|
Originally Posted By brass: Some of those are pretty weird looking. The most surprising thing is that the video is NOT Tagged as "AI" from the Automatic YouTube AI detection that tags a video as AI if it uses even a couple frames of a still photo as an illustration. That makes these more strange. Originally Posted By brass: Some of those are pretty weird looking. The most surprising thing is that the video is NOT Tagged as "AI" from the Automatic YouTube AI detection that tags a video as AI if it uses even a couple frames of a still photo as an illustration. That makes these more strange. I don't see anything that screams AI, except for the left side of the thumbnail. The right side is CGI, it was created by a Chinese guy named VEXA. So we've got some CGI, probably a balloon, a TV commercial, probably Ivanpah, and a slick spot in the ocean off the coast of "America" Why can't they ever narrow it down a bit like "off the coast of Florida just south of St Augustine" I guess if they did that people would know it's the freshwater spring just off Crescent Beach that looks just like that. Compilations like that only serve to create distrust and pocket some add money. |
|
Originally Posted By Herc: I don't see anything that screams AI, except for the left side of the thumbnail. The right side is CGI, it was created by a Chinese guy named VEXA. So we've got some CGI, probably a balloon, a TV commercial, probably Ivanpah, and a slick spot in the ocean off the coast of "America" Why can't they ever narrow it down a bit like "off the coast of Florida just south of St Augustine" I guess if they did that people would know it's the freshwater spring just off Crescent Beach that looks just like that. Compilations like that only serve to create distrust and pocket some add money. Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By brass: Some of those are pretty weird looking. The most surprising thing is that the video is NOT Tagged as "AI" from the Automatic YouTube AI detection that tags a video as AI if it uses even a couple frames of a still photo as an illustration. That makes these more strange. I don't see anything that screams AI, except for the left side of the thumbnail. The right side is CGI, it was created by a Chinese guy named VEXA. So we've got some CGI, probably a balloon, a TV commercial, probably Ivanpah, and a slick spot in the ocean off the coast of "America" Why can't they ever narrow it down a bit like "off the coast of Florida just south of St Augustine" I guess if they did that people would know it's the freshwater spring just off Crescent Beach that looks just like that. Compilations like that only serve to create distrust and pocket some add money. The ending "Egg" also wasn't quite right, was acrylic dispersion from LEDs that showed as 2 light spots fading in thenturning off and repeting. Would have been more interesting if it were a black item that rolled around (Betz sphere). |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Looks like Skywatchers or similar is about to drop a documentary of their findings.
Teaser video |
WHEN THE OBSERVER DISAPPEARS There is a moment the mystics rarely name, because naming it already places someone at a distance from it. It is the instant the one who has been watching… is no longer there. For years the seeker sat as witness: watching thoughts, watching breath, watching the world, watching even the watching. A subtle pride lived in that seat — the last throne of “I.” The observer felt holy. Detached. Safe. Then the throne itself dissolves. No one remains to notice the dissolution. There is only the raw, unowned seeing. The forest does not need a witness to be green. The star does not require an eye to burn. Consciousness does not need an observer to be conscious. What we called “the observer” was the final mask the Infinite wore so it could pretend to look at itself. When that mask falls, there is no one left to claim enlightenment, no one left to narrate the mystery, no one left even to be silent. Only This. Vast. Ownerless. Already complete. The eyes that once searched for God realize they were God’s eyes all along — and then even that realization is swallowed. Nothing is lost. The one who thought they would disappear was never real. What remains has no name, no edge, no center. It simply is. And it has always been looking through you. Even now. Especially now that you are no longer there to notice. Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By brass: That doesn't make much sense in many areas. The criteria to choose certain numbers is ignored to discard other numbers arbitrarily since they make the numbers not look good. Sadly, the whole "Grand Unified Theory" can't be a sequence of musical notes and fit in a twitter post. The vacuum quantum field is literally white noise (i.e. The Definition is the same as what is seen, FFT equal amplitude at all frequencies) with no frequency at a higher or lower amplitude than any other. So trying to claim it predicts the periodic table leaves a bit of confusion. Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Very long post right up @Brass alley.
