911 without a service plan even... |
Member
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
506
EE: 0% (0)
GA, USA
Joined:
Jun 2025
Posts:
3624
EE: 100% (57)
UT, USA
|
Originally Posted By d0z3r: I started on the she did it side.... im am now 95% convinced it was Patrick. Whole thing stinks to high heaven. Wifi just happens to no be working thus fucking all the houses cameras. She has a heart rate of 57 the last time her apple watch logs it. (Because of the large dose of seroquel in her wine tumbler that Patrick just happened to randomly know about in the bedroom). Dude goes to CVS and calls her to ask about if generic pedialax is ok (his story) and then still brings home name brand. I dont think this conversation ever took place. I think he called her and self answered it with her apple watch that he got off of her when the seroquel knocked her out. Which also logged a flight of stairs each time he walked through the air curtain. Apple watch is later found in night stand... So much other shit... It stinks. Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By d0z3r: I started on the she did it side.... im am now 95% convinced it was Patrick. Whole thing stinks to high heaven. Wifi just happens to no be working thus fucking all the houses cameras. She has a heart rate of 57 the last time her apple watch logs it. (Because of the large dose of seroquel in her wine tumbler that Patrick just happened to randomly know about in the bedroom). Dude goes to CVS and calls her to ask about if generic pedialax is ok (his story) and then still brings home name brand. I dont think this conversation ever took place. I think he called her and self answered it with her apple watch that he got off of her when the seroquel knocked her out. Which also logged a flight of stairs each time he walked through the air curtain. Apple watch is later found in night stand... So much other shit... It stinks. 
|
Member
Joined:
Sep 2023
Posts:
507
EE: 0% (0)
GA, USA
|
Originally Posted By d0z3r: But did or didn't they...? Originally Posted By d0z3r: Originally Posted By Xenophon2023: lol. You don’t think the police could’ve geolocated both his phone and her watch to determine that they weren’t in the same place at the time of the murders? This is an insane theory. But did or didn't they...? So does she and her defense lawyer admit she did in fact kill the kids if the Husband did it? |
Fighting for underscores everywhere.
|
She's had 3 years to change her story or waver on whether she did it or not and this hasn't happened. If she initially said she did it then later after counseling changed her story to the husband did it "maybe" there would be reason to consider that, but she has never made that claim. There is no doubt she killed the kids that isn't even an argument. That started on tiktok. |
|
Originally Posted By d0z3r: Patrick's phone is off limits to the case for some reason... his request Holy fucking shit. You think potential suspects get to simply make evidence off limits to the court or the defense? If there was a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with this he'd have a warrant in his face same day and his phone and all his electronic records would be in evidence. My guess is they are, but they are not useful to her. |
Joined:
Jun 2025
Posts:
3625
EE: 100% (57)
UT, USA