Will the cowardly governor seek to get out of testifying claiming the governor's debate later that day... or will she try to get out of debating Zeldin as the polls tighten claiming she has to be in court. Truth be told, she abuses state aircraft resources all of the time, so no reason she can't do both. But those of us in the state capitol know she doesn't want anything to do with either lest the population get a true view of what a vapid and evil twit she is! 
|
|
Quoted: Will the cowardly governor seek to get out of testifying claiming the governor's debate later that day... or will she try to get out of debating Zeldin as the polls tighten claiming she has to be in court. Truth be told, she abuses state aircraft resources all of the time, so no reason she can't do both. But those of us in the state capitol know she doesn't want anything to do with either lest the population get a true view of what a vapid and evil twit she is! 
|
|
Good. Hopefully there are emails obtained from FOIA or other documents showing what her real intentions are. Then during testimony as she sits there and lies her ass off she can be impeached with thing she has said in the past. Will be hilarious. Love it when politicians get nuked from orbit with good old fashioned "never ask a question you do not already know the answer to." Obliterate the bitch. |
|
Quoted: Good. Hopefully there are emails obtained from FOIA or other documents showing what her real intentions are. Then during testimony as she sits there and lies her ass off she can be impeached with thing she has said in the past. Will be hilarious. Love it when politicians get nuked from orbit with good old fashioned "never ask a question you do not already know the answer to." Obliterate the bitch. Who’s going to impeach her? Dems in NY? 
|
|
Quoted: Who’s going to impeach her? Dems in NY? I am talking about a subpoena'd witness on the stand testifying, giving an answer, then having their previous words/statements used against them. When done correctly it makes the person testifying look like a complete and utter clown. Impeachment in a courtroom is a bit different than the political theater term. |
|
Quoted: I am talking about a subpoena'd witness on the stand testifying, giving an answer, then having their previous words/statements used against them. When done correctly it makes the person testifying look like a complete and utter clown. Impeachment in a courtroom is a bit different than the political theater term. Quoted: Quoted: Who’s going to impeach her? Dems in NY? I am talking about a subpoena'd witness on the stand testifying, giving an answer, then having their previous words/statements used against them. When done correctly it makes the person testifying look like a complete and utter clown. Impeachment in a courtroom is a bit different than the political theater term. Correct. We know she lies, she knows she lies, she knows that we all know she lies, we all know that she knows she lies to us but nothing will happen. 
|
|
Quoted: Correct. We know she lies, she knows she lies, she knows that we all know she lies, we all know that she knows she lies to us but nothing will happen. Considering we are attacking a bad law and that she is behind a law that comes from malicious intent... Going in dry will potentially have some of the beat results we could ever hope for regarding some specific concerns in Bruen. We all know what the slime ball liberal intentions are, getting it on the record and in front of the Supreme Court, as currently constructed, is incredibly important. |
|
Quoted: ABC News in NYC just played a clip of Hochul where she was toting her record and said we overturned the supreme court ruling on concealed handguns. I did not know that a state could overrule a USSC ruling.  If she said that she needs to be called out on it |
|
Quoted: Might be common knowledge, but why was that agreement made? Grade school education explanation please? Quoted: Quoted: An agreement was reached for no witnesses on either side. Might be common knowledge, but why was that agreement made? Grade school education explanation please? They wanted to question our witnesses but shield theirs with executive privilege. Would have been one sided and our motions and briefs were far stronger. |
Join the Community
Your next conversation starts here.
Create your free account to join discussions, share your experience, save topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.
- Join discussions
- Follow topics and replies
- Connect with fellow enthusiasts
Already a member? Sign in
Stay informed by subscribing to our Newsletter