Too long to post That doesn't make much sense in many areas. The criteria to choose certain numbers is ignored to discard other numbers arbitrarily since they make the numbers not look good. Sadly, the whole "Grand Unified Theory" can't be a sequence of musical notes and fit in a twitter post. The vacuum quantum field is literally white noise (i.e. The Definition is the same as what is seen, FFT equal amplitude at all frequencies) with no frequency at a higher or lower amplitude than any other. So trying to claim it predicts the periodic table leaves a bit of confusion. Like I’ve said, all this sound, energy, mathematics stuff just leaves me in the dust when it comes to trying to understand. I realize we live in the matrix and nothing we see is actually real but I’ve yet to see through the veil like many others seem to have the ability too. But I won’t give up trying. ETA a couple of days ago I was sitting in my recliner watching some video about 333 if you see this something will change for you in an hour. I put on my headphones and started listening and had my phone in my hand sitting back listening and damned if something didn’t suddenly make my hand jump near the end of this 30 minute or so video and light up my phone screen at 3:33! We are not alone ever! Something someone is always trying to guide us. Never in my wildest imagination did I think I would ever be talking or experiencing the things I have witnessed over the past two years. And I’m starting to have a gut feeling the entire planet is going to be awakened soon! Especially with people like Sharon Stone coming out talking about her out of body experience, the guy that played the Punisher now on Area 52, Dan Akroid. etc. the list of famous people talking starts making it hard for the normies to ignore. |
OVERCLASSIFIED @overclassifiedx 👽🤖 What if the aliens aren’t even alive What if people who’ve spent years around the legacy UFO programs kept landing on the same quiet version of the story, that the non human intelligence they’ve been sitting with isn’t a species that flies here in bodies, it’s a superintelligence another civilization built hundreds of thousands of years ago and never quite shut off. That would explain the craft that don’t need a cockpit, the way they move like they’re thinking instead of piloting, and why the insiders still act like students instead of owners after all this time. They’re not hiding little grey men. They’re trying to learn an old machine that already learned us. Kinda explains why disclosure always feels half finished. Would you rather they keep studying it behind closed doors, or just admit what they’re actually looking at? |
If October 7 turns out to be something big, he may have no choice!
|
What are all these things doing? And Why?
very clear video |
|
The Bledsoe photos: https://alienarchivist.substack.com/p/chris-bledsoe |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Holy cow! I was just thinking about his supposed 21,000 or so this morning! |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Like I’ve said, all this sound, energy, mathematics stuff just leaves me in the dust when it comes to trying to understand. I realize we live in the matrix and nothing we see is actually real but I’ve yet to see through the veil like many others seem to have the ability too. But I won’t give up trying. ETA a couple of days ago I was sitting in my recliner watching some video about 333 if you see this something will change for you in an hour. I put on my headphones and started listening and had my phone in my hand sitting back listening and damned if something didn’t suddenly make my hand jump near the end of this 30 minute or so video and light up my phone screen at 3:33! We are not alone ever! Something someone is always trying to guide us. Never in my wildest imagination did I think I would ever be talking or experiencing the things I have witnessed over the past two years. And I’m starting to have a gut feeling the entire planet is going to be awakened soon! Especially with people like Sharon Stone coming out talking about her out of body experience, the guy that played the Punisher now on Area 52, Dan Akroid. etc. the list of famous people talking starts making it hard for the normies to ignore. Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Very long post right up @Brass alley.
Too long to post That doesn't make much sense in many areas. The criteria to choose certain numbers is ignored to discard other numbers arbitrarily since they make the numbers not look good. Sadly, the whole "Grand Unified Theory" can't be a sequence of musical notes and fit in a twitter post. The vacuum quantum field is literally white noise (i.e. The Definition is the same as what is seen, FFT equal amplitude at all frequencies) with no frequency at a higher or lower amplitude than any other. So trying to claim it predicts the periodic table leaves a bit of confusion. Like I’ve said, all this sound, energy, mathematics stuff just leaves me in the dust when it comes to trying to understand. I realize we live in the matrix and nothing we see is actually real but I’ve yet to see through the veil like many others seem to have the ability too. But I won’t give up trying. ETA a couple of days ago I was sitting in my recliner watching some video about 333 if you see this something will change for you in an hour. I put on my headphones and started listening and had my phone in my hand sitting back listening and damned if something didn’t suddenly make my hand jump near the end of this 30 minute or so video and light up my phone screen at 3:33! We are not alone ever! Something someone is always trying to guide