Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 626
Next Page
1/21/2019 8:23:48 PM EDT
[#1]
DJI SPARK climbs high and attempts to look into the starhopper




1/23/2019 4:09:14 AM EDT
[#3]
When is the test launch?  I wanna see it.
1/23/2019 10:44:51 AM EDT
[#4]
Sounds like the upper section was tipped over and heavily damaged in an overnight storm

Attached File
1/23/2019 10:57:46 AM EDT
[#5]
This is a diversion. Everyone is focused on his Art Deco sculpture so they don't see he's building a lunar lander some place in Iowa
1/23/2019 11:00:19 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Pavelow16478:
Sounds like the upper section was tipped over and heavily damaged in an overnight storm

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/86377/FD14C5AC-5191-4A3A-BDA9-7DBC54E8AD46_jpeg-818525.JPG
View Quote
1/23/2019 11:03:40 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Chokey:

View Quote
That's Texas for you.
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our Light, not our Darkness, that most frightens us.
1/23/2019 3:55:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: HKPDW][Edited] [#8]
oops
1/23/2019 4:22:09 PM EDT
[#9]
The front fell down.
Capitalism: God's way of determining who is smart, and who is poor.
1/23/2019 8:42:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Variable556][Edited] [#10]
Damnit!

ETA:

Attached File
NRA/GOA/SAF/WVSRPA/VFW Lifer
WVCDL member and Dyna Soar Turret Gunner
1/23/2019 9:09:34 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:
Sea Dragon is cool, but BFR/Starship will easily beat it on economics because it is fully re-usable. Fuel is cheap, aerospace equipment is expensive (EDIT: fucking ARFcom keeps auto deleting what I try to write here)

With BFR/Starship you should be capable of >100 tonnes to orbit for <$10 million.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:
Originally Posted By LTCetme:
If  you like that check out The sea dragon .

Super heavy rocket designed for heavy lift economy. It was designed to be launched partially submerged vertical. The saturn V second stage would fit in the nozzle.
Sea Dragon is cool, but BFR/Starship will easily beat it on economics because it is fully re-usable. Fuel is cheap, aerospace equipment is expensive (EDIT: fucking ARFcom keeps auto deleting what I try to write here)

With BFR/Starship you should be capable of >100 tonnes to orbit for <$10 million.
We talking LEO or geosynchronous?
Originally Posted By justsayin:
WHY do celebrities think we care what philosophical or political opinions they have?
We don't pay them for who they really are.....
1/23/2019 9:11:06 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote History
Originally Posted By MCSquared:

We talking LEO or geosynchronous?
View Quote
100+ tonnes to LEO, ~20 tonnes to GTO, (100+ with one refueling)
1/23/2019 9:29:02 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:
SpaceX uses quick iteration and fast failure, which is the same process that got us from rockets being large fireworks displays to less than ten years later walking on the moon.

Oldspace is paralysis by analysis, which is why it has taken a decade to design/build a rocket from shuttle hand-me-downs.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:
Fucking amazing the speed that Spacex is moving.
SpaceX uses quick iteration and fast failure, which is the same process that got us from rockets being large fireworks displays to less than ten years later walking on the moon.

Oldspace is paralysis by analysis, which is why it has taken a decade to design/build a rocket from shuttle hand-me-downs.
The destruction of the American space program was deliberate, with Bathhouse Barry shutting down the shuttle program being the Coup de grâce, or so they though.
Originally Posted By justsayin:
WHY do celebrities think we care what philosophical or political opinions they have?
We don't pay them for who they really are.....
1/23/2019 9:53:08 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:
100+ tonnes to LEO, ~20 tonnes to GTO, (100+ with one refueling)
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:
Originally Posted By MCSquared:

We talking LEO or geosynchronous?
100+ tonnes to LEO, ~20 tonnes to GTO, (100+ with one refueling)
Awesome, thanks!

Maybe it'll be cheaper to get some "five and dime" satellites into GTO now.
Originally Posted By justsayin:
WHY do celebrities think we care what philosophical or political opinions they have?
We don't pay them for who they really are.....
1/23/2019 10:01:35 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Originally Posted By MCSquared:
The destruction of the American space program was deliberate, with Bathhouse Barry shutting down the shuttle program being the Coup de grce, or so they though.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By MCSquared:
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:
Fucking amazing the speed that Spacex is moving.
SpaceX uses quick iteration and fast failure, which is the same process that got us from rockets being large fireworks displays to less than ten years later walking on the moon.

Oldspace is paralysis by analysis, which is why it has taken a decade to design/build a rocket from shuttle hand-me-downs.
The destruction of the American space program was deliberate, with Bathhouse Barry shutting down the shuttle program being the Coup de grce, or so they though.
Absolutely...for maw social justice!
Way to go U.S. Military! Kick ass and take names! NRA Life member, Ohio CCW.org member, Ohio CCW licensee, Infidel ????

