Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/2/2026 4:49:48 PM EDT
Shoot I should probably put this in General and see how it goes.

Resurfaced 3,300-year-old Egyptian document hints at biblical giants being real

Historians are scratching their heads at a resurfaced Egyptian scroll held by the British Museum that might support the claim that biblical giants were, in fact, real.

Genesis chapter 6 of the Bible is about God’s response to the widespread human “wickedness” and corruptness, which was supposedly caused by Nephilim, powerful beings that were the sons of “fallen angels” and human women.

It was these sons who were described as giant beings and referred to as “men of reknown” that caused widespread chaos which prompted God to cleanse the earth by “destroying all creatures under the sky” with “flood waters.”

AD
Close-up of the ancient Egyptian Papyrus Anastasi I, with hieratic script written in black ink on a weathered, light brown background.
The decades-old document has recently been resurfaced by the Associates for Biblical Research.
British Museum
Fast forward to now, Anastasi I, a 3,300-year-old document that’s been in the British Museum since 1839 and has reignited the interest of the Associates for Biblical Research, a religious organization in Pennsylvania, has historians and researchers believing that these “men of reknown” giants may have actually been real.

The ancient document, that is believed to be from the 13th century, BCE, mentions run ins with the Shosu people, who were supposedly eight feet tall, which scared Israelites, as originally reported by the Daily Mail.

Attached File


Attached File
2/2/2026 5:07:04 PM EDT
[#1]
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:


The ancient document, that is believed to be from the 13th century, BCE, mentions run ins with the Shosu people, who were supposedly eight feet tall, which scared Israelites, as originally reported by the Daily Mail.
[/url]
View Quote

The Daily Mail has been around 3300 years?  Amazing!
8 foot tall giants might work.  Tall enough to be legitimate giants, short enough to survive.
2/2/2026 5:12:02 PM EDT
[#2]
Maybe we should start by asking the Smithsonian what they've done with all the skeletons given to them over the years.
2/2/2026 5:19:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Are you surprised?   The Dead Sea Scrolls discusses the Nephillim.  Although they were generally only 6-8' tall unlike the absurd modern depictions.  The average height for a Biblical Jew or Egyptian was between 5' and 5.6" tall, so a 6' to 8' person would be a giant.
2/2/2026 5:30:11 PM EDT
[#4]
News at 11!!! People have been exaggerating for over 3,000 years!!!
2/2/2026 5:34:13 PM EDT
[#5]
My understanding is that while there were the occasional six footers or taller, the average  of the tall groups in Africa and in the Northlands, was 5'7".
2/10/2026 5:21:27 PM EDT
[#6]
Written in Arabic in 1300BCE? Lol. Either the picture is completely incorrect for the article, or the whole thing is a fake.
2/10/2026 7:16:24 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Originally Posted By _Nataraja_:
Written in Arabic in 1300BCE? Lol. Either the picture is completely incorrect for the article, or the whole thing is a fake.
View Quote


It's not Arabic, It's Hieratic. Egypt didn't just use hieroglyphs, the picture is legit and the Papyrus is legit. The interpretation is up for debate.
2/10/2026 7:27:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: dayphotog][Edited] [#8]
So I can finally get death by snu snu



Still pretty interesting like those red haired skeletons
have gun will travel

Well you seen much combat? ......... I've seen a little on TV.

We are jolly green giants, walking the Earth with guns.

Lifetime NRA member SADLY
now GOA and ASA member!!!!!
2/13/2026 2:05:40 PM EDT
[#9]
It simply means they "believed" the giants to be "real". There was a lot of superstition to go around in those days. Anybody that was "educated" in those days took advantage of those who were not.
Sic semper tyrannis!
2/27/2026 3:57:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: brass][Edited] [#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By robmkivseries70:
It simply means they "believed" the giants to be "real". There was a lot of superstition to go around in those days. Anybody that was "educated" in those days took advantage of those who were not.
View Quote


Just because something is passed down in oral history doesn't mean it is BS.   Lots of our current understanding of history, even the "Institutional History" cribbed heavily from Oral Histories.    The same oral histories give us details of a flood in the past, worldwide.  Same about Giants and all the cultures also have giant form constructions with 50 ton blocks hundreds of miles from the nearest source, sometimes up and down extremely rugged terrain (Chichen Itza), or pentagonal block logs in the middle of the pacific making a city out into the ocean.  

Nearly all of the oral histories match when it comes to floods, giants, ice, and things that came and took people away (not mysteriously missing after going hunting, but somebody was there and a few minutes later they weren't.  Imagine something like walking into thin air maybe, no solid documentation but lots of hints as to 'taken' which could be anything from people taking unwanted kids for rituals and attempts at lengthening lifetimes or eaten by animals, they weren't all knowing as we seem to think we are today but they weren't entirely ignorant, either.   These were finally recorded once written history started and as civilizations imported/discovered writing and did a mind dump of their oral histories, things still went along as normal.   It wasn't until the past 50 years that all the various oral histories have been completely translated and computer versions saved, it was at that point that these rare oral histories from thousands of years ago have more in common than not, even from opposite sides of the world and entirely different languages and practices, like Mongolia vs South America differences in beliefs of how things work.

The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In