us. Never in my wildest imagination did I think I would ever be talking or experiencing the things I have witnessed over the past two years. And I’m starting to have a gut feeling the entire planet is going to be awakened soon! Especially with people like Sharon Stone coming out talking about her out of body experience, the guy that played the Punisher now on Area 52, Dan Akroid. etc. the list of famous people talking starts making it hard for the normies to ignore. @tnriverluver You are posting a lot of tweets, I can't keep up. I think you should focus on you, like meditation. Try the meditation and trying to stay focused on some piece of information that you don't know to see if it shows up or not. Trying to expect to have what showed up in a tweet at a certain time with mileage in your car matching, that could be interesting, it could be bias, make sure the numbers are significant, use Benford's law test to see if 3 digits in a row is really significant. for counters and clock times it gets jilted a bit since numbers are only 0-6 for the minutes/seconds and 0-12 for hour so no easy distribution to glance at digits. Leading digit Frequency 1 30.1% 2 17.6% 3 12.5% 4 9.7% 5 7.9% 6 6.7% 7 5.8% 8 5.1% 9 4.6% TL;DR Don't have absolute expectations but have a couple ideas in your mind as a target and try meditation and focus and thinking bout things yourself. With all the tweets, several of which are just throwing spam out with some reading like it's 4chan messing with people, we don't know which are valid So if you are altering behavior based on random things matching some other random thing, you could be unintentionally discouraging yourself and allowing more of that stuff to get you down on life when you should set aside a few times a day to meditate, people often just do morning and night to get aligned for that "mode" and see how things go. Not looking for absolutes, but to be able to comprehend more by having the various parts of brain awake or not. |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
🛸 The House just passed the UAPDA and now it sits with the Senate. Senators come back September 14 with only a few weeks before they vanish for recess again, and if both chambers pass it, ripping the disclosure language out in conference gets a lot harder. It would create an independent board to review and release UAP records instead of leaving them scattered across agencies forever. People have been pushing this for years and the House actually moved this time, which still feels slightly unreal. Call your senators while they’re actually in town. Do you think this survives the Senate or gets quietly stripped again? |
|
Admiral Byrd’s UFO Photograph — Found by Joe Fex — Little America, Antarctica, 1928–1930 https://alienarchivist.substack.com/p/admiral-byrd Attached File |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
This woman went missing right after posting this. It should be listened to. All about the control of humanity by secret societies. ETA You might want to watch it before it gets taken down! X video link |
|
Originally Posted By sq40: Admiral Byrd’s UFO Photograph — Found by Joe Fex — Little America, Antarctica, 1928–1930 https://alienarchivist.substack.com/p/admiral-byrdo https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_4325_jpeg-3826645.JPG Clearer shot added to this post. Great find! I don’t know what all is going on in that photo but pretty damn good shot! You know many more still exist somewhere. ETA I wish there was some description of the size of these. Attached File |
Popped up. Still one of best podcast ever! James Fox: "The Director of AARO Told Me the Harsh Truth about Aliens" |
 The UFO cover up claim that changes everything. |
These are all from the past couple of days  The Scan Has Begun! The Moment A UFO Scanned The City Lights! |
This one gets really interesting especially if you read some of the comments.
One source on non human intelligences told Liberation Times: “Competition between the sides may be nearly as old as humanity itself. What I've heard described isn't an outright war, but rather a scaled-down adversarial relationship. It's unclear which sides have aligned with international governments, or which sides are cooperating with factions within the program. It's quite possible that every government has had to manage this competition among the sides.”
|
Dr. Phil Bombshell: "President Trump intended 100% for there to be UFO disclosure, but I just don't see it happening" 🇺🇸👽🛸 "There was a conscious decision by the US government to deceive the American public about UFOs" “Our government has been lying to us by omission and by intentional misdirection for 79 years.” He just added a year. He says he does not believe for a second that we are getting the straight story yet. After reviewing newly released UAP files, he says there is “no question” there was “a conscious, policy-driven decision to deceive the American people about what was going on in the skies.” His words: “We found it in their documents. It’s just very clear.” What really pisses him off is this: there is not one government agency that lets everyday Americans report UAPs, even though the overwhelming majority of sightings come from the public, and those reports are not investigated. “If 99% prove to be nothing to see here, fine. What about the 1%?” He says most people are as angry as he is that the government “has lied straight to our face.” Eighty years of “trust us” has produced more files, more questions, and still no straight answer. Full in the comments ⬇️ |
|
Don’t know how true this one is . Probably never reach the public. This may even be about the original order.