LEGP 2001 #321
1/23/2019 10:04:27 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Originally Posted By MCSquared:

The destruction of the American space program was deliberate, with Bathhouse Barry shutting down the shuttle program being the Coup de grâce, or so they though.
View Quote
Killing the Space Shuttle is ironically the FIRST thing that someone who was serious about SAVING the US space program would have done too.

Although the downside is that NASA and the ULA companies have been busy applying Shuttle style bureaucracy and waste to what ought to be "simpler" traditional rockets with Constellation/SLS/Orion. Although not having realistic funding levels doesn't help.
Like most Americans, I learned all I needed to know about the Vietnam War by watching M*A*S*H*...
1/23/2019 10:06:30 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
Attached File
1/25/2019 12:06:00 AM EDT
[#18]
That blows. I was going to drive there to see it.
1/25/2019 9:59:59 PM EDT
[#19]
another webcam

https://www.spadre.com/

STARSHIP CAM - SpaceX Boca Chica Texas Live View of Starship Hopper Launches
1/27/2019 11:59:28 AM EDT
[#20]
SpaceX Boca Chica Launch Pad and Starship Construction Progress 1/25/19
NRA/GOA/SAF/WVSRPA/VFW Lifer
WVCDL member and Dyna Soar Turret Gunner
1/27/2019 12:02:58 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:

Boca Chica
View Quote
I'll be down by there next month, I'm hoping we will be able to see it.
2/1/2019 8:25:07 AM EDT
[#22]
Attached File


Attached File


Raptor compared to the Merlin

Attached File
2/3/2019 11:51:21 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote History
Originally Posted By AJ_Dual:
Killing the Space Shuttle is ironically the FIRST thing that someone who was serious about SAVING the US space program would have done too.

Although the downside is that NASA and the ULA companies have been busy applying Shuttle style bureaucracy and waste to what ought to be "simpler" traditional rockets with Constellation/SLS/Orion. Although not having realistic funding levels doesn't help.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By AJ_Dual:
Originally Posted By MCSquared:

The destruction of the American space program was deliberate, with Bathhouse Barry shutting down the shuttle program being the Coup de grâce, or so they though.
Killing the Space Shuttle is ironically the FIRST thing that someone who was serious about SAVING the US space program would have done too.

Although the downside is that NASA and the ULA companies have been busy applying Shuttle style bureaucracy and waste to what ought to be "simpler" traditional rockets with Constellation/SLS/Orion. Although not having realistic funding levels doesn't help.
So you're saying cutting the space shuttle allowed them to use that money on our next space system. Very simple concept with a tiny NASA budget.
Proud Member of Team Ranstad

"Hillary's corruption is corrosive to the soul of our nation." Donald J. Trump, 10/29/2016
2/3/2019 11:58:21 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote History
Awesome

Also, OST
2/3/2019 10:30:43 PM EDT
[#25]
2/4/2019 12:09:30 AM EDT
[#26]


couple of quick videos

2/5/2019 10:00:59 PM EDT
[#27]
DJI Spark Fly by SpaceX Launch Pad Brownsville Tx
2/11/2019 9:01:56 AM EDT
[#28]
Attached File


Attached File


Attached File


Attached File
2/24/2019 8:11:36 PM EDT
[#29]
some new pics, starting to rebuild the top half









2/25/2019 9:46:42 PM EDT
[#30]
Thanks Chokey

I was searching a couple days ago (and also trying to see via the South Beach live cam), but I couldn’t find anything.  Good update.
NRA/GOA/SAF/WVSRPA/VFW Lifer
WVCDL member and Dyna Soar Turret Gunner
2/25/2019 9:52:39 PM EDT
[#31]
a few more pics







2/25/2019 10:21:36 PM EDT
[#32]
It seems so bulky
2/25/2019 11:04:03 PM EDT
[#33]
Looks like SpaceX is hiring for a few positions in Brownsville.

https://www.spacex.com/careers/list?location%5B%5D=1356

Environmental Health & Safety Specialist
Security Officer - Level 2
Security Officer - Level 3
Build Engineer (Starship)
Supervisor, Tank Fabrication
Tank Fabricator/Welder
View Quote
Rebellion To Tyrants Is Obedience To God
3/8/2019 12:53:15 PM EDT
[#34]
3/8/2019 12:53:57 PM EDT
[#35]
videos here:
https://www.facebook.com/maria.pointer/posts/2147432611989999
3/8/2019 9:01:18 PM EDT
[#36]
3/8/2019 10:29:40 PM EDT
[#37]
on the launch pad

3/8/2019 10:55:47 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Chokey:
on the launch pad

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1LpLR0XcAINTSs.jpg
View Quote
Isn't that pretty small for a launch pad when compared to their McGregor, TX launch pad?