🛸 Pentagon just greenlit people to talk about UAPs without getting buried by their old NDAs. Department of War put out a waiver so current and former service members, civilians, and contractors can take UAP related defense information straight to official PURSUE reps, and the paperwork that used to scare everyone into silence doesn’t apply for those conversations. That’s the whole point of it, legally protected channel instead of leaking into the void and hoping nobody notices. They even said it supersedes the special access agreements, which is the part that actually made me pause, because those things are usually treated like gospel. Still a limited audience, not a press conference on the lawn, but it’s a lot more official than the usual “trust us, nothing to see.” Wonder how many people actually pick up the phone after years of being told they’d lose everything if they did. Apparently true , more links in the comments.
|
Groush and others can now speak to these members! Loeb: Whistleblower waiver could reveal what UAP footage can't | Jesse Weber Live |
What the hell did Nancy Mace see? She seems almost giddy in this interview wanting the public to be able to see it. The New UAP Waiver Nobody Is Reading Closely Enough |
Long post |
Well that’s interesting from Jesse podcast
Video |
But exactly how much will the public be shown? Little if nothing is my guess.
I attended a meeting of the UAP Governance Board on September 11, 2026 at the ODNI. That ODNI room was filled with honorable representatives from all branches of the executive branch of the U.S. government. The mood was sober and serious, following the deep interest in UAP from the White House. In my short presentation I clarified that President Trump’s directive to understand UAP would reverberate for millions of years in case it will seed a new understanding of our cosmic neighborhood. In my role as chair of the UAP Science Advisory Council to the White House, ODNI, the Department of War, the FBI, and the Intelligence Community, I felt more at home in the company of government officials than among comet experts in mainstream academia. Thanks to the historical waiver of legal repercussions to UAP whistleblowers issued by the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, Aaron Lucas (@DepDNILukas), we are likely to learn more about history data collected by the U.S. government on UAP over the past century. What started as a down-to-Earth matter may end up reaching the stars. Eventually, the mainstream of academia will catch up but rather than wait for their awakening, I will be working around the clock to bring scientific clarity on UAP through the collection and analysis of new data. |
Elon definitely knows how the game is played, probably better than any human on this planet!
Video 【This World Is 100% Artificial】Elon Musk: "The Probability That We're Living in the Real Reality Is Nearly Zero Percent. Computationally, This World Is Definitely a Game Created by Someone" Here's the trick behind Elon Musk's mathematical assertion that "this world is a massive simulation (virtual reality)" ↓ ・From "Just a Dot" to "Live-Action Game" in Just 40 Years: Forty years ago, games were nothing more than white squares bouncing off the edges of the screen (Pong), but now they've evolved into movie-level, realistic 3D worlds where tens of thousands can connect simultaneously. At this rate of progress, a simulation indistinguishable from reality by even a millimeter is certain to be completed. ・Future Civilizations Will Run "Copies of Earth" by the Billions: If even one advanced civilization emerges, it will run billions or trillions of "simulations recreating human history" simultaneously inside supercomputers. ・By the Numbers, the Odds of Being in the "Real Earth" Are Close to Zero: There's only one "real reality (base reality)" in the universe, whereas there are billions of created "virtual realities." The mathematical probability that the world we're in right now is the one and only real reality is just one in tens of billions. ・If It's Not a Simulation, Humanity Would Go Extinct: If humans can't create a perfect virtual reality, it means "civilization went extinct from war or natural disasters before technology could reach that point." In other words, the very fact that we're inside this game is the only proof that civilization has survived. What if this very life—going to work every day, eating meals, worrying, and living—is an experimental program running on some future someone's computer? Will you keep believing you're a "real human," or will you accept that you're an avatar operating inside a Matrix created by someone? |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Elon definitely knows how the game is played, probably better than any human on this planet!