Or maybe it's just that it's a bigger rocket.

Grasshopper 744m Test | Single Camera (Hexacopter)
3/8/2019 11:02:00 PM EDT
[#39]
I've seen some more pics internally, looks cool.
3/11/2019 11:36:36 AM EDT
[#40]
Attached File
3/11/2019 11:42:56 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Neotopiaman][Edited] [#41]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Pavelow16478:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/86377/3BD7AEB5-7C2E-4ED3-B4AA-DBFF39F257D7_jpeg-873743.JPG
View Quote
New angle... Can get a nice view of the Methane/fuel rich turbopump assembly.



Poor Russia, now with Raptor it's just one more thing that SpaceX has beat them at.

It's also amazing that SpaceX can likely build that engine for less than Aerojet-Rocketdyne can build an RL-10....
3/11/2019 11:43:13 AM EDT
[Last Edit: dorobuta][Edited] [#42]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cole2534:

How is that different than a Vacuum Arc Remelt?
View Quote
it's infinitely larger. You aren't constrained by the size of the building.  

then there is the microgravity - should allow for some really cool crystal alignments that aren't possible on earth.
If not for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable.
3/11/2019 11:47:11 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Chokey:
videos here:
https://www.facebook.com/maria.pointer/posts/2147432611989999
View Quote
The video of it moving around makes it look like a giant R2-D2 if you speed it up...
3/11/2019 11:47:37 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:

New angle... Can get a nice view of the Methane/fuel rich turbopump assembly.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Raptor_Engine_Unofficial_Combustion_Scheme.svg/800px-Raptor_Engine_Unofficial_Combustion_Scheme.svg.png

Poor Russia, now with Raptor it's just one more thing that SpaceX has beat them at.
View Quote
83,000 hp in those turbopumps
3/11/2019 11:51:47 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Neotopiaman][Edited] [#45]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Pavelow16478:

83,000 hp in those turbopumps
View Quote
The eventually 250 tonne thrust version will have over 100,000 hp IIRC.

Thrust power is about 4,000,000 hp



3/11/2019 11:57:52 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:

The eventually 250 tonne thrust version will have over 100,000 hp IIRC.

Thrust power is about 4,000,000 hp

https://rlv.zcache.com/because_merica_thats_why_us_flag_poster_large-r2c264e06b0d44424a0a8109ee782dbd5_2us63_8byvr_540.jpg

View Quote
Now imagine 31 of those at liftoff
3/11/2019 11:59:22 AM EDT
[#47]
I just drove by here a couple weeks ago, I'll post some pics when I get home.
3/11/2019 7:08:41 PM EDT
[#48]
I keep trying to see stuff on Starship Cam, but that place seems to get a lot of fog.

Attached File


I keep expecting King Kong or a T Rex to pop out.
NRA/GOA/SAF/WVSRPA/VFW Lifer
WVCDL member and Dyna Soar Turret Gunner
3/11/2019 7:19:25 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:

Sea Dragon is cool, but BFR/Starship will easily beat it on economics because it is fully re-usable. Fuel is cheap, aerospace equipment is expensive (EDIT: fucking ARFcom keeps auto deleting what I try to write here)

With BFR/Starship you should be capable of >100 tonnes to orbit for <$10 million.
View Quote
That would enable us to build things in space that we wouldn't be able to launch.  Like a space station capable of supporting missions to Mars and maybe even a moon base.
Religion was born when the first con man met the first fool." --Mark Twain.

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
3/11/2019 7:35:44 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ludder093:
That would enable us to build things in space that we wouldn't be able to launch.  Like a space station capable of supporting missions to Mars and maybe even a moon base.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By ludder093:
Originally Posted By Neotopiaman:

Sea Dragon is cool, but BFR/Starship will easily beat it on economics because it is fully re-usable. Fuel is cheap, aerospace equipment is expensive (EDIT: fucking ARFcom keeps auto deleting what I try to write here)

With BFR/Starship you should be capable of >100 tonnes to orbit for <$10 million.
That would enable us to build things in space that we wouldn't be able to launch.  Like a space station capable of supporting missions to Mars and maybe even a moon base.
Yeah, I hadn’t thought out those numbers.  That equals about $45 per pound, into orbit...  Holy shit.

If accurate and successful, that’d enable a whole lotta shit to start happening.  A pretty staggering concept to envision where that could lead.
NRA/GOA/SAF/WVSRPA/VFW Lifer
WVCDL member and Dyna Soar Turret Gunner

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 626
Next Page