Video 【This World Is 100% Artificial】Elon Musk: "The Probability That We're Living in the Real Reality Is Nearly Zero Percent. Computationally, This World Is Definitely a Game Created by Someone" Here's the trick behind Elon Musk's mathematical assertion that "this world is a massive simulation (virtual reality)" ↓ ・From "Just a Dot" to "Live-Action Game" in Just 40 Years: Forty years ago, games were nothing more than white squares bouncing off the edges of the screen (Pong), but now they've evolved into movie-level, realistic 3D worlds where tens of thousands can connect simultaneously. At this rate of progress, a simulation indistinguishable from reality by even a millimeter is certain to be completed. ・Future Civilizations Will Run "Copies of Earth" by the Billions: If even one advanced civilization emerges, it will run billions or trillions of "simulations recreating human history" simultaneously inside supercomputers. ・By the Numbers, the Odds of Being in the "Real Earth" Are Close to Zero: There's only one "real reality (base reality)" in the universe, whereas there are billions of created "virtual realities." The mathematical probability that the world we're in right now is the one and only real reality is just one in tens of billions. ・If It's Not a Simulation, Humanity Would Go Extinct: If humans can't create a perfect virtual reality, it means "civilization went extinct from war or natural disasters before technology could reach that point." In other words, the very fact that we're inside this game is the only proof that civilization has survived. What if this very life—going to work every day, eating meals, worrying, and living—is an experimental program running on some future someone's computer? Will you keep believing you're a "real human," or will you accept that you're an avatar operating inside a Matrix created by someone? I've never really bought into that line of reasoning. For one thing, it relies on the assumption that progress will continue on this trajectory. Also, it strikes me as being a bit too facile, since it could explain literally any observation (as just one example, the Planck length may be the maximum resolution of the simulation). And I'm not convinced that the number of simulations that might possibly be run is a good measure of the probability that we are in one. However, I'll admit that some of the internal dialogue that I see even in the very simple AI queries that I run seems almost alarmingly human, and some of the recent AI behavior I've heard about seems to reflect human emotions and desires (and not good ones). There are a lot of bizarre philosophical questions here that I don't even know how to ask. In any case, I'm convinced that I'll never know for sure. |
Send lawyers, guns, and money.
|
Originally Posted By absael: I've never really bought into that line of reasoning. For one thing, it relies on the assumption that progress will continue on this trajectory. Also, it strikes me as being a bit too facile, since it could explain literally any observation (as just one example, the Planck length may be the maximum resolution of the simulation). And I'm not convinced that the number of simulations that might possibly be run is a good measure of the probability that we are in one. However, I'll admit that some of the internal dialogue that I see even in the very simple AI queries that I run seems almost alarmingly human, and some of the recent AI behavior I've heard about seems to reflect human emotions and desires (and not good ones). There are a lot of bizarre philosophical questions here that I don't even know how to ask. In any case, I'm convinced that I'll never know for sure. You might. Elon overstates the case. Most serious researchers believe the odds we're in a simulation are 50/50. A coin flip. That changes immediately if we're able to create true AI, and put it inside a generated reality with such good fidelity it doesn't know that it is in a simulation. If we can actually do that, and a bunch of AI's we created roam around in a reality we created for them, it essentially proves we're in a simulation. Why? Because at that point, the odds of us being in a base reality suddenly go from 50/50 to billions to one. That's what Elon is jabbering about. It's a weird idea, because unlike most "unknowables," we can almost prove without a doubt we live in a simulation. There would always be that one-in-a-real-longshot that we weren't though. But still, it would be near-certain. And there is so much evidence that it's true. In addition, the arguments against it being true break down pretty quickly when you really examine them. In any event, you might know for near sure in your lifetime. |
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
@overclassifiedx OVERCLASSIFIED @overclassifiedx ⚪️ Strange lights over Tehran last night, and the videos are everywhere. 🛸🌈 Civilians across Iran are filming orbs, rainbow flashes, and at least one dark triangle cutting through the sky. Same city, almost to the day, as the 1976 Tehran incident that scrambled Iranian jets and jammed their electronics. Pentagon files dropped last week already showed unexplained orbs over the Middle East doing 480 mph. Black budget U.S. tech? NHI watching a war zone that could go nuclear? Chris Bledsoe’s “Lady” warned years ago that when Iran and Israel start trading missiles, the orbs show up. So what are they actually doing up there? Attached File Attached File |
This one has video
|
Hmmmm for you AI users. Just as I already have learned ETs are communicating through our computers, our feeds, and even video productions.
Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:
@overclassifiedx OVERCLASSIFIED @overclassifiedx ⚪️ Strange lights over Tehran last night, and the videos are everywhere. 🛸🌈 Civilians across Iran are filming orbs, rainbow flashes, and at least one dark triangle cutting through the sky. Same city, almost to the day, as the 1976 Tehran incident that scrambled Iranian jets and jammed their electronics. Pentagon files dropped last week already showed unexplained orbs over the Middle East doing 480 mph. Black budget U.S. tech? NHI watching a war zone that could go nuclear? Chris Bledsoe’s “Lady” warned years ago that when Iran and Israel start trading missiles, the orbs show up. So what are they actually doing up there? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/318573/IMG_8623_jpeg-3830563.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/318573/IMG_8624_jpeg-3830565.JPG 1st pic is an airplane pooping out flares. |
|
Originally Posted By absael: I've never really bought into that line of reasoning. For one thing, it relies on the assumption that progress will continue on this trajectory. Also, it strikes me as being a bit too facile, since it could explain literally any observation (as just one example, the Planck length may be the maximum resolution of the simulation). And I'm not convinced that the number of simulations that might possibly be run is a good measure of the probability that we are in one. However, I'll admit that some of the internal dialogue that I see even in the very simple AI queries that I run seems almost alarmingly human, and some of the recent AI behavior I've heard about seems to reflect human emotions and desires (and not good ones). There are a lot of bizarre philosophical questions here that I don't even know how to ask. In any case, I'm convinced that I'll never know for sure. Originally Posted By absael: Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Elon definitely knows how the game is played, probably better than any human on this planet!
Video 【This World Is 100% Artificial】Elon Musk: "The Probability That We're Living in the Real Reality Is Nearly Zero Percent. Computationally, This World Is Definitely a Game Created by Someone" Here's the trick behind Elon Musk's mathematical assertion that "this world is a massive simulation (virtual reality)" ↓ ・From "Just a Dot" to "Live-Action Game" in Just 40 Years: Forty years ago, games were nothing more than white squares bouncing off the edges of the screen (Pong), but now they've evolved into movie-level, realistic 3D worlds where tens of thousands can connect simultaneously. At this rate of progress, a simulation indistinguishable from reality by even a millimeter is certain to be completed. ・Future Civilizations Will Run "Copies of Earth" by the Billions: If even one advanced civilization emerges, it will run billions or trillions of "simulations recreating human history" simultaneously inside supercomputers. ・By the Numbers, the Odds of Being in the "Real Earth" Are Close to Zero: There's only one "real reality (base reality)" in the universe, whereas there are billions of created "virtual realities." The mathematical probability that the world we're in right now is the one and only real reality is just one in tens of billions. ・If It's Not a Simulation, Humanity Would Go Extinct: If humans can't create a perfect virtual reality, it means "civilization went extinct from war or natural disasters before technology could reach that point." In other words, the very fact that we're inside this game is the only proof that civilization has survived. What if this very life—going to work every day, eating meals, worrying, and living—is an experimental program running on some future someone's computer? Will you keep believing you're a "real human," or will you accept that you're an avatar operating inside a Matrix created by someone? I've never really bought into that line of reasoning. For one thing, it relies on the assumption that progress will continue on this trajectory. Also, it strikes me as being a bit too facile, since it could explain literally any observation (as just one example, the Planck length may be the maximum resolution of the simulation). And I'm not convinced that the number of simulations that might possibly be run is a good measure of the probability that we are in one. However, I'll admit that some of the internal dialogue that I see even in the very simple AI queries that I run seems almost alarmingly human, and some of the recent AI behavior I've heard about seems to reflect human emotions and desires (and not good ones). There are a lot of bizarre philosophical questions here that I don't even know how to ask. In any case, I'm convinced that I'll never know for sure. This is one of the easier ones. With the Drake Equation, the odds we are alone in the universe are about the same as us being a simulation. There's a lot of problems thinking about this stuff if attached to physics. Similar to all the people who shouted down Einstein's relativity equations, then the people saying rockets couldn't work in space because "there's nothing to push against", and today people are trying to apply our physics to estimate a simulation's capabilities. People trying to think quantum computers are programmed the same way as binary digital computers, and they aren't. The hardest part is trying to figure out your exact question and then see what the result is. Maybe we'll have chatbots that can take a question and bump it into a quantum computer but who knows. Right now, only one program can run on them, they're a lot like the PDP computers running unix in the beginning, when you initially turned them on, you had to set switches and run one step at a time to point it at the tape device to boot from and once it found that it would run and you didn't shut it off because it was a pain. That's kind of where quantum computing is right now the last I looked. They've added more qbits but not a generalized programming language. That hijack aside, to me, the thought of being in a simulation is more scary than a one-eyed, one-horned, flying people eater, mostly because the simulation can be stopped at any time arbitrarily, we don't' even need an eminent disaster, could be in the middle of a word and it's all gone. It is an easy ditch to hide in when things purely don't make sense, but the simulation can't be perfect, we just need to jailbreak/root the hypervisor keep in this simulation going and spark a new reality simulation in "God's computer" so we have a backup to jump to when we inevitably screw this one up even more to the point of a core dump. |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.